Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre, Phase 2 study, with an optional open-label extension, to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of RPh201 in subjects with mild to moderate AD who are eligible for enrollment in this study.
Subject participation will include a Screening Phase, Treatment Phase, and an Optional Open-Label Extension. The Screening Phase will be up to 4 weeks prior to randomization. Both the subject and their study partner(s) will sign an informed consent form (ICF). At Visit 2, Subjects will be randomized 2:1 to RPh201 or placebo. The Treatment Phase will last for 6 months post-randomization, or until subject withdrawal from the study, whichever comes first. The Optional Open-Label Extension will begin once a subject has completed the Treatment Phase and the subject and their study partner(s) have signed an ICF to continue on the study. The Optional Open-Label Extension will continue for 6 months, or until subject withdrawal from the study, whichever comes first. Subjects who do not participate in the Optional Open-Label Extension will be asked to return for an optional post-study visit 6 months after the end of the Treatment Phase.
Subjects may participate in an optional biomarker sub-study. Up to 15 subjects may also participate in an optional FDG-PET sub-study during their study participation. Separate informed consent will be required for both of these sub-studies.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| RPh201 | Experimental | A 26-week schedule consisting of twice-weekly subcutaneous administration of 400 μL of the IMP (20 mg RPh201). |
|
| Placebo | Placebo Comparator | A 26-week schedule consisting of twice-weekly subcutaneous administration of 400 μL of the vehicle control. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RPh201 | Drug | RPh201 is a well-defined extract from a botanical source |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in (Alzheimer disease assessment scale) ADAS-Cog score between Baseline and Month 6 | The ADAS-Cog is an established general cognitive measure scaled used in clinical trials of AD. The ADAS-Cog assesses multiple performance and cognitive domains including memory, language, praxis, and orientation. Test responses are scored using summed error points where 0 represents no errors and 70 represents errors on all items; higher scores indicate greater cognitive impairment. | Month 6 |
| Change in CDR-SB score between Baseline and Month 6 | The CDR is a global clinical scale with established diagnostic and severity-ranking utility widely used in clinical trials yielding global and sum of boxes scores (CDR-SB). The CDR global score is used in AD trials as a global measure of disease severity. The CDR is rated based on subject and informant input. The CDR assess three domains of cognition (memory, orientation, judgment/problem solving) and three domains of function (community affairs, home/hobbies, personal care) using semi- structured interviews of both the study subject and a companion/informant carried out by a trained rater and scored using a standard methodology. Each domain is rated on a 5-point scale of functioning as follows: (0) no impairment; (0.5) questionable impairment; (1) mild impairment; (2) moderate impairment; (3) severe impairment (personal care is scored on a 4-point scale without a 0.5 rating available). Higher scores indicate greater impairment. | Month 6 |
| AEs at Month 6 | Month 6 | |
| 12-lead ECG at Month 6 | Month 6 | |
| Clinical Laboratory Assessments - (blood and urine) at at Month 6 | Chemistry: alkaline phosphatase, albumin, blood urea nitrogen, calcium, chloride, creatinine, glucose (random), inorganic phosphorus, potassium, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, lactate dehydrogenase, sodium, direct bilirubin, total bilirubin, total protein, amylase, uric acid Hematology: haemoglobin, hematocrit, red blood cell count, white blood cell (WBC) count, WBC differential (absolute counts), numerical platelet count Urinalysis: specific gravity, pH, ketones, glucose, nitrite, blood, leukocyte esterase, protein, urobilinogen, bilirubin If nitrite, blood, or protein tests are positive, a microscopic examination will be performed |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change from Baseline on ADAS-Cog total scores at Month 3 | The ADAS-Cog is an established general cognitive measure scaled used in clinical trials of AD. The ADAS-Cog assesses multiple performance and cognitive domains including memory, language, praxis, and orientation. Test responses are scored using summed error points where 0 represents no errors and 70 represents errors on all items; higher scores indicate greater cognitive impairment. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| AD blood biomarkers to assess change from Baseline at Month 6 | Month 6 | |
| AD blood biomarkers to assess change from Baseline at Month 12 | Month 12 | |
| Change in FDG-PET between Baseline and Month 6 in a subset of subjects (Optinal) |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Sharon Cohen, MD | Toronto Memory Program | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kawartha Centre - Redefining Healthy Aging | Peterborough | Ontario | K9H 2P4 | Canada | ||
| Toronto Memory Program |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
1:2
| Placebo |
| Other |
Inactive placebo consisting of the therapeutic vehicle |
|
|
| Month 6 |
| Vital Signs | Vital signs consist of tympanic temperature, respiratory rate, blood pressure (systolic and diastolic blood pressure, mmHg), and pulse (bpm) after at least 3 minutes rest. Blood pressure will be measured in a sitting or semi-reclined seated position. Weight and height will be captured at Screening and weight will be captured at all other visits where this assessment is performed. | Month 6 |
