Mindfulness is measured using the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire. Mindfulness (Baer et al. 2006) was assessed with a 5-point response option (1 = never or very rarely true, 5 = every often or always true) and mean scores were computed for each subscale. A higher score indicates greater levels of mindfulness. Subscales include observing (8 items), describing (8 items), acting with awareness (8 items), non-judging of inner experience (8 items), and non-reactivity to inner experience (7 items).

Mindfulness is measured using the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire. Mindfulness (Baer et al. 2006) was assessed with a 5-point response option (1 = never or very rarely true, 5 = every often or always true) and mean scores were computed for each subscale. A higher score indicates greater levels of mindfulness. Subscales include observing (8 items), describing (8 items), acting with awareness (8 items), non-judging of inner experience (8 items), and non-reactivity to inner experience (7 items).

Mindfulness is measured using the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire. Mindfulness (Baer et al. 2006) was assessed with a 5-point response option (1 = never or very rarely true, 5 = every often or always true) and mean scores were computed for each subscale. A higher score indicates greater levels of mindfulness. Subscales include observing (8 items), describing (8 items), acting with awareness (8 items), non-judging of inner experience (8 items), and non-reactivity to inner experience (7 items).

Mindfulness is measured using the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire. Mindfulness (Baer et al. 2006) was assessed with a 5-point response option (1 = never or very rarely true, 5 = every often or always true) and mean scores were computed for each subscale. A higher score indicates greater levels of mindfulness. Subscales include observing (8 items), describing (8 items), acting with awareness (8 items), non-judging of inner experience (8 items), and non-reactivity to inner experience (7 items).

Emotion Regulation is measured with the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale. Emotional regulation (Gratz and Roemer, 2004) was assessed with a 5-point response option (1 = almost never, 5 = almost always) and mean scores were computed for each subscale. A higher score indicates greater levels of emotional regulation. Subscales include non-acceptance of emotional response (6 items), difficulties engaging in goals (5 items), impulse control difficulties (6 items), lack of emotional awareness (6 items), limited access to emotion regulation strategies (8 items), and lack of emotional clarity (6 items).

Emotion Regulation is measured with the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale. Emotional regulation (Gratz and Roemer, 2004) was assessed with a 5-point response option (1 = almost never, 5 = almost always) and mean scores were computed for each subscale. A higher score indicates greater levels of emotional regulation. Subscales include non-acceptance of emotional response (6 items), difficulties engaging in goals (5 items), impulse control difficulties (6 items), lack of emotional awareness (6 items), limited access to emotion regulation strategies (8 items), and lack of emotional clarity (6 items).

Emotion Regulation is measured with the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale. Emotional regulation (Gratz and Roemer, 2004) was assessed with a 5-point response option (1 = almost never, 5 = almost always) and mean scores were computed for each subscale. A higher score indicates greater levels of emotional regulation. Subscales include non-acceptance of emotional response (6 items), difficulties engaging in goals (5 items), impulse control difficulties (6 items), lack of emotional awareness (6 items), limited access to emotion regulation strategies (8 items), and lack of emotional clarity (6 items).

Emotion Regulation is measured with the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale. Emotional regulation (Gratz and Roemer, 2004) was assessed with a 5-point response option (1 = almost never, 5 = almost always) and mean scores were computed for each subscale. A higher score indicates greater levels of emotional regulation. Subscales include non-acceptance of emotional response (6 items), difficulties engaging in goals (5 items), impulse control difficulties (6 items), lack of emotional awareness (6 items), limited access to emotion regulation strategies (8 items), and lack of emotional clarity (6 items).

Emotion Regulation is measured with the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale. Emotional regulation (Gratz and Roemer, 2004) was assessed with a 5-point response option (1 = almost never, 5 = almost always) and mean scores were computed for each subscale. A higher score indicates greater levels of emotional regulation. Subscales include non-acceptance of emotional response (6 items), difficulties engaging in goals (5 items), impulse control difficulties (6 items), lack of emotional awareness (6 items), limited access to emotion regulation strategies (8 items), and lack of emotional clarity (6 items).

Emotion Regulation is measured with the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale. Emotional regulation (Gratz and Roemer, 2004) was assessed with a 5-point response option (1 = almost never, 5 = almost always) and mean scores were computed for each subscale. A higher score indicates greater levels of emotional regulation. Subscales include non-acceptance of emotional response (6 items), difficulties engaging in goals (5 items), impulse control difficulties (6 items), lack of emotional awareness (6 items), limited access to emotion regulation strategies (8 items), and lack of emotional clarity (6 items).

