Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
COVID-19 increased risk of participation
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Previous research suggests that heart rate variability (HRV) biofeedback aimed at increasing HRV can reduce anxiety and stress. However, some mental quiescence practices that reduce HRV during the practice sessions also lead to positive emotional outcomes. Thus, it is not obvious that the benefits of HRV-biofeedback accrue due to increasing HRV during the session. An alternative possibility is that the benefits arise from engaging prefrontal control over heart rate. In this study, the investigators will test two possible mechanisms of the effects of HRV on emotional health by comparing two groups. In one group, participants will be asked to engage in daily training to decrease HRV using the HRV biofeedback device. In the other group, participants will be asked to engage in daily training to increase HRV using the HRV biofeedback device. This will allow analyses to pit two possible mechanisms against each other:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| HRV-increase group | Experimental | Half of the participants will be randomly assigned to this group who will undergo daily practice to increase their heart rate variability (HRV). |
|
| HRV-decrease group | Experimental | Half of the participants will be randomly assigned to this group who will undergo daily practice to decrease their HRV and heart rate. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HRV training | Behavioral | Participants will be asked to undergo daily practice to regulate (either increase or decrease) HRV for 5 weeks. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| mPFC-right Amygdala Resting-state Functional Connectivity for Younger Adults (ANOVA) | The strength of resting-state functional connectivity was measured by correlation coefficients. Values represent the correlation of BOLD time-series between mPFC and the right amygdala. Higher values indicate greater connectivity. | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
| mPFC-right Amygdala Resting-state Functional Connectivity for Older Adults (ANOVA) | The strength of resting-state functional connectivity was measured by correlation coefficients. Values represent the correlation of BOLD time-series between mPFC and the right amygdala. Higher values indicate greater connectivity. | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
| mPFC-right Amygdala Resting-state Functional Connectivity for Younger Adults (Post-Pre) | The strength of resting-state functional connectivity between mPFC and the right amygdala was measured by correlation coefficients. The difference in functional connectivity between the two time points (Time 2 - Time 1) was calculated. Higher values indicate greater connectivity at Time 2 than Time 1 (or post- than pre-intervention). | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
| mPFC-right Amygdala Resting-state Functional Connectivity for Older Adults (Post-Pre) | The strength of resting-state functional connectivity between mPFC and the right amygdala was measured by correlation coefficients. The difference in functional connectivity between the two time points (Time 2 - Time 1) was calculated. Higher values indicate greater connectivity at Time 2 than Time 1 (or post- than pre-intervention). | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Emotion Regulation in Younger Adults (Behavior) | Emotional intensity ratings, which participants reported during the emotion regulation task inside MRI scanner before and after intervention. The ratings ranged from 1 through 4, and 4 represents strongest intensity. | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
| Emotion Regulation in Older Adults (Behavior) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Working Memory for Younger Adults | Working memory performance measured by NIH Toolbox List Sorting Working Memory Test (LSWM). The standard score is calculated to have a normative mean of 100 and a standard deviation (SD) of 15. Scores range from 59 to 140, with higher scores indicating better Working memory. | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
MRI screening
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Mara Mather, PhD | University of Southern California | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Southern California | Los Angeles | California | 90089 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 36894565 | Derived | Min J, Rouanet J, Martini AC, Nashiro K, Yoo HJ, Porat S, Cho C, Wan J, Cole SW, Head E, Nation DA, Thayer JF, Mather M. Modulating heart rate oscillation affects plasma amyloid beta and tau levels in younger and older adults. Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 9;13(1):3967. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-30167-0. | |
| 36658380 | Derived |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Younger HRV-increase Group | Participants in this group were between the ages of 18 and 35. Half of the younger participants were randomly assigned to this group and underwent daily practice to increase their heart rate variability (HRV) for 5 weeks. |
| FG001 | Younger HRV-decrease Group | Participants in this group were between the ages of 18 and 35. Half of the younger participants were randomly assigned to this group and underwent daily practice to decrease their heart rate variability (HRV) for 5 weeks. |
| FG002 | Older HRV-increase Group | Participants in this group were between the ages of 55 and 80. Half of the older participants were randomly assigned to this group and underwent daily practice to increase their heart rate variability (HRV) for 5 weeks. |
| FG003 | Older HRV-decrease Group | Participants in this group were between the ages of 55 and 80. Half of the older participants were randomly assigned to this group and underwent daily practice to decrease their heart rate variability (HRV) for 5 weeks. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Younger HRV-increase Group | Participants in this group were between the ages of 18 and 35. Half of the younger participants were randomly assigned to this group and underwent daily practice to increase their heart rate variability (HRV) for 5 weeks. |
| BG001 | Younger HRV-decrease Group |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | mPFC-right Amygdala Resting-state Functional Connectivity for Younger Adults (ANOVA) | The strength of resting-state functional connectivity was measured by correlation coefficients. Values represent the correlation of BOLD time-series between mPFC and the right amygdala. Higher values indicate greater connectivity. | Population analyzed was composed by all randomization subjects who completed pre- and post-intervention assessments and whose data quality was sufficient for data analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | correlation coefficients | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
|
7 weeks
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Younger HRV-increase Group | Participants in this group are between the ages of 18 and 35. Half of the younger participants will be randomly assigned to this group who will undergo daily practice to increase their heart rate variability (HRV). |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Mara Mather | University of Southern California | (213) 821-1868 | mara.mather@usc.edu |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Jul 9, 2018 | Feb 28, 2024 | Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Sep 9, 2024 | Sep 9, 2024 | SAP_001.pdf |
Not provided
Participants will be randomly assigned to either the HRV-increase group or the HRV-decrease group.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Emotional intensity ratings, which participants reported during the emotion regulation task inside MRI scanner before and after intervention. The ratings ranged from 1 through 4, and 4 represents strongest intensity. |
| Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
| Left Amygdala BOLD Activity During Emotion Regulation in Younger Adults | We measured percent changes (%) in BOLD activity in the left amygdala region during emotion down-regulation, viewing, and up-regulation before and after intervention. The viewing condition was used as a baseline during the task. The change is represented by %. | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
| Left Amygdala BOLD Activity During Emotion Regulation in Older Adults | We measured percent changes (%) in BOLD activity in the left amygdala region during emotion down-regulation, viewing, and up-regulation before and after intervention. The viewing condition was used as a baseline during the task. The change is represented by %. | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
| Right Amygdala BOLD Activity During Emotion Regulation in Younger Adults | We measured percent changes (%) in BOLD activity in the right amygdala region during emotion down-regulation, viewing, and up-regulation before and after intervention. The viewing condition was used as a baseline during the task. The change is represented by %. | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
| Right Amygdala BOLD Activity During Emotion Regulation in Older Adults | We measured percent changes (%) in BOLD activity in the right amygdala region during emotion down-regulation, viewing, and up-regulation before and after intervention. The viewing condition was used as a baseline during the task. The change is represented by %. | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
| Decision-making for Younger Adults at Post Intervention (Behavior) | The decision-making ability was measured by multiple-choice responses during a computer-based task. Median percentage of acceptance of unfair offers and fair offers were calculated. A higher percentage of accepted both unfair and fair offers points toward more rational decision-making and likely better emotion regulation. This task was administered only at post-intervention (but not pre-intervention). | one time point: at study completion, which is the end of 5-week training |
| Decision-making for Younger Adults (fMRI) | We measured percent changes (%) in BOLD activity in the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex and anterior insula during a computer-based decision-making task. Higher values indicate greater activity. | one time point: at study completion, which is the end of 5-week training |
| Mood for Younger Adults | Emotional well-being measured by the Profile of Mood States (POMS) for younger adults. The POMS consists of 40 items that are rated on a 5-point scale ranging from "0=not at all" to "4=extremely. Total Mood Disturbance (TMD) was calculated by summing the totals for the negative items and then subtracting the totals for the positive items. A constant (i.e., 100) was added to the TMD formula in order to eliminate negative scores. Higher scores indicate more negative mood states. The scores range from 56 and 216. | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
