Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| University of Lausanne Hospitals | OTHER |
| University of Lausanne | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is one of the most frequent causes for limitations in daily, leisure and work-related activities. Although alterations in spinal motor behavior were consistently reported in CLBP patients, it remains unclear how improvements in spinal motor behavior through rehabilitation treatment affect pain and disability. Psychological factors, such as pain-related fear, were suggested as a possible main cause of spinal motor behavior in CLBP and better understanding their relationships with kinematic and muscle activity alterations is required to enhance care, particularly physiotherapy. Therefore, this study will test CLBP patients before and after a 3 week rehabilitation program to test the hypotheses that: 1) improvements in spinal motor behavior (kinematics and trunk muscle activity) are associated with decreased pain and disability; 2) decrease in pain-related fear is associated with spinal motor behavior improvements.
The research project is a prospective observational cohort study. CLBP patients participating to a 3 weeks' multimodal rehabilitation program will be tested in the motion analysis laboratory before (T1) and after (T2) the program. This program is an intensive 3-weeks multidisciplinary rehabilitation program. Patients come daily for individual and group treatments, with a total of 100 hours of intervention during 3 weeks. The program includes physiotherapy treatments, occupational therapy, psychologists encounters and education session. The programs encompasses a multidimensional view of chronic low back pain. Therefore, this setting is a unique opportunity to improve our understanding of the role of motor behavior alterations in CLBP because it will allow connecting changes in spinal kinematics and muscle activity with changes in pain, disability and pain-related fear.
This project has two aims in relation to motor behavior in patients with CLBP:
The first aim is to analyse the relationship between changes in spinal kinematics and changes in pain and disability during and after a multimodal rehabilitation program. First, changes in spinal kinematics and muscle activity between T1 and T2 will be calculated. The relationship between these changes and changes in pain and disability during the program will be tested. Pain and disability will be also measured at 3 months (T3) and one year (T4) after the program, which will allow to further analyze the relationship between spinal motor behavior and pain and disability.
The second aim concerns the role of pain-related fear, and its decrease, in spinal motor behavior alterations. Consequently, the second aim is to analyse if changes in pain-related fear are associated with changes in spinal kinematics during a multimodal rehabilitation program.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chronic low back pain | Patients with chronic low back pain participating to a 3 weeks Multidisciplinary rehabilitation program |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Multidisciplinary rehabilitation program | Other | The multimodal rehabilitation program (MRP) based at the University Hospital is an intensive 3-weeks multidisciplinary rehabilitation program. Patients come daily for individual and group treatments, with a total of 100 hours of intervention during 3 weeks. The MRP includes physiotherapy treatments, aiming at improving cardio-vascular endurance, long-term physical activity adherence, proprioception, mobility and strength. Additionally, occupational therapy is mainly focussed on reassuring patients that spinal movements are safe. Finally, psychologists are involved in the MRP to discuss the meaning of LBP, the psychological implications and the patient's resources. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Spinal kinematics | Range of movement and angular velocity at the lower lumbar, upper lumbar, lower thoracic and upper thoracic joints | Change between baseline and week 4 |
| Trunk muscle activity | Surface electromyography of paraspinal and abdominal muscles | Change between baseline and week 4 |
| Pain intensity | Pain intensity will be quantified by the 11-point Numeric Pain Rating Scale. The scale range from 0 (no pain at all) to 10 (worst pain). | Change between baseline and week 4 |
| Disability | Disability will be quantified by the Patient Specific Functional Scale. The scale assessed three relevant activities for the patient and scores each activity between 0 (impossible to realize the activity) to 10 (capable of doing the activity normally). | Change between baseline and week 4 |
| Kinesiophobia | Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia. The total score is between 17 (no kinesiophobia) to 68 (high level of kinesiophobia). | Change between baseline and week 4 |
| Pain-related fear | Photograph Series of Daily Activities. The score is from 0 (no pain-related fear) to 100 (high levels of pain related fear) | Change between baseline and week 4 |
| Fear | Fear scale measured before each movement or activity. Score between 0 (no fear) and 10 (high levels of fear). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Disability (ODI) | Oswestry Disability Questionnaire. Score between 0 (no disability) and 100. | Baseline (Day 0), week 4, Month 3, Month 12 |
| Disability | Disability will be quantified by the Patient Specific Functional Scale. The scale assessed three relevant activities for the patient and scores each activity between 0 (impossible to realize the activity) to 10 (capable of doing the activity normally). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Fear of moving | Is there any movement or activity that you don't do or do differently because they are harmful or dangerous for your back ? | Baseline (Day 0) |
| Localization of pain | Body chart with localization of pain |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Patients with chronic low back pain for more than three months participating to a 3 weeks' multidisciplinary rehabilitation program
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Lausanne Hospitals | Lausanne | Canton of Vaud | 1011 | Switzerland |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 27262182 | Background | Christe G, Redhead L, Legrand T, Jolles BM, Favre J. Multi-segment analysis of spinal kinematics during sit-to-stand in patients with chronic low back pain. J Biomech. 2016 Jul 5;49(10):2060-2067. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.05.015. Epub 2016 May 20. | |
| 28716466 | Background | Christe G, Kade F, Jolles BM, Favre J. Chronic low back pain patients walk with locally altered spinal kinematics. J Biomech. 2017 Jul 26;60:211-218. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.06.042. Epub 2017 Jul 5. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Change between baseline and week 4 |
| Pain expectation | Pain expectation scale before each movement or activity. Score between 0 (no pain expected) and 10 (high levels of pain expected). | Change between baseline and week 4 |
| Month 3, Month 12 |
| Pain intensity | Pain intensity will be quantified by the 11-point Numeric Pain Rating Scale. The scale range from 0 (no pain at all) to 10 (worst pain). | Month 3, Month 12 |
| Catastrophizing | Pain Catastrophizing Scale. Score between 0 and 52 (high levels of catastrophizing). | Baseline (Day 0), week 4, Month 3, Month 12 |
| Back Pain Attitudes | Back Pain Attitudes Questionnaires. Score between 34 (positive attitudes and beliefs) and 170 (negative attitudes and beliefs) | Baseline (Day 0), week 4, Month 3, Month 12 |
| Kinesiophobia | Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia. The total score is between 17 (no kinesiophobia) to 68 (high level of kinesiophobia). | Month 3, Month 12 |
| Level of Bothersomeness | Bothersomeness mesaured with a scale with one question scored from 0 to 4 (Dunn et al, Spine, 2005). | Baseline (Day 0), week 4, Month 3, Month 12 |
| Level of Worry about back pain | Worry numeric scale. Worry about current back pain is scored from 0 (no worry) to 10 (extremely worried). | Baseline (Day 0), week 4, Month 3, Month 12 |
| Work ability | Work ability. Is back pain limiting the ability to work normally (answer: Yes or No)? | Baseline (Day 0), Month 3, Month 12 |
| Patient Global Impression of Change | This measure is a single-item rating by participants of their improvement with treatment on a 7-point scale that ranges from 'very much improved' (3 points) to 'very much worse' (-3 points) with 'no change' as the mid-point (0 points). The patient will answer this question: "With respect to your low back pain how would you describe yourself now, compared to before the start of the rehabilitation program you did at the University Hospital?" | Month 3, Month 12 |
| Baseline (Day 0) |
| Aggravating factors | Which movements or activity increase pain ? | Baseline (Day 0) |
| Medication | Number of medication for low back pain | Baseline (Day 0), week 4, Month 3, Month 12 |