Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Sponsor's decision to stop the study prematurely due to insufficient inclusion.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Medically intractable pain caused by occipital neuralgia can be very difficult to control with traditional pain management. Peripheral nerve stimulation which is used in migraines and cluster headache can be an alternative for these patients with occipital neuralgias when medical treatment and traditional pain management have failed (drugs for neuropathic pain, infiltrations, psychobehavioral approaches and multidisciplinary approach in a pain center). Occipital nerve stimulation consists to put a lead subcutaneously in front of the occipital nerve and to connect the lead to a pulse generator. A retrospective study of 60 patients was conducted in Nantes University Hospital. The results were good with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) decreased from 8.4 preoperatively to 2.85 postoperatively. The medical quantification scale (MQS) was reduced to about 50% (18 preoperatively versus 9.9 postoperatively). Stimulation was quiet stable over time with a mean follow-up of 24 months (range 6 to 72 months). The aim of StimO is to confirm this result through a national controlled randomized multicenter study where occipital nerve stimulation will be compared to the optimal medical management.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Occipital Nerve Stimulation (ONS) | Experimental | Occipital nerve stimulation with percutaneous or surgical lead plus optimal medical management |
|
| Optimal Medical Management (OMM) | Active Comparator | Optimal Medical Management according to what is done in routine clinical practice |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Occipital nerve stimulation | Device | Occipital nerve stimulation with percutaneous or surgical lead |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Efficacy of occipital nerve stimulation | Compare the decrease of pain (evaluated by visual analogic scale) after 6 months of treatment between the 2 groups (ONS / OMM) | 6 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Decrease of medical treatment (i.e. decrease of Medication Quantification Scale (MQS) score) in the ONS group at 3 months | Evaluate the decrease of medical treatment (i.e. decrease of Medication Quantification Scale (MQS) score) after 3 months of occipital nerve stimulation in the ONS group | 3 months |
| Decrease of medical treatment (i.e. decrease of Medication Quantification Scale (MQS) score) in the ONS group at 6 months |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHU de Caen | Caen | 14009 | France | |||
| CHU de Clermont-Ferrand |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 41827338 | Derived | Ravaillault S, Alipour H, Leger F, Labarre J, Nguyen JM, Pluchon YM, Riant T, Emery E, Nizard J, Raoul S. Occipital Nerve Stimulation for Refractory Occipital Neuralgia: A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial [StimO Study]. J Clin Med. 2026 Mar 3;15(5):1922. doi: 10.3390/jcm15051922. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Optimal Medical Management | Other | Optimal Medical Management according to what is done in routine clinical practice : drug, psychobehavioral approach, acupuncture, sophrology, etc. |
|
Evaluate the decrease of medical treatment (i.e. decrease of Medication Quantification Scale (MQS) score) after 6 months of occipital nerve stimulation in the ONS group |
| 6 months |
| Maximum pain (using Visual Analogic Scale) | Comparison of maximum pain (using Visual Analogic Scale) between the 2 groups (ONS/OMM) | Up to 6 months |
| Average pain (using Visual Analogic Scale) | Comparison of average pain (using Visual Analogic Scale) between the 2 groups (ONS/OMM) | Up to 6 months |
| Relative decrease of pain (using Visual Analogic Scale) at 3 months | Comparison of the relative decrease of pain (using Visual Analogic Scale) at 3 months between the 2 groups (ONS/OMM) | 3 months |
| Relative decrease of pain (using Visual Analogic Scale) at 6 months | Comparison of the relative decrease of pain (using Visual Analogic Scale) at 6 months between the 2 groups (ONS/OMM) | 6 months |
| Efficacy of the treatment (using Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) Test) at 3 months | Comparison of the efficacy of the treatment (using Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) Test) at 3 months between the 2 groups (ONS/OMM) | 3 months |
| Efficacy of the treatment (using Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) Test) at 6 months | Comparison of the efficacy of the treatment (using Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) Test) at 6 months between the 2 groups (ONS/OMM) | 6 months |
| Quality of life (using EQ-5D-5L questionnaire) | Comparison of the quality of life (using EQ-5D-5L questionnaire) between the 2 groups (ONS/OMM) | Up to 6 months |
| Quality of life (using Hamilton Anxiety and Depression (HAD) scale) | Comparison of the quality of life (using Hamilton Anxiety and Depression (HAD) scale) between the 2 groups (ONS/OMM) | Up to 6 months |
| Clermont-Ferrand |
| 63003 |
| France |
| Hôpitaux Civils de Colmar | Colmar | 68024 | France |
| CHU Limoges | Limoges | 87000 | France |
| Hôpital Pierre Wertheimer | Lyon | 69003 | France |
| CHU de Nantes | Nantes | 44093 | France |
| CHU de Nice | Nice | 06001 | France |
| Hôpital Lariboisière | Paris | 75475 | France |
| Hôpital Foch | Paris | 92151 | France |
| CHU de Poitiers | Poitiers | 86021 | France |