Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
unexpected histological findings
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A Phase 2, Double-Blind (DB), Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study Followed by an Open-Label Extension Period to Evaluate the Activity of Seladelpar in Subjects with Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH)
OLE phase was not analyzed due to the early termination of the study
Primary Objectives
Secondary Objectives
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Seladelpar 10 mg | Experimental | Subjects enrolled will receive seladelpar 10 mg, 20 mg, 50 mg or placebo daily for 52 weeks. |
|
| Seladelpar 20 mg | Experimental | Subjects enrolled will receive seladelpar 10 mg, 20 mg, 50 mg or placebo daily for 52 weeks. |
|
| Seladelpar 50 mg | Experimental | Subjects enrolled will receive seladelpar 10 mg, 20 mg, 50 mg or placebo daily for 52 weeks. |
|
| Placebo | Placebo Comparator | Subjects enrolled will receive seladelpar 10 mg, 20 mg, 50 mg or placebo daily for 52 weeks. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seladelpar | Drug | 10 mg, 20 mg, or 50 mg |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage Change From Baseline in Magnetic Resonance Imaging-proton Density Fat Fraction (MRI-PDFF) | Evaluate the effect of seladelpar on hepatic fat fraction, as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) at Week 12 in the double-blind (DB) phase. MRI-PDFF Relative (Percent) Change From Baseline to Week 12 - ANCOVA - mITT Population MRI-PDFF exam was used to quantify the hepatic proton density fat fraction noninvasively. The fat fraction is the proportion of mobile protons in liver tissue attributable to fat and thus, is a noninvasive magnetic resonance-based biomarker of liver triglyceride concentration. | Week 12 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With Improvement of 2 Points or More in the Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Activity Score (NAS) | Histopathology nonalcoholic fatty liver disease activity score (NAS) change from baseline ≤-2 (Improvements of 2 points or more in NAS) - mITT Population Total NAS score represents the sum of scores for steatosis, lobular inflammation, and ballooning, and ranges from 0-8. Diagnosis of NASH (or, alternatively, fatty liver not diagnostic of NASH) should be made first, then NAS is used to grade activity. NAS scores of 0-2 occurred in cases largely considered not diagnostic of NASH, scores of 3-4 were evenly divided among those considered not diagnostic, borderline, or positive for NASH. Scores of 5-8 occurred in cases that were largely considered diagnostic of NASH |
Not provided
DB Inclusion Criteria:
DB Exclusion Criteria:
Significant alcohol consumption, defined as more than 2 drink units per day (equivalent to 20 g) in women and 3 drink units per day (equivalent to 30 g) in men, or inability to reliably quantify alcohol intake
Treatment with drugs associated with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) (amiodarone, methotrexate, oral glucocorticoids at doses greater than 5 mg/day, tamoxifen, estrogens at doses greater than those used for hormone replacement or contraception, anabolic steroids (such as testosterone and valproic acid) for more than 4 weeks within the last 2 months prior to the initial screening
Treatment with pioglitazone or high-dose vitamin E (>400 IU/day) within the last 2 months prior to the initial screening
Initiation of treatment with a glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonist or a dose change within the last 2 months prior to the initial screening
Prior or planned bariatric surgery (a prior reversed sleeve gastrectomy is permitted)
Poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus as defined by hemoglobin A1c [HbA1c] 9.5% or higher or type 1 diabetes mellitus
Diabetic patients who are taking sodium/glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors must be on a stable dose within 2 months prior to the initial screening and throughout the study
Significant weight loss within the last 6 months (e.g., > 10%)
Use of any weight-loss medication for 3 months prior to and during the study period
Body mass index (BMI) < 18.5 kg/m2
Hepatic decompensation defined as the presence of any of the following:
Other chronic liver diseases
ALT > 200 U/L
AST < 20 U/L
Creatine kinase (CK) > upper limit of normal (ULN)
Serum creatinine > ULN
Platelet < lower limit of normal (LLN)
Inability to obtain a liver biopsy
History of biliary diversion
Known history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection
History of malignancy diagnosed or treated within 2 years
Active substance abuse, based on Investigator judgment, including inhaled or injected drugs, within 1 year prior to the initial screening
Females who are pregnant or breastfeeding
Patients unable to undergo MRI-PDFF due to:
Treatment with any other investigational therapy or device within 30 days or within five half-lives, whichever is longer, prior to the initial screening
Active, serious medical disease with likely life expectancy < 5 years
Any other condition(s) that would compromise the safety of the subject or compromise study quality as judged by the Investigator
OLE Phase Enrollment Criteria
Subjects must fulfill the following before allowing to start OLE dosing:
Provide informed consent on or before Day 1 and prior to any OLE-related study procedures.
