Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The objective of the study is to show that stenting the transverse-sigmoid sinus with the River stent is safe and has probable benefit to relieve clinical symptoms in subjects with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH).
The study will enroll 39 IIH subjects with moderate to severe visual field loss or severe headaches that have failed medical therapy.
The primary safety endpoint is the rate of major adverse event at 12 months The primary probable benefit endpoint is a composite at 12 months of absence of significant sinus stenosis and clinically relevant improvement.
Study objective: The objective of the study is to show that stenting the transverse-sigmoid sinus with the River stent is safe and has probable benefit to relieve clinical symptoms in subjects with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH)
Investigational product: Serenity River Stent System
Study design: prospective, multicenter, single arm, open label clinical trial
Subject population: IIH subjects with significant (>50%) stenosis of the transverse-sigmoid sinuses and moderate to severe visual field loss or severe headaches that have failed medical therapy. In the absence of this trial, subjects would have been offered a surgical treatment of IIH such as sinus stenting with an off-label device, cerebrospinal fluid shunting, or optic nerve sheath fenestration by the treating physician.
Enrollment size and sites: 39 subjects will be enrolled in up to 10 US sites.
Primary safety endpoint: Major Adverse Event at 12 months. The MAE is a composite of the following: moderate or severe stroke (NIHSS > 3), neurological death, perforation or thrombosis of sinus or cerebral vein, device distal embolization, need for target lesion revascularization or need for alternate IIH surgical procedure such as cerebrospinal fluid shunting or optic nerve sheath fenestration.
Primary probable benefit endpoint: a composite at 12 months of:
Absence of significant (>50%) stenosis of the stented sinus on retrograde catheter venography and
Trans-stent pressure gradient < 8 mm Hg and
Clinically relevant improvement in the main clinical outcome per specific inclusion criteria and stabilization or better of the other:
Study duration and follow-up: The subjects will be followed at 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months. At 12 months, clinical examination, lumbar puncture and retrograde catheter venography with manometry will be performed to evaluate the patency of the treated sinus and the absence of trans-stent pressure gradient. Subjects will be consented to be clinically followed annually for up to 5 years.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Venous sinus stenting | Experimental | Subjects will have stenting of the transverse-sigmoid sinus |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Venous sinus stenting (Serenity River) | Device | Patient is placed under general anesthesia. From femoral vein access, a standard guide-catheter is advanced in the internal jugular vein (on the side considered for stenting). The sigmoid then transverse sinus is catheterized with a microcatheter and guide-wire and an exchange guide-wire is placed in the superior sagittal sinus. The River stent delivery catheter is advanced over the exchange guide-wire in the sigmoid then transverse sinus up to the torcula. The River stent is deployed to cover the entire transverse sinus and the proximal half of the sigmoid sinus. The catheters are removed and hemostasis obtained by using a closure device or manual compression. The patient is kept overnight in the hospital for observation. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Major Adverse Event (MAE) | The MAE is a composite of the following: Moderate or severe stroke (NIH stroke scale > 3) Neurological death Perforation of sinus or cerebral vein Thrombosis of sinus or cerebral vein Device distal embolization Need for target lesion revascularization or need for IIH alternate procedure (cerebrospinal fluid shunting or optic nerve sheath fenestration) | 12 months |
| Clinical improvement with no restenosis of the venous sinus | The primary probable benefit endpoint is a composite of:
| 12 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Individual components of MAE. | Components of MAE will be reported as individual event rates. | 12 months |
| Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) opening pressure at 12 months | CSF opening pressure will be measured via lumbar puncture in the lateral decubitus position. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Subjects must meet all of the following criteria to be eligible for participation in the study:
Exclusion Criteria:
Subject must be excluded from participation in this study if any of the following criteria are met
