Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Opera CRO, a TIGERMED Group Company | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
mRDX-02-17 is a device for facial beauty care composed of hyaluronic acid in a concentration of 1.5% (p/v), as a functional ingredient, recommended for the correction and treatment of wrinkles and dermal depressions.
The primary hypothesis of this clinical investigation is that, at 30 days after the 60 days of treatment with mRDX-02-17, the mean WSRS score assessed by the investigator will decrease with at least 0.5 points compared to baseline evaluation.
Minimally invasive procedures (injectable dermal fillers) are among the techniques preferred by an increasing number of specialists in Aesthetics due to their clinical performance regarding volume restoration and favorable safety profile.
An evaluation of pre-clinical data was performed before the clinical investigation design.
Similar dermal fillers have been used in several clinical investigations in humans with a good rate of clinical success and good safety profiles.
During January - March 2018, review of the scientific literature was performed, to find similar investigations to determine the minimal clinically significant difference between Baseline and a period of 30 days after the end the treatment.
Considering the exploratory nature of this study and the fact that this investigation is first-in-human, the clinical investigation is designed to have a number of 7 study visits and a treatment period of 60 days.
In a similar dermal filler study, Takanobu Mashiko et al used a 5-grade WSRS and showed that at 4 weeks after treatment, they achieved a 1.7 ± 0.5 (mean ± SD) improvement between those visits.
The primary objectives included in the present clinical investigation are the performance of the medical device in terms of absolute change of Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) score assessed by Investigator at 90 days after the initiation of treatment with mRDX-02-17 dermal filler, compared to Baseline Visit (day 0), and overall safety of the medical device.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| mRDX-02-17 | Experimental | mRDX-02-17 is a dermal filler recommended for correction and treatment of wrinkles and dermal depressions, which are administered by intradermal injections. It encourages repair and restructuring of skin tissue, reducing the signs of aging and has the following indications:
|
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| mRDX-02-17 | Device | mRDX -02-17 is a dermal filler recommended for the correction and treatment of wrinkles and dermal depressions. It is a sterile and viscous aqueous solution of hyaluronic acid in a concentration of 1.5% (p/v) with acetyl tetrapeptide-9 and palmitoyl tripeptide-5, as auxiliary ingredients which is administrated by intradermal injections. This medical device encourages repair and restructuring of skin tissue and reduces the signs of aging. mRDX -02-17 is indicated for patients with hypotrophic tissues, Crow's feet, Glogau III-IV, all skin photo types (Fitzpatrick I - VI) and a WSRS score (Wrinkle Severity Ranking Scale) from 2 to 5. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) Score | The Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale is a 5-grade score scale, evaluating the severity of the facial wrinkles and comprising descriptive answers, numbered from 1 to 5. The best possible answer is 1 (no folds, continuos skin line) and the worst possible answer is 5 (extremely deep and long folds). This scale is evaluated by an investigator | 90 days |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) Score | The Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale is a 5-grade score scale, evaluating the severity of the facial wrinkles and comprising descriptive answers, numbered from 1 to 5. The best possible answer is 1 (no folds, continuos skin line) and the worst possible answer is 5 (extremely deep and long folds). This scale is evaluated by the subject. | 0, 15, 30, 45, 60 and 90 days |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of adverse events | Collection of adverse events during each visit | 0, 15, 30, 45, 60 and 90 days |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Luis Luis, MD | Medical Affairs Director | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Societatea Civila Medicala Doctor Rosu | Timișoara | 300209 | Romania | |||
| Hyperclinica Medlife Sucursala Timisoara |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20844296 | Background | Fitzgerald R, Graivier MH, Kane M, Lorenc ZP, Vleggaar D, Werschler WP, Kenkel JM. Update on facial aging. Aesthet Surg J. 2010 Jul-Aug;30 Suppl:11S-24S. doi: 10.1177/1090820X10378696. | |
| 25081082 | Background | Sudha PN, Rose MH. Beneficial effects of hyaluronic acid. Adv Food Nutr Res. 2014;72:137-176. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-800269-8.00009-9. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
mRDX-02-17 is recommended for correction and treatment of wrinkles and dermal depressions, when administered by intradermal injection.
This is a multi-center, open-label, non-randomized, single-group clinical investigation in subjects aged 35-65 years old seeking facial rejuvenation.
Because it is a medical device with an innovative composition and that it is a first-in-human investigation, we preferred an exploratory approach for the investigation design. The main objectives and clinical endpoints are the performance and the safety profile of the investigational device.
