Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study was conducted to assess the safety and efficacy of topical Beremagene Geperpavec (KB103, HSV1-COL7) on DEB patients.
The primary objectives were the evaluation of safety, through incidence of adverse events associated with the administration of B-VEC as compared to placebo, as well as the demonstration of molecular correction of the disease by establishing the presence of functional COL7 expression and anchoring fibrils (AF) formation post administration of B-VEC. Additional primary objectives were to assess the proportion of wounds with complete wound closure (≥90% reduction from baseline wound surface area) at Week 8, 10, and 12, the duration of wound closure, and the time to wound closure of B-VEC treated wounds as compared with placebo treated wounds.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Topical beremagene geperpavec | Experimental | HSV1-COL7A1 vector (KB103) |
|
| Placebo | Placebo Comparator | Placebo |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Topical beremagene geperpavec | Biological | Topical gel of non-integrating, replication-incompetent HSV-1 expressing the human collagen VII protein |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Subjects Reported at Least One Adverse Event, Safety Population | Safety assessments included evaluation of medical and medication history, physical / skin examination, vital signs, adverse events, and laboratory evaluations. Due to the 'split-person' intrasubject design, the safety assessments were reported at subject level, but not per intervention. | baseline to 12 weeks |
| Number of Adverse Events Reported, Safety Population | Safety assessments included evaluation of medical and medication history, physical / skin examination, vital signs, adverse events, and laboratory evaluations. Due to the 'split-person' intrasubject design, the safety assessments were reported at subject level, but not per intervention. | baseline to 12 weeks |
| Complete Wound Closure Responder, ITT Population | One wound is a responder if the reduction from baseline in wound surface is ≥90%. | from baseline at Weeks 8, 10, and 12 |
| Time to Wound Closure Analysis, ITT Population | Time to wound closure was defined as the time from the first treatment to Complete Wound Closure (≥90% reduction in wound surface area from baseline) | baseline to complete wound closure |
| Duration of Wound Closure, ITT Population | Duration of wound closure | Time from the complete closure to the first reopening of the same wound |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Clinical diagnosis of the recessive form of dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB).
Age
Willing and able to give consent/assent
Confirmation of RDEB diagnosis by genetic testing, IF, and IEM
LH24 antibody negative (non-collagenous [NC] 2domain [NC2-]) and NC1 domain [NC1+]). (This criterion is applicable to the first 2 adults on the study (Phase 1). Subsequent subjects can be NC1+ or NC1-)
Confirmed RDEB COL7A1 mutations in subject
Wound that meets the wound size/surface area entry criteria:
Subjects, who are, in the opinion of the investigator, able to understand the study, cooperate with the study procedures, and are willing to return to the clinic for all the required follow-up visits.
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stanford University | Stanford | California | 94305 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 35347281 | Result | Gurevich I, Agarwal P, Zhang P, Dolorito JA, Oliver S, Liu H, Reitze N, Sarma N, Bagci IS, Sridhar K, Kakarla V, Yenamandra VK, O'Malley M, Prisco M, Tufa SF, Keene DR, South AP, Krishnan SM, Marinkovich MP. In vivo topical gene therapy for recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa: a phase 1 and 2 trial. Nat Med. 2022 Apr;28(4):780-788. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01737-y. Epub 2022 Mar 28. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | All Participants ("Topical Beremagene Geperpavec (B-VEC)", and "Placebo") | The randomization scheme and subject-specific randomization envelopes were created for each phase of the study for each subject. At the baseline visit, subjects were assigned a randomization number and the investigator selected either 2 (Phase 1, B-VEC: Placebo = 1:1), 3 (Phase 2a and 2b, B-VEC: Placebo = 2:1), or 2 (Phase 2c, B-VEC: Placebo = 1:1) similar sized wounds, as applicable. Using the randomization scheme with the subject-specific envelope, the wounds were assigned to either B-VEC or placebo. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Safety population
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | All Participants ("Topical Beremagene Geperpavec (B-VEC)", and "Placebo") | The randomization scheme and subject-specific randomization envelopes were created for each phase of the study. At the baseline visit, subjects were assigned a randomization number and the investigator selected either 2 (Phase 1, B-VEC: Placebo = 1:1), 3 (Phase 2a and 2b, B-VEC: Placebo = 2:1), or 2 (Phase 2c, B-VEC: Placebo = 1:1) similar sized wounds, as applicable. Using the randomization scheme with the subject-specific envelope, the wounds were assigned to either B-VEC or placebo. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Number of Subjects Reported at Least One Adverse Event, Safety Population | Safety assessments included evaluation of medical and medication history, physical / skin examination, vital signs, adverse events, and laboratory evaluations. Due to the 'split-person' intrasubject design, the safety assessments were reported at subject level, but not per intervention. | Safety population included all subjects administered B-VEC or Placebo. Due to the 'split-person' intrasubject design, the safety assessments were reported at subject level, but not per intervention. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | baseline to 12 weeks |
|
3 months
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | All Participants ("Topical Beremagene Geperpavec (B-VEC)", and "Placebo") | The randomization scheme and subject-specific randomization envelopes were created for each phase of the study. At the baseline visit, subjects were assigned a randomization number and the investigator selected either 2 (Phase 1, B-VEC: Placebo = 1:1), 3 (Phase 2a and 2b, B-VEC: Placebo = 2:1), or 2 (Phase 2c, B-VEC: Placebo = 1:1) similar sized wounds, as applicable. Using the randomization scheme with the subject-specific envelope, the wounds were assigned to either B-VEC or placebo. Due to the 'split-person'/intrasubject design, each subject received both B-VEC and Placebo. Therefore, the safety assessments were reported at subject level, but not per intervention. The site/treatment specific information on AEs was not systematically collected in a prospective fashion, therefore it was not reported. |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application site pruritus | General disorders | MedDRA (21.1) | Systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Hubert Chen, MD, Senior Vice President of Clinical Development | Krystal Biotech | (412) 586-5830 | inquiries@krystalbio.com |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Aug 1, 2019 | Jun 6, 2022 | Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | May 15, 2020 | Jun 6, 2022 | SAP_001.pdf |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D016108 | Epidermolysis Bullosa Dystrophica |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004820 | Epidermolysis Bullosa |
