Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Sponsor decision to discontinue the SHP647 (ontamalimab) clinical trial development program for inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) early.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Ontamalimab in inducing clinical remission and endoscopic response in participants with moderate to severe Crohn's Disease.
27Mar2020: Enrollment of new patients into this study has been paused due to the COVID-19 situation. The duration of this pause is dependent on the leveling and control of the COVID-19 pandemic .
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ontamalimab 25 mg | Experimental | Participants will receive 25 mg of ontamalimab subcutaneous injection using a prefilled syringe on Week 0/Day 1, Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12. |
|
| Ontamalimab 75 mg | Experimental | Participants will receive 75 mg of ontamalimab subcutaneous injection using a prefilled syringe on Week 0/Day 1, Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12. |
|
| Placebo | Placebo Comparator | Participants will receive placebo matching with ontamalimab subcutaneous injection using a prefilled syringe on Week 0/Day 1, Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ontamalimab | Biological | Subcutaneous injection of ontamalimab will be administered using a prefilled syringe. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Clinical Remission Based on 2-item Patient-reported Outcome (PRO) at Week 16 | Clinical remission was defined by 2-item PRO subs-cores of average worst daily abdominal pain less than or equal to (<=) 3 (based on 11 point numerical rating scale [NRS] ranging from 0 [no pain] to 10 [worst imaginable pain]); and average daily stool frequency <=2 of type 6/7 (very soft stools/liquid stools) as per the Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS) over the 7 most recent days. BSFS ranges from 1 (separate hard lumps, hard to pass), 2 (sausage-shaped, but lumpy), 3 (like a sausage but with cracks on the surface), 4 (like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft), 5 (soft blobs with clear-cut edges), 6 (fluffy pieces with ragged edges, a mushy stool), 7 (watery, no solid pieces, entirely liquid). Participants with missing data at Week 16 or discontinuation before Week 16 were considered failures. Number of participants with clinical remission were reported. | At Week 16 |
| Number of Participants With Endoscopic Response at Week 16 | Endoscopic response was defined as a decrease in Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's disease (SES-CD) of at least 25 percent (%) from baseline. The SES-CD considers ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, rectum in terms of: size of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface and presence of narrowing. Each graded from 0-3. Scale ranges from 0-56 with a higher score indicating greater severity of disease. Participants with missing data at Week 16 or who discontinued before Week 16 were considered failures. Number of participants with endoscopic response were reported. | At Week 16 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Clinical Remission Based on Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score at Week 16 | Clinical remission was defined as a CDAI score of <150. CDAI assesses CD based on clinical signs/symptoms such as number of liquid stools, intensity of abdominal pain, general well-being (subjective), and presence of complications, use of antidiarrheal, presence of abdominal mass, physical examination and hematocrit (objective). CDAI score is equal to sum of weighted scores for subjective and objective items which range from 0-149 points: asymptomatic remission, 150-220 points: mild to moderate active CD, 221-450 points: moderate to severe active CD, >451 points: severely active to fulminant disease. Higher score indicating more severity. Number of participants with clinical remission as measured by CDAI were reported. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Participants must be between greater than or equal to (> =) 16 and less than or equal to (<=) 80 years of age; participants less than (<) 18 years of age must weigh >=40 kg and must have body mass index >=16.5 kilogram per meter square (kg/m^2)
Participants must have active moderate to severe ileal (terminal ileum), ileocolic, or colonic CD at baseline (Visit 2) as defined by:
i. Abdominal pain subscore >= 5 (average worst daily pain on the 11 point NRS) and abdominal pain subscore >= 2 (average daily pain on the 4-point abdominal pain variable of CDAI) over the 7 most recent days out of the 10 days before colonoscopy preparation (may or may not be contiguous) AND/OR ii. Average of the daily stool frequency subscore >=4 of type 6/7 (very soft stools/liquid stools) as shown in the BSFS over the 7 most recent days out of the 10 days before colonoscopy preparation (may or may not be contiguous) c. Presence of ulcerations that are characteristic to CD, as determined by a colonoscopy performed during screening, and as defined by the SES-CD >6 (SES CD >=4 for isolated ileitis) Note that the participant must be confirmed as meeting the CDAI score and PRO subscore requirements before a colonoscopy is done
Participants must have a documented diagnosis (endoscopic with histology) of CD for >=3 months before screening. Documented diagnosis is defined as:
Participants must be willing and able to undergo a colonoscopy during screening after all other inclusion criteria have been met
Participants must have had an inadequate response to, or lost response to, or had an intolerance to at least 1 conventional treatment such as sulfasalazine or mesalamine (5-aminosalicylic acid [5-ASA]), glucocorticoids, or immunosuppressants (azathioprine [AZA], 6-mercaptopurine [6-MP] or methotrexate [MTX]) or anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF). Participants who have had an inadequate response to sulfasalazine or mesalamine should have also failed at least 1 other conventional treatment such as glucocorticoids
Participants receiving any treatment(s) for CD are eligible provided they have been, and are anticipated to be, on a stable dose for the designated period of time
Participants are males or nonpregnant, nonlactating females who, if sexually active, agree to comply with the contraceptive requirements of the protocol, or females of nonchildbearing potential. Males and females of reproductive potential who are sexually active must agree to use appropriate contraception (ie, highly effective methods for female and medically appropriate methods for male study participants, for the duration of the study
Exclusion criteria:
Participants who have no history of previously diagnosed active or latent TB are excluded if they have a positive Mantoux (PPD) tuberculin skin test (ie >= 5 millimeter [mm] induration) or a positive IGRA (the latter to be tested at the site's local laboratory) during screening or within 12 weeks before screening If the IGRA cannot be performed locally, a central laboratory may be used, with prior agreement from the sponsor:
An IGRA is strongly recommended for participants with a prior Bacillus Calmette-Guérin vaccination but may be used for any participant Documentation of IGRA product used and the test result must be in the participant's source documentation if performed locally Acceptable IGRA products include QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus In-Tube Test
If the results of the IGRA are indeterminate, the test may be repeated, and if a negative result is obtained, enrollment may proceed In participants with no history of treated active or latent TB, a positive test on repeat will exclude the participantParticipants with a history of active or latent TB infection must follow instructions for "Participants with a prior diagnosis of active or latent TB are excluded unless both of the following criteria are met" in this criterion
Participants with repeat indeterminate IGRA results, with no prior TB history, may be enrolled after consultation with a pulmonary or infectious disease specialist who determines low risk of infection (ie, participant would be acceptable for immunosuppressant [eg, anti-TNF] treatment without additional action) This consultation must be included in source documentation Results from a chest x-ray, taken within the 12 weeks before or during screening (Visit 1)must show no abnormalities suggestive of active TB infection as determined by a qualified medical specialist
a. Any major illness/condition or evidence of an unstable clinical condition (eg, renal, hepatic, hematologic, GI [except disease under study], endocrine, cardiovascular, pulmonary, immunologic [eg, Felty's syndrome], or local active infection/infectious illness) that, in the investigator's judgment will substantially increase the risk to the subject if he or she participates in the study b. Cancer or history of cancer or lymphoproliferative disease within the previous 5 years (other than resected cutaneous basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, or carcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix that has been treated with no evidence of recurrence) c. Presence of acute coronary syndrome (eg, acute myocardial infarction, unstable angina pectoris) within 24 weeks before screening (Visit 1) d. History of significant cerebrovascular disease within 24 weeks before screening (Visit 1)
Participants who have had significant trauma or major surgery within 4 weeks before the screening (Visit 1), or with any major elective surgery scheduled to occur during the study.
