Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| RX002456 Part 1 | Other Identifier | Department of Veterans Affairs, Rehabilitation R&D | |
| I01RX002456-01A1 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
When prescribing a prosthetic foot, clinicians face a dizzying array of choices as more than 200 different prosthetic feet are available. While these conventional prosthetic feet primarily function in the sagittal plane, the intact foot and ankle comprise a complex set of joints that allow rotation in multiple planes of motion. Some of these motions are coupled, meaning rotation in one plane induces motion in another. One such coupling is between the sagittal and transverse planes. For every step, plantar- and dorsi-flexion motion in the sagittal plane is coupled with external and internal rotation of the shank relative to the foot in the transverse plane. There is no prosthetic foot available for prescription that mimics this natural coupling.
To investigate the need for this coupling, the investigators have built a torsionally adaptive prosthesis where the coupling ratio between the transverse- and sagittal-planes can be independently controlled with a motor.
This research has one specific aim: to identify the optimal coupling ratio between transverse- and sagittal-plane motions using a novel, torsionally adaptive prosthesis for individuals with lower limb amputation. The investigators will conduct a human subject experiment wearing the motor-driven and computer controlled torsionally adaptive prosthesis. Individuals with lower limb amputation will be asked to walk in a straight line and in both directions around a circle while the coupling ratio between transverse- and sagittal-plane motions is varied between trials. Participants will be blinded to the coupling ratio.
The investigators hypothesize that: (1) a coupling ratio exists that minimizes undesirable transverse-plane socket torque and (2) there will be a coupling ratio that individuals with lower limb amputation prefer.
The human ankle is a complex mechanism that does not behave like a simple hinge. Instead, rotations in all three axes are allowed and some are coupled together. In particular, the axis of rotation of the talo-crural joint during ankle flexion is inclined downwards and laterally relative to horizontal, and the rotation ranges from 10 to 26 degrees among individuals. This rotation couples plantar- and dorsi-flexion motion with external and internal rotation of the shank relative to the foot, respectively. This feature of the natural limb has not been replicated in prosthetic feet and ankles.
Lower limb amputees take thousands of steps on their prosthesis each day and none feature coupled motion between the transverse- and sagittal-planes. The absence of this natural coupling may be related to the high incidence of residual limb soft tissue injuries, the need for compensatory gait, and overall dissatisfaction with their prostheses.
Transverse rotation adapters, consisting of simple torsional springs, are available for prescription. These devices can increase transverse-plane rotations and decrease transverse-plane torques, but their use is not widespread and if excessively compliant, may reduce gait stability. Cost, weight, prosthesis build height, and the inability for the user to adjust the stiffness may all play a role in their lack of adoption, but it may also be that the transverse-plane rotation is not coupled with the sagittal-plane. With these devices, motion only occurs in the transverse-plane when a transverse-plane torque is applied.
This research has one specific aim: to identify the optimal coupling ratio between transverse- and sagittal-plane motions using a novel, torsionally adaptive prosthesis for individuals with lower limb amputation. The investigators will fit a sample population of unilateral transtibial amputees with the motor-driven and computer controlled torsionally adaptive prosthesis.
Participants perform three activities: walking in a straight line (study visit 1) and in both directions around a circle (study visit 2). During each of these three activities, the torsionally adaptive prosthesis will be set to five different coupling ratios in random order. Participants will be blinded to the coupling ratio.
The general hypotheses for this study are: (H1) a coupling ratio exists between 0 (no coupling) to 1:2 (one degree of transverse-plane motion for every two degrees of sagittal-plane motion) that minimizes transverse-plane socket torque and (H2) an amputee preferred coupling ratio will exist within this range.
