Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
In a recently published meta-analysis (Sharaiha, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2017), it is reported that percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) is less clinical successful, causes more adverse events and needs more re-interventions than endoscopic ultrasound guided biliary drainage (EUBD) in patients with malignant, extrahepatic bile duct obstruction. The conclusion was, that EUBD should be prefered in this clinical setting in future.
An improved technique of PTBD may provide better results for coming comparative studies.
The investigators of this retrospective study therefore analyzed all PTBDs that were performed in a period of nine years in a tertiary referral hospital. In this cohort, the analysis focused on PTBDs with primary metal stent implantation by endoscopic luminal guidance.
When Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP) is not successful or is not possible to be performed due to anatomical reasons (altered anatomy after abdominal surgery) in patients with malignant extrahepatic bile duct obstruction, an alternative method is necessary for biliary drainage. In a recently published meta-analysis (Sharaiha, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2017), it is reported that percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) is less clinical successful, causes more adverse events and needs more re-interventions than endoscopic ultrasound guided biliary drainage (EUBD) in patients with malignant, extrahepatic bile duct obstruction. The conclusion was, that EUBD should be prefered in this clinical setting in future.
An improved technique of PTBD may provide better results for coming comparative studies.
The investigators of this retrospective study therefore analyzed all PTBDs that were performed in a period of nine years in a tertiary referral hospital. In this cohort, the analysis focused on PTBDs with primary metal stent implantation by endoscopic luminal guidance considering technical and clinical success, access route, procedure time, fluoroscopic time, radiation exposure, adverse events and survival probability in an observation time of six months.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage | Procedure | When ERCPs failed or was not possible to be performed due to an altered anatomy in patients with malignant extrahepatic bile duct obstruction, PTBD was performed next in all patients. Percutaneous bile duct puncture was guided by Color Doppler ultrasound. The further procedure was guided by fluoroscopy. A self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) was inserted into the obstructed bile duct by endoscopic luminal guidance in the first session. After successful SEMS implantation, the percutaneous external catheter was removed at the end of the procedure. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| technical success | metal stent was implanted successfully bridging the tumor stenosis | 1 minute after injection of a radiocontrast agent into the expanded metal stent |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| clinical success | decrease of Serum Bilirubin level >50% | 7 days |
| adverse events | the report of any adverse events after the procedure, grading of adverse events according to the ASGE lexicon's severity grading system |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
All patients which met the mentioned inclusion and exclusion criteria were enrolled in the study consecutively
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Jochen Rudi, Prof.Dr.med. | Theresienkrankenhaus und St.Hedwigsklinik GmbH | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tertiary referral hospital: Theresienkrankenhaus und St. Hedwig Hospital, Academic | Mannheim | 68165 | Germany |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 28063840 | Background | Sharaiha RZ, Khan MA, Kamal F, Tyberg A, Tombazzi CR, Ali B, Tombazzi C, Kahaleh M. Efficacy and safety of EUS-guided biliary drainage in comparison with percutaneous biliary drainage when ERCP fails: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 May;85(5):904-914. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.12.023. Epub 2017 Jan 4. | |
| 26562399 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001651 | Cholestasis, Extrahepatic |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002779 | Cholestasis |
| D001649 | Bile Duct Diseases |
| D001660 | Biliary Tract Diseases |
| D004066 | Digestive System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Up to 30 days after the intervention |
| re-interventions | Number of re-interventions (ERCP or PTCD) that are necessary after successful PTBD (for example due to stent migration or stent occlusion) | 6 months |
| overall survival | death in the follow up afterperformed PTBD | 2 years |
| Schmitz D, Grosse A, Hallscheidt P, Roseneck A, Niemeyer J, Rudi J. Color Doppler ultrasound-guided PTBD with and without metal stent implantation by endoscopic control: prospective success and early adverse event rates. Z Gastroenterol. 2015 Nov;53(11):1255-60. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-104225. Epub 2015 Nov 12. |
| 24917973 | Background | Bapaye A, Dubale N, Aher A. Comparison of endosonography-guided vs. percutaneous biliary stenting when papilla is inaccessible for ERCP. United European Gastroenterol J. 2013 Aug;1(4):285-93. doi: 10.1177/2050640613490928. |
| 22810111 | Background | Artifon EL, Aparicio D, Paione JB, Lo SK, Bordini A, Rabello C, Otoch JP, Gupta K. Biliary drainage in patients with unresectable, malignant obstruction where ERCP fails: endoscopic ultrasonography-guided choledochoduodenostomy versus percutaneous drainage. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2012 Oct;46(9):768-74. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31825f264c. |
| 25081224 | Background | Khashab MA, Valeshabad AK, Afghani E, Singh VK, Kumbhari V, Messallam A, Saxena P, El Zein M, Lennon AM, Canto MI, Kalloo AN. A comparative evaluation of EUS-guided biliary drainage and percutaneous drainage in patients with distal malignant biliary obstruction and failed ERCP. Dig Dis Sci. 2015 Feb;60(2):557-65. doi: 10.1007/s10620-014-3300-6. Epub 2014 Aug 1. |
| 27129552 | Background | Sharaiha RZ, Kumta NA, Desai AP, DeFilippis EM, Gabr M, Sarkisian AM, Salgado S, Millman J, Benvenuto A, Cohen M, Tyberg A, Gaidhane M, Kahaleh M. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage versus percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage: predictors of successful outcome in patients who fail endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Surg Endosc. 2016 Dec;30(12):5500-5505. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4913-y. Epub 2016 Apr 29. |
| 26748220 | Background | Lee TH, Choi JH, Park do H, Song TJ, Kim DU, Paik WH, Hwangbo Y, Lee SS, Seo DW, Lee SK, Kim MH. Similar Efficacies of Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Transmural and Percutaneous Drainage for Malignant Distal Biliary Obstruction. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Jul;14(7):1011-1019.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.12.032. Epub 2015 Dec 31. |
| 28567118 | Background | Sportes A, Camus M, Greget M, Leblanc S, Coriat R, Hochberger J, Chaussade S, Grabar S, Prat F. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy versus percutaneous transhepatic drainage for malignant biliary obstruction after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a retrospective expertise-based study from two centers. Ther Adv Gastroenterol. 2017 Jun;10(6):483-493. doi: 10.1177/1756283X17702096. Epub 2017 Apr 10. |