Participant with evidence of cirrhosis with or without decompensation (ie, esophageal varices, hepatic encephalopathy, portal hypertension, ascites)
Participant with primary sclerosing cholangitis
Participant with evidence of positive hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) or hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb) Note: if a subject tests negative for HBsAg, but positive for HBcAb, the subject would be considered eligible if no presence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA is confirmed by HBV DNA polymerase chain reaction (PCR) reflex testing performed in the central laboratory
Participant with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) (positive HCV antibody [HCVAb] and HCV RNA) Note: Participant who are HCVAb positive without evidence of HCV RNA may be considered eligible (spontaneous viral clearance or previously treated and cured [defined as no evidence of HCV RNA at least 12 weeks prior to baseline])
Participant with any of the following abnormalities in hematology and/or serum chemistry profiles during screening (Visit 1) Note: Screening laboratory tests, if the results are considered by the investigator to be transient and inconsistent with the subject's clinical condition, may be repeated once during the screening period for confirmation results must be reviewed for eligibility prior to the screening colonoscopy procedure
Participant with known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection based on documented history with positive serological test, or positive HIV serologic test at screening, tested at the site's local laboratory in accordance with country requirements or tested at the central laboratory Note: A documented negative HIV test within 6 months of screening is acceptable and does not need to be repeated
With known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection based on documented history with positive serological test, or positive HIV serologic test at screening, tested at the site's local laboratory in accordance with country requirements or tested at the central laboratory.
Participants who have, or who have a history of (within 2 years before screening), serious psychiatric disease, alcohol dependency, or substance/drug abuse or dependency of any kind including abuse of medicinal marijuana (cannabis)
NOTE: The above Inclusion/Exclusion criteria are NOT exhaustive and other Inclusion/ Exclusion criteria as defined in the protocol may apply.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Study Director | Shire | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arizona Digestive Health Mesa - East | Mesa | Arizona | 85206 | United States | ||
| Elite Clinical Studies - Phoenix - Clinedge - PPDS |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 38096402 | Derived | Vermeire S, Danese S, Sandborn WJ, Schreiber S, Hanauer S, D'Haens G, Nagy P, Thakur M, Bliss C, Cataldi F, Goetsch M, Gorelick KJ, Reinisch W. Efficacy and Safety of the Anti-mucosal Addressin Cell Adhesion Molecule-1 Antibody Ontamalimab in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Ulcerative Colitis or Crohn's Disease. J Crohns Colitis. 2024 May 31;18(5):708-719. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad199. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| To obtain more information on the study, click here/on this link | View source |
Not provided
A total of 34 participants were enrolled into the study, of which 27 participants completed the study. Other secondary outcome measures were not analyzed due to early discontinuation of the study for reasons unrelated to safety.
The study was conducted at 25 sites in the Unites States, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Colombia, Hungary, Japan, Mexico, Slovakia, Republic of Korea, Spain and Ukraine between 17 July 2018 (first participant first visit) and 18 August 2020 (last participant last visit).
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Placebo | Participants received ontamalimab matching-placebo, injection, subcutaneously using a prefilled syringe on Week 0 (Day 1), Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 in a 16-week treatment period. |
| FG001 | Ontamalimab 25 mg |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Nov 22, 2019 | Apr 16, 2021 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Placebo | Other | Subcutaneous injection of placebo matched with ontamalimab will be administered using a prefilled syringe. |
|
| At Week 16 |
| Number of Participants With Enhanced Endoscopic Response at Week 16 | Enhanced endoscopic response was defined as a decrease in SES-CD by matching segments of at least 50% from baseline. The SES-CD considers ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, rectum in terms of: size of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface and presence of narrowing. Each graded from 0-3. Scale ranges from 0-56 with a higher score indicating greater severity of disease. Participants with missing data at Week 16 or who discontinued before Week 16 were considered non-responders. Number of participants with enhanced endoscopic response were reported. | At Week 16 |
| Number of Participants With Clinical Remission Based on 2-item PRO With 4-point Scale for Abdominal Pain at Week 16 | Clinical remission was defined by 2-item PRO subs-cores of average daily abdominal pain <=1 (based on the 4 point scale, with scores ranging from 0 [none] to 3 [severe]) over the 7 most recent days and average daily stool frequency <=3 of type 6/7 (very soft stools/liquid stools) as per the BSFS over the 7 most recent days. BSFS ranges from 1 (separate hard lumps, hard to pass), 2 (sausage-shaped, but lumpy), 3 (like a sausage but with cracks on the surface), 4 (like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft), 5 (soft blobs with clear-cut edges), 6 (fluffy pieces with ragged edges, a mushy stool), 7 (watery, no solid pieces, entirely liquid). Participants with missing data at Week 16 or who discontinued before Week 16 were considered failures. Number of participants with enhanced endoscopic response were reported. | At Week 16 |
