Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study evaluates the effect of positive end-expiratory pressure on the position, length and function of the diaphragm. During the first part of the study, physiological measurements of the diaphragm will be performed while participants receive non-invasive ventilation at different PEEP levels. During the second part of the study, MRI measurements of the diaphragm will be performed during a change in PEEP level.
In almost all mechanically ventilated patients, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is used. Its function is to prevent alveolar collapse and to maintain oxygenation. However, it has recently been found that PEEP may contribute to diaphragm weakness, which is an important problem in the intensive care unit (ICU). This study showed that mechanical ventilation with PEEP resulted in a caudal displacement of the diaphragm, since PEEP increases the end-expiratory volume. Furthermore, their study in rats showed that this displacement resulted in a reduced fiber length and sarcomere length on the short term.
After rats were ventilated with PEEP for 18 hours, it was found that adaptation of the diaphragm occurred; i.e. the number of sarcomeres were decreased. It is hypothesized that this adaptation may also occur in mechanically ventilated patients. This could lead to problems in weaning a patient off the ventilator, as PEEP is abruptly removed during a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT). This leads to a reduction in end-expiratory volume which would mean that the newly-adapted diaphragm fibers are being stretched. These stretched muscle fibers are not working at their optimal length of the force-length relation, thereby contributing to diaphragm weakness.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| PEEP level of 5 cmH2O | Active Comparator | During second part of the study (MRI) Diaphragm position |
|
| PEEP level of 10 cmH2O | Active Comparator | During second part of the study (MRI) Diaphragm position |
|
| PEEP level of 15 cmH2O | Active Comparator | During second part of the study (MRI) Diaphragm position |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PEEP: 5 cmH2O | Other | During second part of the study (MRI) |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Changes in diaphragm's position | Changes in the position of the diaphragm during different PEEP levels, as measured with both ultrasound and MRI | 2 hours |
| Changes in diaphragm's shape and length | Changes of the diaphragm's shape and length during different PEEP levels, as measured with MRI | 2 hours |
| Changes in diaphragm's efficiency | Changes in the neuro-mechanical efficiency of the diaphragm (ratio between pressure and electrical muscle activity) during different PEEP levels, as measured with a nasogastric catheter | 2 hours |
| Change in twitch transdiaphragmatic pressures | Twitch transdiaphragmatic pressures during different PEEP levels, as measured with magnetic stimulation of the phrenic nerves. | 2 hours |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Difference between MRI and ultrasound | The difference between diaphragm parameters obtained by ultrasound and parameters obtained by MRI | 2 hours |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Expiratory abdominal muscle activity | Expiratory abdominal muscle activity during different levels of PEEP measured with surface EMG electrodes | 2 hours |
| Flow | Flow during different levels of PEEP measured by the non-invasive ventilator |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Leo Heunks, MD, PhD | Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VU Medical Center | Amsterdam | North Holland | 1081 HV | Netherlands |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
All participants will receive the same protocol with different levels of PEEP ventilation during the first part of the study (physiological part), so the interventional study model for this part is single group. During the second part (MRI), participants are randomized for one of the three available PEEP levels (5, 10 or 15 cmH2O), so the study model for this part is parallel.
Not provided
Not provided
The assessor of the MRI measurements will analyze the MRI data in a blinded fashion. The rest of the outcomes will not be analyzed in a blinded fashion.
| PEEP: 10 cmH2O |
| Other |
During second part of the study (MRI) |
|
| PEEP: 15 cmH2O | Other | During second part of the study (MRI) |
|
| 2 hours |