| D012868 | Skin Abnormalities |
| D000013 | Congenital Abnormalities |
| D009358 | Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities |
Not provided
Not provided
Intrasubject treatment assignment/randomization
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Placebo gel | Biological | Placebo gel |
|
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
|
|
| Primary | Number of Adverse Events Reported, Safety Population | Safety assessments included evaluation of medical and medication history, physical / skin examination, vital signs, adverse events, and laboratory evaluations. Due to the 'split-person' intrasubject design, the safety assessments were reported at subject level, but not per intervention. | Safety population included all subjects administered B-VEC or Placebo. Due to the 'split-person' intrasubject design, the safety assessments were reported at subject level, but not per intervention. | Posted | Number | number of adverse events | baseline to 12 weeks |
|
|
|
| Primary | Complete Wound Closure Responder, ITT Population | One wound is a responder if the reduction from baseline in wound surface is ≥90%. | The intent-to-treat (ITT) population: subjects who were administered KB103 who have had at least one paired assessment of the target wound area post-administration, i.e., at least one KB103 target wound and one placebo target wound. The Safety population: all subjects who were administered IP. The per-protocol (PP) population: all subjects in the ITT population who have had at least one paired assessment of the target wound area post-administration and completed the protocol as planned. | Posted | Number | number of responder | from baseline at Weeks 8, 10, and 12 | Wounds | Wounds |
|
|
|
| Primary | Time to Wound Closure Analysis, ITT Population | Time to wound closure was defined as the time from the first treatment to Complete Wound Closure (≥90% reduction in wound surface area from baseline) | Intent to treat (ITT) included all subjects who were administered IP and had at least 1 post dose paired wound assessment. | Posted | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | days | baseline to complete wound closure | Wounds | Wounds |
|
|
|
|
| Primary | Duration of Wound Closure, ITT Population | Duration of wound closure | ITT population included all subjects who were administered IP and had at least 1 post dose paired wound assessment. | Posted | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | days | Time from the complete closure to the first reopening of the same wound | Wounds | Wounds |
|
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 12 |
| 0 |
| 12 |
| 9 |
| 12 |
| Application site bruise | General disorders | MedDRA (21.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Application site erythema | General disorders | MedDRA (21.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Application site rash | General disorders | MedDRA (21.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Fatigue | General disorders | MedDRA (21.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Feeling cold | General disorders | MedDRA (21.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Injection site erythema | General disorders | MedDRA (21.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Injection site pain | General disorders | MedDRA (21.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Injection site swelling | General disorders | MedDRA (21.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pyrexia | General disorders | MedDRA (21.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Bacterial vaginosis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (21.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pharyngitis streptococcal | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (21.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Purulent discharge | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (21.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Wound infection pseuomonas | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (21.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Erythema | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (21.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pruritis | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (21.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Rash | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (21.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Rash generalised | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (21.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (21.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (21.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Bacterial test positive | Investigations | MedDRA (21.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Nasal congestion | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (21.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Throat irritation | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (21.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Gastrostomy | Surgical and medical procedures | MedDRA (21.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Wound Treatment | Surgical and medical procedures | MedDRA (21.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Drug hypersensitivity | Immune system disorders | MedDRA (21.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Wound complication | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (21.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Product taste abnormal | Product Issues | MedDRA (21.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| D012873 | Skin Diseases, Genetic |
| D030342 | Genetic Diseases, Inborn |
| D003095 | Collagen Diseases |
| D003240 | Connective Tissue Diseases |
| D017437 | Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |
| D012871 | Skin Diseases |
| D012872 | Skin Diseases, Vesiculobullous |
|
| Week 10 |
|
|
| Week 12 |
|
|