Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Sponsor decision to discontinue the SHP647 (ontamalimab) clinical trial development program for inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) early.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ontamalimab in inducing clinical remission and endoscopic response in participants with moderate to severe Crohn's Disease.
27Mar2020: Enrollment of new patients into this study has been paused due to the COVID-19 situation. The duration of this pause is dependent on the leveling and control of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ontamalimab 25 mg | Experimental | Participants will receive 25 mg of ontamalimab subcutaneous injection using a prefilled syringe on Week 0/Day 1, Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12. |
|
| Ontamalimab 75 mg | Experimental | Participants will receive 75 mg of ontamalimab subcutaneous injection using a prefilled syringe on Week 0/Day 1, Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12. |
|
| Placebo | Placebo Comparator | Participants will receive placebo matching with ontamalimab subcutaneous injection using a prefilled syringe on Week 0/Day 1, Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ontamalimab | Biological | Subcutaneous injection of ontamalimab will be administered using a prefilled syringe. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Clinical Remission Based on 2-item Patient-reported Outcome (PRO) at Week 16 | Clinical remission was defined by 2-item PRO subs-cores of average worst daily abdominal pain less than or equal to (<=) 3 (based on 11 point numerical rating scale [NRS] ranging from 0 [no pain] to 10 [worst imaginable pain]); and average daily stool frequency <=2 of type 6/7 (very soft stools/liquid stools) as per the Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS) over the 7 most recent days. BSFS ranges from 1 (separate hard lumps, hard to pass), 2 (sausage-shaped, but lumpy), 3 (like a sausage but with cracks on the surface), 4 (like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft), 5 (soft blobs with clear-cut edges), 6 (fluffy pieces with ragged edges, a mushy stool), 7 (watery, no solid pieces, entirely liquid). Participants with missing data at Week 16 or discontinuation before Week 16 were considered failures. Number of participants with clinical remission were reported. | At Week 16 |
| Number of Participants With Endoscopic Response at Week 16 | Endoscopic response was defined as a decrease in Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's disease (SES-CD) of at least 25 percent (%) from baseline. The SES-CD considers ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, rectum in terms of: size of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface and presence of narrowing. Each graded from 0-3. Scale ranges from 0-56 with a higher score indicating greater severity of disease. Participants with missing data at Week 16 or who discontinued before Week 16 were considered failures. Number of participants with endoscopic response were reported. | At Week 16 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Clinical Remission Based on Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score at Week 16 | Clinical remission was defined as a CDAI score of <150. CDAI assessed CD based on clinical signs/symptoms such as number of liquid stools, intensity of abdominal pain, general well-being (subjective), and presence of complications, use of antidiarrheal, presence of abdominal mass,. physical examination and hematocrit (objective). CDAI score is equal to sum of weighted scores for subjective and objective items which range from 0-149 points: asymptomatic remission, 150-220 points: mild to moderate active CD, 221-450 points: moderate to severe active CD, >451 points: severely active to fulminant disease. Higher score indicating more severity. Number of participants with clinical remission as measured by CDAI were reported. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Participants must be between greater than or equal to (> =) 16 and less than or equal to (<=) 80 years of age; participants less than (<) 18 years of age must weigh >=40 kg and must have body mass index >=16.5 kilogram per meter square (kg/m^2)
Participants must have active moderate to severe ileal (terminal ileum), ileocolic, or colonic CD at baseline (Visit 2) as defined by:
i. Abdominal pain subscore >= 5 (average worst daily pain on the 11 point NRS) and abdominal pain subscore >= 2 (average daily pain on the 4-point abdominal pain variable of CDAI) over the 7 most recent days out of the 10 days before colonoscopy preparation (may or may not be contiguous) AND/OR ii. Average of the daily stool frequency subscore >=4 of type 6/7 (very soft stools/liquid stools) as shown in the BSFS over the 7 most recent days out of the 10 days before colonoscopy preparation (may or may not be contiguous) c. Presence of ulcerations that are characteristic to CD, as determined by a colonoscopy performed during screening, and as defined by the SES-CD >6 (SES CD >=4 for isolated ileitis) Note that the participant must be confirmed as meeting the CDAI score and PRO subscore requirements before a colonoscopy is done
Participants must have a documented diagnosis (endoscopic with histology) of CD for >=3 months before screening. Documented diagnosis is defined as:
Participants must be willing and able to undergo a colonoscopy during screening after all other inclusion criteria have been met
Participants must have had an inadequate response to, or lost response to, or had an intolerance to at least 1 conventional treatment such as sulfasalazine or mesalamine (5-aminosalicylic acid [5-ASA]), glucocorticoids, or immunosuppressants (azathioprine [AZA], 6-mercaptopurine [6-MP] or methotrexate [MTX]) or anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF). Participants who have had an inadequate response to sulfasalazine or mesalamine should have also failed at least 1 other conventional treatment such as glucocorticoids
Participants receiving any treatment(s) for CD are eligible provided they have been, and are anticipated to be, on a stable dose for the designated period of time
Participants are males or nonpregnant, nonlactating females who, if sexually active, agree to comply with the contraceptive requirements of the protocol, or females of nonchildbearing potential. Males and females of reproductive potential who are sexually active must agree to use appropriate contraception (ie, highly effective methods for female and medically appropriate methods for male study participants, for the duration of the study
Exclusion criteria:
Participants with indeterminate colitis, microscopic colitis, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced colitis, ischemic colitis, infectious colitis, or clinical/histologic findings suggestive of UC
Participants with colonic dysplasia or neoplasia. (Participants with prior history of adenomatous polyps will be eligible if the polyps have been completely removed)
Participants with past medical history or presence of toxic megacolon
Participants with presence of enterovesical (ie, between the bowel and urinary bladder) or enterovaginal fistulae
Participants with current symptomatic diverticulitis or diverticulosis
Participants with clinically significant obstructive colonic stricture, or who have a history of bowel surgery within 6 months before screening, or who are likely to require surgery for CD during the treatment period. Participants who have undergone previous colonic resection or ileocolectomy more than 6 months before screening must have at least 25 cm of colon remaining
Participants with past medical history of multiple small bowel resections resulting in clinically significant short bowel syndrome
Participants requiring total parenteral nutrition
Participants with past medical history of bowel surgery resulting in an existing or current stoma. Participants who had a j-pouch are excluded as a j-pouch could result in a stoma
Participants have had prior treatment with ontamalimab (formerly PF-00547659; SHP647)
Participants with known or suspected intolerance or hypersensitivity to the investigational product(s), closely related compounds, or any of the stated ingredients
