Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study aims to understand the experience of the dietetic consultation from the perspective of nutritionally vulnerable older patients receiving oral nutrition support and dietitians, as well as other key stakeholders involved in the process of such a consultation.
Malnutrition is prevalent and increases the risk of health complications and socioeconomic burden. Patients with malnutrition are often older patients with complex needs and therefore may require specialist knowledge and skills to provide nutritional support. Dietitians are uniquely skilled to assess the multiple factors that underpin diet and to tailor nutritional support, which could help improve outcomes. Although the causes of malnutrition are complicated, its treatment typically involves oral nutritional supplements, dietary advice or food-based interventions, either separately or in combination.
Effectiveness of the various oral nutritional support interventions has been studied, with the findings on food-based interventions suggesting more research is needed and the widespread research on ONS suggesting contradictory results and interpretations. Despite this, the factors responsible for these inconsistencies have not been identified. There are no studies so far that have examined the patient experience of the consultation with the dietitian in the context of nutritional support. Although the patient experience of consultations is increasingly being recognised as an important part of investigating their effectiveness in healthcare, to date, there are a number of limitations in this literature, leaving the role of the patient experience in dietetic consultations for the management of malnutrition, poorly understood. It's probable that this is one contributing factor to the variation observed in the literature.
A review of the literature indicates a need for exploration of the patient experience and its possible impact on the success or failure of the dietetic encounter. This study aims to address some of the knowledge gaps. The use of qualitative interviews will allow an in-depth understanding of the experience of the dietetic consultation for the provision of nutrition support and will utilise an overall illuminative evaluation approach to broaden that understanding by considering data from various sources. Participants will include older patients who are considered nutritionally vulnerable, their consulting dietitians and patient-nominated key stakeholders. Four clinical settings within the Trust where dietitians would often see patients for nutritional support will be included.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patient group 1 | Consultation observation, documentary analysis |
| |
| Patient group 2 | Qualitative interview, key stakeholders, documentary analysis |
| |
| Dietitians | Consulting Dietitians |
| |
| Key Stakeholders | Patient-Nominated Key Stakeholders (Relatives/Carers) |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Observations, documents | Other | Consultation observations, documentary analysis |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Experience of the Dietetic Consultation (Number of Participants With Dietetic Consultation Experience That Relate to Each Theme) | Themes and sub-themes related to the patient experience, dietitian experience and key stakeholder experience of the consultation. These were derived from qualitative thematic analysis of triangulated data from interviews, consultation observations and consultation documents derived from ALL study participants (n=39). Final themes included: 1. Building a therapeutic alliance 2. Navigating changes beyond the consultation 3. Dynamics of expectations, power and satisfaction 4. Influences and realities of professional practice. Please note that ALL study participants (n=39) from all 4 groups (Patient Group 1, Patient Group 2, Dietitians, and Key Stakeholders) contributed to all 4 final constructed themes noted above as all data were qualitatively triangulated. These 4 themes represent how the dietetic consultation was experienced from multiple perspectives, in different contexts and highlighted key areas of the dietetic encounter that mattered to participants. | Through study completion, an average of 2 months |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Dietitian AfC Banding | The NHS AfC Banding for consulting dietitians included. NHS Band 5 = entry level dietitian, NHS Band 6 = more experienced and specialised dietitian, NHS Band 7 = more advanced level dietitian. Data were collected on the NHS Banding (determined by their employer) for each dietitian included to understand how their experiences differed by seniority. Data collected for dietitians only. |
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients:
Dietitians:
Key Stakeholders:
Up to 2 optional patient-nominated key stakeholders who are involved in the dietetic consultation and success of the dietetic intervention e.g. other HCP, family member, carer or friend. Their criteria for inclusion will include:
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients:
Participants with visual or hearing impairment or other physical disabilities will NOT be excluded from the study.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Patients:
Older patients malnourished or at risk of malnutrition requiring oral nutritional support from a dietitian in a range of clinical settings.
Dietitians:
Consulting registered dietitian providing the nutritional advice to patient above
Key Stakeholders:
Up to 2 optional patient-nominated key stakeholders who are involved in the dietetic consultation and success of the dietetic intervention e.g. other HCP, carer or family member.
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Alastair Duncan, PhD | King's College London | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| King's College London | London | SE1 9NH | United Kingdom |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Please note that 45 participants were enrolled but only 39 took part in research activities. 4 dietitians gave consent but did not complete the study activities due to changes in their clinical speciality, change in employment, maternity leave and lack of eligible patients within the study time frame. Also, 2 patients gave consent but didn't complete the study activities, 1 patient died before this was possible and 1 withdrew their consent to participate so no research activities were commenced.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Patient Group 1 | Consultation observation, documentary analysis Observations, documents: Consultation observations, documentary analysis |
| FG001 | Patient Group 2 | Qualitative interview, key stakeholders, documentary analysis Interviews, key stakeholders, documents: Qualitative interviews, key stakeholders, documentary analysis |
| FG002 | Dietitians | Consulting Dietitians |
| FG003 | Key Stakeholders | Patient-nominated Key Stakeholders |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Patient Group 1 | Consultation observation, documentary analysis Observations, documents: Consultation observations, documentary analysis |
| BG001 | Patient Group 2 | Qualitative interview, key stakeholders, documentary analysis Interviews, key stakeholders, documents: Qualitative interviews, key stakeholders, documentary analysis |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Experience of the Dietetic Consultation (Number of Participants With Dietetic Consultation Experience That Relate to Each Theme) | Themes and sub-themes related to the patient experience, dietitian experience and key stakeholder experience of the consultation. These were derived from qualitative thematic analysis of triangulated data from interviews, consultation observations and consultation documents derived from ALL study participants (n=39). Final themes included: 1. Building a therapeutic alliance 2. Navigating changes beyond the consultation 3. Dynamics of expectations, power and satisfaction 4. Influences and realities of professional practice. Please note that ALL study participants (n=39) from all 4 groups (Patient Group 1, Patient Group 2, Dietitians, and Key Stakeholders) contributed to all 4 final constructed themes noted above as all data were qualitatively triangulated. These 4 themes represent how the dietetic consultation was experienced from multiple perspectives, in different contexts and highlighted key areas of the dietetic encounter that mattered to participants. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Through study completion, an average of 2 months |
|
From participant recruitment date until the final date when their research activities were completed - on average < 3 months.