| Mood for Older Adults | Emotional well-being measured by the Profile of Mood States (POMS) for older adults. The POMS consists of 40 items that are rated on a 5-point scale ranging from "0=not at all" to "4=extremely. Total Mood Disturbance (TMD) was calculated by summing the totals for the negative items and then subtracting the totals for the positive items. A constant (i.e., 100) was added to the TMD formula in order to eliminate negative scores. Higher scores indicate more negative mood states. The scores range from 56 and 216. | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
| Depression for Younger Adults | Emotional well-being measured by the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) for younger adults. The CES-D consists of 20 items that are rated on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = Rarely or None of the Time, 1 = Some or Little of the Time, 2 = Moderately or Much of the time, 3 = Most or Almost All the Time). Possible range of scores is 0 to 60, with the higher scores indicating more depressive symptoms. | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
| Depression for Older Adults | Emotional well-being measured by the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) for older adults. The CES-D consists of 20 items that are rated on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = Rarely or None of the Time, 1 = Some or Little of the Time, 2 = Moderately or Much of the time, 3 = Most or Almost All the Time). Possible range of scores is 0 to 60, with the higher scores indicating more depressive symptoms. | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
| State Anxiety for Younger Adults | Emotional well-being measured by the State Anxiety Inventory (SAI) for younger adults. The SAI consists of 20 items that are rated on a 4-point scale as follows: 1) not at all, 2) somewhat, 3) moderately so, and 4) very much so. Scores range from 20 to 80, with higher scores indicating greater state anxiety. | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
| State Anxiety for Older Adults | Emotional well-being measured by the State Anxiety Inventory (SAI) for older adults. The SAI consists of 20 items that are rated on a 4-point scale as follows: 1) not at all, 2) somewhat, 3) moderately so, and 4) very much so. Scores range from 20 to 80, with higher scores indicating greater state anxiety. | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
| Trait Anxiety for Younger Adults | Emotional well-being measured by the Trait Anxiety Inventory (TAI) for younger adults. The TAI consists of 20 items that are rated on a 4-point scale as follows: 1) not at all, 2) somewhat, 3) moderately so, and 4) very much so. Scores range from 20 to 80, with higher scores indicating greater trait anxiety. | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
| Trait Anxiety for Older Adults | Emotional well-being measured by the Trait Anxiety Inventory (TAI) for older adults. The TAI consists of 20 items that are rated on a 4-point scale as follows: 1) not at all, 2) somewhat, 3) moderately so, and 4) very much so. Scores range from 20 to 80, with higher scores indicating greater trait anxiety. | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
| Stress Recovery (Systolic Blood Pressure) for Younger Adults | Difference in stress recovery elicited by standard cognitive tasks, as assessed by change in systolic blood pressure from cognitive tasks to recovery rest | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
| Stress Recovery (Systolic Blood Pressure) for Older Adults | Difference in stress recovery elicited by standard cognitive tasks, as assessed by change in systolic blood pressure from cognitive tasks to recovery rest | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
| Stress Recovery (Heart Rate) for Younger Adults | Difference in stress recovery elicited by standard cognitive tasks, as assessed by change in heart rate from cognitive tasks to recovery rest | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
| Stress Recovery (Heart Rate) for Older Adults | Difference in stress recovery elicited by standard cognitive tasks, as assessed by change in heart rate from cognitive tasks to recovery rest | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
| Stress Recovery (Breathing Rate) for Younger Adults | Difference in stress recovery elicited by standard cognitive tasks, as assessed by change in breathing rate from cognitive tasks to recovery rest | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
| Stress Recovery (Breathing Rate) for Older Adults | Difference in stress recovery elicited by standard cognitive tasks, as assessed by change in breathing rate from cognitive tasks to recovery rest | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
| Stress Reactivity (Systolic Blood Pressure) for Younger Adults | Difference in stress reactivity elicited by standard cognitive tasks, as assessed by change in systolic blood pressure from rest to cognitive tasks | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
| Stress Reactivity (Systolic Blood Pressure) for Older Adults | Difference in stress reactivity elicited by standard cognitive tasks, as assessed by change in systolic blood pressure from rest to cognitive tasks | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
| Stress Reactivity (Heart Rate) for Younger Adults | Difference in stress reactivity elicited by standard cognitive tasks, as assessed by change in heart rate from rest to cognitive tasks | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
| Stress Reactivity (Heart Rate) for Older Adults | Difference in stress reactivity elicited by standard cognitive tasks, as assessed by change in heart rate from cognitive tasks to recovery rest | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
| Stress Reactivity (Breathing Rate) for Younger Adults | Difference in stress reactivity elicited by standard cognitive tasks, as assessed by change in breathing rate from rest to cognitive tasks | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
| Stress Reactivity (Breathing Rate) for Older Adults | Difference in stress reactivity elicited by standard cognitive tasks, as assessed by change in breathing rate from rest to cognitive tasks | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
| Arterial Spin Labeling (ASL) for Younger Adults | Cerebral blood flow was measured at pre-training resting state and post-training paced-breathing. | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
| Arterial Spin Labeling (ASL) for Older Adults | Cerebral blood flow was measured at pre-training resting state and post-training paced-breathing. | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
| High Frequency (HF) HRV for Younger Adults | HRV measured by high frequency (HF) HRV for younger adults. HF-HRV was quantified as the spectral power of interbeat interval variability within the high frequency range (typically 0.15-0.40 Hz), which reflects parasympathetic (vagal) activity. In this study, HF-HRV was obtained using photoplethysmography (PPG) methods. During a standardized resting condition, the device continuously recorded interbeat intervals. These data were then processed via spectral analysis to calculate the power in the high frequency band. Measurements are expressed in units of milliseconds squared (ms²). Higher HF-HRV values indicate increased parasympathetic modulation and are generally associated with improved autonomic regulation and better cognitive performance. | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
| High Frequency (HF) HRV for Older Adults | HRV measured by high frequency (HF) HRV for older adults. HF-HRV was quantified as the spectral power of interbeat interval variability within the high frequency range (typically 0.15-0.40 Hz), which reflects parasympathetic (vagal) activity. In this study, HF-HRV was obtained using photoplethysmography (PPG) methods. During a standardized resting condition, the device continuously recorded interbeat intervals. These data were then processed via spectral analysis to calculate the power in the high frequency band. Measurements are expressed in units of milliseconds squared (ms²). Higher HF-HRV values indicate increased parasympathetic modulation and are generally associated with improved autonomic regulation and better cognitive performance. | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
| Low Frequency (LF) HRV for Younger Adults | HRV measured by low frequency (LF) HRV for younger adults. LF-HRV was quantified as the spectral power of interbeat interval variability within the low frequency range (typically 0.04-0.15 Hz), which reflects the combined influences of sympathetic and parasympathetic activity. In this study, LF-HRV was obtained using photoplethysmography (PPG) methods. During a standardized resting condition, the device continuously recorded interbeat intervals. These data were then processed via spectral analysis to calculate the power in the low frequency band. Measurements are expressed in units of milliseconds squared (ms²). Although LF-HRV reflects contributions from both branches of the autonomic nervous system, higher LF-HRV values can indicate enhanced autonomic modulation, with interpretation made in the context of overall autonomic balance. | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
| Low Frequency (LF) HRV for Older Adults | HRV measured by low frequency (LF) HRV for older adults. LF-HRV was quantified as the spectral power of interbeat interval variability within the low frequency range (typically 0.04-0.15 Hz), which reflects the combined influences of sympathetic and parasympathetic activity. In this study, LF-HRV was obtained using photoplethysmography (PPG) methods. During a standardized resting condition, the device continuously recorded interbeat intervals. These data were then processed via spectral analysis to calculate the power in the low frequency band. Measurements are expressed in units of milliseconds squared (ms²). Although LF-HRV reflects contributions from both branches of the autonomic nervous system, higher LF-HRV values can indicate enhanced autonomic modulation, with interpretation made in the context of overall autonomic balance. | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