| Number of Participants With Clinical Response Based on 2-item PRO With 2 Criteria at Week 16 | Clinical response was measured by 2-item PRO and defined as meeting at least 1 of the following 2 criteria: 1)A decrease of greater than or equal to (>=) 30% and at least 2 points from baseline in the average daily worst abdominal pain over the 7 most recent days, with the average daily stool frequency of type 6/7 (very soft stools/liquid stools) either a) not worsening from baseline and/or b) average daily stool frequency <=2 of type 6/7 as per the BSFS over the 7 most recent days; 2)A decrease of >=30% from baseline in the average daily stool frequency of type 6/7 (very soft stools/liquid stools) as per the BSFS over the 7 most recent days, with the average daily worst abdominal pain either a) not worsening from baseline and/or b) worst daily abdominal pain <=3 (based on 11-point NRS) over the 7 most recent days. Participants with missing data at Week16 or who discontinued before Week 16 were considered failures. Number of participants with clinical response were reported. | At Week 16 |
| Number of Participants With Clinical Remission Based on 2-Item PRO With Endoscopic Response at Week 16 | Clinical remission was defined by 2-item PRO subs-cores of average worst daily abdominal pain <=3 (based on 11 point NRS ranging from 0 [no pain] to 10 [worst imaginable pain]) over the 7 most recent days and average daily stool frequency <=2 of type 6/7 (very soft stools/liquid stools) as per BSFS ranging from type 1 (separate hard lumps-like stools) to type 7 (entirely liquid stools) over the 7 most recent days. Endoscopic response was defined as a decrease in SES CD of at least 25% from baseline. The SES-CD considers ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, rectum in terms of: size of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface and presence of narrowing. Each graded from 0-3. Scale ranges from 0-56 with a higher score indicating greater severity of disease. Participants with missing data at Week 16 or who discontinued before Week 16 were considered failures. Number of participants with clinical remission and endoscopic response were reported. | At Week 16 |
| Number of Participants With Complete Endoscopic Healing at Week 16 | Clinical remission was defined by 2-item PRO subs-cores of average worst daily abdominal pain <=3 (based on 11 point NRS ranging from 0 [no pain] to 10 [worst imaginable pain]) over the 7 most recent days and average daily stool frequency <=2 of type 6/7 (very soft stools/liquid stools) as per BSFS ranging from type 1 (separate hard lumps-like stools) to type 7 (entirely liquid stools) over the 7 most recent days. Endoscopic response was defined as a decrease in SES CD of at least 25% from baseline. The SES-CD considers ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, rectum in terms of: size of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface and presence of narrowing. Each graded from 0-3. Scale ranges from 0-56 with a higher score indicating greater severity of disease. Participants with missing data at Week 16 or who discontinued before Week 16 were considered failures. Number of participants with complete endoscopic healing were reported. | At Week 16 |
| Number of Participants With Clinical Response as Measured by CDAI-100 at Week 16 | Clinical response was measured by at least a 100-point reduction in the CDAI from baseline (CDAI-100 response). CDAI assesses CD based on clinical signs/symptoms such as number of liquid stools, intensity of abdominal pain, general well-being (subjective), and presence of complications, use of antidiarrheal, presence of abdominal mass, physical examination and hematocrit (objective). CDAI score is equal to sum of weighted scores for subjective and objective items which range from 0-149 points: asymptomatic remission, 150-220 points: mild to moderate active CD, 221-450 points: moderate to severe active CD, >451 points: severely active to fulminant disease. Higher score indicating more severity. | At Week 16 |
| Number of Participants With Clinical Response as Measured by CDAI-70 at Week 16 | Clinical response was measured by at least a 70-point reduction in the CDAI from baseline (CDAI-70 response). CDAI assesses CD based on clinical signs/symptoms such as number of liquid stools, intensity of abdominal pain, general well-being (subjective), and presence of complications, use of antidiarrheal, presence of abdominal mass, physical examination and hematocrit (objective). CDAI score is equal to sum of weighted scores for subjective and objective items which range from 0-149 points: asymptomatic remission, 150-220 points: mild to moderate active CD, 221-450 points: moderate to severe active CD, >451 points: severely active to fulminant disease. Higher score indicating more severity. | At Week 16 |
| Number of Participants With Clinical Remission Over Time | Clinical remission was defined by 2-item PRO subs-cores of average worst daily abdominal pain (based on 11 point NRS ranging from 0 [no pain] to 10 [worst imaginable pain]); and average daily stool frequency of type 6/7 (very soft stools/liquid stools) as per BSFS over the 7 most recent days. BSFS ranges from 1 (separate hard lumps, hard to pass), 2 (sausage-shaped, but lumpy), 3 (like a sausage but with cracks on the surface), 4 (like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft), 5 (soft blobs with clear-cut edges), 6 (fluffy pieces with ragged edges, a mushy stool), 7 (watery, no solid pieces, entirely liquid). | At Week 16 |
| Change From Baseline in Individual and Total Sign/Symptom Score Based on Participant Daily Electronic Diary (E-diary) Entries | CD clinical signs and symptoms includes total stool frequency, rectal bleeding frequency, rectal urgency frequency, nausea severity, vomiting frequency, and rectal incontinence frequency. | Baseline and at Week 16 |
| Number of Participants With Endoscopic Healing at Week 16 | Endoscopic healing was measured by SES-CD <=4 and at least 2-point reduction versus baseline and no sub-score >1 in any individual variable. The SES-CD considers ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, rectum in terms of: size of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface and presence of narrowing. Each graded from 0-3. Scale ranges from 0-56 with a higher score indicating greater severity of disease. | At Week 16 |
| Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total (Absolute) Score at Weeks 8, 12 and 16 | The IBDQ is a psychometrically validated PRO instrument for measuring the disease-specific health-related quality of life (HRQL) in participants with IBD, including CD. The IBDQ consists of 32 items, which are grouped into 4 domains and scored as: bowel function (10 to 70), systemic symptoms (5 to 35), emotional status (12 to 84), and social function (5 to 35). The total IBDQ score ranges from 32 to 224. For the total score and each domain, a higher score indicates better HRQL. A score of at least 170 corresponds to clinical remission and an increase of at least 16 points is considered to indicate a clinically meaningful improvement. | Baseline, Weeks 8, 12 and 16 |
| Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36) Scores at Week 16 | The SF-36, version 2 is a generic quality-of-life instrument that has been widely used to assess HRQL of participants. The SF-36 consists of 36 items that are aggregated into 8 multi-item scales (physical functioning, role - physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role - emotional, and mental health), with scores ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better HRQL. | Baseline, Week 16 |
| Number of Participants Based on Incidence of All-cause Hospitalizations | Incidence of all cause hospitalizations was planned to be assessed. | Baseline up to Week 32 |
| Number of Participants Based on Total Inpatient Days | Total inpatient days were planned to be assessed. | Baseline up to Week 32 |
| Number of Participants Based on Incidence of CD-related Surgeries and Other Surgical Procedures | Incidence of CD-related surgeries and other surgical procedures were planned to be recorded. | Baseline up to Week 32 |
| Phoenix |
| Arizona |
| 85018 |
| United States |
| Advanced Research Center | Anaheim | California | 92805 | United States |
| Kindred Medical Institute for Clinical Trials, LLC | Corona | California | 92879 | United States |
| Alliance Clinical Research-(Vestavia Hills) | Poway | California | 92064 | United States |
| Care Access Research, San Pablo | San Pablo | California | 94806 | United States |
| Renaissance Research Medical Group, INC | Cape Coral | Florida | 33991 | United States |
| Gastro Florida | Clearwater | Florida | 33756 | United States |
| Alliance Medical Research LLC | Coral Springs | Florida | 33071 | United States |
| SIH Research | Kissimmee | Florida | 34741 | United States |
| Hi Tech and Global Research, LLc | Miami | Florida | 33135 | United States |
| Sanchez Clinical Research, Inc | Miami | Florida | 33157 | United States |
| Crystal Biomedical Research | Miami Lakes | Florida | 33065 | United States |
| Pharma Research International Inc | Naples | Florida | 34110 | United States |
| Bayside Clinical Research - New Port Richey | New Port Richey | Florida | 34655 | United States |
| Accel Research Sites - St. Petersburg - ERN - PPDS | Pinellas Park | Florida | 33781 | United States |
| DBC Research | Tamarac | Florida | 33321 | United States |
| Infinite Clinical Trials | Atlanta | Georgia | 30349 | United States |
| Atlanta Center For Gastroenterology PC | Decatur | Georgia | 30033 | United States |
| Atlanta Gastroenterology Specialists, PC | Suwanee | Georgia | 30024 | United States |
| Loretto Hospital | Chicago | Illinois | 60644 | United States |
| IL Gastroenterology Group | Gurnee | Illinois | 60031 | United States |
| Cotton O'Neil Clinical Research Center | Topeka | Kansas | 66606 | United States |
| Gastroenterology Associates of Hazard | Hazard | Kentucky | 41701 | United States |
| CroNOLA, LLC. | Houma | Louisiana | 70360 | United States |
| DelRicht Clinical Research, LLC - ClinEdge - PPDS | New Orleans | Louisiana | 70115 | United States |
| Commonwealth Clinical Studies LLC | Brockton | Massachusetts | 02302 | United States |
| Winchester Gastroenterology Associates | Winchester | Massachusetts | 22601 | United States |
| UMass Memorial Medical Center | Worcester | Massachusetts | 01655 | United States |
| University of Michigan | Ann Arbor | Michigan | 48109 | United States |
| Clinical Research Institute of Michigan | Chesterfield | Michigan | 48047 | United States |
| National Clinical, LLC | Hamtramck | Michigan | 48212 | United States |
| Gastroenterology Associates of Western Michigan, PLC | Wyoming | Michigan | 49519 | United States |
| Mayo Clinic Health System - PPDS | Duluth | Minnesota | 55805 | United States |
| Minnesota Gastroenterology PA | Plymouth | Minnesota | 55446 | United States |
| Washington University in St. Louis | St Louis | Missouri | 63110 | United States |
| Advanced Biomedical Research of America | Las Vegas | Nevada | 89123 | United States |
| Encompass Care | North Las Vegas | Nevada | 89086 | United States |
| NYU Langone Long Island Clinical Research Associates | Great Neck | New York | 11021 | United States |
| Southtowns Gastroenterology, PLLC | Orchard Park | New York | 14127 | United States |
| Penn State Hershey Medical Group | State College | Pennsylvania | 16803 | United States |
| Digestive Health Associates of Texas, P.A.dba DHAT Research Institute | Garland | Texas | 75044 | United States |
| Precision Research Institute, LLC | Houston | Texas | 77039 | United States |
| Biopharma Informatic Inc. | Houston | Texas | 77043 | United States |
| Southwest Clinical Trials | Houston | Texas | 77074 | United States |
| BI Research Center | Houston | Texas | 77084 | United States |
| Southern Star Research Institute LLC | San Antonio | Texas | 78229 | United States |
| Mid Atlantic Health Specialists | Galax | Virginia | 24333 | United States |
| Fundación Favaloro | Buenos Aires | C1093AAS | Argentina |
| Hospital Privado Centro Médico de Córdoba | Córdoba | Argentina |
| UZ Gent | Ghent | Oost-Vlaanderen | 9000 | Belgium |
| AZ Groeninge | Kortrijk | West-Vlaanderen | 8500 | Belgium |
| CHU Mouscron | Mouscron | 7700 | Belgium |
| Clinical Center Banja Luka | Banja Luka | 78000 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| Acibadem City Clinic University Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment EOOD | Sofia | Sofia-Grad | 1784 | Bulgaria |
| Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment Eurohospital | Plovdiv | 4000 | Bulgaria |
| Second Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment Sofia | Sofia | 1202 | Bulgaria |
| Diagnostic and Consulting Center Aleksandrovska EOOD | Sofia | 1431 | Bulgaria |
| University Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment Sv Ivan Rilski EAD | Sofia | 1431 | Bulgaria |
| University Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment Tsaritsa Yoanna - ISUL EAD | Sofia | 1527 | Bulgaria |
| Medical Center Excelsior OOD - PPDS | Sofia | 1632 | Bulgaria |
| Medical Center Convex EOOD | Sofia | 1680 | Bulgaria |
| Diagnostic Consultative Centre Mladost - M OOD | Varna | 9000 | Bulgaria |
| Fundación Valle Del Lili | Cali | Valle del Cauca Department | 760026 | Colombia |
| IPS Centro Médico Julián Coronel S.A.S. - PPDS | Cali | Valle del Cauca Department | 760035 | Colombia |
