Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Determine effects of perceptions and expectations on experience of cervical spine manipulation
The purpose of this study is to better understand how therapists may affect a patient's thoughts/ beliefs/ opinions on cervical spine (neck) manipulation. Current evidence suggests that patients who have a positive expectation about neck manipulation are more likely to report benefit from it, and we wish to determine if the perceived experience level of the therapist and the words they use to describe neck manipulation will affect the patient's perception.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Experienced - Positive | Experimental | Participants will receive cervical spine manipulation after being given a positive description of the technique from an experienced clinician |
|
| Experienced - Negative | Experimental | Participants will receive cervical spine manipulation after being given a negative description of the technique from an experienced clinician |
|
| Novice - Positive | Active Comparator | Participants will receive cervical spine manipulation after being given a positive description of the technique from a novice clinician |
|
| Novice - Negative | Active Comparator | Participants will receive cervical spine manipulation after being given a negative description of the technique from a novice clinician |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cervical spine manipulation | Procedure | High-velocity low-amplitude thrust joint manipulation to the cervical spine |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Global Perceived Effect Scale (GPE) | 7 point Likert scale anchored with "1" completely recovered to "7" worse than ever. | Immediate |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Perception of comfort scale | 5 point Likert scale ranging from 1 "very comfortable" to 5 "very uncomfortable | Immediate |
| Beliefs about cervical spine manipulation | 6 questions determining participant's beliefs about safety, comfort and effectiveness of spinal manipulation. Likert scale with statements participants can 'completely disagree', 'somewhat disagree', 'neutral', 'somewhat agree', or 'completely agree' with |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Emilio J Puentedura, DPT, PhD | Baylor University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Nevada Las Vegas - Department of Physical Therapy | Las Vegas | Nevada | 89154 | United States |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D019547 | Neck Pain |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010146 | Pain |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Participants randomly assigned to one of 2 instructional sets (positive/ negative) and randomly assigned to one of 2 practitioner experience levels (experienced/ novice)
| Immediate |