| The Root Mean Squared Successive Differences (RMSSD) HRV for Younger Adults | HRV measured by the root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD) for younger adults. RMSSD (Root Mean Square of Successive Differences) is a time-domain measure that quantifies the variability between successive interbeat intervals, primarily reflecting parasympathetic (vagal) activity. In this study, RMSSD was obtained using photoplethysmography (PPG) methods. During a standardized resting condition, the device continuously recorded interbeat intervals, and RMSSD was computed as the square root of the mean of the squared differences between consecutive interbeat intervals. Measurements are expressed in milliseconds (ms). Higher RMSSD values indicate increased parasympathetic modulation, generally associated with improved autonomic regulation and better cardiovascular and cognitive performance. | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
| The Root Mean Squared Successive Differences (RMSSD) HRV for Older Adults | HRV measured by the root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD) for older adults. RMSSD (Root Mean Square of Successive Differences) is a time-domain measure that quantifies the variability between successive interbeat intervals, primarily reflecting parasympathetic (vagal) activity. In this study, RMSSD was obtained using photoplethysmography (PPG) methods. During a standardized resting condition, the device continuously recorded interbeat intervals, and RMSSD was computed as the square root of the mean of the squared differences between consecutive interbeat intervals. Measurements are expressed in milliseconds (ms). Higher RMSSD values indicate increased parasympathetic modulation, generally associated with improved autonomic regulation and better cardiovascular and cognitive performance. | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
| Inflammation Measured by C-reactive Protein for Younger Adults | Inflammation measured by salivary C-reactive protein (CRP) for younger adults | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
| Inflammation Measured by C-reactive Protein for Older Adults | Inflammation measured by salivary C-reactive protein (CRP) for older adults | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
| Inflammation Measured by IL-1b Levels for Younger Adults | Inflammation measured by salivary IL-1b levels for younger adults | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
| Inflammation Measured by IL-1b Levels for Older Adults | Inflammation measured by salivary IL-1b levels for older adults | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
| Inflammation Measured by IL-6 Levels for Younger Adults | Inflammation measured by salivary IL-6 levels for younger adults | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
| Inflammation Measured by IL-6 Levels for Older Adults | Inflammation measured by salivary IL-6 levels for older adults | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
| Inflammation Measured by IL-8 Levels for Younger Adults | Inflammation measured by salivary IL-8 levels for younger adults | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
| Inflammation Measured by IL-8 Levels for Older Adults | Inflammation measured by salivary IL-8 levels for older adults | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
| Inflammation Measured by TNF-a Levels for Younger Adults | Inflammation measured by salivary TNF-a levels for younger adults | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
| Inflammation Measured by TNF-a Levels for Older Adults | Inflammation measured by salivary TNF-a levels for older adults | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
| Plasma Amyloid Beta 40 (Aβ40) for Younger Adults | Plasma Aβ40 levels at pre- and post-intervention were compared between HRV-increase and HRV-decrease group for younger adults. | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
| Plasma Amyloid Beta 40 (Aβ40) for Older Adults | Plasma Aβ40 levels at pre- and post-intervention were compared between HRV-increase and HRV-decrease group for older adults. | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
| Plasma Amyloid Beta 42 (Aβ42) Younger Adults | Plasma Aβ42 levels at pre- and post-intervention were compared between HRV-increase and HRV-decrease group for younger adults. | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
| Plasma Amyloid Beta 42 (Aβ42) for Older Adults | Plasma Aβ42 levels at pre- and post-intervention were compared between HRV-increase and HRV-decrease group for older adults. | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
| Plasma Phosphorylated Tau 181 (pTau) for Younger Adults | Plasma pTau levels at pre- and post-intervention were reported for HRV-increase and HRV-decrease group for younger adults. | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
| Plasma Phosphorylated Tau 181 (pTau) for Older Adults | Plasma pTau levels at pre- and post-intervention were compared between HRV-increase and HRV-decrease group for older adults. | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
| Plasma Total Tau (tTau) for Younger Adults | Plasma tTau levels at pre- and post-intervention were reported for HRV-increase and HRV-decrease group for younger adults. | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
| Plasma Total Tau (tTau) for Older Adults | Plasma tTau levels at pre- and post-intervention were compared between HRV-increase and HRV-decrease group for older adults. | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
| LC-innervated Subregion Volume in the Hippocampus for Younger Adults | LC-innervated subregion volume in the hippocampus at pre- and post-intervention was compared between the HRV-increase and HRV-decrease groups in younger adults. | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
| LC-innervated Subregion Volume in the Hippocampus for Older Adults | LC-innervated subregion volume in the hippocampus at pre- and post-intervention was compared between the HRV-increase and HRV-decrease groups in older adults. | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
| Cortical Volume in the Left Orbitofrontal Cortex for Younger Adults | Left orbitofrontal volume at pre- and post-intervention was compared between the HRV-increase and HRV-decrease groups in younger adults. | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
| Cortical Volume in the Left Orbitofrontal Cortex for Older Adults | Left orbitofrontal volume at pre- and post-intervention was compared between the HRV-increase and HRV-decrease groups in older adults. | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
| Cortical Volume in the Right Orbitofrontal Cortex for Younger Adults | Right orbitofrontal volume at pre- and post-intervention was compared between the HRV-increase and HRV-decrease groups in younger adults. | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
| Cortical Volume in the Right Orbitofrontal Cortex for Older Adults | Right orbitofrontal volume at pre- and post-intervention was compared between the HRV-increase and HRV-decrease groups in older adults. | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
| mPFC-left Amygdala Resting-state Functional Connectivity for Younger Adults (Post-Pre) | The strength of resting-state functional connectivity between mPFC and the left amygdala was measured by correlation coefficients. The difference in functional connectivity between the two time points (Time 2 - Time 1) was calculated. Higher values indicate greater connectivity at Time 2 than Time 1 (or post- than pre-intervention). | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
| mPFC-left Amygdala Resting-state Functional Connectivity for Older Adults (Post-Pre) | The strength of resting-state functional connectivity between mPFC and the left amygdala was measured by correlation coefficients. The difference in functional connectivity between the two time points (Time 2 - Time 1) was calculated. Higher values indicate greater connectivity at Time 2 than Time 1 (or post- than pre-intervention). | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
| mPFC-left Amygdala Resting-state Functional Connectivity for Younger Adults (ANOVA) | The strength of resting-state functional connectivity was measured by correlation coefficients. Values represent the correlation of BOLD time-series between mPFC and the left amygdala. Higher values indicate greater connectivity. | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
| mPFC-left Amygdala Resting-state Functional Connectivity for Older Adults (ANOVA) | The strength of resting-state functional connectivity was measured by correlation coefficients. Values represent the correlation of BOLD time-series between mPFC and the left amygdala. Higher values indicate greater connectivity. | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
| Working Memory for Older Adults |
Working memory performance measured by NIH Toolbox List Sorting Working Memory Test (LSWM). The standard score is calculated to have a normative mean of 100 and a standard deviation (SD) of 15. Scores range from 59 to 140, with higher scores indicating better Working memory. |
| Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
| Processing Speed for Younger Adults | Processing speed performance measured by NIH Toolbox Pattern Comparison Processing Speed Test (PCPS). The standard score is calculated to have a normative mean of 100 and a standard deviation (SD) of 15. Scores range from 59 to 140, with higher scores indicating faster processing speed. | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
| Processing Speed for Older Adults | Processing speed performance measured by NIH Toolbox Pattern Comparison Processing Speed Test (PCPS). The standard score is calculated to have a normative mean of 100 and a standard deviation (SD) of 15. Scores range from 59 to 140, with higher scores indicating faster processing speed. | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
| Inhibitory Control and Attention for Younger Adults | Inhibitory control performance measured by NIH Toolbox Flanker Inhibitory Control and Attention Test (Flanker). The standard score is calculated to have a normative mean of 100 and a standard deviation (SD) of 15. Scores range from 59 to 140, with higher scores indicating better Inhibitory Control and Attention. | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
| Inhibitory Control and Attention for Older Adults | Inhibitory control performance measured by NIH Toolbox Flanker Inhibitory Control and Attention Test (Flanker). The standard score is calculated to have a normative mean of 100 and a standard deviation (SD) of 15. Scores range from 59 to 140, with higher scores indicating better Inhibitory Control and Attention. | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
| Sustained Attention for Younger Adults | Sustained attention performance was measured by Sustained Attention to Response Test (SART). A commission error was calculated as the number of button press for 25 no-go trials, and an omission error was calculated as the number of no button press for 200 go trials in younger adults. The number of errors range from 0 to 25 for commission errors and from 0 to 200 for omission errors. A higher number of omission and commission errors indicates worse sustained attention performance. | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