Participants have received any nonbiologic treatment with immunomodulatory properties (other than AZA, 6-MP, or MTX) or continuous antibiotics (>2 weeks) for the treatment of CD within 30 days before baseline (Visit 2)
Participants have received anti-TNF treatment within 60 days before baseline (Visit 2)
Participants have received any biologic with immunomodulatory properties (other than anti-TNFs) within 90 days before baseline (Visit 2)
Participants have ever received anti-integrin/adhesion molecule treatment (eg, natalizumab,vedolizumab, efalizumab, etrolizumab, or any other investigational anti-integrin/adhesion molecule)
Participants have received lymphocytes apheresis or selective monocyte granulocytes apheresis within 60 days before baseline (Visit 2)
Participants have received enteral nutrition treatment within 30 days before baseline (Visit 2)
Participants have received parenteral or rectal glucocorticoids or rectal 5-ASA within 14 days before screening colonoscopy
Participants have taken >20 milligram per day(mg/day) of prednisone, >9 mg/day of budesonide, or equivalent oral systemic corticosteroid dose within 14 days before baseline (Visit 2) or have taken >=40 mg/day of prednisone or equivalent oral systemic corticosteroid dose within 6 weeks before baseline (Visit 2)
Participants have participated in other investigational studies within either 30 days or 5 half-lives of investigational product used in the study (whichever is longer) before screening (Visit 1)
Participants have received a live (attenuated) vaccine within 30 days before the baseline visit (Visit 2)
Participants with active enteric infections (positive stool culture and sensitivity), Clostridium difficile infection or pseudomembranous colitis (subjects with C. difficile infection at screening may be allowed retest after treatment), evidence of active cytomegalovirus infection or Listeria monocytogenes, known active invasive fungal infections such as histoplasmosis or parasitic infections, clinically significant underlying disease that could predispose the subjects to infections, or a history of serious infection (requiring parenteral antibiotic and/or hospitalization) within 4 weeks before the baseline visit (Visit 2)
Participants with abnormal chest x-ray or other imaging findings at screening (Visit 1), such as presence of active tuberculosis (TB), general infections, heart failure, or malignancy (A chest x-ray, computed tomography scan, etc, performed up to 12 weeks before study entry [screening, Visit 1] may be used if available; documentation of the official reading must be located and available in the source documentation)
Participants with evidence of active or latent infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis (TB) or participants with this history who have not completed a generally accepted full course of treatment before baseline (Visit 2) are excluded All other participants must have either the Mantoux (purified protein derivative [PPD]) tuberculin skin test or interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA) performed
Participants who have no history of previously diagnosed active or latent TB are excluded if they have a positive Mantoux (PPD) tuberculin skin test (ie >= 5 millimeter [mm] induration) or a positive IGRA (the latter to be tested at the site's local laboratory) during screening or within 12 weeks before screening If the IGRA cannot be performed locally, a central laboratory may be used, with prior agreement from the sponsor:
Participants with a pre-existing demyelinating disorder such as multiple sclerosis or new onset seizures, unexplained sensory motor, or cognitive behavioral, neurological deficits, or significant abnormalities noted during screening
Participants with any unexplained symptoms suggestive of PML based on the targeted neurological assessment during the screening period
Participants with a transplanted organ. Skin grafts to treat pyoderma gangrenosum are allowed
Participants with a significant concurrent medical condition at the time of screening (Visit 1) or baseline (Visit 2), including, but not limited to, the following:
Participants who have had significant trauma or major surgery within 4 weeks before the screening (Visit 1), or with any major elective surgery scheduled to occur during the study.
Participant with evidence of cirrhosis with or without decompensation (ie, esophageal varices, hepatic encephalopathy, portal hypertension, ascites)
Participant with primary sclerosing cholangitis
Participant with evidence of positive hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) or hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb) Note: if a subject tests negative for HBsAg, but positive for HBcAb, the subject would be considered eligible if no presence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA is confirmed by HBV DNA polymerase chain reaction (PCR) reflex testing performed in the central laboratory
Participant with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) (positive HCV antibody [HCVAb] and HCV RNA) Note: Participant who are HCVAb positive without evidence of HCV RNA may be considered eligible (spontaneous viral clearance or previously treated and cured [defined as no evidence of HCV RNA at least 12 weeks prior to baseline])
Participant with any of the following abnormalities in hematology and/or serum chemistry profiles during screening (Visit 1) Note: Screening laboratory tests, if the results are considered by the investigator to be transient and inconsistent with the subject's clinical condition, may be repeated once during the screening period for confirmation results must be reviewed for eligibility prior to the screening colonoscopy procedure
Participant with known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection based on documented history with positive serological test, or positive HIV serologic test at screening, tested at the site's local laboratory in accordance with country requirements or tested at the central laboratory Note: A documented negative HIV test within 6 months of screening is acceptable and does not need to be repeated
With known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection based on documented history with positive serological test, or positive HIV serologic test at screening, tested at the site's local laboratory in accordance with country requirements or tested at the central laboratory.
Participants who have, or who have a history of (within 2 years before screening), serious psychiatric disease, alcohol dependency, or substance/drug abuse or dependency of any kind including abuse of medicinal marijuana (cannabis)
NOTE: The above Inclusion/Exclusion criteria are NOT exhaustive and other Inclusion/ Exclusion criteria as defined in the protocol may apply.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Study Director | Shire | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CATS Research Center - University of Arizona | Tucson | Arizona | 85724 | United States | ||
| Atria Clinical Research - Clinedge - PPDS |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 38096402 | Derived | Vermeire S, Danese S, Sandborn WJ, Schreiber S, Hanauer S, D'Haens G, Nagy P, Thakur M, Bliss C, Cataldi F, Goetsch M, Gorelick KJ, Reinisch W. Efficacy and Safety of the Anti-mucosal Addressin Cell Adhesion Molecule-1 Antibody Ontamalimab in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Ulcerative Colitis or Crohn's Disease. J Crohns Colitis. 2024 May 31;18(5):708-719. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad199. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| To obtain more information on the study, click here/on this link | View source |
Not provided
A total of 30 participants were enrolled and randomized into the study, of which 29 participants received study treatment. Other secondary outcome measures were not analyzed due to early termination of the study as per sponsor's decision for reasons unrelated to safety.
The study was conducted at 21 sites in the Unites States, Australia, Israel, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Russia and South Africa between 29 August 2018 (first participant first visit) and 08 October 2020 (last participant last visit).