This research will discover how best to couple transverse- and sagittal-plane motion in the prostheses of lower limb amputees.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Straight line walking | Experimental | All participants will walk in a straight line while wearing the study prosthesis. |
|
| Circle walking with prosthesis inside | Experimental | All participants will walk around a 1-meter radius circle with their prosthesis on the inside of the circle. |
|
| Circle walking with prosthesis outside | Experimental | All participants will walk around a 1-meter radius circle with their prosthesis on the outside of the circle. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Torsionally adaptive prosthesis with 0:1 coupling ratio | Device | The torsionally adaptive prosthesis can be programmed to couple the motion between the transverse- and sagittal-planes. A coupling ratio (transverse:sagittal) of 0:1 means there will be no coupling between the transverse- and sagittal-plane motion. That is, regardless of any motion in the sagittal plane, there will be zero motion in the transverse plane. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Peak Transverse-plane Prosthetic Socket Torque Normalized to Body Mass | Peak transverse-plane prosthetic socket torque measured while walking normalized to body mass | During walking trials for each coupling ratio |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Satisfaction With the Prosthesis | An 11-point Likert scale will be used to record the subject's perception of satisfaction with the prosthesis after completing the trials for each coupling ratio. Participants will be asked to rate their satisfaction with the prosthesis on a 0 - 10 scale. Zero represented the most uncomfortable socket fit the subject could imagine, and ten represented the most comfortable socket fit. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Glenn K Klute, PhD | VA Puget Sound Health Care System Seattle Division, Seattle, WA | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VA Puget Sound Health Care System Seattle Division, Seattle, WA | Seattle | Washington | 98108-1532 | United States |
A de-identified, anonymized dataset in machine-readable format will be created and shared for all individual participant data (IPD) that underlie results in a publication. The investigators will follow 164.514(a) of the HIPAA Privacy Rule for de-identification of IPD.
Not provided
Within six months after publication of final study findings.
Open access through PubMed Central, SimTK, PhysioNet, or other similar open-source data repository websites. The investigators will work with manuscript publishers when possible to link the final study data sets to an appendix of supplemental materials on the publisher websites.
Not provided
Two enrolled participants decided they were no longer interested in participating before beginning the study protocol. One enrolled participant had a long residual limb and could not accommodate the build height of the study intervention.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Individuals With a Lower Limb Prosthesis | In this cross-over study, all subjects were asked to perform 3 activities:
While performing each of these activities, the study intervention was set to 5 different settings (5 sagittal:transverse coupling ratio, 1:0, 6:1, 4:1, 3:1, and 2:1). These settings were block randomized and blinded to the participant. The study was conducted over two visits with overnight rest in between each visit. During the first study visit, participants performed the walking in a straight line activity. During the second study visit, participants walked around a 2-meter diameter circle with the study intervention (prosthesis) on the inside and the outside of the circle. The order in which the participants walked with the study intervention (prosthesis) on the inside or the outside of the circle was randomized. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Jun 25, 2021 | Oct 14, 2025 |
Not provided
This within-subject, cross-over, factorial design study (3 arms x 5 intervention settings) aims to identify the optimal coupling ratio between transverse- and sagittal-plane motions using a torsionally adaptive prosthesis. The 3 arms including walking in a straight line (study visit 1) and walking in a circle with their lower limb prosthesis on the inside and outside of the circle (study visit 2). The order in which the participants walk around a circle with their prosthesis on the inside or the outside will be randomized. The study intervention, a torsionally adaptive prosthesis, can be set to 5 different settings (i.e., coupling ratios) including 0:0, 1:6, 1:4, 1:3, and 1:2 (transverse:sagittal). Within each arm, each participant will walk with the torsionally adaptive prosthesis set to the 5 different settings in random order. Participants will not be blinded to the arm but will be blinded to the intervention setting (coupling ratio).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Torsionally adaptive prosthesis with 1:6 coupling ratio | Device | The torsionally adaptive prosthesis can be programmed to couple the motion between the transverse- and sagittal-planes. A coupling ratio (transverse:sagittal) of 1:6 means there will be one degree of motion in the transverse plane for every six degrees of motion in the sagittal plane. |