| OÜ LV Venter | Pärnu | 80010 | Estonia |
| West Tallinn Central Hospital | Tallinn | 10617 | Estonia |
| Ippokrateio General Hospital of Athens | Athens | Attica | 11527 | Greece |
| University General Hospital of Heraklion | Heraklion | 71110 | Greece |
| Iatriko Palaiou Falirou | Paliao Faliro | 17562 | Greece |
| University General Hospital of Patras | Pátrai | 26504 | Greece |
| Euromedica - PPDS | Thessaloniki | 54645 | Greece |
| Bekes Megyei Kozponti Korhaz | Békéscsaba | 5600 | Hungary |
| Magyar Honvédség Egészségügyi Központ | Budapest | 1062 | Hungary |
| Pannónia Magánorvosi Centrum Kft | Budapest | 1135 | Hungary |
| ENDOMEDIX Kft. | Budapest | 1139 | Hungary |
| Debreceni Egyetem Klinikai Kozpont | Debrecen | 4032 | Hungary |
| Mohacsi Korhaz | Mohács | 7700 | Hungary |
| Tolna Megyei Balassa János Kórház | Szekszárd | 7100 | Hungary |
| Fejer Megyei Szent Gyorgy Egyetemi Oktato Korhaz | Székesfehérvár | 8000 | Hungary |
| St Vincent's University Hospital | Dublin | 4 | Ireland |
| Sapporo Medical University Hospital | Sapporo | Hokkaidô | 060-8543 | Japan |
| Medical Corporation Aoyama Clinic | Kobe | Hyôgo | 650-0015 | Japan |
| Hyogo College of Medicine | Nishinomiya-shi | Hyôgo | 663-8501 | Japan |
| Kunimoto Hospital | Asahikawa | 070-0061 | Japan |
| Chiinkai Dojima General & Gastroenterology Clinic | Osaka | 530-0003 | Japan |
| Kinshukai Infusion Clinic | Osaka | 530-0011 | Japan |
| Yodogawa Christian Hospital | Osaka | 533-0024 | Japan |
| Toho University Sakura Medical Center | Sakura | 285-8741 | Japan |
| Dokkyo Medical University Hospital | Shimotsuga-gun | 321-0293 | Japan |
| Nihonbashi Egawa Clinic | Tokyo | 103-0028 | Japan |
| Ishida Clinic of IBD and Gastroenterology | Ōita | Ôita | 870-0823 | Japan |
| Al Zahraa University Hospital | Beirut | Lebanon |
| Hammoud Hospital University Medical Center | Saida | Lebanon |
| Investigacion Biomedica para el Desarrollo de Farmacos S.A. de C.V. | Zapopan | Jalisco | 45030 | Mexico |
| Health Pharma Professional Research S.A de C.V. | Mexico City | Mexico City | 03810 | Mexico |
| Clinica de Higado y Gastroenterologia Integral, S.C. | Cuernavaca | Morelos | 62170 | Mexico |
| JM Research S.C | Cuernavaca | Morelos | 62290 | Mexico |
| Accelerium, S. de R.L. de C.V. | Monterrey | Nuevo León | 64000 | Mexico |
| Unidad de Atencion Medica e Investigacion en Salud | Mérida | Yucatán | 97000 | Mexico |
| Centro de Investigacion Clinica Acelerada, S.C. | Distrito Federal | 07020 | Mexico |
| Instituto de Investigaciones Aplicadas a la Neurociencia A.C. | Durango | 34000 | Mexico |
| Dunedin Hospital | Dunedin | South Island | 9016 | New Zealand |
| Wellington Hospital | Newtown | Wellington Region | 6021 | New Zealand |
| Waikato Hospital | Hamilton | 3240 | New Zealand |
| Hospital da Luz | Lisbon | Lisbon District | 1500-650 | Portugal |
| Hospital Senhora da Oliveira - Guimaraes, E.P.E | Guimarães | 4835-044 | Portugal |
| Centro Hospitalar do Algarve - Hospital de Portimao | Portimão | 8500-338 | Portugal |
| KM Management, spol. s r.o. | Nitra | 949 01 | Slovakia |
| Gastro LM, s.r.o. | Prešov | 080 01 | Slovakia |
| CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University | Seongnam | Gyeonggido | 13496 | South Korea |
| The Catholic University of Korea, St. Vincent's Hospital | Suwon | Gyeonggido | 16247 | South Korea |
| Inje University Haeundae Paik Hospital | Busan | 48108 | South Korea |
| Pusan National University Hospital | Busan | 49241 | South Korea |
| Kyungpook National University Hospital | Daegu | 41944 | South Korea |
| Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital | Daegu | 702-210 | South Korea |
| Gachon University Gil Medical Center | Incheon | 21565 | South Korea |
| Seoul National University Hospital | Seoul | 03080 | South Korea |
| Kangbuk Samsung Hospital | Seoul | 03181 | South Korea |
| Inje University Seoul Paik Hospital | Seoul | 04551 | South Korea |
| Yonsei University Wonju Severance Christian Hospital | Wonju-si, Gangwon-do | 26426 | South Korea |
| C.H. Regional Reina Sofia - PPDS | Córdoba | Córdoba | 14004 | Spain |
| Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada | Fuenlabrada | Madrid | 28942 | Spain |
| Hospital Universitario La Paz - PPDS | Madrid | Madrid, Communidad Delaware | 28046 | Spain |
| CHUVI - H.U. Alvaro Cunqueiro | Vigo | Pontevedra | 36312 | Spain |
| Centro Medico Teknon - Grupo Quironsalud | Barcelona | 8022 | Spain |
| Hospital Universitario Juan Ramon Jimenez | Huelva | 21005 | Spain |
| Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Maranon | Madrid | 28007 | Spain |
| Hospital Universitario Fundacion Jimenez Diaz | Madrid | 28040 | Spain |
| Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio - PPDS | Seville | 41013 | Spain |
| Istanbul Universitesi Cerrahpasa Tip Fakultesi | Istanbul | 34098 | Turkey (Türkiye) |
| Mersin University Medical Faculty | Mersin | 33169 | Turkey (Türkiye) |
| Regional Municipal Non-profit Enterprise "Chernivtsi Regional Clinical Hospital" | Chernivtsi | Chernivtsi Oblast | 58001 | Ukraine |
| Municipal Nonprofit Enterprise CCH #2 n.a. prof. O.O. Shalimov of Kharkiv City Council | Kharkiv | Kharkiv Oblast | 61037 | Ukraine |
| Municipal Non-profit Enterprise of Kyiv Regional Council Kyiv Regional Clinical Hospital | Kyiv | Kyïv | 04107 | Ukraine |
| LLC Medical Center Family Medicine Clinic | Dnipro | 49038 | Ukraine |
| Municipal Nonprofit Enterprise of Kharkiv Regional Council Regional Clinical Hospital | Kharkiv | 61058 | Ukraine |
| Municipal Non-profit Enterprise Kherson City Clinical Hospital named after Ye.Ye. Karabelesh | Kherson | 73000 | Ukraine |
| Medical Center of LLC Medical Clinic Blagomed | Kyiv | 01023 | Ukraine |
| Medical Center OK!Clinic+LLC International Institute of Clinical Research | Kyiv | 02091 | Ukraine |
| Medical Center of LLC Medical Center Dopomoga-Plus | Kyiv | 02132 | Ukraine |
| Communal Non-profit Enterprise of Kyiv Regional Council Kyiv Regional Hospital | Kyiv | 04073 | Ukraine |
| Municipal Nonprofit Enterprise Lviv Clinical Emergency Care Hospital | Lviv | 79059 | Ukraine |
| Communal Non-Commercial Enterprise "Vinnytsia City Clinical Hospital No1" | Vinnytsia | 21029 | Ukraine |
| MNPE City Hospital No. 6 of Zaporizhzhia City Council | Zaporizhzhia | 69035 | Ukraine |
Participants received ontamalimab 25 milligram (mg), injection, subcutaneously using a prefilled syringe on Week 0 (Day 1), Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 in a 16-week treatment period.