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Placebo | Participants received ontamalimab matching-placebo, injection, subcutaneously using a prefilled syringe on Week 0 (Day 1), Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 in a 16-week treatment period. |
| FG001 | Ontamalimab 25 mg |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Nov 22, 2019 | Apr 2, 2021 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Placebo | Other | Subcutaneous injection of placebo matched with ontamalimab will be administered using a prefilled syringe. |
|
| At Week 16 |
| Number of Participants With Enhanced Endoscopic Response at Week 16 | Enhanced endoscopic response was defined as a decrease in SES-CD by matching segments of at least 50% from baseline. The SES-CD considers ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, rectum in terms of: size of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface and presence of narrowing. Each graded from 0-3. Scale ranges from 0-56 with a higher score indicating greater severity of disease. Participants with missing data at Week 16 or who discontinued before Week 16 were considered non-responders. Number of participants with enhanced endoscopic response were reported. | At Week 16 |
| Number of Participants With Clinical Remission Based on 2-item PRO With 4-point Scale for Abdominal Pain at Week 16 | Clinical remission was defined by 2-item PRO subs-cores of average daily abdominal pain <=1 (based on the 4 point scale, with scores ranging from 0 [none] to 3 [severe]) over the 7 most recent days and average daily stool frequency <=3 of type 6/7 (very soft stools/liquid stools) as per the BSFS over the 7 most recent days. BSFS ranges from 1 (separate hard lumps, hard to pass), 2 (sausage-shaped, but lumpy), 3 (like a sausage but with cracks on the surface), 4 (like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft), 5 (soft blobs with clear-cut edges), 6 (fluffy pieces with ragged edges, a mushy stool), 7 (watery, no solid pieces, entirely liquid). Participants with missing data at Week 16 or who discontinued before Week 16 were considered failures. Number of participants with enhanced endoscopic response were reported. | At Week 16 |
| Number of Participants With Clinical Response Based on 2-item PRO With 2 Criteria at Week 16 | Clinical response was measured by 2-item PRO and defined as meeting at least 1 of the following 2 criteria: 1)A decrease of greater than or equal to (>=) 30% and at least 2 points from baseline in the average daily worst abdominal pain over the 7 most recent days, with the average daily stool frequency of type 6/7 (very soft stools/liquid stools) either a) not worsening from baseline and/or b) average daily stool frequency <=2 of type 6/7 as per the BSFS over the 7 most recent days; 2)A decrease of >=30% from baseline in the average daily stool frequency of type 6/7 (very soft stools/liquid stools) as per the BSFS over the 7 most recent days, with the average daily worst abdominal pain either a) not worsening from baseline and/or b) worst daily abdominal pain <=3 (based on 11-point NRS) over the 7 most recent days. Participants with missing data at Week16 or who discontinued before Week 16 were considered failures. Number of participants with clinical response were reported. | At Week 16 |
| Number of Participants With Clinical Remission Based on 2-Item PRO With Endoscopic Response at Week 16 | Clinical remission was defined by 2-item PRO subs-cores of average worst daily abdominal pain <=3 (based on 11 point NRS ranging from 0 [no pain] to 10 [worst imaginable pain]) over the 7 most recent days and average daily stool frequency <=2 of type 6/7 (very soft stools/liquid stools) as per BSFS ranging from type 1 (separate hard lumps-like stools) to type 7 (entirely liquid stools) over the 7 most recent days. Endoscopic response was defined as a decrease in SES CD of at least 25% from baseline. The SES-CD considers ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, rectum in terms of: size of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface and presence of narrowing. Each graded from 0-3. Scale ranges from 0-56 with a higher score indicating greater severity of disease. Participants with missing data at Week 16 or who discontinued before Week 16 were considered failures. Number of participants with clinical remission and endoscopic response were reported. | At Week 16 |
| Number of Participants With Complete Endoscopic Healing at Week 16 | Clinical remission was defined by 2-item PRO subs-cores of average worst daily abdominal pain <=3 (based on 11 point NRS ranging from 0 [no pain] to 10 [worst imaginable pain]) over the 7 most recent days and average daily stool frequency <=2 of type 6/7 (very soft stools/liquid stools) as per BSFS ranging from type 1 (separate hard lumps-like stools) to type 7 (entirely liquid stools) over the 7 most recent days. Endoscopic response was defined as a decrease in SES CD of at least 25% from baseline. The SES-CD considers ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, rectum in terms of: size of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface and presence of narrowing. Each graded from 0-3. Scale ranges from 0-56 with a higher score indicating greater severity of disease. Participants with missing data at Week 16 or who discontinued before Week 16 were considered failures. Number of participants with complete endoscopic healing were reported. | At Week 16 |
| Number of Participants With Clinical Response as Measured by CDAI-100 at Week 16 | Clinical response is measured by at least a 100-point reduction in the CDAI from baseline (CDAI-100 response). CDAI assesses CD based on clinical signs/symptoms such as number of liquid stools, intensity of abdominal pain, general well-being (subjective), and presence of complications, use of antidiarrheal, presence of abdominal mass, physical examination and hematocrit (objective). CDAI score is equal to sum of weighted scores for subjective and objective items which range from 0-149 points: asymptomatic remission, 150-220 points: mild to moderate active CD, 221-450 points: moderate to severe active CD, >451 points: severely active to fulminant disease. Higher score indicating more severity. | At Week 16 |
| Number of Participants With Clinical Response as Measured by CDAI-70 at Week 16 | Clinical response is measured by at least a 70-point reduction in the CDAI from baseline (CDAI-70 response). CDAI assesses CD based on clinical signs/symptoms such as number of liquid stools, intensity of abdominal pain, general well-being (subjective), and presence of complications, use of antidiarrheal, presence of abdominal mass, physical examination and hematocrit (objective). CDAI score is equal to sum of weighted scores for subjective and objective items which range from 0-149 points: asymptomatic remission, 150-220 points: mild to moderate active CD, 221-450 points: moderate to severe active CD, >451 points: severely active to fulminant disease. Higher score indicating more severity. | At Week 16 |
| Number of Participants With Clinical Remission Over Time | Clinical remission is defined by 2-item PRO subs-cores of average worst daily abdominal pain (based on 11 point NRS ranging from 0 [no pain] to 10 [worst imaginable pain]); and average daily stool frequency of type 6/7 (very soft stools/liquid stools) as per BSFS over the 7 most recent days. BSFS ranges from 1 (separate hard lumps, hard to pass), 2 (sausage-shaped, but lumpy), 3 (like a sausage but with cracks on the surface), 4 (like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft), 5 (soft blobs with clear-cut edges), 6 (fluffy pieces with ragged edges, a mushy stool), 7 (watery, no solid pieces, entirely liquid). | Baseline up to Week 16 |