| Sustained Attention for Older Adults | Sustained attention performance was measured by Sustained Attention to Response Test (SART). A commission error was calculated as the number of button press for 25 no-go trials, and an omission error was calculated as the number of no button press for 200 go trials in older adults. The number of errors range from 0 to 25 for commission errors and from 0 to 200 for omission errors. A higher number of omission and commission errors indicates worse sustained attention performance. | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
| Recognition Memory for Younger Adults (Hits) | Recognition memory performance based on average proportion of previously presented images that were correctly identified (i.e., hits) by younger adults | Week 5 Lab Visit (after about 2.5-3 weeks of training) |
| Recognition Memory for Older Adults (Hits) | Recognition memory performance based on average proportion of previously presented images that were correctly identified (i.e., hits) by older adults | Week 5 Lab Visit (after about 2.5-3 weeks of training) |
| Recognition Memory for Younger Adults (False Alarm) | Recognition memory performance based on average proportion of images not previously presented that were incorrectly identified as seen (i.e., False Alarms) by younger adults | Week 5 Lab Visit (after about 2.5-3 weeks of training) |
| Recognition Memory for Older Adults (False Alarm) | Recognition memory performance based on average proportion of images not previously presented that were incorrectly identified as seen (i.e., False Alarms) by older adults | Week 5 Lab Visit (after about 2.5-3 weeks of training) |
| Recall Memory for Younger Adults | Average proportion of previously presented images that were correctly recalled by younger adults | Week 5 Lab Visit (after about 2.5-3 weeks of training) |
| Recall Memory for Older Adults | Average proportion of previously presented images that were correctly recalled by older adults | Week 5 Lab Visit (after about 2.5-3 weeks of training) |
| Stress Measured by Cortisol Levels for Younger Adults | Stress measured by salivary cortisol levels for younger adults | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
| Cho C, Yoo HJ, Min J, Nashiro K, Thayer JF, Lehrer PM, Mather M. Changes in Medial Prefrontal Cortex Mediate Effects of Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback on Positive Emotional Memory Biases. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2023 Jun;48(2):135-147. doi: 10.1007/s10484-023-09579-1. Epub 2023 Jan 20. |
| 35193926 | Derived | Min J, Nashiro K, Yoo HJ, Cho C, Nasseri P, Bachman SL, Porat S, Thayer JF, Chang C, Lee TH, Mather M. Emotion Downregulation Targets Interoceptive Brain Regions While Emotion Upregulation Targets Other Affective Brain Regions. J Neurosci. 2022 Apr 6;42(14):2973-2985. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1865-21.2022. Epub 2022 Feb 22. |
| Study halted due to risk of catching COVID-19 |
|
Participants in this group were between the ages of 18 and 35. Half of the younger participants were randomly assigned to this group and underwent daily practice to decrease their heart rate variability (HRV) for 5 weeks. |
| BG002 | Older HRV-increase Group | Participants in this group were between the ages of 55 and 80. Half of the older participants were randomly assigned to this group and underwent daily practice to increase their heart rate variability (HRV) for 5 weeks. |
| BG003 | Older HRV-decrease Group | Participants in this group were between the ages of 55 and 80. Half of the older participants were randomly assigned to this group and underwent daily practice to decrease their heart rate variability (HRV) for 5 weeks. |
| BG004 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Participants |
|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| OG001 | Younger HRV-decrease Group | Participants in this group were between the ages of 18 and 35. Half of the younger participants were randomly assigned to this group and underwent daily practice to decrease their heart rate variability (HRV) for 5 weeks. |
|
|
|
| Primary | mPFC-right Amygdala Resting-state Functional Connectivity for Older Adults (ANOVA) | The strength of resting-state functional connectivity was measured by correlation coefficients. Values represent the correlation of BOLD time-series between mPFC and the right amygdala. Higher values indicate greater connectivity. | Population analyzed was composed by all randomization subjects who completed pre- and post-intervention assessments and whose data quality was sufficient for data analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | correlation coefficients | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
|
|
|
|
| Primary | mPFC-right Amygdala Resting-state Functional Connectivity for Younger Adults (Post-Pre) | The strength of resting-state functional connectivity between mPFC and the right amygdala was measured by correlation coefficients. The difference in functional connectivity between the two time points (Time 2 - Time 1) was calculated. Higher values indicate greater connectivity at Time 2 than Time 1 (or post- than pre-intervention). | Population analyzed was composed by all randomization subjects who completed pre- and post-intervention assessments and whose data quality was sufficient for data analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | correlation coefficients | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
|
|
|
|
| Primary | mPFC-right Amygdala Resting-state Functional Connectivity for Older Adults (Post-Pre) | The strength of resting-state functional connectivity between mPFC and the right amygdala was measured by correlation coefficients. The difference in functional connectivity between the two time points (Time 2 - Time 1) was calculated. Higher values indicate greater connectivity at Time 2 than Time 1 (or post- than pre-intervention). | Population analyzed was composed by all randomization subjects who completed pre- and post-intervention assessments and whose data quality was sufficient for data analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | correlation coefficients | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Emotion Regulation in Younger Adults (Behavior) | Emotional intensity ratings, which participants reported during the emotion regulation task inside MRI scanner before and after intervention. The ratings ranged from 1 through 4, and 4 represents strongest intensity. | Population analyzed was composed by all randomization subjects who completed pre- and post-intervention assessments and whose data quality was sufficient for data analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | score on a scale | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Emotion Regulation in Older Adults (Behavior) | Emotional intensity ratings, which participants reported during the emotion regulation task inside MRI scanner before and after intervention. The ratings ranged from 1 through 4, and 4 represents strongest intensity. | Population analyzed was composed by all randomization subjects who completed pre- and post-intervention assessments and whose data quality was sufficient for data analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | score on a scale | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Left Amygdala BOLD Activity During Emotion Regulation in Younger Adults | We measured percent changes (%) in BOLD activity in the left amygdala region during emotion down-regulation, viewing, and up-regulation before and after intervention. The viewing condition was used as a baseline during the task. The change is represented by %. | Population analyzed was composed by all randomization subjects who completed pre- and post-intervention assessments and whose data quality was sufficient for data analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | Percent changes (%) in BOLD signal | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Left Amygdala BOLD Activity During Emotion Regulation in Older Adults | We measured percent changes (%) in BOLD activity in the left amygdala region during emotion down-regulation, viewing, and up-regulation before and after intervention. The viewing condition was used as a baseline during the task. The change is represented by %. | Population analyzed was composed by all randomization subjects who completed pre- and post-intervention assessments and whose data quality was sufficient for data analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | Percent changes (%) in BOLD signal | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Right Amygdala BOLD Activity During Emotion Regulation in Younger Adults | We measured percent changes (%) in BOLD activity in the right amygdala region during emotion down-regulation, viewing, and up-regulation before and after intervention. The viewing condition was used as a baseline during the task. The change is represented by %. | Population analyzed was composed by all randomization subjects who completed pre- and post-intervention assessments and whose data quality was sufficient for data analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | Percent changes (%) in BOLD signal | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Right Amygdala BOLD Activity During Emotion Regulation in Older Adults | We measured percent changes (%) in BOLD activity in the right amygdala region during emotion down-regulation, viewing, and up-regulation before and after intervention. The viewing condition was used as a baseline during the task. The change is represented by %. | Population analyzed was composed by all randomization subjects who completed pre- and post-intervention assessments and whose data quality was sufficient for data analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | Percent changes (%) in BOLD signal | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Decision-making for Younger Adults at Post Intervention (Behavior) | The decision-making ability was measured by multiple-choice responses during a computer-based task. Median percentage of acceptance of unfair offers and fair offers were calculated. A higher percentage of accepted both unfair and fair offers points toward more rational decision-making and likely better emotion regulation. This task was administered only at post-intervention (but not pre-intervention). | Population analyzed was composed by all randomization subjects who completed the decision making task, who were unfamiliar with the task and whose data quality was sufficient for data analysis. | Posted | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | percentage of offers | one time point: at study completion, which is the end of 5-week training |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Decision-making for Younger Adults (fMRI) | We measured percent changes (%) in BOLD activity in the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex and anterior insula during a computer-based decision-making task. Higher values indicate greater activity. | Population analyzed was composed by all randomization subjects who completed the decision making task, whose data quality was sufficient for data analysis and who were unfamiliar with the task. