Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| John Templeton Foundation | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to test a strengths-based intervention to be delivered in a primary care setting with adolescents and a parent. Investigators want to find out if the intervention can help parents and teens communicate. Specifically Investigators want to see if they can help parents and teens identify and build teen's strengths. Half the dyads will receive the educational materials in conjunction with their teen's well-child visit, while the other half will receive usual care at the well-child visit and receive the educational materials at the end of the study. Additionally, Investigators expect that a strengths-based intervention may also impact adherence to treatment in youth with a chronic illness. As such, Investigators will include a subgroup of teenagers diagnosed with asthma in this study, to assess whether the strengths-based intervention that the Investigators developed has an impact on adherence.
Recent research suggests that parents and adolescents report an interest in doctors facilitating increased parent-teen communication about teen strengths. However, little research focuses on how to address this need in a primary care setting. Content from subject matter experts along with data gathered from parents and teens were used to develop a novel strengths-based intervention to be tested in primary care.
The study intervention being examined is called the Strengths Intervention Project and includes a written pamphlet, a guided discussion activity, in-person/phone health coaching, and in-person or mailed health care provider endorsement and key messaging. Measures will be collected at baseline pre-intervention (T1), in clinic or over the phone at the time of the intervention (T2), approximately two weeks post-intervention (T3), and approximately 2 months post-intervention (T4). Daily diaries will also be utilized twice to gather data pre- and post- intervention. We will measure feasibility of clinic implementation of intervention, as well as influence of intervention on parent-teen communication and adolescent outcomes.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention Group (Arm 1- Main) | Experimental | Will receive the "Build Your Teen's Strengths" educational pamphlet, health coaching sessions, and provider endorsement. |
|
| Control Group (Arm 1- Main) | No Intervention | Will receive usual care at well-child visit. | |
| Intervention Group (Arm 1-asthma subgroup) | Experimental | Will receive the "Build Your Teen's Strengths" educational pamphlet, health coaching sessions, and provider endorsement. |
|
| Control Group (Arm 1-asthma subgroup) | No Intervention | Will receive usual care at well-child visit. | |
| Control Group (Arm 2) | No Intervention | Convenience sample used for a post-hoc, exploratory analysis. Will receive usual care at well-child visit. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Build and Support Your Teen's Strengths | Behavioral | This is a clinic based psychoeducational intervention for adolescent patients and their parents to improve parent-teen communication about teen strengths. The intervention is designed, if possible, to coincide with the adolescent patients' well-child visits and consists of the following components: (1) In-person or over the phone orientation session with a trained health coach and parent, (2) Distribution of psychoeducational materials to the parent, (3) Endorsement and delivery of key messages from the health care provider, and (4) "Booster" phone call placed by the health coach. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Beliefs about Adolescents | 26 items (parents only); Likert scale (1= very unlikely; 7= very, very likely) | Baseline (T1) and 2-months (T4) |
| Change in Parent-Adolescent Communication (PACS) | 20 items (parent and teens); Likert scale (1= strongly disagree; 5= strongly agree) | Baseline (T1) and 2-months (T4) |
| Change in Confidence in exploring and using adolescent's strengths | 15 items (parents and teens); Likert scale (1=strongly disagree; 5= strongly agree) | Baseline (T1) and 2-months (T4) |
| Feasibility of consent rates | Feasibility will be demonstrated by consent rates ≥60% | 9 months |
| Feasibility of intervention implementation | Completion of core intervention components ≥ 70%. | 1 month |
| Parent and adolescent acceptability of intervention materials | Adolescent and parent acceptability ratings ≥80%. Investigators will also elicit open-ended feedback. | 2-weeks post intervention (T3) |
| Parent and adolescent acceptability of intervention materials (additional) | 2 items (parents and teens); Yes/No/Not sure and Likert scale (1=very likely; 5 very unlikely) | 2-months post intervention (T4) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Psychological well-being using the Flourishing Scale | Measure of psychological well-being. 8 items (parents and teens). (Likert scale 1= Strongly disagree; 2= Disagree; 3= Slightly disagree; 4= Mixed or neither agree nor disagree; 5= Slightly agree; 6= Agree; 7= Strongly agree). Score will be summed for range of 8 (Strong Disagreement with all items) to 56 (Strong Agreement with items). High scores signify that respondents view themselves in positive terms in important areas of functioning. |
Not provided
Adolescent Criteria:
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Parent Criteria:
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Victoria A Miller, PhD | Children's Hospital of Phiadelphia | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 19104 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 27151760 | Background | Ford CA, Cheek C, Culhane J, Fishman J, Mathew L, Salek EC, Webb D, Jaccard J. Parent and Adolescent Interest in Receiving Adolescent Health Communication Information From Primary Care Clinicians. J Adolesc Health. 2016 Aug;59(2):154-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.03.001. Epub 2016 Apr 14. | |