| Change From Baseline in Individual and Total Sign/Symptom Score Based on Participant Daily Electronic Diary (E-diary) Entries at Week 16 | CD clinical signs and symptoms includes total stool frequency, rectal bleeding frequency, rectal urgency frequency, nausea severity, vomiting frequency, and rectal incontinence frequency. | Baseline and at Week 16 |
| Number of Participants With Endoscopic Healing at Week 16 | Endoscopic healing is measured by SES-CD <=4 and at least 2-point reduction versus baseline and no sub-score >1 in any individual variable. The SES-CD considers ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, rectum in terms of: size of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface and presence of narrowing. Each graded from 0-3. Scale ranges from 0-56 with a higher score indicating greater severity of disease. | At Week 16 |
| Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total (Absolute) Score at Weeks 8, 12 and 16 | The IBDQ is a psychometrically validated PRO instrument for measuring the disease-specific health-related quality of life (HRQL) in participants with IBD, including CD. The IBDQ consists of 32 items, which are grouped into 4 domains and scored as: bowel function (10 to 70), systemic symptoms (5 to 35), emotional status (12 to 84), and social function (5 to 35). The total IBDQ score ranges from 32 to 224. For the total score and each domain, a higher score indicates better HRQL. A score of at least 170 corresponds to clinical remission and an increase of at least 16 points is considered to indicate a clinically meaningful improvement. | Baseline, Weeks 8, 12 and 16 |
| Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36) Scores at Week 16 | The SF-36, version 2 is a generic quality-of-life instrument that has been widely used to assess HRQL of participants. The SF-36 consists of 36 items that are aggregated into 8 multi-item scales (physical functioning, role - physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role - emotional, and mental health), with scores ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better HRQL. | Baseline, Week 16 |
| Number of Participants Based on Incidence of All-cause Hospitalizations | Incidence of all cause hospitalizations was planned to be assessed. | Baseline up to Week 32 |
| Number of Participants Based on Total Inpatient Days | Total inpatient days were planned to be assessed. | Baseline up to Week 32 |
| Number of Participants Based on Incidence of CD-related Surgeries and Other Surgical Procedures | Incidence of CD-related surgeries and other surgical procedures were planned to be recorded. | Baseline up to Week 32 |
| Little Rock |
| Arkansas |
| 72209 |
| United States |
| OM Research LLC - Lancaster - ClinEdge - PPDS | Lancaster | California | 93534 | United States |
| Inland Empire Liver Foundation | Rialto | California | 92377 | United States |
| Peak Gastroenterology Associates | Colorado Springs | Colorado | 80903 | United States |
| Asthma and Allergy Associates PC - CRN - PPDS | Colorado Springs | Colorado | 80907 | United States |
| Advanced Clinical Research Network | Miami | Florida | 33176 | United States |
| Gastroenterology Group of Naples | Naples | Florida | 34102 | United States |
| Omega Research Consultants LLC - Clinedge - PPDS | Orlando | Florida | 32810 | United States |
| East Coast Institute for Research, LLC | Saint Augustine | Florida | 32086 | United States |
| Laporte County Institute For Clinical Research | Michigan City | Indiana | 46360 | United States |
| Clinical Trials of SWLA LLC | Lake Charles | Louisiana | 70601 | United States |
| Louisiana Research Center LLC | Shreveport | Louisiana | 71103 | United States |
| New York Total Medical Care PC | Brooklyn | New York | 11215 | United States |
| Piedmont Healthcare | Statesville | North Carolina | 28625 | United States |
| Consultants For Clinical Research Inc | Cincinnati | Ohio | 45219 | United States |
| Consultants For Clinical Research Inc | Cincinnati | Ohio | 45249 | United States |
| Consultants For Clinical Research Inc | Fairfield | Ohio | 45014 | United States |
| Digestive Disease Associates | Wyomissing | Pennsylvania | 19610 | United States |
| Gastro One | Germantown | Tennessee | 38138 | United States |
| Vanderbilt University Medical Center | Nashville | Tennessee | 37212 | United States |
| Advanced Gastroenterology-Union City | Union City | Tennessee | 38261 | United States |
| Inquest Clinical Research/Coastal Gastroenterology Associates, PA - TDDC - PPDS | Baytown | Texas | 77521 | United States |
| Northside Gastroenterology | Cypress | Texas | 77429 | United States |
| HP Clinical Research | Bountiful | Utah | 84010 | United States |
| Concord Repatriation General Hospital | Concord | New South Wales | 2139 | Australia |
| Liverpool Hospital | Liverpool | New South Wales | 2170 | Australia |
| Mater Hospital Brisbane | South Brisbane | Queensland | 4101 | Australia |
| Royal Adelaide Hospital | Adelaide | South Australia | 5000 | Australia |
| The Alfred Hospital | Melbourne | Victoria | 3004 | Australia |
| St Vincents Hospital Melbourne - PPDS | Melbourne | Victoria | 3065 | Australia |
| Klinikum Wels-Grieskirchen GmbH | Vienna | State of Vienna | A-1090 | Austria |
| LKH-Universitätsklinikum Klinikum Graz | Graz | Styria | 8036 | Austria |
| Salzburger Landeskliniken | Salzburg | 5020 | Austria |
| Medizinische Universitat Wien (Medical University of Vienna) | Vienna | 1090 | Austria |
| University Hospital Center Zagreb | Zagreb | City of Zagreb | 10000 | Croatia |
| Opca bolnica Bjelovar | Bjelovar | 43000 | Croatia |
| Clinical Hospital Centre Osijek | Osijek | 31000 | Croatia |
| General Hospital Virovitica | Virovitica | 33000 | Croatia |
| Universitätsklinikum der RWTH Aachen | Aachen | North Rhine-Westphalia | 52074 | Germany |
| Uniklinik Köln | Cologne | North Rhine-Westphalia | 50937 | Germany |
| Gastro Campus Research GbR | Münster | North Rhine-Westphalia | 48159 | Germany |
| Universitatsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein | Kiel | Schleswig-Holstein | 24105 | Germany |
| Universitatsklinikum Jena | Jena | Thuringia | 07747 | Germany |
| Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin | Berlin | 13353 | Germany |
| Gastroenterologische Facharztpraxis am Mexikoplatz | Berlin-Zehlendorf | 14163 | Germany |
| Sana Klinikum Biberach | Biberach an der Riss | 88400 | Germany |
| Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt | Frankfurt | 60596 | Germany |
| Klinikum rechts der Isa der Technischen Universitaet Muenchen | Munich | 81675 | Germany |
| Shaare Zedek Medical Center | Jerusalem | 91031 | Israel |
| Hadassah Medical Center - PPDS | Jerusalem | 91120 | Israel |
| Galilee Medical Center | Nahariya | 22100 | Israel |
| Baruch Padeh Poriya Medical Center | Tiberias | 15208 | Israel |
| Azienda Ospedaliera Mater Domini Di Catanzaro | Catanzaro | Calabria | 88100 | Italy |
| Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Di Modena Policlinico | Modena | Emilia-Romagna | 41100 | Italy |
| Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi | Florence | Tuscany | 50134 | Italy |
| Ospedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria | Negrar | Veneto | 37024 | Italy |
| A.O.U. Maggiore della Carità | Novara | 28100 | Italy |
| Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo di Pavia | Pavia | 27100 | Italy |
| La Sapienza-Università di Roma-Policlinico Umberto I | Roma | 00161 | Italy |
| Istituto Clinico Humanitas | Rozzano (MI) | 20089 | Italy |
| Ospedale Casa Sollievo Della Sofferenza IRCCS | San Giovanni Rotondo | 71013 | Italy |
