TNSS was participant-reported composite symptom assessment of 4 symptoms (rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, nasal itching & sneezing), each scored on a scale from 0 to 3 where 0 = none, 3 = severe. TNSS total score was calculated as the sum of the response for all 4 individual nasal symptom scores and ranged from 0 to 12, where higher score indicated more severe symptoms. AUC of TNSS/component from time of the first observation to time of the last observation (AUC [0-1 hr]) was calculated by using the trapezoid rule. Data was reported for Dupilumab + SCIT and placebo matched to Dupilumab + SCIT monotherapy group in this outcome measure.

The full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants. Efficacy analyses were based on the treatment allocated at randomization (as randomized).

TNSS was participant-reported composite symptom assessment of 4 symptoms (rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, nasal itching & sneezing) each scored on a scale from 0 to 3 where 0 = none, 3 = severe. TNSS total score was calculated as the sum of the response for all 4 individual nasal symptom scores and ranged from 0 to 12, where higher score indicated more severe symptoms. AUC of TNSS/component from time of the first observation to time of the last observation (AUC [0-1 hr]) was calculated by using the trapezoid rule. Data was reported for Dupilumab + SCIT and placebo matched to Dupilumab + SCIT monotherapy group in this outcome measure.

FAS included all randomized participants. Efficacy analyses were based on the treatment allocated at randomization (as randomized).

TNSS was participant-reported composite symptom assessment of 4 symptoms (rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, nasal itching & sneezing) each scored on a scale from 0 to 3 where 0 = none, 3 = severe. TNSS total score was calculated as the sum of the response for all 4 individual nasal symptom scores and ranged from 0 to 12, where higher score indicated more severe symptoms. AUC of TNSS/component from time of the first observation to time of the last observation (AUC [0-1 hr]) was calculated by using the trapezoid rule. Data was reported for Dupilumab + placebo matched to SCIT and placebo matched to dupilumab + placebo matched to SCIT group in this outcome measure.

FAS included all randomized participants. Efficacy analyses were based on the treatment allocated at randomization (as randomized).

TNSS was participant-reported composite symptom assessment of 4 symptoms (rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, nasal itching & sneezing) each scored on a scale from 0 to 3 where 0 = none, 3 = severe. TNSS total score was calculated as the sum of the response for all 4 individual nasal symptom scores and ranged from 0 to 12, where higher score indicated more severe symptoms. AUC of TNSS/component from time of the first observation to time of the last observation (AUC [0-1 hr]) was calculated by using the trapezoid rule. Data was reported for Dupilumab + placebo matched to SCIT and placebo matched to dupilumab + placebo matched to SCIT.

FAS included all randomized participants. Efficacy analyses were based on the treatment allocated at randomization (as randomized).

TNSS was participant-reported composite symptom assessment of 4 symptoms (rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, nasal itching & sneezing) each scored on a scale from 0 to 3 where 0 = none, 3 = severe. TNSS total score was calculated as the sum of responses for all 4 individual nasal symptom scores and ranged from 0 to 12, where higher score indicated more severe symptoms. AUC of TNSS/component from time of the first observation to time of the last observation (AUC [0-1 hr]) was calculated by using the trapezoid rule. Data was reported for Dupilumab + SCIT and Dupilumab + placebo matched to SCIT group in this outcome measure.

FAS included all randomized participants. Efficacy analyses were based on the treatment allocated at randomization (as randomized).

TNSS was participant-reported composite symptom assessment of 4 symptoms (rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, nasal itching & sneezing) each scored on a scale from 0 to 3 where 0 = none, 3 = severe. TNSS total score was calculated as the sum of the response for all 4 individual nasal symptom scores and ranged from 0 to 12, where higher score indicated more severe symptoms. AUC of TNSS/component from time of the first observation to time of the last observation (AUC [0-1 hr]) was calculated by using the trapezoid rule. Data was reported for Dupilumab + SCIT and Dupilumab + placebo matched to SCIT group in this outcome measure.

FAS included all randomized participants. Efficacy analyses were based on the treatment allocated at randomization (as randomized).

Measurement of Timothy Grass specific IgG4 was performed in serum or plasma to determine effects on biomarkers of relevant physiological and pathogenic processes. Data was reported for Dupilumab + SCIT and placebo matched to Dupilumab + SCIT monotherapy group in this outcome measure. Missing values were imputed by Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) method for visits between post-baseline to Week 17.

FAS included all randomized participants. Efficacy analyses were based on the treatment allocated at randomization (as randomized).

Measurement of Timothy Grass specific IgG4 was performed in serum or plasma to determine effects on biomarkers of relevant physiological and pathogenic processes. Data was for Dupilumab + SCIT and placebo matched to Dupilumab + SCIT monotherapy group in this outcome measure. Missing value was imputed by LOCF method for visits between post-baseline to Week 17.

FAS included all randomized participants. Efficacy analyses were based on the treatment allocated at randomization (as randomized).

Measurement of Timothy Grass specific sIgE was performed in serum or plasma to determine effects on biomarkers of relevant physiological and pathogenic processes. Data was reported for Dupilumab + SCIT and placebo matched to Dupilumab + SCIT monotherapy group in this outcome measure. Missing value was imputed by LOCF method for visits between post-baseline to Week 17.

FAS included all randomized participants. Efficacy analyses were based on the treatment allocated at randomization (as randomized).

Measurement of Timothy Grass specific sIgE was performed in serum or plasma to determine effects on biomarkers of relevant physiological and pathogenic processes. Data was reported for Dupilumab + SCIT and placebo matched to Dupilumab + SCIT monotherapy group in this outcome measure. Missing value was imputed by LOCF method for visits between post-baseline to Week 17.

FAS included all randomized participants. Efficacy analyses were based on the treatment allocated at randomization (as randomized).

Biomarkers measured in serum or plasma to determine effects on biomarkers of relevant physiological and pathogenic processes. Data was reported for Dupilumab + SCIT and placebo matched to Dupilumab + SCIT monotherapy group in this outcome measure. Missing value was imputed by LOCF method for visits between post-baseline to Week 17.

FAS included all randomized participants. Efficacy analyses were based on the treatment allocated at randomization (as randomized).

Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as adverse events (AEs) that developed or worsened or became serious during on-treatment period (time from the first dose of study drug up to the end of study [Week 24]). A serious adverse event (SAE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death, life-threatening, required initial or prolonged in-participant hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, or considered as medically important event. Any TEAE included participants with both serious and non-serious AEs.

The safety analysis set (SAF) included all randomized participants who received at least one injection of study drug, it was based on the treatment received (as treated).