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | Percent changes (%) in BOLD signal | one time point: at study completion, which is the end of 5-week training |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Mood for Younger Adults | Emotional well-being measured by the Profile of Mood States (POMS) for younger adults. The POMS consists of 40 items that are rated on a 5-point scale ranging from "0=not at all" to "4=extremely. Total Mood Disturbance (TMD) was calculated by summing the totals for the negative items and then subtracting the totals for the positive items. A constant (i.e., 100) was added to the TMD formula in order to eliminate negative scores. Higher scores indicate more negative mood states. The scores range from 56 and 216. | Population analyzed was composed by all randomization subjects who completed pre- and post-intervention assessments and whose data quality was sufficient for data analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Mood for Older Adults | Emotional well-being measured by the Profile of Mood States (POMS) for older adults. The POMS consists of 40 items that are rated on a 5-point scale ranging from "0=not at all" to "4=extremely. Total Mood Disturbance (TMD) was calculated by summing the totals for the negative items and then subtracting the totals for the positive items. A constant (i.e., 100) was added to the TMD formula in order to eliminate negative scores. Higher scores indicate more negative mood states. The scores range from 56 and 216. | Population analyzed was composed by all randomization subjects who completed pre- and post-intervention assessments and whose data quality was sufficient for data analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Depression for Younger Adults | Emotional well-being measured by the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) for younger adults. The CES-D consists of 20 items that are rated on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = Rarely or None of the Time, 1 = Some or Little of the Time, 2 = Moderately or Much of the time, 3 = Most or Almost All the Time). Possible range of scores is 0 to 60, with the higher scores indicating more depressive symptoms. | Population analyzed was composed by all randomization subjects who completed pre- and post-intervention assessments and whose data quality was sufficient for data analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Depression for Older Adults | Emotional well-being measured by the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) for older adults. The CES-D consists of 20 items that are rated on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = Rarely or None of the Time, 1 = Some or Little of the Time, 2 = Moderately or Much of the time, 3 = Most or Almost All the Time). Possible range of scores is 0 to 60, with the higher scores indicating more depressive symptoms. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | State Anxiety for Younger Adults | Emotional well-being measured by the State Anxiety Inventory (SAI) for younger adults. The SAI consists of 20 items that are rated on a 4-point scale as follows: 1) not at all, 2) somewhat, 3) moderately so, and 4) very much so. Scores range from 20 to 80, with higher scores indicating greater state anxiety. | Population analyzed was composed by all randomization subjects who completed pre- and post-intervention assessments and whose data quality was sufficient for data analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | State Anxiety for Older Adults | Emotional well-being measured by the State Anxiety Inventory (SAI) for older adults. The SAI consists of 20 items that are rated on a 4-point scale as follows: 1) not at all, 2) somewhat, 3) moderately so, and 4) very much so. Scores range from 20 to 80, with higher scores indicating greater state anxiety. | Population analyzed was composed by all randomization subjects who completed pre- and post-intervention assessments and whose data quality was sufficient for data analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Trait Anxiety for Younger Adults | Emotional well-being measured by the Trait Anxiety Inventory (TAI) for younger adults. The TAI consists of 20 items that are rated on a 4-point scale as follows: 1) not at all, 2) somewhat, 3) moderately so, and 4) very much so. Scores range from 20 to 80, with higher scores indicating greater trait anxiety. | Population analyzed was composed by all randomization subjects who completed pre- and post-intervention assessments and whose data quality was sufficient for data analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Trait Anxiety for Older Adults | Emotional well-being measured by the Trait Anxiety Inventory (TAI) for older adults. The TAI consists of 20 items that are rated on a 4-point scale as follows: 1) not at all, 2) somewhat, 3) moderately so, and 4) very much so. Scores range from 20 to 80, with higher scores indicating greater trait anxiety. | Population analyzed was composed by all randomization subjects who completed pre- and post-intervention assessments and whose data quality was sufficient for data analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Stress Recovery (Systolic Blood Pressure) for Younger Adults | Difference in stress recovery elicited by standard cognitive tasks, as assessed by change in systolic blood pressure from cognitive tasks to recovery rest | Population analyzed was composed by all randomization subjects who completed pre- and post-intervention assessments and whose data quality was sufficient for data analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | mmHg | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Stress Recovery (Systolic Blood Pressure) for Older Adults | Difference in stress recovery elicited by standard cognitive tasks, as assessed by change in systolic blood pressure from cognitive tasks to recovery rest | Population analyzed was composed by all randomization subjects who completed pre- and post-intervention assessments and whose data quality was sufficient for data analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | mmHg | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Stress Recovery (Heart Rate) for Younger Adults | Difference in stress recovery elicited by standard cognitive tasks, as assessed by change in heart rate from cognitive tasks to recovery rest | Population analyzed was composed by all randomization subjects who completed pre- and post-intervention assessments and whose data quality was sufficient for data analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | beats per minute | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Stress Recovery (Heart Rate) for Older Adults | Difference in stress recovery elicited by standard cognitive tasks, as assessed by change in heart rate from cognitive tasks to recovery rest | Population analyzed was composed by all randomization subjects who completed pre- and post-intervention assessments and whose data quality was sufficient for data analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | beats per minute | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Stress Recovery (Breathing Rate) for Younger Adults | Difference in stress recovery elicited by standard cognitive tasks, as assessed by change in breathing rate from cognitive tasks to recovery rest | Population analyzed was composed by all randomization subjects who completed pre- and post-intervention assessments and whose data quality was sufficient for data analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | breaths per minute | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Stress Recovery (Breathing Rate) for Older Adults | Difference in stress recovery elicited by standard cognitive tasks, as assessed by change in breathing rate from cognitive tasks to recovery rest | Population analyzed was composed by all randomization subjects who completed pre- and post-intervention assessments and whose data quality was sufficient for data analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | breaths per minute | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Stress Reactivity (Systolic Blood Pressure) for Younger Adults | Difference in stress reactivity elicited by standard cognitive tasks, as assessed by change in systolic blood pressure from rest to cognitive tasks | Population analyzed was composed by all randomization subjects who completed pre- and post-intervention assessments and whose data quality was sufficient for data analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | mmHg | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Stress Reactivity (Systolic Blood Pressure) for Older Adults | Difference in stress reactivity elicited by standard cognitive tasks, as assessed by change in systolic blood pressure from rest to cognitive tasks | Population analyzed was composed by all randomization subjects who completed pre- and post-intervention assessments and whose data quality was sufficient for data analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | mmHg | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Stress Reactivity (Heart Rate) for Younger Adults | Difference in stress reactivity elicited by standard cognitive tasks, as assessed by change in heart rate from rest to cognitive tasks | Population analyzed was composed by all randomization subjects who completed pre- and post-intervention assessments and whose data quality was sufficient for data analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | beats per minute | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Stress Reactivity (Heart Rate) for Older Adults | Difference in stress reactivity elicited by standard cognitive tasks, as assessed by change in heart rate from cognitive tasks to recovery rest | Population analyzed was composed by all randomization subjects who completed pre- and post-intervention assessments and whose data quality was sufficient for data analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | beats per minute | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Stress Reactivity (Breathing Rate) for Younger Adults | Difference in stress reactivity elicited by standard