| Azienda Ospedaliera Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino | Torino | 10126 | Italy |
| Sapporo Tokushukai Hospital | Sapporo | Hokkaidô | 004-0041 | Japan |
| Jikei University Hospital | Minato-ku | Tokyo | 105-8471 | Japan |
| Ome Municipal General Hospital | ÅŒme | Tokyo | 198-0042 | Japan |
| Hidaka Coloproctology Clinic | Kurume-shi | 839-0809 | Japan |
| Aichi Medical University Hospital | Nagakute | 480-1195 | Japan |
| Nishinomiya Municipal Central Hospital | Nishinomiya | 663-8014 | Japan |
| Onomichi General Hospital | Onomichi | Japan |
| Shiga University of Medical Science Hospital | ÅŒtsu | 520-2192 | Japan |
| Sapporo Higashi Tokushukai Hospital | Sapporo | 065-0033 | Japan |
| Colo-Proctology Center Matsushima Clinic | Yokohama | 220-0045 | Japan |
| Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos | Vilnius | LT- 08661 | Lithuania |
| Vilnius City Clinical Hospital | Vilnius | LT-10207 | Lithuania |
| ETZ-Elisabeth | Tilburg | North Brabant | 5022 GC | Netherlands |
| NWZ, location Alkmaar | Den Helder | North Holland | 1782 GZ | Netherlands |
| Academisch Medisch Centrum Amsterdam | Amsterdam | 1105 AZ | Netherlands |
| Vitamed Galaj i Cichomski sp.j. | Bydgoszcz | Kuyavian-Pomeranian Voivodeship | 85-079 | Poland |
| Gastromed Kopon Zmudzinski i Wspolnicy Sp.j.Specjalistyczne Centrum Gastrologii i Endoskopii Specj | Torun | Kuyavian-Pomeranian Voivodeship | 87-100 | Poland |
| Centrum Diagnostyczno - Lecznicze Barska sp. z o.o. | Włocławek | Kuyavian-Pomeranian Voivodeship | 87-800 | Poland |
| Melita Medical | Wroclaw | Lower Silesian Voivodeship | 50-449 | Poland |
| Lexmedica | Wroclaw | Lower Silesian Voivodeship | 53-114 | Poland |
| Niepubliczny Zaklad Opieki Zdrowotnej CENTRUM MEDYCZNE Szpital Swietej Rodziny | Lódz | Lódzkie | 90-302 | Poland |
| Centrum Opieki Zdrowotnej Orkan-Med Stec-Michalska Sp. J. | Lódz | Lódzkie | 90-647 | Poland |
| Centrum Medyczne Warszawa - PRATIA - PPDS | Warsaw | Masovian Voivodeship | 00-660 | Poland |
| Narodowy Instytut Onkologii im. Marii Skłodowskiej-Curie - Państwowy Instytut Badawczy | Warsaw | Masovian Voivodeship | 02-781 | Poland |
| Niepubliczny Zaklad Opieki Zdrowotnej VIVAMED | Warsaw | Masovian Voivodeship | 03-580 | Poland |
| Miedzyleski Szpital Specjalistyczny w Warszawie | Warsaw | Masovian Voivodeship | 04-749 | Poland |
| Uniwersytecki Szpital Kliniczny w Bialymstoku | Bialystok | Podlaskie Voivodeship | 15-276 | Poland |
| Endoskopia Sp. z o.o. | Sopot | Pomeranian Voivodeship | 81-756 | Poland |
| Twoja Przychodnia - Szczecińskie Centrum Medyczne | Szczecin | West Pomeranian Voivodeship | 71-434 | Poland |
| Szpital Uniwersytecki Nr 2 im. Dr Jana Biziela w Bydgoszczy | Bydgoszcz | 85-168 | Poland |
| Centrum Medyczne Czestochowa - PRATIA - PPDS | Częstochowa | 42-200 | Poland |
| Centrum Medyczne Gdynia - PRATIA - PPDS | Gdynia | 81-338 | Poland |
| BioVirtus Centrum Medyczne | Józefów | 05-410 | Poland |
| NZOZ All Medicus | Katowice | 40-659 | Poland |
| Med Gastr Sp.z.o.o Sp.k | Lodz | 91-034 | Poland |
| Instytut Centrum Zdrowia Matki Polki | Lodz | 93-338 | Poland |
| Twoja Przychodnia - Centrum Medyczne Nowa Sol | Nowa Sól | 67-100 | Poland |
| Clinical Research Center Spółka z Ograniczoną Odpowiedzialnością, Medic-R Spółka Komandytowa | Poznan | 60-856 | Poland |
| Korczowski Bartosz, Gabinet Lekarski | Rzeszów | 35-302 | Poland |
| Sonomed Sp. z o.o. | Szczecin | 70-361 | Poland |
| Centrum Zdrowia M D M | Warsaw | 00-635 | Poland |
| Centralny Szpital Kliniczny MSW | Warsaw | 02-507 | Poland |
| Samodzielny Publiczny Szpital Wojewodzki im. Papieza Jana Pawla II | Zamość | 22-400 | Poland |
| Szpital Specjalistyczny sw Lukasza - Oddzial Gastroenterologii | Gmina Końskie | Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship | 26-200 | Poland |
| Sana Monitoring SRL | Bucharest | Bucharest | 011025 | Romania |
| Cluj-Napoca Emergency Clinical County Hospital | Cluj-Napoca | Cluj | 400006 | Romania |
| Dr.Carol Davila Emergency University Central Military Hospital | Bucharest | 010825 | Romania |
| Colentina Clinical Hospital | Bucharest | 020125 | Romania |
| Prof. Dr. Matei Bals Institute of Infectious Diseases | Bucharest | 021105 | Romania |
| Fundeni Clinical Institute | Bucharest | 022328 | Romania |
| Centrul Medical Hifu Terramed Conformal S.R.L. | Bucharest | 031864 | Romania |
| Emergency University Hospital | Bucharest | 050098 | Romania |
| Affidea Romania SRL | Constanța | RO-900591 | Romania |
| Gastromedica SRL | Iași | 700506 | Romania |
| Dr. Tirnaveanu Amelita Private Practice | Oradea | 410066 | Romania |
| Dr. Goldis Gastroenterology Center SRL | Timișoara | 300002 | Romania |
| Rostov State Medical University | Rostov-on-Don | 344091 | Russia |
| St. Elizabeth Municipal Clinical Hospital | Saint Petersburg | 195067 | Russia |
| Russian Medical Military Academy n.a. S.M. Kirov | Saint Petersburg | Russia |
| Medical University Reaviz | Samara | 443011 | Russia |
| Private Healthcare Institution Clinical Hospital RZD-Medicina of Samara city | Samara | 443029 | Russia |
| SHI Regional Clinical Hospital | Saratov | 410012 | Russia |
| Clinical Hospital Center ''Bezanijska Kosa'' | Belgrade | 11080 | Serbia |
| University Clinical Center Nis | Niš | 18000 | Serbia |
| General Hospital Vrsac | Vršac | 26300 | Serbia |
| Clinical Hospital Center Zemun | Zemun | Serbia |
| University Clinical Center Kragujevac | Kragujevac | Å umadijski Okrug | 34000 | Serbia |
| CLINRESCO, ARWYP Medical Suites | Johannesburg | Gauteng | 1619 | South Africa |
| Dr. J Breedt | Pretoria | Gauteng | 0084 | South Africa |
| Emmed Research | Pretoria | Gauteng | 0084 | South Africa |
| Dr JP Wright | Claremont | Western Cape | 7708 | South Africa |
| North Tyneside General Hospital | North Shields | Northumberland | NE29 8NH | United Kingdom |
| Aberdeen Royal Infirmary - PPDS | Aberdeen | AB25 2ZN | United Kingdom |
| Royal Gwent Hospital - PPDS | Newport | NP20 2UB | United Kingdom |
| New Cross Hospital | Wolverhampton | WV10 0QP | United Kingdom |
Participants received ontamalimab 25 milligram (mg), injection, subcutaneously using a prefilled syringe on Week 0 (Day 1), Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 in a 16-week treatment period.
| FG002 | Ontamalimab 75 mg | Participants received ontamalimab 75 mg, injection, subcutaneously using a prefilled syringe on Week 0 (Day 1), Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 in a 16-week treatment period. |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
The safety set consisted of all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study treatment.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Placebo | Participants received ontamalimab matching-placebo, injection, subcutaneously using a prefilled syringe on Week 0 (Day 1), Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 in a 16-week treatment period. |
| BG001 | Ontamalimab 25 mg | Participants received ontamalimab 25 mg, injection, subcutaneously using a prefilled syringe on Week 0 (Day 1), Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 in a 16-week treatment period. |
| BG002 | Ontamalimab 75 mg | Participants received ontamalimab 75 mg, injection, subcutaneously using a prefilled syringe on Week 0 (Day 1), Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 in a 16-week treatment period. |