|
| Torsionally adaptive prosthesis with 1:4 coupling ratio | Device | The torsionally adaptive prosthesis can be programmed to couple the motion between the transverse- and sagittal-planes. A coupling ratio (transverse:sagittal) of 1:4 means there will be one degree of motion in the transverse plane for every four degrees of motion in the sagittal plane. |
|
| Torsionally adaptive prosthesis with 1:3 coupling ratio | Device | The torsionally adaptive prosthesis can be programmed to couple the motion between the transverse- and sagittal-planes. A coupling ratio (transverse:sagittal) of 1:3 means there will be one degree of motion in the transverse plane for every three degrees of motion in the sagittal plane. |
|
| Torsionally adaptive prosthesis with 1:2 coupling ratio | Device | The torsionally adaptive prosthesis can be programmed to couple the motion between the transverse- and sagittal-planes. A coupling ratio (transverse:sagittal) of 1:2 means there will be one degree of motion in the transverse plane for every two degrees of motion in the sagittal plane. |
|
| Immediately following walking trials for each coupling ratio |
| ** Straight Line Walking |
|
| Straight Line Walking With 0:1 Coupling Ratio |
|
| Straight Line Walking With 1:6 Coupling Ratio |
|
| Straight Line Walking With 1:4 Coupling Ratio |
|
| Straight Line Walking With 1:3 Coupling Ratio |
|
| Straight Line Walking With 1:2 Coupling Ratio |
|
| ** Circle Walking With Prosthesis on the Inside |
|
| Circle Walking With Prosthesis on the Inside and 0:1 Coupling Ratio |
|
| Circle Walking With Prosthesis on the Inside and 1:6 Coupling Ratio |
|
| Circle Walking With Prosthesis on the Inside and 1:4 Coupling Ratio |
|
| Circle Walking With Prosthesis on the Inside and 1:3 Coupling Ratio |
|
| Circle Walking With Prosthesis on the Inside and 1:2 Coupling Ratio |
|
| ** Circle Walking With Prosthesis on the Outside |
|
| Circle Walking With Prosthesis on the Outside and 0:1 Coupling Ratio |
|
| Circle Walking With Prosthesis on the Outside and 1:6 Coupling Ratio |
|
| Circle Walking With Prosthesis on the Outside and 1:4 Coupling Ratio |
|
| Circle Walking With Prosthesis on the Outside and 1:3 Coupling Ratio |
|
| Circle Walking With Prosthesis on the Outside and 1:2 Coupling Ratio |
|
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Individuals With a Lower Limb Amputation | All participants were block randomized to the order in which they walked in a straight line, walked around a 2m diameter circle with their prosthesis on the inside of the circle, and walked around a 2m diameter circle with their prosthesis on the outside of the circle. Additionally, the order of the sagittal:transverse coupling ratio of 1:0, 6:1, 4:1, 3:1, and 2:1 were also block randomized and blinded to the participant. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Peak Transverse-plane Prosthetic Socket Torque Normalized to Body Mass | Peak transverse-plane prosthetic socket torque measured while walking normalized to body mass | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | Nm/kg | During walking trials for each coupling ratio |
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Satisfaction With the Prosthesis | An 11-point Likert scale will be used to record the subject's perception of satisfaction with the prosthesis after completing the trials for each coupling ratio. Participants will be asked to rate their satisfaction with the prosthesis on a 0 - 10 scale. Zero represented the most uncomfortable socket fit the subject could imagine, and ten represented the most comfortable socket fit. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Immediately following walking trials for each coupling ratio |
|
1 week
In this study, subjects only wore the study intervention while in the laboratory under supervision of laboratory staff. Because the 3 arms (activities) and the 5 intervention settings could be quickly changed, adverse events for all arms and interventions were combined.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Individuals With a Lower Limb Amputation | All participants performed walking in a straight line (study visit 1) and walking in a circle with their lower limb prosthesis on the inside and outside of the circle (study visit 2). The order in which the participants walked around a circle with their prosthesis on the inside or the outside was randomized. During each walking activity, the participants experienced each of the five different intervention settings (i.e., coupling ratios) in random order. Participants were blinded to the intervention setting. | 0 | 11 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glenn Klute, PhD | CLiMB | 206.277.6724 | Glenn.Klute@va.gov |
| Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Sep 23, 2025 | Sep 23, 2025 | SAP_001.pdf |
| ICF | No | No | Yes | Informed Consent Form | Mar 31, 2021 | Oct 14, 2025 | ICF_002.pdf |
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| White |
|
| More than one race |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
|
| Sagittal:transverse coupling ratio 4:1 |
|
| Sagittal:transverse coupling ratio 3:1 |
|
| Sagittal:transverse coupling ratio 2:1 |
|
| 0.047 |
Pairwise hypothesis testing was carried out with adjustments for multiple comparisons using Tukey's method. |
| Superiority |
| 6:1 versus 2:1 | Regression, Linear | 0.016 | Pairwise hypothesis testing was carried out with adjustments for multiple comparisons using Tukey's method. | Superiority |
| Hypothesis testing for the association between outcome and coupling ratio was carried out using conditional F-tests with degrees of freedom estimated using the Kenward-Roger method. | Regression, Linear | 0.340 | Superiority |
| Hypothesis testing for the association between outcome and coupling ratio was carried out using conditional F-tests with degrees of freedom estimated using the Kenward-Roger method. | Regression, Linear | 0.040 | Superiority |
| 6:1 versus 3:1 | Regression, Linear | 0.036 | Pairwise hypothesis testing was carried out with adjustments for multiple comparisons using Tukey's method. | Superiority |
| 6:1 versus 2:1 | Regression, Linear | 0.028 | Pairwise hypothesis testing was carried out with adjustments for multiple comparisons using Tukey's method. | Superiority |
| OG001 | Circle Walking With Prosthesis Inside | All participants will walk around a 1-meter radius circle with their prosthesis on the inside of the circle. The torsionally adaptive prosthesis can be programmed to couple the motion between the transverse- and sagittal-planes. Torsionally adaptive prosthesis with 0:1 coupling ratio. A coupling ratio (transverse:sagittal) of 0:1 means there will be no coupling between the transverse- and sagittal-plane motion. That is, regardless of any motion in the sagittal plane, there will be zero motion in the transverse plane. Torsionally adaptive prosthesis with 1:6 coupling ratio. A coupling ratio (transverse:sagittal) of 1:6 means there will be one degree of motion in the transverse plane for every six degrees of motion in the sagittal plane. Torsionally adaptive prosthesis with 1:4 coupling ratio. A coupling ratio (transverse:sagittal) of 1:4 means there will be one degree of motion in the transverse plane for every four degrees of motion in the sagittal plane. Torsionally adaptive prosthesis with 1:3 coupling ratio. A coupling ratio (transverse:sagittal) of 1:3 means there will be one degree of motion in the transverse plane for every three degrees of motion in the sagittal plane. Torsionally adaptive prosthesis with 1:2 coupling ratio. A coupling ratio (transverse:sagittal) of 1:2 means there will be one degree of motion in the transverse plane for every two degrees of motion in the sagittal plane. |
| OG002 | Circle Walking With Prosthesis Outside | All participants will walk around a 1-meter radius circle with their prosthesis on the outside of the circle. The torsionally adaptive prosthesis can be programmed to couple the motion between the transverse- and sagittal-planes. Torsionally adaptive prosthesis with 0:1 coupling ratio. A coupling ratio (transverse:sagittal) of 0:1 means there will be no coupling between the transverse- and sagittal-plane motion. That is, regardless of any motion in the sagittal plane, there will be zero motion in the transverse plane. Torsionally adaptive prosthesis with 1:6 coupling ratio. A coupling ratio (transverse:sagittal) of 1:6 means there will be one degree of motion in the transverse plane for every six degrees of motion in the sagittal plane. Torsionally adaptive prosthesis with 1:4 coupling ratio. A coupling ratio (transverse:sagittal) of 1:4 means there will be one degree of motion in the transverse plane for every four degrees of motion in the sagittal plane. Torsionally adaptive prosthesis with 1:3 coupling ratio. A coupling ratio (transverse:sagittal) of 1:3 means there will be one degree of motion in the transverse plane for every three degrees of motion in the sagittal plane. Torsionally adaptive prosthesis with 1:2 coupling ratio. A coupling ratio (transverse:sagittal) of 1:2 means there will be one degree of motion in the transverse plane for every two degrees of motion in the sagittal plane. |
|
|