Please note these data were not routinely collected unless the patient died after providing consent but before their research activity (consultation observation or qualitative interview) was completed.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Patient Group 1 | Consultation observation, documentary analysis Observations, documents: Consultation observations, documentary analysis |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr Alastair Duncan | Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust | 02071882010 | alastair.duncan@gstt.nhs.uk |
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Jan 21, 2020 | Sep 13, 2024 | Prot_000.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D044342 | Malnutrition |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009748 | Nutrition Disorders |
| D009750 | Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D057832 | Watchful Waiting |
| D007407 | Interviews as Topic |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D017063 | Outcome Assessment, Health Care |
| D010043 | Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care |
| D011787 | Quality of Health Care |
| D006298 | Health Services Administration |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Interviews, key stakeholders, documents | Other | Qualitative interviews, key stakeholders, documentary analysis |
|
| At enrollment. |
| Dietitian Speciality | Clinical speciality of consulting dietitians included. Data collected for dietitians only. | At enrollment |
| Type of Intervention | Type of nutritional support intervention the patient received during dietetic consultation. Data collected for patients only. | At enrollment. |
| Consultation Type | New (i.e. new episode of dietetic care) or review/follow-up (had previous consultation in current episode of care) re the dietetic consultation. Data collected for patients only. | At enrollment. |
| Family Support | Whether the patient had family support or not at the time of study enrollment. Data collected for patients only. | At enrollment. |
| Relationship to Patient | Relationship of key stakeholder to patient. Data collected for key stakeholders only. | At enrollment. |
| BG002 | Dietitians | Consulting dietitians |
| BG003 | Key Stakeholders | Key stakeholders (relatives/carers of the patient. |
| BG004 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Participants |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Clinical setting | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Patient Group 1 | Number of participants for whom data were gathered from dietetic consultation observations and documentary analysis. Observations, documents: Consultation observations, documentary analysis |
| OG001 | Patient Group 2 | Number of participants for whom data were gathered from qualitative interview, key stakeholders, and documentary analysis. Interviews, key stakeholders, documents: Qualitative interviews, key stakeholders, documentary analysis |
| OG002 | Dietitians | Number of participants who were consulting dietitians and for whom data were gathered from consultation observations and/or interviews and consultation documents. |
| OG003 | Key Stakeholders | Number of participants who were Patient-nominated Key Stakeholders and for whom data were gathered from consultation observations or interviews and consultation documents. |
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Dietitian AfC Banding | The NHS AfC Banding for consulting dietitians included. NHS Band 5 = entry level dietitian, NHS Band 6 = more experienced and specialised dietitian, NHS Band 7 = more advanced level dietitian. Data were collected on the NHS Banding (determined by their employer) for each dietitian included to understand how their experiences differed by seniority. Data collected for dietitians only. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | At enrollment. |
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Dietitian Speciality | Clinical speciality of consulting dietitians included. Data collected for dietitians only. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | At enrollment |
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Type of Intervention | Type of nutritional support intervention the patient received during dietetic consultation. Data collected for patients only. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | At enrollment. |
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Consultation Type | New (i.e. new episode of dietetic care) or review/follow-up (had previous consultation in current episode of care) re the dietetic consultation. Data collected for patients only. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | At enrollment. |
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Family Support | Whether the patient had family support or not at the time of study enrollment. Data collected for patients only. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | At enrollment. |
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Relationship to Patient | Relationship of key stakeholder to patient. Data collected for key stakeholders only. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | At enrollment. |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 10 |
| 0 |
| 10 |
| 0 |
| 10 |
| EG001 | Patient Group 2 | Qualitative interview, key stakeholders, documentary analysis Interviews, key stakeholders, documents: Qualitative interviews, key stakeholders, documentary analysis | 1 | 11 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| EG002 | Dietitians | Consulting Dietitians | 0 | 13 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 13 |
| EG003 | Key Stakeholders | Patient-nonimated key stakeholders | 0 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| D003625 | Data Collection |
| D004812 | Epidemiologic Methods |
| D008919 | Investigative Techniques |
| D017531 | Health Care Evaluation Mechanisms |
| D017530 | Health Care Quality, Access, and Evaluation |
| D011634 | Public Health |
| D004778 | Environment and Public Health |
| Gastro |
|
| Renal |
|
| HIV |
|
| COMB intervention (ONS + FB) |
|