| BG003 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Number of Participants With Clinical Remission Based on 2-item Patient-reported Outcome (PRO) at Week 16 | Clinical remission was defined by 2-item PRO subs-cores of average worst daily abdominal pain less than or equal to (<=) 3 (based on 11 point numerical rating scale [NRS] ranging from 0 [no pain] to 10 [worst imaginable pain]); and average daily stool frequency <=2 of type 6/7 (very soft stools/liquid stools) as per the Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS) over the 7 most recent days. BSFS ranges from 1 (separate hard lumps, hard to pass), 2 (sausage-shaped, but lumpy), 3 (like a sausage but with cracks on the surface), 4 (like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft), 5 (soft blobs with clear-cut edges), 6 (fluffy pieces with ragged edges, a mushy stool), 7 (watery, no solid pieces, entirely liquid). Participants with missing data at Week 16 or discontinuation before Week 16 were considered failures. Number of participants with clinical remission were reported. | Full analysis set (FAS) consisted of all randomized participants who had received at least 1 dose of study treatment. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | At Week 16 |
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Number of Participants With Endoscopic Response at Week 16 | Endoscopic response was defined as a decrease in Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's disease (SES-CD) of at least 25 percent (%) from baseline. The SES-CD considers ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, rectum in terms of: size of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface and presence of narrowing. Each graded from 0-3. Scale ranges from 0-56 with a higher score indicating greater severity of disease. Participants with missing data at Week 16 or who discontinued before Week 16 were considered failures. Number of participants with endoscopic response were reported. | FAS consisted of all randomized participants who had received at least 1 dose of study treatment. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | At Week 16 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Clinical Remission Based on Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score at Week 16 | Clinical remission was defined as a CDAI score of <150. CDAI assessed CD based on clinical signs/symptoms such as number of liquid stools, intensity of abdominal pain, general well-being (subjective), and presence of complications, use of antidiarrheal, presence of abdominal mass,. physical examination and hematocrit (objective). CDAI score is equal to sum of weighted scores for subjective and objective items which range from 0-149 points: asymptomatic remission, 150-220 points: mild to moderate active CD, 221-450 points: moderate to severe active CD, >451 points: severely active to fulminant disease. Higher score indicating more severity. Number of participants with clinical remission as measured by CDAI were reported. | FAS consisted of all randomized participants who had received at least 1 dose of study treatment. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | At Week 16 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Enhanced Endoscopic Response at Week 16 | Enhanced endoscopic response was defined as a decrease in SES-CD by matching segments of at least 50% from baseline. The SES-CD considers ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, rectum in terms of: size of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface and presence of narrowing. Each graded from 0-3. Scale ranges from 0-56 with a higher score indicating greater severity of disease. Participants with missing data at Week 16 or who discontinued before Week 16 were considered non-responders. Number of participants with enhanced endoscopic response were reported. | FAS consisted of all randomized participants who had received at least 1 dose of study treatment. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | At Week 16 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Clinical Remission Based on 2-item PRO With 4-point Scale for Abdominal Pain at Week 16 | Clinical remission was defined by 2-item PRO subs-cores of average daily abdominal pain <=1 (based on the 4 point scale, with scores ranging from 0 [none] to 3 [severe]) over the 7 most recent days and average daily stool frequency <=3 of type 6/7 (very soft stools/liquid stools) as per the BSFS over the 7 most recent days. BSFS ranges from 1 (separate hard lumps, hard to pass), 2 (sausage-shaped, but lumpy), 3 (like a sausage but with cracks on the surface), 4 (like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft), 5 (soft blobs with clear-cut edges), 6 (fluffy pieces with ragged edges, a mushy stool), 7 (watery, no solid pieces, entirely liquid). Participants with missing data at Week 16 or who discontinued before Week 16 were considered failures. Number of participants with enhanced endoscopic response were reported. | FAS consisted of all randomized participants who had received at least 1 dose of study treatment. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | At Week 16 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Clinical Response Based on 2-item PRO With 2 Criteria at Week 16 | Clinical response was measured by 2-item PRO and defined as meeting at least 1 of the following 2 criteria: 1)A decrease of greater than or equal to (>=) 30% and at least 2 points from baseline in the average daily worst abdominal pain over the 7 most recent days, with the average daily stool frequency of type 6/7 (very soft stools/liquid stools) either a) not worsening from baseline and/or b) average daily stool frequency <=2 of type 6/7 as per the BSFS over the 7 most recent days; 2)A decrease of >=30% from baseline in the average daily stool frequency of type 6/7 (very soft stools/liquid stools) as per the BSFS over the 7 most recent days, with the average daily worst abdominal pain either a) not worsening from baseline and/or b) worst daily abdominal pain <=3 (based on 11-point NRS) over the 7 most recent days. Participants with missing data at Week16 or who discontinued before Week 16 were considered failures. Number of participants with clinical response were reported. | FAS consisted of all randomized participants who had received at least 1 dose of study treatment. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | At Week 16 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Clinical Remission Based on 2-Item PRO With Endoscopic Response at Week 16 | Clinical remission was defined by 2-item PRO subs-cores of average worst daily abdominal pain <=3 (based on 11 point NRS ranging from 0 [no pain] to 10 [worst imaginable pain]) over the 7 most recent days and average daily stool frequency <=2 of type 6/7 (very soft stools/liquid stools) as per BSFS ranging from type 1 (separate hard lumps-like stools) to type 7 (entirely liquid stools) over the 7 most recent days. Endoscopic response was defined as a decrease in SES CD of at least 25% from baseline. The SES-CD considers ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, rectum in terms of: size of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface and presence of narrowing. Each graded from 0-3. Scale ranges from 0-56 with a higher score indicating greater severity of disease. Participants with missing data at Week 16 or who discontinued before Week 16 were considered failures. Number of participants with clinical remission and endoscopic response were reported. | FAS consisted of all randomized participants who had received at least 1 dose of study treatment. