Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A prospective study designed to show the superiority of contrast guided echoendoscopy versus conventional echoendoscopy
A prospective study that compares the results using FNA contrast echoendoscopy versus standard FNA echoendoscopy in the diagnosis of solid pancreatic tumors
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| contrast enhanced FNA endosonography | Active Comparator | First passage in the solid pancreatic tumor using FNA endosonography then with the contrast enhanced FNA endosonography |
|
| FNA standard endosonography | Active Comparator | First passage in the solid pancreatic tumor using contrast enhanced FNA endosonography then with the FNA endosonography |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Endosonography | Diagnostic Test | Puncture of the pancreatic solid mass with fine needle aspiration under endoscopic ultrasonographic control. Passage in the same pancreatic mass of first using standard FNA method then contrast enhanced FNA method or vice versa according to the randomization |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Diagnostic accuracy of CEUS FNA endosonography versus standard FNA endosonography in the etiological cyto histological of pancreatic solid tumors using histology core as comparison between the two methods | Diagnostic accuracy of CEUS FNA endosonography versus standard FNA endosonography in the etiological cyto histological of pancreatic solid tumors using histology core as comparison between the two methods | an average of 2 years |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Quality of histological specimen(histology core) obtained with the two types of FNA biopsies (contrast enhanced and standard) | Visual analogic scale | 5 days |
| Dysfunction in the two types of biopsies |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Seicean Andrada | Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology "Octavian Fodor"Cluj-Napoca | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seicean Andrada | Cluj-Napoca | Cluj | Romania |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25793739 | Background | Hou X, Jin Z, Xu C, Zhang M, Zhu J, Jiang F, Li Z. Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions: a retrospective study. PLoS One. 2015 Mar 20;10(3):e0121236. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121236. eCollection 2015. | |
| 21535197 | Background |
Not provided
Not provided
The Study is used to show the superiority of CEUS-FNA endosonography Versus standard FNA endosonography in diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D019160 | Endosonography |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014463 | Ultrasonography |
| D003952 | Diagnostic Imaging |
| D019937 | Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures |
| D003933 | Diagnosis |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
failure or difficulty reports with each procedure (%)
| day one |
| Comparison between standand endosonography and contrast enhanced endosonography in obtaining a superior quality in obtaining histology core | Visual analogic scale | day one |
| Yoshinaga S, Suzuki H, Oda I, Saito Y. Role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses. Dig Endosc. 2011 May;23 Suppl 1:29-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1443-1661.2011.01112.x. |
| 28218198 | Result | Seicean A, Jinga M. Harmonic contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration: Fact or fiction? Endosc Ultrasound. 2017 Jan-Feb;6(1):31-36. doi: 10.4103/2303-9027.196917. |