Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
During pregnancy, women often experience musculoskeletal pain, specifically in their low back and/or pelvic girdle. Pelvic girdle pain (PGP) is defined as pain between the posterior iliac crest and gluteal fold, particularly in the region of the sacroiliac joint (SIJ)1. Although it is often referred to as "sciatica". PGP in pregnancy is common with prevalence estimates of 45%2. Previous studies have found that one third of patients will rate their PGP intensity as severe, leading to functional impairments. Functional disabilities include sitting, walking, and standing; thus, significantly impacting the ability of patients to perform routine daily activities. This pain has been reported to develop as early as 17-19 weeks' gestation, lasting up to 3 months postpartum; with a peak incidence of 24-36 weeks.
The etiology of PGP in pregnant women is still not fully understood, largely due to the complex interactions between bone, ligaments, fascia, and muscles in the pelvic joints3. Some studies suggest the increased mobility of the joints in the pelvic girdle during pregnancy due to relaxing cause a lack of stabilization in the sacroiliac region, which results in pain4. Thus, it is hypothesized that providing stabilization of the joints with an external force, such as a maternity or SIJ belt, will improve pain.
During pregnancy, women often experience musculoskeletal pain, specifically in their low back and/or pelvic girdle. Pelvic girdle pain (PGP) is defined as pain between the posterior iliac crest and gluteal fold, particularly in the region of the sacroiliac joint (SIJ)1. Although it is often referred to as "sciatica". PGP in pregnancy is common with prevalence estimates of 45%2. Previous studies have found that one third of patients will rate their PGP intensity as severe, leading to functional impairments. Functional disabilities include sitting, walking, and standing; thus, significantly impacting the ability of patients to perform routine daily activities. This pain has been reported to develop as early as 17-19 weeks' gestation, lasting up to 3 months postpartum; with a peak incidence of 24-36 weeks.
The etiology of PGP in pregnant women is still not fully understood, largely due to the complex interactions between bone, ligaments, fascia, and muscles in the pelvic joints3. Some studies suggest the increased mobility of the joints in the pelvic girdle during pregnancy due to relaxing cause a lack of stabilization in the sacroiliac region, which results in pain4. Thus, it is hypothesized that providing stabilization of the joints with an external force, such as a maternity or SIJ belt, will improve pain.
Clinically, pelvic belts are often used as a part of a multimodal approach to reduce PGP alongside other conservative treatments such as analgesics and physical therapy, or more alternative treatments such as acupuncture5. This makes it difficult to determine their individual effect on pain reduction. Further confounding this issue are variations in physician counseling, physical therapy regimens, and analgesic usage. Moreover, several support belts have been designed that vary in padding size, flexibility, and site of application5-7. Among these belts, it has not yet been identified which belt is most beneficial regarding pain reduction and patient tolerance5. Previous studies have found benefit in short term use (3-6 weeks) of maternity belts, providing women with improved pain and function compared to exercise or no intervention7. Pelvic belts are a cost-effective option to treating PGP, and more specifically SIJ pain, yet studies are limited regarding the effect they have on SIJ mobility and pain reduction8 and more specifically determining what clinically predicts those who will benefit most from an SIJ belt.
The active straight leg raise test originally described by Mens is an examination maneuver that measures functional mobility and has been correlated with pregnancy related PGP (cite). Anecdotally, our clinical team has observed that women who benefit from compression during the second part of the test, seem to benefit most from the use of an SIJ belt. Having a simple test for obstetric providers to perform in pregnant women with pain would be informative in determining who might benefit most from an SIJ belt. Hence our study seeks to investigate the following aims:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sacroiliac Joint Belt | Other | All patients will receive and be fitted by the PI with an SIJ belt. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SIJ Belt | Device | Support Belts |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Functioning on the Active Straight Leg Rise (ASLR) Scale at 4 Weeks. | The ASLR scale is an assessment of the functioning level of a patient's affected leg. It ranges from 0 to 5 with higher values indicating greater impairment. | Baseline and 4 weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Pain on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at 4 Weeks | The NRS is a pain assessment scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 represents "No Pain", 5 represents "Moderate Pain", and a value of 10 represents the "Worst Possible Pain". | Baseline and 4 weeks |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Colleen Fitzgerald, MD | Loyola University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loyola University Health System | Maywood | Illinois | 60153 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18259783 | Background | Vleeming A, Albert HB, Ostgaard HC, Sturesson B, Stuge B. European guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pelvic girdle pain. Eur Spine J. 2008 Jun;17(6):794-819. doi: 10.1007/s00586-008-0602-4. Epub 2008 Feb 8. | |
