Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The study did not start, can not secure the products.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A comparison between the efficacy of negative pressure wound therapy and the efficacy of standard care dressing
The aim of our study is to compare the efficacy of negative pressure wound therapy (Prevena) and standard clinical dressing in terms of prevention of postoperative surgical site infection, length of hospital stay, and total cost of hospitalization among vascular, plastic and general surgery patients.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Negative pressure wound therapy | Experimental | This group of patients will receive negative pressure wound therapy (prevena) as their postoperative wound care method. |
|
| standard care dressing | Active Comparator | This group of patients will receive standard care dressing as their postoperative wound care method. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Negative pressure wound therapy | Device | The application of a vacuum across the surface of a wound through a foam dressing cut to fit the wound. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Surgical site infection | The rate of occurrence of signs and symptoms of surgical site infection | 30-day postoperative period |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| length of total hospital stay | number of days of patients hospital stay after the surgery | 6 months |
| cost of hospitalization | The total cost in USD of patient's hospitalization |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| munier nazzal, md | UTMC | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UTMC | Toledo | Ohio | 43614 | United States |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D054843 | Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004322 | Drainage |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
| D013514 | Surgical Procedures, Operative |
| D058106 | Wound Closure Techniques |
Not provided
Not provided
Comparing the rate of occurrence of surgical site infection, total hospital cost and length of stay between two groups: group 1 represents patients who receive Prevena for postoperative wound care and group 2 represents patients who receive standard care dressing for the same purpose.
Not provided
Not provided
Out study is a single-blinded randomized clinical trial. The patient will be informed about the type of dressing used for their wound care, but the investigator and the outcome assessor will be blinded for which type of dressing used for each participant patient.
|
| standard care dressing | Other | The application of a standard care dressing (instead of negative pressure wound therapy) across the surface of wound. |
|
|
| 6 months |
| Rate of reoperation | The rate of patients' re-operation after the principal operation | 30-day postoperative period |