| FG002 | Ontamalimab 75 mg | Participants received ontamalimab 75 mg, injection, subcutaneously using a prefilled syringe on Week 0 (Day 1), Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 in a 16-week treatment period. |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
The safety set consisted of all participants who had received at least 1 dose of investigational product (IP).
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Placebo | Participants received ontamalimab matching-placebo, injection, subcutaneously using a prefilled syringe on Week 0 (Day 1), Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 in a 16-week treatment period. |
| BG001 | Ontamalimab 25 mg | Participants received ontamalimab 25 mg, injection, subcutaneously using a prefilled syringe on Week 0 (Day 1), Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 in a 16-week treatment period. |
| BG002 | Ontamalimab 75 mg | Participants received ontamalimab 75 mg, injection, subcutaneously using a prefilled syringe on Week 0 (Day 1), Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 in a 16-week treatment period. |
| BG003 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Number of Participants With Clinical Remission Based on 2-item Patient-reported Outcome (PRO) at Week 16 | Clinical remission was defined by 2-item PRO subs-cores of average worst daily abdominal pain less than or equal to (<=) 3 (based on 11 point numerical rating scale [NRS] ranging from 0 [no pain] to 10 [worst imaginable pain]); and average daily stool frequency <=2 of type 6/7 (very soft stools/liquid stools) as per the Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS) over the 7 most recent days. BSFS ranges from 1 (separate hard lumps, hard to pass), 2 (sausage-shaped, but lumpy), 3 (like a sausage but with cracks on the surface), 4 (like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft), 5 (soft blobs with clear-cut edges), 6 (fluffy pieces with ragged edges, a mushy stool), 7 (watery, no solid pieces, entirely liquid). Participants with missing data at Week 16 or discontinuation before Week 16 were considered failures. Number of participants with clinical remission were reported. | The full analysis set (FAS) consisted of all participants in the randomized set who had received at least 1 dose of IP. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | At Week 16 |
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Number of Participants With Endoscopic Response at Week 16 | Endoscopic response was defined as a decrease in Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's disease (SES-CD) of at least 25 percent (%) from baseline. The SES-CD considers ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, rectum in terms of: size of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface and presence of narrowing. Each graded from 0-3. Scale ranges from 0-56 with a higher score indicating greater severity of disease. Participants with missing data at Week 16 or who discontinued before Week 16 were considered failures. Number of participants with endoscopic response were reported. | The FAS consisted of all participants in the randomized set who had received at least 1 dose of IP. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | At Week 16 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Clinical Remission Based on Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score at Week 16 | Clinical remission was defined as a CDAI score of <150. CDAI assesses CD based on clinical signs/symptoms such as number of liquid stools, intensity of abdominal pain, general well-being (subjective), and presence of complications, use of antidiarrheal, presence of abdominal mass, physical examination and hematocrit (objective). CDAI score is equal to sum of weighted scores for subjective and objective items which range from 0-149 points: asymptomatic remission, 150-220 points: mild to moderate active CD, 221-450 points: moderate to severe active CD, >451 points: severely active to fulminant disease. Higher score indicating more severity. Number of participants with clinical remission as measured by CDAI were reported. | The FAS consisted of all participants in the randomized set who had received at least 1 dose of IP. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | At Week 16 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Enhanced Endoscopic Response at Week 16 | Enhanced endoscopic response was defined as a decrease in SES-CD by matching segments of at least 50% from baseline. The SES-CD considers ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, rectum in terms of: size of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface and presence of narrowing. Each graded from 0-3. Scale ranges from 0-56 with a higher score indicating greater severity of disease. Participants with missing data at Week 16 or who discontinued before Week 16 were considered non-responders. Number of participants with enhanced endoscopic response were reported. | The FAS consisted of all participants in the randomized set who had received at least 1 dose of IP. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | At Week 16 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Clinical Remission Based on 2-item PRO With 4-point Scale for Abdominal Pain at Week 16 | Clinical remission was defined by 2-item PRO subs-cores of average daily abdominal pain <=1 (based on the 4 point scale, with scores ranging from 0 [none] to 3 [severe]) over the 7 most recent days and average daily stool frequency <=3 of type 6/7 (very soft stools/liquid stools) as per the BSFS over the 7 most recent days. BSFS ranges from 1 (separate hard lumps, hard to pass), 2 (sausage-shaped, but lumpy), 3 (like a sausage but with cracks on the surface), 4 (like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft), 5 (soft blobs with clear-cut edges), 6 (fluffy pieces with ragged edges, a mushy stool), 7 (watery, no solid pieces, entirely liquid). Participants with missing data at Week 16 or who discontinued before Week 16 were considered failures. Number of participants with enhanced endoscopic response were reported. | The FAS consisted of all participants in the randomized set who had received at least 1 dose of IP. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | At Week 16 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Clinical Response Based on 2-item PRO With 2 Criteria at Week 16 | Clinical response was measured by 2-item PRO and defined as meeting at least 1 of the following 2 criteria: 1)A decrease of greater than or equal to (>=) 30% and at least 2 points from baseline in the average daily worst abdominal pain over the 7 most recent days, with the average daily stool frequency of type 6/7 (very soft stools/liquid stools) either a) not worsening from baseline and/or b) average daily stool frequency <=2 of type 6/7 as per the BSFS over the 7 most recent days; 2)A decrease of >=30% from baseline in the average daily stool frequency of type 6/7 (very soft stools/liquid stools) as per the BSFS over the 7 most recent days, with the average daily worst abdominal pain either a) not worsening from baseline and/or b) worst daily abdominal pain <=3 (based on 11-point NRS) over the 7 most recent days. Participants with missing data at Week16 or who discontinued before Week 16 were considered failures. Number of participants with clinical response were reported. | The FAS consisted of all participants in the randomized set who had received at least 1 dose of IP. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | At Week 16 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Clinical Remission Based on 2-Item PRO With Endoscopic Response at Week 16 | Clinical remission was defined by 2-item PRO subs-cores of average worst daily abdominal pain <=3 (based on 11 point NRS ranging from 0 [no pain] to 10 [worst imaginable pain]) over the 7 most recent days and average daily stool frequency <=2 of type 6/7 (very soft stools/liquid stools) as per BSFS ranging from type 1 (separate hard lumps-like stools) to type 7 (entirely liquid stools) over the 7 most recent days. Endoscopic response was defined as a decrease in SES CD of at least 25% from baseline. The SES-CD considers ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, rectum in terms of: size of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface and presence of narrowing. Each graded from 0-3. Scale ranges from 0-56 with a higher score indicating greater severity of disease. Participants with missing data at Week 16 or who discontinued before Week 16 were considered failures. Number of participants with clinical remission and endoscopic response were reported. | The FAS consisted of all participants in the randomized set who had received at least 1 dose of IP. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | At Week 16 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Complete Endoscopic Healing at Week 16 | Clinical remission was defined by 2-item PRO subs-cores of average worst daily abdominal pain <=3 (based on 11 point NRS ranging from 0 [no pain] to 10 [worst imaginable pain]) over the 7 most recent days and average daily stool frequency <=2 of type 6/7 (very soft stools/liquid stools) as per BSFS ranging from type 1 (separate hard lumps-like stools) to type 7 (entirely liquid stools) over the 7 most recent days. Endoscopic response was defined as a decrease in SES CD of at least 25% from baseline. The SES-CD considers ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, rectum in terms of: size of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface and presence of narrowing. Each graded from 0-3. Scale ranges from 0-56 with a higher score indicating greater severity of disease. Participants with missing data at Week 16 or who discontinued before Week 16 were considered failures. Number of participants with complete endoscopic healing were reported. | The FAS consisted of all participants in the randomized set who had received at least 1 dose of IP. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | At Week 16 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Clinical Response as Measured by CDAI-100 at Week 16 | Clinical response was measured by at least a 100-point reduction in the CDAI from baseline (CDAI-100 response). CDAI assesses CD based on clinical signs/symptoms such as number of liquid stools, intensity of abdominal pain, general well-being (subjective), and presence of complications, use of antidiarrheal, presence of abdominal mass, physical examination and hematocrit (objective). CDAI score is equal to sum of weighted scores for subjective and objective items which range from 0-149 points: asymptomatic remission, 150-220 points: mild to moderate active CD, 221-450 points: moderate to severe active CD, >451 points: severely active to fulminant disease. Higher score indicating more severity. | Study terminated early for reasons unrelated to safety. Hence, for this outcome measure, the planned data collection and analysis was not performed. | Posted | At Week 16 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Clinical Response as Measured by CDAI-70 at Week 16 | Clinical response was measured by at least a 70-point reduction in the CDAI from baseline (CDAI-70 response). CDAI assesses CD based on clinical signs/symptoms such as number of liquid stools, intensity of abdominal pain, general well-being (subjective), and presence of complications, use of antidiarrheal, presence of abdominal mass, physical examination and hematocrit (objective). CDAI score is equal to sum of weighted scores for subjective and objective items which range from 0-149 points: asymptomatic remission, 150-220 points: mild to moderate active CD, 221-450 points: moderate to severe active CD, >451 points: severely active to fulminant disease. Higher score indicating more severity. | Study terminated early for reasons unrelated to safety. Hence, for this outcome measure, the planned data collection and analysis was not performed. | Posted | At Week 16 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Clinical Remission Over Time | Clinical remission was defined by 2-item PRO subs-cores of average worst daily abdominal pain (based on 11 point NRS ranging from 0 [no pain] to 10 [worst imaginable pain]); and average daily stool frequency of type 6/7 (very soft stools/liquid stools) as per BSFS over the 7 most recent days. BSFS ranges from 1 (separate hard lumps, hard to pass), 2 (sausage-shaped, but lumpy), 3 (like a sausage but with cracks on the surface), 4 (like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft), 5 (soft blobs with clear-cut edges), 6 (fluffy pieces with ragged edges, a mushy stool), 7 (watery, no solid pieces, entirely liquid). | Study terminated early for reasons unrelated to safety. Hence, for this outcome measure, the planned data collection and analysis was not performed. | Posted | At Week 16 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Individual and Total Sign/Symptom Score Based on Participant Daily Electronic Diary (E-diary) Entries | CD clinical signs and symptoms includes total stool frequency, rectal bleeding frequency, rectal urgency frequency, nausea severity, vomiting frequency, and rectal incontinence frequency. | Study terminated early for reasons unrelated to safety. Hence, for this outcome measure, the planned data collection and analysis was not performed. | Posted | Baseline and at Week 16 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Endoscopic Healing at Week 16 | Endoscopic healing was measured by SES-CD <=4 and at least 2-point reduction versus baseline and no sub-score >1 in any individual variable. The SES-CD considers ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, rectum in terms of: size of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface and presence of narrowing. Each graded from 0-3. Scale ranges from 0-56 with a higher score indicating greater severity of disease. | Study terminated early for reasons unrelated to safety. Hence, for this outcome measure, the planned data collection and analysis was not performed. | Posted | At Week 16 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total (Absolute) Score at Weeks 8, 12 and 16 | The IBDQ is a psychometrically validated PRO instrument for measuring the disease-specific health-related quality of life (HRQL) in participants with IBD, including CD. The IBDQ consists of 32 items, which are grouped into 4 domains and scored as: bowel function (10 to 70), systemic symptoms (5 to 35), emotional status (12 to 84), and social function (5 to 35). The total IBDQ score ranges from 32 to 224. For the total score and each domain, a higher score indicates better HRQL. A score of at least 170 corresponds to clinical remission and an increase of at least 16 points is considered to indicate a clinically meaningful improvement. | Study terminated early for reasons unrelated to safety. Hence, for this outcome measure, the planned data collection and analysis was not performed. | Posted | Baseline, Weeks 8, 12 and 16 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36) Scores at Week 16 | The SF-36, version 2 is a generic quality-of-life instrument that has been widely used to assess HRQL of participants. The SF-36 consists of 36 items that are aggregated into 8 multi-item scales (physical functioning, role - physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role - emotional, and mental health), with scores ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better HRQL. | Study terminated early for reasons unrelated to safety. Hence, for this outcome measure, the planned data collection and analysis was not performed. | Posted | Baseline, Week 16 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants Based on Incidence of All-cause Hospitalizations | Incidence of all cause hospitalizations was planned to be assessed. | Study terminated early for reasons unrelated to safety. Hence, for this outcome measure, the planned data collection and analysis was not performed. | Posted | Baseline up to Week 32 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants Based on Total Inpatient Days | Total inpatient days were planned to be assessed. | Study terminated early for reasons unrelated to safety. Hence, for this outcome measure, the planned data collection and analysis was not performed. | Posted | Baseline up to Week 32 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants Based on Incidence of CD-related Surgeries and Other Surgical Procedures | Incidence of CD-related surgeries and other surgical procedures were planned to be recorded. | Study terminated early for reasons unrelated to safety. Hence, for this outcome measure, the planned data collection and analysis was not performed. | Posted | Baseline up to Week 32 |
