Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| RnaDx-BRV-BC- 02 (for Germany) | Other Identifier | Rna Diagnostics Inc. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The current study aims to provide validation results of RNA Disruption Assay (RDA) as a tumour response assessment tool that uses tumour core biopsies taken starting from 35 +/- 4 days after the initiation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Study Rationale:
There is some evidence that identifying non-responders early in neoadjuvant treatment and offering alternative agents (response-guided therapy) increased pathological complete response (pCR) rates and/or survival resulting in improved care and incremental cost effectiveness.
Differentiating non-responders to chemotherapy from responders with reliable guidance tools early during therapy is crucial to the success of response-guided therapy.
The current study aims to provide validation results of RDA as a tumor response assessment tool that uses tumor core biopsies starting from 35 +/- 4 days after the initiation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Study Objectives and Endpoints:
The primary objective of the study is to determine the 2 RDI cut-offs to have a diagnostic test optimized in terms of both negative and positive predictive values NPV and PPV (in a training set of patients i.e. phase 1 of the study) for predicting nopCR/pCR and to establish the performance characteristics for the first cut-off (test result "zone 1") in terms of NPV as primary endpoint (in a validation set i.e. phase 2).
The secondary objective is to assess the test's NPV in the different cancer subtypes and the test's PPV in Her2+ patients; also to assess and compare pCR prevalence, residual cancer burden (RCB class at surgery) and DFS (secondary endpoints) in zones 1-3 for all patients and each cancer subtype.
Patient Population:
The study aims to enroll approximately 801 patients in centers in the US, Canada, Italy, Germany, Spain and France and Poland.
The population consists of patients diagnosed with invasive breast cancer and scheduled to receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy as part of standard of care treatment. Throughout the study, patients will receive standard of care neoadjuvant chemotherapy treatments including taxanes, anthracyclines or other targeted drugs and drug combinations as prescribed based on the investigators' / clinicians' choice. Adjuvant therapies (e.g. radiotherapy, hormonal treatment … etc.) may be prescribed to patients according to standard of care and independently of the RDI score results.
RDA is presently in an experimental stage and clinicians will not receive or use the RDA results in this study.
Biopsy Collection:
Statistical Plan:
The study consists of a training set / phase 1 (80 fully evaluable patients) to determine response zone cut-offs using pCR outcomes and RDA's predictive values, and a validation set / phase 2 (454 fully evaluable patients) to validate the performance characteristics of the RDA test. The study aims to enroll 801 patients in order to achieve an accrual of 534 fully evaluable patients (phase 1 and 2) which is the number required to adequately statistically power the trial. Recruitment per subgroup of cancer subtypes will be closed when the target number of fully evaluable patients per subgroup is reached for both phase 1 and 2. Combined statistical analysis and various subgroup analyses will be performed for the primary and secondary objectives.
Duration and Follow-up:
There will be an active patient accrual until last patient is accrued (to achieve the required fully evaluable patient numbers) in addition to 60 months of patient follow-up.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Single Interventional Study Arm | Experimental | There will be 2 biopsy collection time points with 2 core needle biopsy specimens taken at each biopsy collection time point for RDA analysis during neoadjuvant chemotherapy. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Core needle biopsy | Procedure | 1st core needle biopsy for RDA (2 specimens): Time Point: 35 +/-4 days after initiation of chemotherapy. If no change is made to the therapy, a second biopsy (2 specimens) will be performed at 55 +/- 5 days after therapy initiation. If there is a change of drugs, the second biopsy (2 specimens) will be performed at ~2-3 weeks after initiation of new drugs; Timing by type of drug schedule 3-weekly: at 16 days +/- 2 days, Bi-weekly: at day of 2nd dose preferably before drug admin., Weekly: at day of 4th dose preferably before drug admin. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Pathological complete response (pCR) | (ypT0,ypN0) / (ypTis,ypN0) | At surgery after completion of neoadjuvant therapy |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Disease-free survival | Time between diagnosis and first event of progression or death | 5 years of survival follow-up |