Completed through the Week 52 biopsy and Week 56 lab assessments in the DB phase
Meet the above DB phase Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria before Day 1 of the OLE phase, with the exception of the following:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CymaBay Research Site | Glendale | Arizona | 85306 | United States | ||
| CymaBay Research Site |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 39326675 | Derived | Alkhouri N, Beyer C, Shumbayawonda E, Andersson A, Yale K, Rolph T, Chung RT, Vuppalanchi R, Cusi K, Loomba R, Pansini M, Dennis A. Decreases in cT1 and liver fat content reflect treatment-induced histological improvements in MASH. J Hepatol. 2025 Mar;82(3):438-445. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2024.08.031. Epub 2024 Sep 25. | |
| 33793651 | Derived |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
DB Phase: A total of 181 subjects were randomly assigned to receive placebo, seladelpar 10 mg/day, seladelpar 20 mg/day, or seladelpar 50 mg/day (1:2:2:2 ratio). Subjects were stratified by diabetic status (yes/no) and fibrosis stage (F1 versus F2-3). Study drug (placebo or seladelpar) was taken in a blinded manner orally once a day for a period of 52 weeks.
OLE Phase: All subjects will receive seladelpar 50 mg regardless of dose received during the DB phase.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Period 1: Seladelpar 10 mg | DB Phase. Subjects were randomized to receive seladelpar 10 mg daily for 52 weeks. |
| FG001 | Period 1: Seladelpar 20 mg | DB Phase. Subjects were randomized to receive seladelpar 20 mg daily for 52 weeks. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DB Phase |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Dec 20, 2019 | Aug 30, 2022 |
Not provided
Not provided
Randomization: 1:2:2:2 (placebo: seladelpar 10 mg: 20 mg: 50 mg)
Not provided
Not provided
Double Blind Placebo Controlled
| Placebos | Drug | Matching placebo Capsule |
|
| Week 52 |
| Percent Change From Baseline in Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) at Week 12 and Week 52 | Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Relative (percent) change of from Baseline to Weeks 12 and Week 52 - mITT Population A decreased serum levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) is a marker of liver function improvement. | Week 12, Week 52 |
| Percent Change From Baseline in Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) at Week 12 and Week 52 | Relative (Percent) Change of Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) From Baseline to Weeks 12 and Week 52 - mITT Population A decreased serum levels of Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) is a marker of liver function improvement. | Weeks 12, Week 52 |
| Percent Change From Baseline in Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT) at Week 12 and Week 52 | Relative (Percent) Change of Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT) From Baseline to Weeks 12 and Week 52 - mITT Population A decreased serum levels of Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT) is a marker of liver function improvement. | Weeks 12, Week 52 |
| Number of Participants With Decrease in MRI-PDFF ≥ 30% From Baseline at Week 12 and Week 52 | Number of Participants with a relative decrease in MRI-PDFF ≥30% (ie, percent change ≥ 30%) at Weeks 12, and 52/ET (Early Termination) in the DB phase - mITT Population. MRI-PDFF exam was used to quantify the hepatic proton density fat fraction noninvasively. The fat fraction is the proportion of mobile protons in liver tissue attributable to fat and thus, is a noninvasive magnetic resonance-based biomarker of liver triglyceride concentration. MRI-PDFF response defined as ≥30% relative decline in MRI-PDFF is associated with ≥1 stage improvement in fibrosis and may be used as a surrogate marker of fibrosis regression in early phase clinical trials for NASH | Week 12, Week 52 |
| Percentage Change From Baseline in Magnetic Resonance Imaging-proton Density Fat Fraction (MRI-PDFF) at Week 52 | Percentage Change from Baseline in MRI-PDFF to Weeks 52//ET - mITT Population MRI-PDFF exam was used to quantify the hepatic proton density fat fraction noninvasively. The fat fraction is the proportion of mobile protons in liver tissue attributable to fat and thus, is a noninvasive magnetic resonance-based biomarker of liver triglyceride concentration. | Week 52 |