| 14964942 | Background |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000294 | Adolescent Behavior |
| D003142 | Communication |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001519 | Behavior |
Not provided
Not provided
Treatment groups receive intervention and control groups receive usual care.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Provider acceptability of intervention | Provider acceptability ratings ≥80%. Investigators will also elicit open-ended feedback. | 9 months |
| Baseline (T1) and 2-months (T4) |
| Change in Adherence to inhaled controller medication use | 2-items about adherence to inhaled controller medication use (parent and teen) will be assessed using the Visual analog scale (0-10). | Baseline (T1) and 2-months (T4) |
| Jaccard J, Dodge T, Dittus P. Parent-adolescent communication about sex and birth control: a conceptual framework. New Dir Child Adolesc Dev. 2002 Fall;(97):9-41. doi: 10.1002/cd.48. No abstract available. |
| Background | Elster AB, Kuznets NJ. AMA Guidelines for Adolescent Preventive Services (GAPS): Recommendations and Rationale. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1994. |
| Background | Hagan J, Shaw J, PM Duncan PM e. Bright Futures: Guidelines for Health Supervision of Infants, Children, and Adolescents 4th ed. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics; 2017. |
| 21700157 | Background | Ford CA, Davenport AF, Meier A, McRee AL. Partnerships between parents and health care professionals to improve adolescent health. J Adolesc Health. 2011 Jul;49(1):53-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.10.004. Epub 2011 Mar 12. |
| 18023780 | Background | Duncan PM, Garcia AC, Frankowski BL, Carey PA, Kallock EA, Dixon RD, Shaw JS. Inspiring healthy adolescent choices: a rationale for and guide to strength promotion in primary care. J Adolesc Health. 2007 Dec;41(6):525-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.05.024. Epub 2007 Aug 29. |
| Background | Catalano RF, Berglund ML, Ryan JAM, et al. Positive youth development in the United States: research findings on evaluations of positive youth development programs. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci 2004;591:98 -125. |
| 17928599 | Background | Mangione-Smith R, DeCristofaro AH, Setodji CM, Keesey J, Klein DJ, Adams JL, Schuster MA, McGlynn EA. The quality of ambulatory care delivered to children in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2007 Oct 11;357(15):1515-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa064637. |
| 25926665 | Background | Hammig B, Jozkowski K. Health Education Counseling During Pediatric Well-Child Visits in Physicians' Office Settings. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2015 Jul;54(8):752-8. doi: 10.1177/0009922815584943. Epub 2015 Apr 29. |
| 12925054 | Background | Viner RM, Christie D, Taylor V, Hey S. Motivational/solution-focused intervention improves HbA1c in adolescents with Type 1 diabetes: a pilot study. Diabet Med. 2003 Sep;20(9):739-42. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2003.00995.x. |
| 25678533 | Background | Rosenberg AR, Yi-Frazier JP, Eaton L, Wharton C, Cochrane K, Pihoker C, Baker KS, McCauley E. Promoting Resilience in Stress Management: A Pilot Study of a Novel Resilience-Promoting Intervention for Adolescents and Young Adults With Serious Illness. J Pediatr Psychol. 2015 Oct;40(9):992-9. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsv004. Epub 2015 Feb 11. |
| 19204102 | Background | Steinhardt MA, Mamerow MM, Brown SA, Jolly CA. A resilience intervention in African American adults with type 2 diabetes: a pilot study of efficacy. Diabetes Educ. 2009 Mar-Apr;35(2):274-84. doi: 10.1177/0145721708329698. Epub 2009 Feb 9. |
| 23332482 | Background | Maslow G, Adams C, Willis M, Neukirch J, Herts K, Froehlich W, Calleson D, Rickerby M. An evaluation of a positive youth development program for adolescents with chronic illness. J Adolesc Health. 2013 Feb;52(2):179-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.06.020. Epub 2012 Aug 17. |
| 7390914 | Background | Schoenfeld D. Statistical considerations for pilot studies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1980 Mar;6(3):371-4. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(80)90153-4. No abstract available. |
| Background | Buchanan, C. M., & Holmbeck, G. N. (1998). Measuring beliefs about adolescent personality and behavior. J. Youth Adolescence 27(5): 607-627 |
| Background | Olson, D. H. Family inventories: Inventories used in a national survey of families across the life cycle. St Paul, MN: Family Social Science, University of Minnesota. 1985 |
| Background | Diener, E. et al. (2010). New Well-being Measures: Short Scales to Assess Flourishing and Positive and Negative Feelings. Social Indicators Research, 97(2), 143-156. |
| 11807312 | Background | Walsh JC, Mandalia S, Gazzard BG. Responses to a 1 month self-report on adherence to antiretroviral therapy are consistent with electronic data and virological treatment outcome. AIDS. 2002 Jan 25;16(2):269-77. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200201250-00017. |
| Background | Hair, EC et al. (2005). The Parent-Adolescent Relationship Scale. Adolescent & Family Health, 4(1), 12-25. |
| 32444221 | Derived | Miller VA, Silva K, Friedrich E, Robles R, Ford CA. Efficacy of a Primary Care-Based Intervention to Promote Parent-Teen Communication and Well-Being: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Pediatr. 2020 Jul;222:200-206.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.03.050. Epub 2020 May 19. |