| Residual Cancer Burden | RCB Class |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Maureen Trudeau, MD | Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, Toronto, Canada | Principal Investigator |
| Daniele Generali, MD | SST di Cremona Multidisciplinare di Patologia Mammaria, Italy | Principal Investigator |
| Foluso Ademuyiwa, MD | Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, USA | Principal Investigator |
| Thierry Petit, MD | Institut de Cancérologie, Strasbourg, France | Principal Investigator |
| Joke Tio, MD | Munster, Germany | Principal Investigator |
| Eva Ciruelos, MD | Madrid, Spain | Principal Investigator |
| Tomasz Jankowski, MD | NZOZ Neuromed, Lublin, Poland | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Siteman Cancer Center | St Louis | Missouri | 63129 | United States | ||
| Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26208483 | Background | Parissenti AM, Guo B, Pritzker LB, Pritzker KP, Wang X, Zhu M, Shepherd LE, Trudeau ME. Tumor RNA disruption predicts survival benefit from breast cancer chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015 Aug;153(1):135-44. doi: 10.1007/s10549-015-3498-9. Epub 2015 Jul 25. | |
| 26911141 | Background | Narendrula R, Mispel-Beyer K, Guo B, Parissenti AM, Pritzker LB, Pritzker K, Masilamani T, Wang X, Lanner C. RNA disruption is associated with response to multiple classes of chemotherapy drugs in tumor cell lines. BMC Cancer. 2016 Feb 24;16:146. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2197-1. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001943 | Breast Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D001941 | Breast Diseases |
| D012871 | Skin Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D062005 | Biopsy, Large-Core Needle |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001707 | Biopsy, Needle |
| D001706 | Biopsy |
| D003581 | Cytodiagnosis |
| D003584 | Cytological Techniques |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a diagnostic study. The RDI operator that assesses patient response to therapy using the RDA test is blinded to patient outcome. The clinicians and patients will not receive the RDI score in order to not act on the RDA test result (because this is an investigational study).
Not provided
|
| At surgery |
| Toronto |
| Canada |
| Institut de Cancerologie de Strasbourg | Strasbourg | France |
| Universitätsklinikum Münster | Münster | Germany |
| SST di Cremona Multidisciplinare di Patologia Mammaria, Italy | Cremona | Italy |
| NZOZ Neuromed | Lublin | Poland |
| Hospital U. 12 de Octubre | Madrid | Spain |
| 27377904 | Background | Toomey S, Eustace AJ, Pritzker LB, Pritzker KP, Fay J, O'Grady A, Cummins R, Grogan L, Kennedy J, O'Connor D, Young L, Kay EW, O'Donovan N, Gallagher WM, Kalachand R, Crown J, Hennessy BT. RE: RNA Disruption Assay as a Biomarker of Pathological Complete Response in Neoadjuvant Trastuzumab-Treated Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Breast Cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016 Jul 4;108(8):djw111. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djw111. Print 2016 Aug. No abstract available. |
| 26063893 | Background | Pritzker K, Pritzker L, Generali D, Bottini A, Cappelletti MR, Guo B, Parissenti A, Trudeau M. RNA Disruption and Drug Response in Breast Cancer Primary Systemic Therapy. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2015 May;2015(51):76-80. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgv015. |
| 38113421 | Result | Cazzaniga ME, Ademuyiwa F, Petit T, Tio J, Generali D, Ciruelos EM, Califaretti N, Poirier B, Ardizzoia A, Hoenig A, Lex B, Mouret-Reynier MA, Giesecke D, Isambert N, Masetti R, Pitre L, Wrobel D, Augereau P, Milani M, Rask S, Solbach C, Pritzker L, Noubir S, Parissenti A, Trudeau ME. Low RNA disruption during neoadjuvant chemotherapy predicts pathologic complete response absence in patients with breast cancer. JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2024 Jan 4;8(1):pkad107. doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkad107. |
| D017437 |
| Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |
| D019411 |
| Clinical Laboratory Techniques |
| D019937 | Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures |
| D003933 | Diagnosis |
| D013048 | Specimen Handling |
| D003949 | Diagnostic Techniques, Surgical |
| D013514 | Surgical Procedures, Operative |
| D011677 | Punctures |
| D008919 | Investigative Techniques |