Proportion of participants that use e-cigarette use as measured by Youth Substances Interview

Proportion of participants that use alcohol use as measured by Youth Substances Interview

Proportion of participants that use marijuana use as measured by Youth Substances Interview

Mindfulness is measured using the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire. Mindfulness (Baer et al. 2006) was assessed with a 5-point response option (1 = never or very rarely true, 5 = every often or always true) and mean scores were computed for each subscale. A higher score indicates greater levels of mindfulness. Subscales include observing (8 items), describing (8 items), acting with awareness (8 items), non-judging of inner experience (8 items), and non-reactivity to inner experience (7 items).

Mindfulness is measured using the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire. Mindfulness (Baer et al. 2006) was assessed with a 5-point response option (1 = never or very rarely true, 5 = every often or always true) and mean scores were computed for each subscale. A higher score indicates greater levels of mindfulness. Subscales include observing (8 items), describing (8 items), acting with awareness (8 items), non-judging of inner experience (8 items), and non-reactivity to inner experience (7 items).

Mindfulness is measured using the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire. Mindfulness (Baer et al. 2006) was assessed with a 5-point response option (1 = never or very rarely true, 5 = every often or always true) and mean scores were computed for each subscale. A higher score indicates greater levels of mindfulness. Subscales include observing (8 items), describing (8 items), acting with awareness (8 items), non-judging of inner experience (8 items), and non-reactivity to inner experience (7 items).

Mindfulness is measured using the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire. Mindfulness (Baer et al. 2006) was assessed with a 5-point response option (1 = never or very rarely true, 5 = every often or always true) and mean scores were computed for each subscale. A higher score indicates greater levels of mindfulness. Subscales include observing (8 items), describing (8 items), acting with awareness (8 items), non-judging of inner experience (8 items), and non-reactivity to inner experience (7 items).

Mindfulness is measured using the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire. Mindfulness (Baer et al. 2006) was assessed with a 5-point response option (1 = never or very rarely true, 5 = every often or always true) and mean scores were computed for each subscale. A higher score indicates greater levels of mindfulness. Subscales include observing (8 items), describing (8 items), acting with awareness (8 items), non-judging of inner experience (8 items), and non-reactivity to inner experience (7 items).

Emotion Regulation is measured with the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale. Emotional regulation (Gratz and Roemer, 2004) was assessed with a 5-point response option (1 = almost never, 5 = almost always) and mean scores were computed for each subscale. A higher score indicates greater levels of emotional regulation. Subscales include non-acceptance of emotional response (6 items), difficulties engaging in goals (5 items), impulse control difficulties (6 items), lack of emotional awareness (6 items), limited access to emotion regulation strategies (8 items), and lack of emotional clarity (6 items).

Emotion Regulation is measured with the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale. Emotional regulation (Gratz and Roemer, 2004) was assessed with a 5-point response option (1 = almost never, 5 = almost always) and mean scores were computed for each subscale. A higher score indicates greater levels of emotional regulation. Subscales include non-acceptance of emotional response (6 items), difficulties engaging in goals (5 items), impulse control difficulties (6 items), lack of emotional awareness (6 items), limited access to emotion regulation strategies (8 items), and lack of emotional clarity (6 items).

Emotion Regulation is measured with the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale. Emotional regulation (Gratz and Roemer, 2004) was assessed with a 5-point response option (1 = almost never, 5 = almost always) and mean scores were computed for each subscale. A higher score indicates greater levels of emotional regulation. Subscales include non-acceptance of emotional response (6 items), difficulties engaging in goals (5 items), impulse control difficulties (6 items), lack of emotional awareness (6 items), limited access to emotion regulation strategies (8 items), and lack of emotional clarity (6 items).

Emotion Regulation is measured with the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale. Emotional regulation (Gratz and Roemer, 2004) was assessed with a 5-point response option (1 = almost never, 5 = almost always) and mean scores were computed for each subscale. A higher score indicates greater levels of emotional regulation. Subscales include non-acceptance of emotional response (6 items), difficulties engaging in goals (5 items), impulse control difficulties (6 items), lack of emotional awareness (6 items), limited access to emotion regulation strategies (8 items), and lack of emotional clarity (6 items).

Emotion Regulation is measured with the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale. Emotional regulation (Gratz and Roemer, 2004) was assessed with a 5-point response option (1 = almost never, 5 = almost always) and mean scores were computed for each subscale. A higher score indicates greater levels of emotional regulation. Subscales include non-acceptance of emotional response (6 items), difficulties engaging in goals (5 items), impulse control difficulties (6 items), lack of emotional awareness (6 items), limited access to emotion regulation strategies (8 items), and lack of emotional clarity (6 items).

Emotion Regulation is measured with the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale. Emotional regulation (Gratz and Roemer, 2004) was assessed with a 5-point response option (1 = almost never, 5 = almost always) and mean scores were computed for each subscale. A higher score indicates greater levels of emotional regulation. Subscales include non-acceptance of emotional response (6 items), difficulties engaging in goals (5 items), impulse control difficulties (6 items), lack of emotional awareness (6 items), limited access to emotion regulation strategies (8 items), and lack of emotional clarity (6 items).