| Number of Liver Biopsy Responders With Reversal of NASH Reversal of NASH (Ballooning Score of 0 and Lobular Inflammation Score of 0 or 1) and no Worsening of Hepatic Fibrosis at Week 52 | Liver Biopsy Responders with reversal of NASH (ballooning score of 0 and lobular inflammation score of 0 or 1 and no worsening of hepatic fibrosis) at Week 52/ET. The reversal of NASH was defined as the absence of hepatocellular ballooning (score of 0) and no or minimal inflammation (lobular inflammation score of 0 or 1). | Week 52 |
| Percentage of Participants With Improvement by at Least 1 Stage in Fibrosis From Baseline at Week 12 and Week 52 | Proportion of subjects with improvement by at least 1 stage in fibrosis without worsening of NASH (ie, improvement by at least 1 fibrosis stage without worsening of NAS) at Week 52/ET - Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel - mITTb Population There five liver fibrosis stages (F0: no scarring (no fibrosis); F1: minimal scarring; F2: scarring has occurred and extends outside the liver area (significant fibrosis); F3: fibrosis spreading and forming bridges with other fibrotic liver areas (severe fibrosis); F4: cirrhosis or advanced scarring) | Week 52 |
| Tucson |
| Arizona |
| 85712 |
| United States |
| CymaBay Research Site | Los Angeles | California | 90057 | United States |
| CymaBay Research Site | Boca Raton | Florida | 33434 | United States |
| CymaBay Research Site | Lakewood Rch | Florida | 34211 | United States |
| CymaBay Research Site | Flowood | Mississippi | 39232 | United States |
| CymaBay Research Site | Clarksville | Tennessee | 37040 | United States |
| CymaBay Research Site | Germantown | Tennessee | 38138 | United States |
| CymaBay Research Site | Hermitage | Tennessee | 37076 | United States |
| CymaBay Research Site | Knoxville | Tennessee | 37909 | United States |
| CymaBay Research Site | Chandler | Texas | 85224 | United States |
| CymaBay Research Site | Dallas | Texas | 75246 | United States |
| CymaBay Research Site | Live Oak | Texas | 78233 | United States |
| CymaBay Research Site | Rollingwood | Texas | 78746 | United States |
| Beyer C, Hutton C, Andersson A, Imajo K, Nakajima A, Kiker D, Banerjee R, Dennis A. Comparison between magnetic resonance and ultrasound-derived indicators of hepatic steatosis in a pooled NAFLD cohort. PLoS One. 2021 Apr 1;16(4):e0249491. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249491. eCollection 2021. |
| FG002 | Period 1: Seladelpar 50 mg | DB Phase. Subjects were randomized to receive seladelpar 50 mg daily for 52 weeks. |
| FG003 | Period 1: Placebo | DB Phase. Subjects were randomized to receive placebo daily for 52 weeks. |
| FG004 | Period 2: Seladelpar 50 mg | OLE phase: All subjects received seladelpar 50 mg |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
| OLE Phase |
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Seladelpar 10 mg | Subjects were randomized to receive seladelpar 10 mg, 20 mg, 50 mg or placebo daily for 52 weeks. Seladelpar: 10 mg, 20 mg, or 50 mg |
| BG001 | Seladelpar 20 mg | Subjects were randomized to receive seladelpar 10 mg, 20 mg, 50 mg or placebo daily for 52 weeks. Seladelpar: 10 mg, 20 mg, or 50 mg |
| BG002 | Seladelpar 50 mg | Subjects were randomized to receive seladelpar 10 mg, 20 mg, 50 mg or placebo daily for 52 weeks. Seladelpar: 10 mg, 20 mg, or 50 mg |
| BG003 | Placebo | Subjects were randomized to receive seladelpar 10 mg, 20 mg, 50 mg or placebo daily for 52 weeks. Placebos: Matching placebo Capsule |
| BG004 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Percentage Change From Baseline in Magnetic Resonance Imaging-proton Density Fat Fraction (MRI-PDFF) | Evaluate the effect of seladelpar on hepatic fat fraction, as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) at Week 12 in the double-blind (DB) phase. MRI-PDFF Relative (Percent) Change From Baseline to Week 12 - ANCOVA - mITT Population MRI-PDFF exam was used to quantify the hepatic proton density fat fraction noninvasively. The fat fraction is the proportion of mobile protons in liver tissue attributable to fat and thus, is a noninvasive magnetic resonance-based biomarker of liver triglyceride concentration. | mITT Population: defined as any subject who was randomized, received at least one dose of study drug, and had Baseline and Week 12 MRI-PDFF. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | percentage of change from Baseline | Week 12 |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Improvement of 2 Points or More in the Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Activity Score (NAS) | Histopathology nonalcoholic fatty liver disease activity score (NAS) change from baseline ≤-2 (Improvements of 2 points or more in NAS) - mITT Population Total NAS score represents the sum of scores for steatosis, lobular inflammation, and ballooning, and ranges from 0-8. Diagnosis of NASH (or, alternatively, fatty liver not diagnostic of NASH) should be made first, then NAS is used to grade activity. NAS scores of 0-2 occurred in cases largely considered not diagnostic of NASH, scores of 3-4 were evenly divided among those considered not diagnostic, borderline, or positive for NASH. Scores of 5-8 occurred in cases that were largely considered diagnostic of NASH | mITTb population: The mITTb population is defined as any subject who is randomized, receives at least one dose of study drug, and has Baseline and Week 52/ET liver biopsies. | Posted | Number | Percentage of Participants | Week 52 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline in Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) at Week 12 and Week 52 | Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Relative (percent) change of from Baseline to Weeks 12 and Week 52 - mITT Population A decreased serum levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) is a marker of liver function improvement. | mITTb population: The mITTb population is defined as any subject who is randomized, receives at least one dose of study drug, and has Baseline and Week 52/ET liver biopsies. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | percentage of change from Baseline | Week 12, Week 52 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline in Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) at Week 12 and Week 52 | Relative (Percent) Change of Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) From Baseline to Weeks 12 and Week 52 - mITT Population A decreased serum levels of Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) is a marker of liver function improvement. | mITTb population: The mITTb population is defined as any subject who is randomized, receives at least one dose of study drug, and has Baseline and Week 52/ET liver biopsies. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | percentage of change from baseline | Weeks 12, Week 52 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline in Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT) at Week 12 and Week 52 | Relative (Percent) Change of Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT) From Baseline to Weeks 12 and Week 52 - mITT Population A decreased serum levels of Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT) is a marker of liver function improvement. | mITTb population: The mITTb population is defined as any subject who is randomized, receives at least one dose of study drug, and has Baseline and Week 52/ET liver biopsies. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Percentage of change from Baseline | Weeks 12, Week 52 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Decrease in MRI-PDFF ≥ 30% From Baseline at Week 12 and Week 52 | Number of Participants with a relative decrease in MRI-PDFF ≥30% (ie, percent change ≥ 30%) at Weeks 12, and 52/ET (Early Termination) in the DB phase - mITT Population. MRI-PDFF exam was used to quantify the hepatic proton density fat fraction noninvasively. The fat fraction is the proportion of mobile protons in liver tissue attributable to fat and thus, is a noninvasive magnetic resonance-based biomarker of liver triglyceride concentration. MRI-PDFF response defined as ≥30% relative decline in MRI-PDFF is associated with ≥1 stage improvement in fibrosis and may be used as a surrogate marker of fibrosis regression in early phase clinical trials for NASH | mITT Population: defined as any subject who is randomized, receives at least one dose of study drug, and has Baseline and Week 12 MRI-PDFF | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Week 12, Week 52 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage Change From Baseline in Magnetic Resonance Imaging-proton Density Fat Fraction (MRI-PDFF) at Week 52 | Percentage Change from Baseline in MRI-PDFF to Weeks 52//ET - mITT Population MRI-PDFF exam was used to quantify the hepatic proton density fat fraction noninvasively. The fat fraction is the proportion of mobile protons in liver tissue attributable to fat