The total study duration will be approximately 3 months or 90 days.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Score | The Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale is a 5-grade score scale, evaluating the general appearance, comprising descriptive answers, numbered from 1 to 5. The best possible answer is 1 (optimal cosmetic result) and the worst possible answer is 5 (the appearance is worse than the original condition). This scale is evaluated by the subject. | 15, 30, 45, 60 and 90 days |
| Treatment Satisfaction | Questionnaire related to Treatment satisfaction assessed by the subject | 30 and 90 days |
| Choice of Recommendation | The choice of recommending further the treatment will be assessed by the subject at the final visit. It includes a 3-point scale. The subject must evaluate the treatment from the perspective of recommending it further by marking one of the the following answers: yes, perhaps or no. | 90 days |
| Timișoara |
| 300551 |
| Romania |
| Background | The European Medical Device Regulations Annex VIII. Classification rules. April 2017. |
| Background | ISO 14155:2011. Clinical investigation of medical devices for human subjects - Good clinical practice. |
| 26893992 | Background | Mashiko T, Kinoshita K, Kanayama K, Feng J, Yoshimura K. Perpendicular Strut Injection of Hyaluronic Acid Filler for Deep Wrinkles. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2015 Dec 9;3(11):e567. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000552. eCollection 2015 Nov. |
| 27274627 | Background | Kim BW, Moon IJ, Yun WJ, Chung BY, Kim SD, Lee GY, Chang SE. A Randomized, Evaluator-Blinded, Split-Face Comparison Study of the Efficacy and Safety of a Novel Mannitol Containing Monophasic Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Filler for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Nasolabial Folds. Ann Dermatol. 2016 Jun;28(3):297-303. doi: 10.5021/ad.2016.28.3.297. Epub 2016 May 25. |
| 25821787 | Background | Kopera D, Palatin M, Bartsch R, Bartsch K, O'Rourke M, Holler S, Baumgartner RR, Prinz M. An open-label uncontrolled, multicenter study for the evaluation of the efficacy and safety of the dermal filler Princess VOLUME in the treatment of nasolabial folds. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:195328. doi: 10.1155/2015/195328. Epub 2015 Mar 3. |
| 25964628 | Background | Few J, Cox SE, Paradkar-Mitragotri D, Murphy DK. A Multicenter, Single-Blind Randomized, Controlled Study of a Volumizing Hyaluronic Acid Filler for Midface Volume Deficit: Patient-Reported Outcomes at 2 Years. Aesthet Surg J. 2015 Jul;35(5):589-99. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjv050. Epub 2015 May 11. |
| 23687448 | Background | Callan P, Goodman GJ, Carlisle I, Liew S, Muzikants P, Scamp T, Halstead MB, Rogers JD. Efficacy and safety of a hyaluronic acid filler in subjects treated for correction of midface volume deficiency: a 24 month study. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2013 Mar 20;6:81-9. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S40581. Print 2013. |
| 28040813 | Background | Dong J, Gantz M, Goldenberg G. Efficacy and safety of new dermal fillers. Cutis. 2016 Nov;98(5):309-313. |
| 25926750 | Background | De Boulle K, Heydenrych I. Patient factors influencing dermal filler complications: prevention, assessment, and treatment. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2015 Apr 15;8:205-14. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S80446. eCollection 2015. |
| 27621659 | Background | Rivkin AZ. Volume correction in the aging hand: role of dermal fillers. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2016 Aug 30;9:225-32. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S92853. eCollection 2016. |
| 27799807 | Background | Kuhne U, Esmann J, von Heimburg D, Imhof M, Weissenberger P, Sattler G. Safety and performance of cohesive polydensified matrix hyaluronic acid fillers with lidocaine in the clinical setting - an open-label, multicenter study. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2016 Oct 20;9:373-381. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S115256. eCollection 2016. |
| 23190816 | Background | Lorenc ZP, Bank D, Kane M, Lin X, Smith S. Validation of a four-point photographic scale for the assessment of midface volume loss and/or contour deficiency. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Dec;130(6):1330-1336. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31826d9fa6. |
| 10231509 | Background | Chen WY, Abatangelo G. Functions of hyaluronan in wound repair. Wound Repair Regen. 1999 Mar-Apr;7(2):79-89. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-475x.1999.00079.x. |
| 21779421 | Background | McCall-Perez F, Stephens TJ, Herndon JH Jr. Efficacy and tolerability of a facial serum for fine lines, wrinkles, and photodamaged skin. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2011 Jul;4(7):51-4. |
| 22759252 | Background | Rzany B, Cartier H, Kestemont P, Trevidic P, Sattler G, Kerrouche N, Dhuin JC, Ma YM. Full-face rejuvenation using a range of hyaluronic acid fillers: efficacy, safety, and patient satisfaction over 6 months. Dermatol Surg. 2012 Jul;38(7 Pt 2):1153-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2012.02470.x. |
| 20725567 | Background | Van Dyke S, Hays GP, Caglia AE, Caglia M. Severe Acute Local Reactions to a Hyaluronic Acid-derived Dermal Filler. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2010 May;3(5):32-5. |
| 25730536 | Background | Funt D, Pavicic T. Dermal fillers in aesthetics: an overview of adverse events and treatment approaches. Plast Surg Nurs. 2015 Jan-Mar;35(1):13-32. doi: 10.1097/PSN.0000000000000087. |
| Background | Almeida A, Sampaio G. Hyaluronic acid in the rejuvenation of the upper third of the face: review and update - Part 1. 2018. |
| Background | Freedberg et al. Fitzpatrick's Dermatology In General Medicine (Two Vol. Set) 6th edition (May 23, 2003) |
| Background | ISO 14971:2012 Medical devices. Application of risk management to medical devices. |
| Background | ISO 13485:2016. Medical device - Quality management system- Requirements for regulatory purposes. |
| Background | ISO 10993: 2009. Part1. Biological evaluation of medical devices. |
| Background | ISO 14644: 2015 Part 1. Clean rooms and associated controlled environments. |
| Background | ISO 17665-1:2006. Sterilization of health care products -- Moist heat -- Part 1: Requirements for the development, validation and routine control of a sterilization process for medical devices |
| 23125964 | Background | Bhatt A. Protocol deviation and violation. Perspect Clin Res. 2012 Jul;3(3):117. doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.100663. No abstract available. |
| 27453830 | Background | Ghooi RB, Bhosale N, Wadhwani R, Divate P, Divate U. Assessment and classification of protocol deviations. Perspect Clin Res. 2016 Jul-Sep;7(3):132-6. doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.184817. |
| Background | MEDDEV 2.7/3 revision 3 Clinical Investigations: Serious Adverse Event Reporting Under Directives 90/385/EEC and 93/42/EEC. |
| 24141714 | Background | World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.281053. No abstract available. |