Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Manufacturer of the investigational device has ceased all business activities
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study aims to assess the impact of the subretinal implant RETINA IMPLANT Alpha AMS on the patient's daily life, using validated activities of daily living and questionnaires.
This study aims to assess the impact of the subretinal implant RETINA IMPLANT Alpha AMS on the patient's daily life. In addition, the study will provide additional information about the safety and efficacy of the CE-certified RETINA IMPLANT Alpha AMS. In several studies it has been shown that patients who received this subretinal implant regain visual function to a certain extent and that its use is safe. So far, all assessments of patients with the RETINA IMPLANT Alpha AMS have been done in a controlled environment within the scope of interventional studies where the benefit in daily life has been assessed anecdotally only. Currently, there is no standard method available for an objective assessment of the impact of such devices in daily life of these patients. Hence, the aim of this study is to further assess the impact in daily life with a combination of already validated and newly developed assessments and questionnaires.
This study adheres to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| RETINA IMPLANT Alpha AMS | Experimental | All participants receive the subretinal device RETINA IMPLANT Alpha AMS |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RETINA IMPLANT Alpha AMS | Device | Implantation of the subretinal RETINA IMPLANT Alpha AMS |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in functional vision | Instrumental Activities of Daily Living assessed at baseline (prior to implantation) versus one year after implantation | baseline vs. 12 months after implantation |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Vision Related Quality of Life - Questionnaire | A validated patient reported outcome questionnaire, IVI-VLV, assessed at baseline versus one year after implantation | at baseline and 1, 2.5, 4, 6, 9 and 12 months after implantation (and for longterm review after 18 and 24 months) |
| Visual Function - Questionnaire |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Nicolas Leveziel, Prof | Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Poitiers, France | Study Chair |
| Pierre-André Duval, Dr | Clinique Saint Jean, Montpellier, France | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clinique Saint Jean | Montpellier | Hérault | 34093 | France | ||
| Centre Hospitalier Universitaire La Milétrie de Poitiers |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 28878616 | Background | Stingl K, Schippert R, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Besch D, Cottriall CL, Edwards TL, Gekeler F, Greppmaier U, Kiel K, Koitschev A, Kuhlewein L, MacLaren RE, Ramsden JD, Roider J, Rothermel A, Sachs H, Schroder GS, Tode J, Troelenberg N, Zrenner E. Interim Results of a Multicenter Trial with the New Electronic Subretinal Implant Alpha AMS in 15 Patients Blind from Inherited Retinal Degenerations. Front Neurosci. 2017 Aug 23;11:445. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00445. eCollection 2017. | |
| 29110946 |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Retina Implant AG Sponsor homepage | View source |
Not provided
If data are shared, this will only be done in a pseudonymized manner.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012162 | Retinal Degeneration |
| D012174 | Retinitis Pigmentosa |
| D000071700 | Cone-Rod Dystrophies |
| D015794 | Choroideremia |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D015785 | Eye Diseases, Hereditary |
| D005128 | Eye Diseases |
| D012164 | Retinal Diseases |
| D058499 | Retinal Dystrophies |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A validated patient reported outcome questionnaire, ULV-VFQ, assessed at baseline versus one year after implantation |
| at baseline and 1, 2.5, 4, 6, 9 and 12 months after implantation (and for longterm review after 18 and 24 months) |
| Adverse Events | Number, nature and severity of device-related and implantation-related adverse events | 2 years |
| Measure of implant-mediated visual function | Computer test assessed with implant on versus off | 2 years |
| Poitiers |
| Vienne |
| 86021 |
| France |
| Background |
| Edwards TL, Cottriall CL, Xue K, Simunovic MP, Ramsden JD, Zrenner E, MacLaren RE. Assessment of the Electronic Retinal Implant Alpha AMS in Restoring Vision to Blind Patients with End-Stage Retinitis Pigmentosa. Ophthalmology. 2018 Mar;125(3):432-443. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.09.019. Epub 2017 Oct 27. |
| D030342 |
| Genetic Diseases, Inborn |
| D009358 | Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities |
| D015862 | Choroid Diseases |
| D014603 | Uveal Diseases |
| D040181 | Genetic Diseases, X-Linked |