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | At Week 16 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Complete Endoscopic Healing at Week 16 | Clinical remission was defined by 2-item PRO subs-cores of average worst daily abdominal pain <=3 (based on 11 point NRS ranging from 0 [no pain] to 10 [worst imaginable pain]) over the 7 most recent days and average daily stool frequency <=2 of type 6/7 (very soft stools/liquid stools) as per BSFS ranging from type 1 (separate hard lumps-like stools) to type 7 (entirely liquid stools) over the 7 most recent days. Endoscopic response was defined as a decrease in SES CD of at least 25% from baseline. The SES-CD considers ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, rectum in terms of: size of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface and presence of narrowing. Each graded from 0-3. Scale ranges from 0-56 with a higher score indicating greater severity of disease. Participants with missing data at Week 16 or who discontinued before Week 16 were considered failures. Number of participants with complete endoscopic healing were reported. | FAS consisted of all randomized participants who had received at least 1 dose of study treatment. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | At Week 16 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Clinical Response as Measured by CDAI-100 at Week 16 | Clinical response is measured by at least a 100-point reduction in the CDAI from baseline (CDAI-100 response). CDAI assesses CD based on clinical signs/symptoms such as number of liquid stools, intensity of abdominal pain, general well-being (subjective), and presence of complications, use of antidiarrheal, presence of abdominal mass, physical examination and hematocrit (objective). CDAI score is equal to sum of weighted scores for subjective and objective items which range from 0-149 points: asymptomatic remission, 150-220 points: mild to moderate active CD, 221-450 points: moderate to severe active CD, >451 points: severely active to fulminant disease. Higher score indicating more severity. | Study terminated early for reasons unrelated to safety. Hence, for this outcome measure, the planned data collection and analysis was not performed. | Posted | At Week 16 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Clinical Response as Measured by CDAI-70 at Week 16 | Clinical response is measured by at least a 70-point reduction in the CDAI from baseline (CDAI-70 response). CDAI assesses CD based on clinical signs/symptoms such as number of liquid stools, intensity of abdominal pain, general well-being (subjective), and presence of complications, use of antidiarrheal, presence of abdominal mass, physical examination and hematocrit (objective). CDAI score is equal to sum of weighted scores for subjective and objective items which range from 0-149 points: asymptomatic remission, 150-220 points: mild to moderate active CD, 221-450 points: moderate to severe active CD, >451 points: severely active to fulminant disease. Higher score indicating more severity. | Study terminated early for reasons unrelated to safety. Hence, for this outcome measure, the planned data collection and analysis was not performed. | Posted | At Week 16 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Clinical Remission Over Time | Clinical remission is defined by 2-item PRO subs-cores of average worst daily abdominal pain (based on 11 point NRS ranging from 0 [no pain] to 10 [worst imaginable pain]); and average daily stool frequency of type 6/7 (very soft stools/liquid stools) as per BSFS over the 7 most recent days. BSFS ranges from 1 (separate hard lumps, hard to pass), 2 (sausage-shaped, but lumpy), 3 (like a sausage but with cracks on the surface), 4 (like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft), 5 (soft blobs with clear-cut edges), 6 (fluffy pieces with ragged edges, a mushy stool), 7 (watery, no solid pieces, entirely liquid). | Study terminated early for reasons unrelated to safety. Hence, for this outcome measure, the planned data collection and analysis was not performed. | Posted | Baseline up to Week 16 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Individual and Total Sign/Symptom Score Based on Participant Daily Electronic Diary (E-diary) Entries at Week 16 | CD clinical signs and symptoms includes total stool frequency, rectal bleeding frequency, rectal urgency frequency, nausea severity, vomiting frequency, and rectal incontinence frequency. | Study terminated early for reasons unrelated to safety. Hence, for this outcome measure, the planned data collection and analysis was not performed. | Posted | Baseline and at Week 16 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Endoscopic Healing at Week 16 | Endoscopic healing is measured by SES-CD <=4 and at least 2-point reduction versus baseline and no sub-score >1 in any individual variable. The SES-CD considers ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, rectum in terms of: size of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface and presence of narrowing. Each graded from 0-3. Scale ranges from 0-56 with a higher score indicating greater severity of disease. | Study terminated early for reasons unrelated to safety. Hence, for this outcome measure, the planned data collection and analysis was not performed. | Posted | At Week 16 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total (Absolute) Score at Weeks 8, 12 and 16 | The IBDQ is a psychometrically validated PRO instrument for measuring the disease-specific health-related quality of life (HRQL) in participants with IBD, including CD. The IBDQ consists of 32 items, which are grouped into 4 domains and scored as: bowel function (10 to 70), systemic symptoms (5 to 35), emotional status (12 to 84), and social function (5 to 35). The total IBDQ score ranges from 32 to 224. For the total score and each domain, a higher score indicates better HRQL. A score of at least 170 corresponds to clinical remission and an increase of at least 16 points is considered to indicate a clinically meaningful improvement. | Study terminated early for reasons unrelated to safety. Hence, for this outcome measure, the planned data collection and analysis was not performed. | Posted | Baseline, Weeks 8, 12 and 16 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36) Scores at Week 16 | The SF-36, version 2 is a generic quality-of-life instrument that has been widely used to assess HRQL of participants. The SF-36 consists of 36 items that are aggregated into 8 multi-item scales (physical functioning, role - physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role - emotional, and mental health), with scores ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better HRQL. | Study terminated early for reasons unrelated to safety. Hence, for this outcome measure, the planned data collection and analysis was not performed. | Posted | Baseline, Week 16 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants Based on Incidence of All-cause Hospitalizations | Incidence of all cause hospitalizations was planned to be assessed. | Study terminated early for reasons unrelated to safety. Hence, for this outcome measure, the planned data collection and analysis was not performed. | Posted | Baseline up to Week 32 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants Based on Total Inpatient Days | Total inpatient days were planned to be assessed. | Study terminated early for reasons unrelated to safety. Hence, for this outcome measure, the planned data collection and analysis was not performed. | Posted | Baseline up to Week 32 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants Based on Incidence of CD-related Surgeries and Other Surgical Procedures | Incidence of CD-related surgeries and other surgical procedures were planned to be recorded. | Study terminated early for reasons unrelated to safety. Hence, for this outcome measure, the planned data collection and analysis was not performed. | Posted | Baseline up to Week 32 |
|
From screening up to safety follow-up period (Week 32)
