This intervention consists of a disposable virtual reality headset which will enable the use of virtual reality in clinic through the commodity hardware iPod Touch. An additional piece of software on an iPad will allow clinical staff to act as an orchestrator and trigger events that occur for the patient's benefit in the virtual reality environment. The mechanism for the dashboard will be dashboard software running on an iPad tablet that will wirelessly communicate to the iPod Touch the patient is wearing. A study timer will be incorporated into the orchestration dashboard. The VAS/FACES scale will be incorporated into the iPad used for orchestration.

This intervention consists of a two dimensional distraction (ie TV/tablet) as well as verbal distraction (ie singing/talking/music) will be allowed by caregivers, nurses and phlebotomy staff but will not qualified or quantified. IV procedures will proceed in Groups A and B. At the completion of the IV procedure the nurse orchestrator will stop the procedure timer. The Subject, Guardian and Nurse orchestrator will complete the Final VAS/FACES assessment on the iPad.

This intervention consists of a disposable virtual reality headset which will enable the use of virtual reality in clinic through the commodity hardware iPod Touch. An additional piece of software on an iPad will allow clinical staff to act as an orchestrator and trigger events that occur for the patient's benefit in the virtual reality environment. The mechanism for the dashboard will be dashboard software running on an iPad tablet that will wirelessly communicate to the iPod Touch the patient is wearing. A study timer will be incorporated into the orchestration dashboard. The VAS/FACES scale will be incorporated into the iPad used for orchestration.

The primary outcome of feasibility was assessed using a surrogate marker of feasibility which was duration of the IV procedure measured in minutes in both study arms. Procedure time was the length of time from the moment a patient was positioned for the procedure to the completion of the procedure. The study timer was incorporated in the study IPAD and timing was performed by the nurse orchestrator.

The primary outcome of feasibility was assessed using a surrogate marker of feasibility which was duration of the IV procedure measured in minutes in both study arms. Procedure time was the length of time from the moment a patient was positioned for the procedure to the completion of the procedure. The study timer was incorporated in the study IPAD and timing was performed by the nurse orchestrator.

Both patient groups assessed the effectiveness of their distraction techniques following the procedure by using a Visual analogue/FACES scale answering 3 anchored questions. 1) "Did the distraction technique keep you/your child /your patient engaged?" The anchors were 0=It really kept them engaged and 100=It really did not keep them engaged. 2) "Do you think the distraction technique/s changed you/your child/your patient's nervousness/anxiety level during the IV procedure?" The anchor of 0=it decreased nervousness/anxiety a lot, 100=it increased nervousness/anxiety a lot. 3) "How did the distraction technique/s affect pain during your/your child/your patient's IV procedure?" With 0=it made pain a lot better, 100=it made pain a lot worse.