| Months 3 |
| Change from Baseline on ADAS-Cog total scores at Month 5 | The ADAS-Cog is an established general cognitive measure scaled used in clinical trials of AD. The ADAS-Cog assesses multiple performance and cognitive domains including memory, language, praxis, and orientation. Test responses are scored using summed error points where 0 represents no errors and 70 represents errors on all items; higher scores indicate greater cognitive impairment. | Month 5 |
| Change from Baseline on ADAS-Cog total scores at Month 12 | The ADAS-Cog is an established general cognitive measure scaled used in clinical trials of AD. The ADAS-Cog assesses multiple performance and cognitive domains including memory, language, praxis, and orientation. Test responses are scored using summed error points where 0 represents no errors and 70 represents errors on all items; higher scores indicate greater cognitive impairment. | Month 12 |
| Change from Baseline on CDR-SB total scores at Month 3 | The CDR is a global clinical scale with established diagnostic and severity-ranking utility widely used in clinical trials yielding global and sum of boxes scores (CDR-SB). The CDR global score is used in AD trials as a global measure of disease severity. The CDR is rated based on subject and informant input. The CDR assess three domains of cognition (memory, orientation, judgment/problem solving) and three domains of function (community affairs, home/hobbies, personal care) using semi- structured interviews of both the study subject and a companion/informant carried out by a trained rater and scored using a standard methodology. Each domain is rated on a 5-point scale of functioning as follows: (0) no impairment; (0.5) questionable impairment; (1) mild impairment; (2) moderate impairment; (3) severe impairment (personal care is scored on a 4-point scale without a 0.5 rating available). Higher scores indicate greater impairment. | Month 3 |
| Change from Baseline on CDR-SB total scores at Month 5 | The CDR is a global clinical scale with established diagnostic and severity-ranking utility widely used in clinical trials yielding global and sum of boxes scores (CDR-SB). The CDR global score is used in AD trials as a global measure of disease severity. The CDR is rated based on subject and informant input. The CDR assess three domains of cognition (memory, orientation, judgment/problem solving) and three domains of function (community affairs, home/hobbies, personal care) using semi- structured interviews of both the study subject and a companion/informant carried out by a trained rater and scored using a standard methodology. Each domain is rated on a 5-point scale of functioning as follows: (0) no impairment; (0.5) questionable impairment; (1) mild impairment; (2) moderate impairment; (3) severe impairment (personal care is scored on a 4-point scale without a 0.5 rating available). Higher scores indicate greater impairment. | Month 5 |
| Change from Baseline on CDR-SB total scores at Month 12 | The CDR is a global clinical scale with established diagnostic and severity-ranking utility widely used in clinical trials yielding global and sum of boxes scores (CDR-SB). The CDR global score is used in AD trials as a global measure of disease severity. The CDR is rated based on subject and informant input. The CDR assess three domains of cognition (memory, orientation, judgment/problem solving) and three domains of function (community affairs, home/hobbies, personal care) using semi- structured interviews of both the study subject and a companion/informant carried out by a trained rater and scored using a standard methodology. Each domain is rated on a 5-point scale of functioning as follows: (0) no impairment; (0.5) questionable impairment; (1) mild impairment; (2) moderate impairment; (3) severe impairment (personal care is scored on a 4-point scale without a 0.5 rating available). Higher scores indicate greater impairment. | Month 12 |
| Change from Baseline in ADCS-ADL total score at Month 3 | The ADCS-ADL is an assessment consisting of 23 basic and instrumental ADLs used in mild to moderate AD subjects.7 The scores of the informant-rated assessment are graded against a 78- point scale, with lower scores indicating greater impairment. | Month 3 |
| Change from Baseline in ADCS-ADL total score at Months 12 | The ADCS-ADL is an assessment consisting of 23 basic and instrumental ADLs used in mild to moderate AD subjects.7 The scores of the informant-rated assessment are graded against a 78- point scale, with lower scores indicating greater impairment. | Month 12 |
| Change from Baseline in NPI total score at Month 3 | The NPI is designed to detect, quantify, and track changes of psychiatric symptoms in a demented population.6 It uses a structured, caregiver-based interview format to assess 10 behavioral domains (delusions, hallucinations, agitation/aggression, dysphoria/depression, anxiety, apathy, irritability, euphoria, disinhibition, and aberrant motor behavior). The same behaviors are then rated on level of severity (1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe). The domain total score is the product of the frequency score multiplied by the severity score for that behavioral domain. An NPI total score is obtained by summing all the individual domain total scores. | Month 3 |
| Change from Baseline in NPI total score at Month 6 | The NPI (Appendix 7) is designed to detect, quantify, and track changes of psychiatric symptoms in a demented population.6 It uses a structured, caregiver-based interview format to assess 10 behavioral domains (delusions, hallucinations, agitation/aggression, dysphoria/depression, anxiety, apathy, irritability, euphoria, disinhibition, and aberrant motor behavior). The same behaviors are then rated on level of severity (1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe). The domain total score is the product of the frequency score multiplied by the severity score for that behavioral domain. An NPI total score is obtained by summing all the individual domain total scores. | Month 6 |