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Placebo | Participants received ontamalimab matching-placebo, injection, subcutaneously using a prefilled syringe on Week 0 (Day 1), Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 in a 16-week treatment period. | 0 | 8 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 8 |
| EG001 | Ontamalimab 25 mg | Participants received ontamalimab 25 mg, injection, subcutaneously using a prefilled syringe on Week 0 (Day 1), Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 in a 16-week treatment period. | 0 | 9 | 0 | 9 | 4 | 9 |
| EG002 | Ontamalimab 75 mg | Participants received ontamalimab 75 mg, injection, subcutaneously using a prefilled syringe on Week 0 (Day 1), Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 in a 16-week treatment period. | 0 | 12 | 3 | 12 | 5 | 12 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crohn's disease | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Intestinal obstruction | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Spinal fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dehydration | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Prostatitis | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Angina pectoris | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Palpitations | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sinus tachycardia | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anal fistula | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Aphthous ulcer | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Crohn's disease | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Frequent bowel movements | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Large intestinal stenosis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rectal polyp | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Asthenia | General disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Chills | General disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Peripheral swelling | General disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pyrexia | General disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nasopharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Tinea versicolour | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Body temperature increased | Investigations | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Electrocardiogram abnormal | Investigations | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Weight decreased | Investigations | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypokalaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arthralgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Joint effusion | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Neck pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rheumatoid arthritis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Syncope | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Insomnia | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dysmenorrhoea | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Menstruation irregular | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dyspnoea | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rhinitis allergic | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Night sweats | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 19.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
The study was terminated as the sponsor discontinued the ontamalimab clinical trial program in ulcerative colitis and CD for reasons unrelated to safety.
If a multicenter publication is not submitted within twelve (12) months after conclusion, abandonment or termination of the Study at all sites, or after Sponsor confirms there shall be no multicenter Study publication, the Institution and/or such Principal Investigator may publish the results from the Institution site individually.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Study Director | Shire | +1 866 842 5335 | ClinicalTransparency@takeda.com |
| Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Aug 27, 2020 | Apr 2, 2021 | SAP_001.pdf |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003424 | Crohn Disease |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D015212 | Inflammatory Bowel Diseases |
| D005759 | Gastroenteritis |
| D005767 | Gastrointestinal Diseases |
| D004066 | Digestive System Diseases |
| D007410 | Intestinal Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C000597368 | ontamalimab |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Male |
|
| Not Hispanic or Latino |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Asian |
|
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| White |
|
| More than one race |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
Participants received ontamalimab 75 mg, injection, subcutaneously using a prefilled syringe on Week 0 (Day 1), Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 in a 16-week treatment period.
|
|
| OG002 | Ontamalimab 75 mg | Participants received ontamalimab 75 mg, injection, subcutaneously using a prefilled syringe on Week 0 (Day 1), Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 in a 16-week treatment period. |
|
|
Participants received ontamalimab 75 mg, injection, subcutaneously using a prefilled syringe on Week 0 (Day 1), Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 in a 16-week treatment period.
|
|
| OG002 | Ontamalimab 75 mg | Participants received ontamalimab 75 mg, injection, subcutaneously using a prefilled syringe on Week 0 (Day 1), Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 in a 16-week treatment period. |
|
|
Participants received ontamalimab 25 mg, injection, subcutaneously using a prefilled syringe on Week 0 (Day 1), Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 in a 16-week treatment period.
| OG002 | Ontamalimab 75 mg | Participants received ontamalimab 75 mg, injection, subcutaneously using a prefilled syringe on Week 0 (Day 1), Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 in a 16-week treatment period. |
|
|
Participants received ontamalimab 25 mg, injection, subcutaneously using a prefilled syringe on Week 0 (Day 1), Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 in a 16-week treatment period.
| OG002 | Ontamalimab 75 mg | Participants received ontamalimab 75 mg, injection, subcutaneously using a prefilled syringe on Week 0 (Day 1), Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 in a 16-week treatment period. |
|
|
| OG002 | Ontamalimab 75 mg | Participants received ontamalimab 75 mg, injection, subcutaneously using a prefilled syringe on Week 0 (Day 1), Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 in a 16-week treatment period. |
|
|
| Ontamalimab 75 mg |
Participants received ontamalimab 75 mg, injection, subcutaneously using a prefilled syringe on Week 0 (Day 1), Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 in a 16-week treatment period. |
|
| Ontamalimab 75 mg |
Participants received ontamalimab 75 mg, injection, subcutaneously using a prefilled syringe on Week 0 (Day 1), Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 in a 16-week treatment period. |
|
Participants received ontamalimab 75 mg, injection, subcutaneously using a prefilled syringe on Week 0 (Day 1), Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 in a 16-week treatment period. |
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Ontamalimab 75 mg |
Participants received ontamalimab 75 mg, injection, subcutaneously using a prefilled syringe on Week 0 (Day 1), Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 in a 16-week treatment period. |
|
|
| Participants |
|
| Participants |
|
| Units |
|---|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|