cognitive tasks, as assessed by change in breathing rate from rest to cognitive tasks | Population analyzed was composed by all randomization subjects who completed pre- and post-intervention assessments and whose data quality was sufficient for data analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | breaths per minute | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Stress Reactivity (Breathing Rate) for Older Adults | Difference in stress reactivity elicited by standard cognitive tasks, as assessed by change in breathing rate from rest to cognitive tasks | Population analyzed was composed by all randomization subjects who completed pre- and post-intervention assessments and whose data quality was sufficient for data analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | breaths per minute | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Arterial Spin Labeling (ASL) for Younger Adults | Cerebral blood flow was measured at pre-training resting state and post-training paced-breathing. | Population analyzed was composed by all randomization subjects who completed pre- and post-intervention assessments and whose data quality was sufficient for data analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | mL/100 g/min | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Arterial Spin Labeling (ASL) for Older Adults | Cerebral blood flow was measured at pre-training resting state and post-training paced-breathing. | Population analyzed was composed by all randomization subjects who completed pre- and post-intervention assessments and whose data quality was sufficient for data analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | mL/100 g/min | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | High Frequency (HF) HRV for Younger Adults | HRV measured by high frequency (HF) HRV for younger adults. HF-HRV was quantified as the spectral power of interbeat interval variability within the high frequency range (typically 0.15-0.40 Hz), which reflects parasympathetic (vagal) activity. In this study, HF-HRV was obtained using photoplethysmography (PPG) methods. During a standardized resting condition, the device continuously recorded interbeat intervals. These data were then processed via spectral analysis to calculate the power in the high frequency band. Measurements are expressed in units of milliseconds squared (ms²). Higher HF-HRV values indicate increased parasympathetic modulation and are generally associated with improved autonomic regulation and better cognitive performance. | Population analyzed was composed by all randomization subjects who completed pre- and post-intervention assessments and whose data quality was sufficient for data analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | log transformed power(ms^2) | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | High Frequency (HF) HRV for Older Adults | HRV measured by high frequency (HF) HRV for older adults. HF-HRV was quantified as the spectral power of interbeat interval variability within the high frequency range (typically 0.15-0.40 Hz), which reflects parasympathetic (vagal) activity. In this study, HF-HRV was obtained using photoplethysmography (PPG) methods. During a standardized resting condition, the device continuously recorded interbeat intervals. These data were then processed via spectral analysis to calculate the power in the high frequency band. Measurements are expressed in units of milliseconds squared (ms²). Higher HF-HRV values indicate increased parasympathetic modulation and are generally associated with improved autonomic regulation and better cognitive performance. | Population analyzed was composed by all randomization subjects who completed pre- and post-intervention assessments and whose data quality was sufficient for data analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | log transformed power(ms^2) | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Low Frequency (LF) HRV for Younger Adults | HRV measured by low frequency (LF) HRV for younger adults. LF-HRV was quantified as the spectral power of interbeat interval variability within the low frequency range (typically 0.04-0.15 Hz), which reflects the combined influences of sympathetic and parasympathetic activity. In this study, LF-HRV was obtained using photoplethysmography (PPG) methods. During a standardized resting condition, the device continuously recorded interbeat intervals. These data were then processed via spectral analysis to calculate the power in the low frequency band. Measurements are expressed in units of milliseconds squared (ms²). Although LF-HRV reflects contributions from both branches of the autonomic nervous system, higher LF-HRV values can indicate enhanced autonomic modulation, with interpretation made in the context of overall autonomic balance. | Population analyzed was composed by all randomization subjects who completed pre- and post-intervention assessments and whose data quality was sufficient for data analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | log transformed power(ms^2) | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Low Frequency (LF) HRV for Older Adults | HRV measured by low frequency (LF) HRV for older adults. LF-HRV was quantified as the spectral power of interbeat interval variability within the low frequency range (typically 0.04-0.15 Hz), which reflects the combined influences of sympathetic and parasympathetic activity. In this study, LF-HRV was obtained using photoplethysmography (PPG) methods. During a standardized resting condition, the device continuously recorded interbeat intervals. These data were then processed via spectral analysis to calculate the power in the low frequency band. Measurements are expressed in units of milliseconds squared (ms²). Although LF-HRV reflects contributions from both branches of the autonomic nervous system, higher LF-HRV values can indicate enhanced autonomic modulation, with interpretation made in the context of overall autonomic balance. | Population analyzed was composed by all randomization subjects who completed pre- and post-intervention assessments and whose data quality was sufficient for data analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | log transformed power(ms^2) | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | The Root Mean Squared Successive Differences (RMSSD) HRV for Younger Adults | HRV measured by the root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD) for younger adults. RMSSD (Root Mean Square of Successive Differences) is a time-domain measure that quantifies the variability between successive interbeat intervals, primarily reflecting parasympathetic (vagal) activity. In this study, RMSSD was obtained using photoplethysmography (PPG) methods. During a standardized resting condition, the device continuously recorded interbeat intervals, and RMSSD was computed as the square root of the mean of the squared differences between consecutive interbeat intervals. Measurements are expressed in milliseconds (ms). Higher RMSSD values indicate increased parasympathetic modulation, generally associated with improved autonomic regulation and better cardiovascular and cognitive performance. | Population analyzed was composed by all randomization subjects who completed pre- and post-intervention assessments and whose data quality was sufficient for data analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | millisecond | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | The Root Mean Squared Successive Differences (RMSSD) HRV for Older Adults | HRV measured by the root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD) for older adults. RMSSD (Root Mean Square of Successive Differences) is a time-domain measure that quantifies the variability between successive interbeat intervals, primarily reflecting parasympathetic (vagal) activity. In this study, RMSSD was obtained using photoplethysmography (PPG) methods. During a standardized resting condition, the device continuously recorded interbeat intervals, and RMSSD was computed as the square root of the mean of the squared differences between consecutive interbeat intervals. Measurements are expressed in milliseconds (ms). Higher RMSSD values indicate increased parasympathetic modulation, generally associated with improved autonomic regulation and better cardiovascular and cognitive performance. | Population analyzed was composed by all randomization subjects who completed pre- and post-intervention assessments and whose data quality was sufficient for data analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | millisecond | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Inflammation Measured by C-reactive Protein for Younger Adults | Inflammation measured by salivary C-reactive protein (CRP) for younger adults | Population analyzed was composed by all randomization subjects who completed pre- and post-intervention assessments and whose data quality was sufficient for data analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | CRP level (pg/ml) | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Inflammation Measured by C-reactive Protein for Older Adults | Inflammation measured by salivary C-reactive protein (CRP) for older adults | Population analyzed was composed by all randomization subjects who completed pre- and post-intervention assessments and whose data quality was sufficient for data analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | CRP level (pg/ml) | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Inflammation Measured by IL-1b Levels for Younger Adults | Inflammation measured by salivary IL-1b levels for younger adults | Population analyzed was composed by all randomization subjects who completed pre- and post-intervention assessments and whose data quality was sufficient for data analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | IL-1b level (pg/ml) | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Inflammation Measured by IL-1b Levels for Older Adults | Inflammation measured by salivary IL-1b levels for older adults | Population analyzed was composed by all randomization subjects who completed pre- and post-intervention assessments and whose data quality was sufficient for data analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | IL-1b level (pg/ml) | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Inflammation Measured by IL-6 Levels for Younger Adults | Inflammation measured by salivary IL-6 levels for younger adults | Population analyzed was composed by all randomization subjects who completed pre- and post-intervention assessments and whose data quality was sufficient for data analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | IL-6 level (pg/ml) | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Inflammation Measured by IL-6 Levels for Older Adults | Inflammation measured by salivary IL-6 levels for older adults | Population analyzed was composed by all randomization subjects who completed pre- and post-intervention assessments and whose data quality was sufficient for data analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | IL-6 level (pg/ml) | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Inflammation Measured by IL-8 Levels for Younger Adults | Inflammation measured by salivary IL-8 levels for younger adults | Population analyzed was composed by all randomization subjects who completed pre- and post-intervention assessments and whose data quality was sufficient for data analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | IL-8 level (pg/ml) | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Inflammation Measured by IL-8 Levels for Older Adults | Inflammation measured by salivary IL-8 levels for older adults | Population analyzed was composed by all randomization subjects who completed pre- and post-intervention assessments and whose data quality was sufficient for data analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | IL-8 level (pg/ml) | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Inflammation Measured by TNF-a Levels for Younger Adults | Inflammation measured by salivary TNF-a levels for younger adults | Population analyzed was composed by all randomization subjects who completed pre- and post-intervention assessments and whose data quality was sufficient for data analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | TNF-a level (pg/ml) | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Inflammation Measured by TNF-a Levels for Older Adults | Inflammation measured by salivary TNF-a levels for older adults | Population analyzed was composed by all randomization subjects who completed pre- and post-intervention assessments and whose data quality was sufficient for data analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | TNF-a level (pg/ml) | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Plasma Amyloid Beta 40 (Aβ40) for Younger Adults | Plasma Aβ40 levels at pre- and post-intervention were compared between HRV-increase and HRV-decrease group for younger adults. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | pg/ml | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Plasma Amyloid Beta 40 (Aβ40) for Older Adults | Plasma Aβ40 levels at pre- and post-intervention were compared between HRV-increase and HRV-decrease group for older adults. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | pg/ml | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Plasma Amyloid Beta 42 (Aβ42) Younger Adults | Plasma Aβ42 levels at pre- and post-intervention were compared between HRV-increase and HRV-decrease group for younger adults. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | pg/ml | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Plasma Amyloid Beta 42 (Aβ42) for Older Adults | Plasma Aβ42 levels at pre- and post-intervention were compared between HRV-increase and HRV-decrease group for older adults. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | pg/ml | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Plasma Phosphorylated Tau 181 (pTau) for Younger Adults | Plasma pTau levels at pre- and post-intervention were reported for HRV-increase and HRV-decrease group for younger adults. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | pg/ml | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Plasma Phosphorylated Tau 181 (pTau) for Older Adults | Plasma pTau levels at pre- and post-intervention were compared between HRV-increase and HRV-decrease group for older adults. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | pg/ml | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Plasma Total Tau (tTau) for Younger Adults | Plasma tTau levels at pre- and post-intervention were reported for HRV-increase and HRV-decrease group for younger adults. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | pg/ml | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Plasma Total Tau (tTau) for Older Adults | Plasma tTau levels at pre- and post-intervention were compared between HRV-increase and HRV-decrease group for older adults. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | pg/ml | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | LC-innervated Subregion Volume in the Hippocampus for Younger Adults | LC-innervated subregion volume in the hippocampus at pre- and post-intervention was compared between the HRV-increase and HRV-decrease groups in younger adults. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | mm^3 | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | LC-innervated Subregion Volume in the Hippocampus for Older Adults | LC-innervated subregion volume in the hippocampus at pre- and post-intervention was compared between the HRV-increase and HRV-decrease groups in older adults. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | mm^3 | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Cortical Volume in the Left Orbitofrontal Cortex for Younger Adults | Left orbitofrontal volume at pre- and post-intervention was compared between the HRV-increase and HRV-decrease groups in younger adults. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | mm^3 | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Cortical Volume in the Left Orbitofrontal Cortex for Older Adults | Left orbitofrontal volume at pre- and post-intervention was compared between the HRV-increase and HRV-decrease groups in older adults. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | mm^3 | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Cortical Volume in the Right Orbitofrontal Cortex for Younger Adults | Right orbitofrontal volume at pre- and post-intervention was compared between the HRV-increase and HRV-decrease groups in younger adults. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | mm^3 | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Cortical Volume in the Right Orbitofrontal Cortex for Older Adults | Right orbitofrontal volume at pre- and post-intervention was compared between the HRV-increase and HRV-decrease groups in older adults. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | mm^3 | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | mPFC-left Amygdala Resting-state Functional Connectivity for Younger Adults (Post-Pre) | The strength of resting-state functional connectivity between mPFC and the left amygdala was measured by correlation coefficients. The difference in functional connectivity between the two time points (Time 2 - Time 1) was calculated. Higher values indicate greater connectivity at Time 2 than Time 1 (or post- than pre-intervention). | Population analyzed was composed by all randomization subjects who completed pre- and post-intervention assessments and whose data quality was sufficient for data analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | correlation coefficients | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | mPFC-left Amygdala Resting-state Functional Connectivity for Older Adults (Post-Pre) | The strength of resting-state functional connectivity between mPFC and the left amygdala was measured by correlation coefficients. The difference in functional connectivity between the two time points (Time 2 - Time 1) was calculated. Higher values indicate greater connectivity at Time 2 than Time 1 (or post- than pre-intervention). | Population analyzed was composed by all randomization subjects who completed pre- and post-intervention assessments and whose data quality was sufficient for data analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | correlation coefficients | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | mPFC-left Amygdala Resting-state Functional Connectivity for Younger Adults (ANOVA) | The strength of resting-state functional connectivity was measured by correlation coefficients. Values represent the correlation of BOLD time-series between mPFC and the left amygdala. Higher values indicate greater connectivity. | Population analyzed was composed by all randomization subjects who completed pre- and post-intervention assessments and whose data quality was sufficient for data analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | correlation coefficients | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | mPFC-left Amygdala Resting-state Functional Connectivity for Older Adults (ANOVA) | The strength of resting-state functional connectivity was measured by correlation coefficients. Values represent the correlation of BOLD time-series between mPFC and the left amygdala. Higher values indicate greater connectivity. | Population analyzed was composed by all randomization subjects who completed pre- and post-intervention assessments and whose data quality was sufficient for data analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | correlation coefficients | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
|
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Working Memory for Younger Adults | Working memory performance measured by NIH Toolbox List Sorting Working Memory Test (LSWM). The standard score is calculated to have a normative mean of 100 and a standard deviation (SD) of 15. Scores range from 59 to 140, with higher scores indicating better Working memory. | Population analyzed was composed by all randomization subjects who completed pre- and post-intervention assessments and whose data quality was sufficient for data analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | age corrected standard score | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
|
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Working Memory for Older Adults | Working memory performance measured by NIH Toolbox List Sorting Working Memory Test (LSWM). The standard score is calculated to have a normative mean of 100 and a standard deviation (SD) of 15. Scores range from 59 to 140, with higher scores indicating better Working memory. | Population analyzed was composed by all randomization subjects who completed pre- and post-intervention assessments and whose data quality was sufficient for data analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | age corrected standard score | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
|
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Processing Speed for Younger Adults | Processing speed performance measured by NIH Toolbox Pattern Comparison Processing Speed Test (PCPS). The standard score is calculated to have a normative mean of 100 and a standard deviation (SD) of 15. Scores range from 59 to 140, with higher scores indicating faster processing speed. | Population analyzed was composed by all randomization subjects who completed pre- and post-intervention assessments and whose data quality was sufficient for data analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | age corrected standard score | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