|
From screening up to safety follow-up period (Week 32)
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Placebo | Participants received ontamalimab matching-placebo, injection, subcutaneously using a prefilled syringe on Week 0 (Day 1), Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 in a 16-week treatment period. | 0 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| EG001 | Ontamalimab 25 mg | Participants received ontamalimab 25 mg, injection, subcutaneously using a prefilled syringe on Week 0 (Day 1), Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 in a 16-week treatment period. | 0 | 15 | 2 | 15 | 6 | 15 |
| EG002 | Ontamalimab 75 mg | Participants received ontamalimab 75 mg, injection, subcutaneously using a prefilled syringe on Week 0 (Day 1), Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 in a 16-week treatment period. | 0 | 13 | 2 | 13 | 5 | 13 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Crohn's disease | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Intestinal stenosis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastroenteritis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lymphadenopathy | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anal fistula | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Constipation | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Crohn's disease | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dyspepsia | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Large intestinal stenosis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Injection site bruising | General disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pyrexia | General disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fungal skin infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gingival abscess | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Respiratory tract infection viral | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Tonsillitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ureteritis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Chest injury | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Muscle strain | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Road traffic accident | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pain threshold decreased | Investigations | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Weight decreased | Investigations | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| White blood cell count increased | Investigations | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arthralgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Back pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Musculoskeletal stiffness | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Myalgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pain in extremity | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Spondylitis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Memory impairment | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Insomnia | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Menstruation irregular | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cough | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oropharyngeal pain | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rhinorrhoea | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pruritus generalised | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urticaria | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
The study was terminated as the sponsor discontinued the ontamalimab clinical trial program in ulcerative colitis and CD for reasons unrelated to safety.
If a multicenter publication is not submitted within twelve (12) months after conclusion, abandonment or termination of the Study at all sites, or after Sponsor confirms there shall be no multicenter Study publication, the Institution and/or such Principal Investigator may publish the results from the Institution site individually.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Study Director | Shire | +1 866 842 5335 | ClinicalTransparency@takeda.com |
| Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Aug 27, 2020 | Apr 16, 2021 | SAP_001.pdf |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003424 | Crohn Disease |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D015212 | Inflammatory Bowel Diseases |
| D005759 | Gastroenteritis |
| D005767 | Gastrointestinal Diseases |
| D004066 | Digestive System Diseases |
| D007410 | Intestinal Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C000597368 | ontamalimab |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Male |
|
| Not Hispanic or Latino |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Asian |
|
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| White |
|
| More than one race |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
Participants received ontamalimab 75 mg, injection, subcutaneously using a prefilled syringe on Week 0 (Day 1), Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 in a 16-week treatment period.
|
|
| OG002 | Ontamalimab 75 mg | Participants received ontamalimab 75 mg, injection, subcutaneously using a prefilled syringe on Week 0 (Day 1), Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 in a 16-week treatment period. |
|
|
Participants received ontamalimab 75 mg, injection, subcutaneously using a prefilled syringe on Week 0 (Day 1), Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 in a 16-week treatment period.
|
|
| OG002 | Ontamalimab 75 mg | Participants received ontamalimab 75 mg, injection, subcutaneously using a prefilled syringe on Week 0 (Day 1), Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 in a 16-week treatment period. |
|
|
Participants received ontamalimab 25 mg, injection, subcutaneously using a prefilled syringe on Week 0 (Day 1), Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 in a 16-week treatment period.
| OG002 | Ontamalimab 75 mg | Participants received ontamalimab 75 mg, injection, subcutaneously using a prefilled syringe on Week 0 (Day 1), Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 in a 16-week treatment period. |
|
|
Participants received ontamalimab 25 mg, injection, subcutaneously using a prefilled syringe on Week 0 (Day 1), Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 in a 16-week treatment period.
| OG002 | Ontamalimab 75 mg | Participants received ontamalimab 75 mg, injection, subcutaneously using a prefilled syringe on Week 0 (Day 1), Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 in a 16-week treatment period. |
|
|
| OG002 | Ontamalimab 75 mg | Participants received ontamalimab 75 mg, injection, subcutaneously using a prefilled syringe on Week 0 (Day 1), Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 in a 16-week treatment period. |
|
|
| Ontamalimab 75 mg |
Participants received ontamalimab 75 mg, injection, subcutaneously using a prefilled syringe on Week 0 (Day 1), Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 in a 16-week treatment period. |
|
| Ontamalimab 75 mg |
Participants received ontamalimab 75 mg, injection, subcutaneously using a prefilled syringe on Week 0 (Day 1), Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 in a 16-week treatment period. |
|
Participants received ontamalimab 75 mg, injection, subcutaneously using a prefilled syringe on Week 0 (Day 1), Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 in a 16-week treatment period. |
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Ontamalimab 75 mg |
Participants received ontamalimab 75 mg, injection, subcutaneously using a prefilled syringe on Week 0 (Day 1), Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 in a 16-week treatment period. |
|
|
| Participants |
|
| Participants |
|
| Units |
|---|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|