PHAT Life: Peer Versus Adult-Led HIV Prevention for Juvenile Offenders
PHAT Life: Peer Versus Adult-Led HIV Prevention for Juvenile Offenders
This application proposes a 2-arm randomized controlled trial comparing the impact of PHAT Life on 350 13-17 year-old offenders' risky sex, STI, substance use, and theoretical mediators when delivered by Youth Representatives (YR) vs. probation staff (PS). 100 facilitators will be recruited to deliver the intervention and participate in the research.
The main objectives of the proposed study are to compare the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and sustainability of Youth Representative-led vs. probation staff-led PHAT Life in a real-world juvenile probation setting. The Specific Aims of this study are:
We hypothesize: (a) Compared to teens in PS-led groups, we expect teens in YR-led groups to report less risky sex and substance use at 6-month follow-up, to demonstrate greater improvement on theoretical mediators of risk, and to have fewer incident STI infections; (b) We expect YR-led PHAT Life to cost less and be more cost-effective than PS-led PHAT Life.
Inclusion Criteria:
a) male or female gender; b) remanded to a probation program; c) 13-17 years old; d) adolescent is fluent in English; e) are not wards of the Department of Child and Family Services (DCFS); and f) they have not already received the PHAT Life intervention.
Exclusion Criteria:
a) are unable to understand the consent/assent process; b) do not speak English, because instruments are normed for English speakers; c) do not assent; d) legal guardians do not consent to teens' participation; e) are not 13 -17 years old; f) are not on probation or remanded to a probation program; g) are wards of the Department of Child and Family Services (DCFS); and h) they have already received the PHAT Life intervention.