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Athos Patsalides, MD | Northwell Health | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baptist Health | Jacksonville | Florida | 32207 | United States | ||
| UB Neurosurgery |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 27178402 | Background | Albuquerque FC, Gross BA, Levitt MR. Time to re-assess the treatment of idiopathic intracranial hypertension. J Neurointerv Surg. 2016 Jun;8(6):549-50. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012460. No abstract available. | |
| 21323404 | Result | Abubaker K, Ali Z, Raza K, Bolger C, Rawluk D, O'Brien D. Idiopathic intracranial hypertension: lumboperitoneal shunts versus ventriculoperitoneal shunts--case series and literature review. Br J Neurosurg. 2011 Feb;25(1):94-9. doi: 10.3109/02688697.2010.544781. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011559 | Pseudotumor Cerebri |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D019586 | Intracranial Hypertension |
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Prospective, multicenter, single arm, open label clinical study
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| 12 months |
| Stent patency at 12 months | Stent patency will be assessed by retrograde catheter venography. Patency is defined as absence of significant (>50%) stenosis | 12 months |
| Medications | Change in IIH medications and dosage at 12 months compared to baseline | 12 months |
| Headaches | Change in headaches assessed using the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) scale (minimum score 36, maximum 78; higher value represents worse headache) at 12 months compared to baseline. | 12 months |
| Papilledema | Change in papilledema grading using Frisen scale (Stage 0 to 5; stage 0 represents no papilledema and is the best outcome) at 12 months compared to baseline. | 12 months |
| Visual acuity | Change in visual acuity using the Early treatment Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) chart at 12 months compared to baseline. | 12 months |
| Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness | Change in retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured using Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) at 12 months compared to baseline. | 12 months |
| Tinnitus | Change in the intensity of tinnitus evaluated on the Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI) score (overall score; minimum 0, maximum 100; 100 is the worst tinnitus with the worst negative impact) at 12 months compared to baseline. | 12 months |
| Quality of Life SF-12 | Change in quality of life assessed with the Short Form health survey 12 items (SF-12) at 12 months compared to baseline | 12 months |
| Quality of Life NEI-VFQ-25 | Change in quality of life assessed with the National Eye Institute - Visual Functioning Questionnaire - 25 at 12 months compared to baseline. | 12 months |
| Buffalo |
| New York |
| 14203 |
| United States |
| Northwell Health | Manhasset | New York | 11030 | United States |
| Weill Cornell Medicine | New York | New York | 10065 | United States |
| Wake Forest University Health Sciences | Winston-Salem | North Carolina | 27157 | United States |
| Oregon Health & Science University | Portland | Oregon | 97239 | United States |
| 28255904 | Result | Aguilar-Perez M, Martinez-Moreno R, Kurre W, Wendl C, Bazner H, Ganslandt O, Unsold R, Henkes H. Endovascular treatment of idiopathic intracranial hypertension: retrospective analysis of immediate and long-term results in 51 patients. Neuroradiology. 2017 Mar;59(3):277-287. doi: 10.1007/s00234-017-1783-5. Epub 2017 Mar 2. |
| 21799038 | Result | Ahmed RM, Wilkinson M, Parker GD, Thurtell MJ, Macdonald J, McCluskey PJ, Allan R, Dunne V, Hanlon M, Owler BK, Halmagyi GM. Transverse sinus stenting for idiopathic intracranial hypertension: a review of 52 patients and of model predictions. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011 Sep;32(8):1408-14. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2575. Epub 2011 Jul 28. |
| 27556959 | Result | Dinkin MJ, Patsalides A. Venous Sinus Stenting in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: Results of a Prospective Trial. J Neuroophthalmol. 2017 Jun;37(2):113-121. doi: 10.1097/WNO.0000000000000426. |
| 25859134 | Result | Kanagalingam S, Subramanian PS. Cerebral venous sinus stenting for pseudotumor cerebri: A review. Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2015 Jan-Mar;29(1):3-8. doi: 10.1016/j.sjopt.2014.09.007. Epub 2014 Sep 27. |
| 27886896 | Result | Dinkin MJ, Patsalides A. Venous Sinus Stenting for Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: Where Are We Now? Neurol Clin. 2017 Feb;35(1):59-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ncl.2016.08.006. |