Treatment comparisons between each berotralstat dose and placebo in the rate of investigator-confirmed HAE attacks during the Part 1 dosing period were analyzed using a negative binomial model. The number of investigator-confirmed attacks was included as the dependent variable, the treatment was included as a fixed effect, the stratification variable (baseline attack rate) was included as a covariate, and the logarithm of duration on treatment was included as an offset variable. The estimated attack rate for each treatment group, the treatment differences expressed as the attack rate ratio (berotralstat over placebo rate ratio), and the associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were provided from the negative binomial model.

The intent to treat (ITT) population included all randomized subjects, regardless of whether study treatment was administered. This population was the primary population for the analysis of the efficacy and health outcomes data.

The safety data was assessed for the safety population, for subjects who entered Part 2 and Part 3, and includes TEAEs that began in Part 2 or 3, respectively, for these subjects. Safety data for Part 2 and Part 3 is combined to clearly show TEAEs occurring in subjects as the proceeded through the 2 study parts. TEAEs are defined as AEs that occurred on or after first dose of study treatment, whether in Part 1 or 2, and were assigned to the relevant treatment depending on when the TEAE began (Part 2 or Part 3 treatment). No statistical analysis was performed on this safety data.

The safety population included all subjects who received at least 1 capsule of study treatment.

Change in Quality of Life, on a 1-100 scale, where higher scores indicate more impairment and a decrease (change with a negative value) in AE-QoL questionnaire scores indicates an improvement in the subject's QoL. The minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for the AE-QoL questionnaire is -6 (total score). The AE-QoL is only validated for adults; however, data were collected on all adult and adolescent study subjects.

The intent to treat (ITT) population included all randomized subjects, regardless of whether study treatment was administered. This population was the primary population for the analysis of the efficacy and health outcomes data

Assessment of proportion of days subjects had angioedema symptoms from expert-confirmed HAE attacks during Part 1.

The ITT population included all randomized subjects, regardless of whether study treatment was administered. This population was the primary population for the analysis of the efficacy and health outcomes data. Data were analyzed according to randomized treatment.

The rate of expert-confirmed HAE attacks for the effective treatment period gives an analysis of the efficacy of active treatment after berotralstat had reached steady-state concentrations, given the effective half-life of 150 mg berotralstat in Study BCX7353-106 (Study 106) of 89 hours.

The ITT population included all randomized subjects, regardless of whether study treatment was administered. This population was the primary population for the analysis of the efficacy and health outcomes data. Data were analyzed according to randomized treatment.

Monthly Attack Rate was defined as the total number of investigator-confirmed HAE attacks experienced during the treatment period adjusted for the length of a month (defined as 28 days) and the number of days the subject was on treatment during that month. The end of Month 6 was defined as the start of Part 2 treatment.

Baseline investigator-confirmed attack rate was defined as the total number of investigator-confirmed HAE attacks experienced in the period between screening and first dose of study drug adjusted for the length of a month (defined as 28 days) and the number of days during that period.

The intent to treat (ITT) population included all randomized subjects, regardless of whether study treatment was administered. This population was the primary population for the analysis of the efficacy data. The numbers analysed reflect participants providing details of HAE attacks via the study diary each month during part 2.

Angioedema-specific QoL was assessed by the AE-QoL, consisting of 4 domains (i.e., functioning, fatigue/mood, fears/shame, and nutrition) and a total score. The AE-QoL scores range from 0 points (best QoL) to 100 points (worst QoL). A decrease (change with a negative value) in AE-QoL questionnaire scores indicates an improvement in the subject's QoL. The minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for the AE-QoL questionnaire is -6 (total score). The AE-QoL was completed by the subjects at each visit starting at baseline, and questions were answered with regard to the previous 28 days. For subjects who received active treatment following placebo, visits were adjusted according to the date of the first dose of active treatment.

The ITT population included all randomized subjects, regardless of study treatment administration. Subjects in the 2 berotralstat treatment arms included those previously treated with placebo in part 1; for these subjects, visits were adjusted according to the date of 1st dose of active treatment. The variation in number of subjects analysed at each study visit reflects subject withdrawal prior to study completion and the number of subjects completing the AE-QoL questionnaire.

The Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) was completed by subjects at baseline and at each study visit until the end of the study. TSQM scores consisted of 14 items of which 13 items were made up of 3 specific scales (Effectiveness, Side Effects, and Convenience) and 1 global satisfaction scale (Global Satisfaction). At baseline, TSQM questionnaires were completed based on subject's satisfaction with usual medications. At all other time points for collection of TSQM, subjects were asked about their level of satisfaction or dissatisfaction with the study drug. Scales scores were calculated for each scale and were transformed into scores ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating higher satisfaction. TSQM score and corresponding change from baseline values were calculated at each visit. For subjects who received active treatment following placebo, visits were adjusted according to the date of the first dose of active treatment.

The ITT population included all randomized subjects, regardless of study treatment administration. Subjects in the 2 berotralstat treatment arms included those previously treated with placebo in part 1; for these subjects, visits were adjusted according to the date of 1st dose of active treatment. The variation in number of subjects analysed at each study visit reflects subject withdrawal prior to study completion and the number of subjects completing the TSQM questionnaire.