Optimizing HIV Viral Load Monitoring and Outcomes for High Risk Populations
Optimizing HIV Viral Load Monitoring and Outcomes for High Risk Populations
The RAPID-VL study will take place in 20 HIV care health facilities in Southwestern Uganda. The study will test the hypothesis that a multi-component intervention package that targets barriers to efficient and timely HIV viral load (VL) testing will improve test ordering, speed up result turnaround times, and improve the quality of VL results counseling to patients. Phase 1 of the study will consist of a 1-year retrospective medical record review in all participating health facilities. In Phase 2 the intervention will be introduced in 10 randomly chosen health facilities, while the remaining 10 sites will continue with standard VL testing and counseling operations. The study will measure the speed and efficiency of VL testing, experiences of patients and clinicians with the intervention, and the cost of the intervention.
We will test the hypothesis that a multi-component intervention grounded in implementation science principles and that targets key barriers to optimal HIV viral load (VL) processing will improve viral load ordering, speed up viral load turnaround, and improve the quality of viral load counseling of results to patients within a Ugandan network of HIV care clinics. Specific objectives are as follows: Objective 1: Determine the comparative effectiveness of the RAPID-VL intervention on VL ordering and VL turnaround time: We will randomize 20 HIV clinics to the RAPID-VL multi-component intervention vs. standard of care VL procedures (n=10 clinics each, 60 patients/health facility). Objective 2: Identify facilitators and barriers to implementation, and perceived utility of the RAPID-VL intervention from both the patient and clinician perspectives. Objective 3: Determine the costs, cost-effectiveness, and incremental change costs of the RAPID-VL intervention.
Inclusion Criteria:
Phase 1, Intervention and Control Clinics:
"High risk" subgroups of patients (n=10 each per clinic, total of 40 per clinic): registered for care, with a clinic visit within a year of the Phase 1 start date, plus the following:
"Non-high-risk" patients (n=20 per clinic): Inclusion criteria (1) adult (age ≥18 years), (2) registered for care, with clinic visit within a year of the Phase 1 start date, (3) already on ART or starting ART at time of study enrollment, (4) do not meet any of the inclusion criteria of a "high risk" subgroup
Phase 2, Intervention Clinics:
We will select 60 patients in each of the 10 intervention clinics (600 patients total; different than the 60 patients in each clinic studied in Phase 1), with inclusion criteria as follows:
"High risk" subgroups of patients (n=10 each per clinic, total of 40 per clinic): registered for care, with a clinic visit within a year of the Phase 2 start date; able to consent for study participation; plus the following:
"Non-high-risk" patients (n=20 per clinic): Inclusion criteria: (1) adult (age ≥18 years), (2) registered in the general HIV clinic, (3) already on ART or starting ART at time of study enrollment, (4) do not meet any of the inclusion criteria of a "high risk" subgroup
Phase 2, Control Clinics:
We will select 60 patients in each of the 10 control clinics (600 patients total; different than the 60 patients in each clinic studied in Phase 1), with inclusion criteria as follows
"High risk" subgroups of patients (n=10 each per clinic, total of 40 per clinic): registered for care, with a clinic visit within a year of the Phase 1 start date; able to provide consent; plus the following:
"Non-high-risk" patients (n=20 per clinic): Inclusion criteria: (1) adult (age ≥18 years), (2) registered for care, with clinic visit within a year of the Phase 2 start date, (3) already on ART or starting ART at time of study enrollment, (4) do not meet any of the inclusion criteria of a "high risk" subgroup
Exclusion criteria: None