| Change from Baseline in NPI total score at Month 12 | The NPI (Appendix 7) is designed to detect, quantify, and track changes of psychiatric symptoms in a demented population.6 It uses a structured, caregiver-based interview format to assess 10 behavioral domains (delusions, hallucinations, agitation/aggression, dysphoria/depression, anxiety, apathy, irritability, euphoria, disinhibition, and aberrant motor behavior). The same behaviors are then rated on level of severity (1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe). The domain total score is the product of the frequency score multiplied by the severity score for that behavioral domain. An NPI total score is obtained by summing all the individual domain total scores. | Month 12 |
| Change from Baseline in the MMSE at Month 3 | The MMSE is a brief 30-point examination consisting of 11 questions intended to evaluate an adult subject's level of cognition. The MMSE evaluates 6 areas of cognition: orientation, attention, immediate recall, short-term recall, language, and the ability to follow simple verbal and written commands. In addition, it provides a total score allowing the examiner to evaluate the severity of cognitive impairment. The MMSE will be scored using backward spelling (WORLD) and not serial subtractions. The scoring of WORLD will follow the original Folstein et al (1975)8 instructions for this assessment. | Month 3 |
| Change from Baseline in the MMSE at Month 6 | The MMSE is a brief 30-point examination consisting of 11 questions intended to evaluate an adult subject's level of cognition. The MMSE evaluates 6 areas of cognition: orientation, attention, immediate recall, short-term recall, language, and the ability to follow simple verbal and written commands. In addition, it provides a total score allowing the examiner to evaluate the severity of cognitive impairment. The MMSE will be scored using backward spelling (WORLD) and not serial subtractions. The scoring of WORLD will follow the original Folstein et al (1975)8 instructions for this assessment. | Month 6 |
| Change from Baseline in the MMSE at Month 12 | The MMSE is a brief 30-point examination consisting of 11 questions intended to evaluate an adult subject's level of cognition. The MMSE evaluates 6 areas of cognition: orientation, attention, immediate recall, short-term recall, language, and the ability to follow simple verbal and written commands. In addition, it provides a total score allowing the examiner to evaluate the severity of cognitive impairment. The MMSE will be scored using backward spelling (WORLD) and not serial subtractions. The scoring of WORLD will follow the original Folstein et al (1975)8 instructions for this assessment. | Month 12 |
| AEs at Month 12 | Month 12 |
| Clinically significant changes in vital signs at Month 12 | Month 12 |
| 12-lead ECG at Month 12 | Month 12 |
| Clinical Laboratory Assessments - (blood and urine) at Month 12 | Chemistry: alkaline phosphatase, albumin, blood urea nitrogen, calcium, chloride, creatinine, glucose (random), inorganic phosphorus, potassium, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, lactate dehydrogenase, sodium, direct bilirubin, total bilirubin, total protein, amylase, uric acid Hematology: haemoglobin, hematocrit, red blood cell count, white blood cell (WBC) count, WBC differential (absolute counts), numerical platelet count Urinalysis: specific gravity, pH, ketones, glucose, nitrite, blood, leukocyte esterase, protein, urobilinogen, bilirubin If nitrite, blood, or protein tests are positive, a microscopic examination will be performed | Month 12 |
| Vital Signs | Vital signs consist of tympanic temperature, respiratory rate, blood pressure (systolic and diastolic blood pressure, mmHg), and pulse (bpm) after at least 3 minutes rest. Blood pressure will be measured in a sitting or semi-reclined seated position. Weight and height will be captured at Screening and weight will be captured at all other visits where this assessment is performed. | Month 12 |
18-Fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) is a noninvasive, 3-dimensional imaging modality that has become widely used in the management of subjects with malignant lymphomas.9 Up to 15 subjects will participate in an optional FDG-PET sub-study to assess the effect of RPh201 on cerebral glucose metabolism at Baseline and after 6 months of treatment. |
| Month 6 |
| Toronto |
| Ontario |
| M3B 2S7 |
| Canada |
| Gerontion Research Inc., The Center for Memory & Aging | Toronto | Ontario | M4G 3E8 | Canada |
| Recherches Neuro-Hippocampe Inc. d/b/a Clinique de la Memoire de l'Outaouais | Gatineau | Quebec | J8T 8J1 | Canada |
| Diex Recherche Sherbrooke Inc. | Sherbrooke | Quebec | J1L 0H8 | Canada |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000544 | Alzheimer Disease |
| D003704 | Dementia |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D024801 | Tauopathies |
| D019636 | Neurodegenerative Diseases |
| D019965 | Neurocognitive Disorders |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003369 | Cottonseed Oil |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004042 | Dietary Fats, Unsaturated |
| D004041 | Dietary Fats |
| D005223 | Fats |
| D008055 | Lipids |
| D005224 | Fats, Unsaturated |
| D010938 | Plant Oils |
| D009821 | Oils |
| D028321 | Plant Preparations |
| D001688 | Biological Products |
| D045424 | Complex Mixtures |
| D005502 | Food |
| D000066888 | Diet, Food, and Nutrition |
| D010829 | Physiological Phenomena |
| D019602 | Food and Beverages |
Not provided
Not provided