| 15338362 | Background | Wu WH, Meijer OG, Uegaki K, Mens JM, van Dieen JH, Wuisman PI, Ostgaard HC. Pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain (PPP), I: Terminology, clinical presentation, and prevalence. Eur Spine J. 2004 Nov;13(7):575-89. doi: 10.1007/s00586-003-0615-y. Epub 2004 Aug 27. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Patients were recruited from November 2017 through June 2019 (20 months) from a tertiary care female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery practice.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Sacroiliac Joint Belt | All patients receive an SIJ belt |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Sacroiliac Joint Belt | All patients receive an SIJ belt |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change From Baseline in Functioning on the Active Straight Leg Rise (ASLR) Scale at 4 Weeks. | The ASLR scale is an assessment of the functioning level of a patient's affected leg. It ranges from 0 to 5 with higher values indicating greater impairment. | Sixty-three women who signed an informed consent document were available at baseline and 52 women returning for the week 4 follow-up visit completed the ASLR assessment. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Baseline and 4 weeks |
|
Adverse event data were collected for six weeks
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Sacroiliac Joint Belt | All patients receive an SIJ belt | 0 |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pinched nerve | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Non-systematic Assessment |
There are no limitations or caveats to report.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colleen Fitzgerald, M.D., M.S. | Loyola University Chicago | 708-216-3380 | CFITZGERALD@lumc.edu |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Feb 8, 2018 | Sep 30, 2020 | Prot_SAP_001.pdf |
| ICF | No | No | Yes | Informed Consent Form | Jun 27, 2019 | Sep 30, 2020 | ICF_002.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D059388 | Pelvic Girdle Pain |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D059352 | Musculoskeletal Pain |
| D010146 | Pain |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
All patients receive an SIJ belt.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 15948432 | Background | Ekman EF, Koman LA. Acute pain following musculoskeletal injuries and orthopaedic surgery: mechanisms and management. Instr Course Lect. 2005;54:21-33. |
| 8942512 | Background | Kristiansson P, Svardsudd K, von Schoultz B. Serum relaxin, symphyseal pain, and back pain during pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Nov;175(5):1342-7. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70052-2. |
| 25885585 | Background | Flack NA, Hay-Smith EJ, Stringer MD, Gray AR, Woodley SJ. Adherence, tolerance and effectiveness of two different pelvic support belts as a treatment for pregnancy-related symphyseal pain - a pilot randomized trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Feb 15;15:36. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0468-5. |
| 23640314 | Background | Kordi R, Abolhasani M, Rostami M, Hantoushzadeh S, Mansournia MA, Vasheghani-Farahani F. Comparison between the effect of lumbopelvic belt and home based pelvic stabilizing exercise on pregnant women with pelvic girdle pain; a randomized controlled trial. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2013;26(2):133-9. doi: 10.3233/BMR-2012-00357. |
| 28251846 | Background | Mens JM. Does a pelvic belt reduce hip adduction weakness in pregnancy-related posterior pelvic girdle pain? A case-control study. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2017 Aug;53(4):575-581. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.17.04442-2. Epub 2017 Mar 1. |
| 25781325 | Background | Soisson O, Lube J, Germano A, Hammer KH, Josten C, Sichting F, Winkler D, Milani TL, Hammer N. Pelvic belt effects on pelvic morphometry, muscle activity and body balance in patients with sacroiliac joint dysfunction. PLoS One. 2015 Mar 17;10(3):e0116739. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116739. eCollection 2015. |
| 33745213 | Derived | Fitzgerald CM, Bennis S, Marcotte ML, Shannon MB, Iqbal S, Adams WH. The impact of a sacroiliac joint belt on function and pain using the active straight leg raise in pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain. PM R. 2022 Jan;14(1):19-29. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12591. Epub 2021 May 20. |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Employment | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Previous mode of delivery | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Previous abdominal surgery | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| History of low back pain | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Prior physical therapy for lower back pain | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Prior pelvic pain | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Physical activity level | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Smoker status | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| History of depression | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| History of anxiety | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Pain on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at 4 Weeks | The NRS is a pain assessment scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 represents "No Pain", 5 represents "Moderate Pain", and a value of 10 represents the "Worst Possible Pain". | Sixty-three women who signed an informed consent document were available at baseline and 57 women returning for the week 4 follow-up visit completed the NRS. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Baseline and 4 weeks |
|
|
|
|
| 63 |
| 0 |
| 63 |
| 1 |
| 63 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| D013568 |
| Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D017699 | Pelvic Pain |