|
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Processing Speed for Older Adults | Processing speed performance measured by NIH Toolbox Pattern Comparison Processing Speed Test (PCPS). The standard score is calculated to have a normative mean of 100 and a standard deviation (SD) of 15. Scores range from 59 to 140, with higher scores indicating faster processing speed. | Population analyzed was composed by all randomization subjects who completed pre- and post-intervention assessments and whose data quality was sufficient for data analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | age corrected standard score | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
|
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Inhibitory Control and Attention for Younger Adults | Inhibitory control performance measured by NIH Toolbox Flanker Inhibitory Control and Attention Test (Flanker). The standard score is calculated to have a normative mean of 100 and a standard deviation (SD) of 15. Scores range from 59 to 140, with higher scores indicating better Inhibitory Control and Attention. | Population analyzed was composed by all randomization subjects who completed pre- and post-intervention assessments and whose data quality was sufficient for data analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | age corrected standard score | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
|
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Inhibitory Control and Attention for Older Adults | Inhibitory control performance measured by NIH Toolbox Flanker Inhibitory Control and Attention Test (Flanker). The standard score is calculated to have a normative mean of 100 and a standard deviation (SD) of 15. Scores range from 59 to 140, with higher scores indicating better Inhibitory Control and Attention. | Population analyzed was composed by all randomization subjects who completed pre- and post-intervention assessments and whose data quality was sufficient for data analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | age corrected standard score | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
|
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Sustained Attention for Younger Adults | Sustained attention performance was measured by Sustained Attention to Response Test (SART). A commission error was calculated as the number of button press for 25 no-go trials, and an omission error was calculated as the number of no button press for 200 go trials in younger adults. The number of errors range from 0 to 25 for commission errors and from 0 to 200 for omission errors. A higher number of omission and commission errors indicates worse sustained attention performance. | Population analyzed was composed by all randomization subjects who completed pre- and post-intervention assessments and whose data quality was sufficient for data analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | number of errors | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
|
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Sustained Attention for Older Adults | Sustained attention performance was measured by Sustained Attention to Response Test (SART). A commission error was calculated as the number of button press for 25 no-go trials, and an omission error was calculated as the number of no button press for 200 go trials in older adults. The number of errors range from 0 to 25 for commission errors and from 0 to 200 for omission errors. A higher number of omission and commission errors indicates worse sustained attention performance. | Population analyzed was composed by all randomization subjects who completed pre- and post-intervention assessments and whose data quality was sufficient for data analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | number of errors | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
|
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Recognition Memory for Younger Adults (Hits) | Recognition memory performance based on average proportion of previously presented images that were correctly identified (i.e., hits) by younger adults | Population analyzed was composed by all randomization subjects who completed the memory tests and whose data quality was sufficient for data analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | Proportion of correct hits | Week 5 Lab Visit (after about 2.5-3 weeks of training) |
|
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Recognition Memory for Older Adults (Hits) | Recognition memory performance based on average proportion of previously presented images that were correctly identified (i.e., hits) by older adults | Population analyzed was composed by all randomization subjects who completed the memory tests and whose data quality was sufficient for data analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | Proportion of correct hits | Week 5 Lab Visit (after about 2.5-3 weeks of training) |
|
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Recognition Memory for Younger Adults (False Alarm) | Recognition memory performance based on average proportion of images not previously presented that were incorrectly identified as seen (i.e., False Alarms) by younger adults | Population analyzed was composed by all randomization subjects who completed the memory tests and whose data quality was sufficient for data analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | Proportion of false alarm | Week 5 Lab Visit (after about 2.5-3 weeks of training) |
|
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Recognition Memory for Older Adults (False Alarm) | Recognition memory performance based on average proportion of images not previously presented that were incorrectly identified as seen (i.e., False Alarms) by older adults | Population analyzed was composed by all randomization subjects who completed the memory tests and whose data quality was sufficient for data analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | Proportion of false alarms | Week 5 Lab Visit (after about 2.5-3 weeks of training) |
|
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Recall Memory for Younger Adults | Average proportion of previously presented images that were correctly recalled by younger adults | Population analyzed was composed by all randomization subjects who completed the memory tests and whose data quality was sufficient for data analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | Proportion of items correctly recalled | Week 5 Lab Visit (after about 2.5-3 weeks of training) |
|
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Recall Memory for Older Adults | Average proportion of previously presented images that were correctly recalled by older adults | Population analyzed was composed by all randomization subjects who completed the memory tests and whose data quality was sufficient for data analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | Proportion of items correctly recalled | Week 5 Lab Visit (after about 2.5-3 weeks of training) |
|
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Stress Measured by Cortisol Levels for Younger Adults | Stress measured by salivary cortisol levels for younger adults | Population analyzed was composed by all randomization subjects who completed pre- and post-intervention assessments and whose data quality was sufficient for data analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | CAR level (µg/dL) | Time 1 (Baseline), Time 2 (5 weeks) |
|
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 63 |
| 0 |
| 63 |
| 0 |
| 63 |
| EG001 | Younger HRV-decrease Group | Participants in this group are between the ages of 18 and 35. Half of the younger participants will be randomly assigned to this group who will undergo daily practice to decrease their heart rate variability (HRV). | 0 | 58 | 0 | 58 | 0 | 58 |
| EG002 | Older HRV-increase Group | Participants in this group are between the ages of 55 and 80. Half of the older participants will be randomly assigned to this group who will undergo daily practice to increase their heart rate variability (HRV). | 0 | 37 | 0 | 37 | 0 | 37 |
| EG003 | Older HRV-decrease Group | Participants in this group are between the ages of 55 and 80. Half of the older participants will be randomly assigned to this group who will undergo daily practice to decrease their heart rate variability (HRV). | 0 | 35 | 0 | 35 | 0 | 35 |
Not provided
Not provided
| Time 1: up-regulation |
|
| Time 2: down-regulation |
|
| Time 2: viewing |
|
| Time 2: up-regulation |
|
| Time 1: up-regulation |
|
| Time 2: down-regulation |
|
| Time 2: viewing |
|
| Time 2: up-regulation |
|
| Time 1: up-regulation |
|
| Time 2: down-regulation |
|
| Time 2: viewing |
|
| Time 2: up-regulation |
|
| Time 1: up-regulation |
|
| Time 2: down-regulation |
|
| Time 2: viewing |
|
| Time 2: up-regulation |
|
| Time 1: up-regulation |
|
| Time 2: down-regulation |
|
| Time 2: viewing |
|
| Time 2: up-regulation |
|
| Time 1: up-regulation |
|
| Time 2: down-regulation |
|
| Time 2: viewing |
|
| Time 2: up-regulation |
|
| 0.716 |
| Superiority |
| t-test, 2 sided |
| 0.059 |
| Superiority |
Linear mixed effects model with random factors (intercepts) for participants; F- and p-values determined using Satterthwaite's method |
| Superiority |
| 0.191 |
Linear mixed effects model with random factors (intercepts) for participants; F- and p-values determined using Satterthwaite's method |
| Superiority |
| 0.425 |
Linear mixed effects model with random factors (intercepts) for participants; F- and p-values determined using Satterthwaite's method |
| Superiority |
| 0.235 |
Linear mixed effects model with random factors (intercepts) for participants; F- and p-values determined using Satterthwaite's method |
| Superiority |
| 0.468 |
Linear mixed effects model with random factors (intercepts) for participants; F- and p-values determined using Satterthwaite's method |
| Superiority |
| 0.159 |
Linear mixed effects model with random factors (intercepts) for participants; F- and p-values determined using Satterthwaite's method |
| Superiority |
| 0.562 |
Linear mixed effects model with random factors (intercepts) for participants; F- and p-values determined using Satterthwaite's method |
| Superiority |
| 0.901 |
Linear mixed effects model with random factors (intercepts) for participants; F- and p-values determined using Satterthwaite's method |
| Superiority |
| Time 1: omission error |
|
| Time 2: omission error |
|
| Time 1: omission error |
|
| Time 2: omission error |
|
| Negative |
|
| Negative |
|
| Negative |
|
| Negative |
|
| Time 2: cortisol level at awakening |
|
| Time 2: cortisol level at 30 min after awakening |
|