and thus, is a noninvasive magnetic resonance-based biomarker of liver triglyceride concentration. | mITT Population: defined as any subject who is randomized, receives at least one dose of study drug, and has Baseline and Week 12 MRI-PDFF | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | percentage of change from Baseline | Week 52 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Liver Biopsy Responders With Reversal of NASH Reversal of NASH (Ballooning Score of 0 and Lobular Inflammation Score of 0 or 1) and no Worsening of Hepatic Fibrosis at Week 52 | Liver Biopsy Responders with reversal of NASH (ballooning score of 0 and lobular inflammation score of 0 or 1 and no worsening of hepatic fibrosis) at Week 52/ET. The reversal of NASH was defined as the absence of hepatocellular ballooning (score of 0) and no or minimal inflammation (lobular inflammation score of 0 or 1). | mITTb population: The mITTb population is defined as any subject who is randomized, receives at least one dose of study drug, and has Baseline and Week 52/ET liver biopsies. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Week 52 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Improvement by at Least 1 Stage in Fibrosis From Baseline at Week 12 and Week 52 | Proportion of subjects with improvement by at least 1 stage in fibrosis without worsening of NASH (ie, improvement by at least 1 fibrosis stage without worsening of NAS) at Week 52/ET - Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel - mITTb Population There five liver fibrosis stages (F0: no scarring (no fibrosis); F1: minimal scarring; F2: scarring has occurred and extends outside the liver area (significant fibrosis); F3: fibrosis spreading and forming bridges with other fibrotic liver areas (severe fibrosis); F4: cirrhosis or advanced scarring) | mITTb population: The mITTb population is defined as any subject who is randomized, receives at least one dose of study drug, and has Baseline and Week 52/ET liver biopsies. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Week 52 |
|
Through DB Phase (from first dose of DB phase study drug, and up to 30 days after last dose of DB phase study drug or 1 day before the first dose of OLE phase, whichever was earlier), up to 56 weeks. AEs are only summarized in DB phase, not OLE phase.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Seladelpar 10 mg | Subjects were randomized to receive seladelpar 10 mg daily for 52 weeks. AEs are only summarized in DB phase, not OLE phase. | 0 | 53 | 1 | 53 | 45 | 53 |
| EG001 | Seladelpar 20 mg | Subjects were randomized to receive seladelpar 20 mg daily for 52 weeks. AEs are only summarized in DB phase, not OLE phase. | 0 | 51 | 3 | 51 | 49 | 51 |
| EG002 | Seladelpar 50 mg | Subjects were randomized to receive seladelpar 50 mg daily for 52 weeks. AEs are only summarized in DB phase, not OLE phase. | 0 | 50 | 5 | 50 | 48 | 50 |
| EG003 | Placebo | Subjects were randomized to receive placebo daily for 52 weeks. AEs are only summarized in DB phase, not OLE phase. | 0 | 27 | 0 | 27 | 25 | 27 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Faeces discoloured | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Obstructive pancreatitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Non-cardiac chest pain | General disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diverticulitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastroenteritis Escherichia coli | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pneumonia | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Intentional overdose | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Post procedural complication | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Procedural pain | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cataract | Eye disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal distension | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain upper | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Constipation | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dyspepsia | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastrooesophageal reflux disease | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Toothache | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fatigue | General disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bronchitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Influenza | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nasopharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sinusitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Tooth infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Meniscus injury | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Procedural pain | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diabetes mellitus inadequate control | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hyperglycaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Type 2 diabetes mellitus | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arthralgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Back pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Musculoskeletal pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Myalgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cough | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Alopecia | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dry skin | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pruritus | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rash | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypertension | Vascular disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barry Crittenden, Vice President of Clinical Development | CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc. | 510-293-8800 | medinfo@cymabay.com |
| Prot_002.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Feb 28, 2020 | Apr 5, 2022 | SAP_001.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D065626 | Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005234 | Fatty Liver |
| D008107 | Liver Diseases |
| D004066 | Digestive System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C000713688 | seladelpar |
| C572244 | (2-methyl-4-(5-methyl-2-(4-trifluoromethyl-phenyl)-2H-(1,2,3)triazol-4-ylmethylsulfanyl)phenoxy)acetic acid |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Male |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| Asian |
|
| American Indian or Alaska native |
|
| Multiple |
|
| ANCOVA |
| 0.3151 |
| LS Mean of Difference |
| 6.54 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -6.28 |
| 19.37 |
| Other |
The LS Means, confidence intervals, and p-values come from an ANCOVA model with relative (percent) change from baseline as the dependent variable and treatment and stratification groups (diabetic status and fibrosis stage) as factors and baseline as a covariate. |
| ANCOVA | 0.2313 | LS Mean of Difference | 7.78 | 2-Sided | 95 | -5.01 | 20.58 | Other | The LS Means, confidence intervals, and p-values come from an ANCOVA model with relative (percent) change from baseline as the dependent variable and treatment and stratification groups (diabetic status and fibrosis stage) as factors and baseline as a covariate. |
| OG002 |
| Seladelpar 50 mg |
Subjects were randomized to receive seladelpar 10 mg, 20 mg, 50 mg or placebo daily for 52 weeks. Seladelpar: 10 mg, 20 mg, or 50 mg |
| OG003 | Placebo | Subjects were randomized to receive seladelpar 10 mg, 20 mg, 50 mg or placebo daily for 52 weeks. Placebos: Matching placebo Capsule |
|
|
| Placebo |
Subjects were randomized to receive seladelpar 10 mg, 20 mg, 50 mg or placebo daily for 52 weeks. Placebos: Matching placebo Capsule |
|
|
| Placebo |
Subjects were randomized to receive seladelpar 10 mg, 20 mg, 50 mg or placebo daily for 52 weeks. Placebos: Matching placebo Capsule |
|
|
| Placebo |
Subjects were randomized to receive seladelpar 10 mg, 20 mg, 50 mg or placebo daily for 52 weeks. Placebos: Matching placebo Capsule |
|
|
| Seladelpar 50 mg |
Subjects were randomized to receive seladelpar 10 mg, 20 mg, 50 mg or placebo daily for 52 weeks. Seladelpar: 10 mg, 20 mg, or 50 mg |
| OG003 | Placebo | Subjects were randomized to receive seladelpar 10 mg, 20 mg, 50 mg or placebo daily for 52 weeks. Placebos: Matching placebo Capsule |
|
|
| OG003 | Placebo | Subjects were randomized to receive seladelpar 10 mg, 20 mg, 50 mg or placebo daily for 52 weeks. Placebos: Matching placebo Capsule |
|
|
| OG003 | Placebo | Subjects were randomized to receive seladelpar 10 mg, 20 mg, 50 mg or placebo daily for 52 weeks. Placebos: Matching placebo Capsule |
|
|
Subjects were randomized to receive seladelpar 10 mg, 20 mg, 50 mg or placebo daily for 52 weeks.
Seladelpar: 10 mg, 20 mg, or 50 mg
| OG003 | Placebo | Subjects were randomized to receive seladelpar 10 mg, 20 mg, 50 mg or placebo daily for 52 weeks. Placebos: Matching placebo Capsule |
|
|