Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Clinical evaluation of osteointegration of bone level implants (Stark conical screw implants, with V-Blast surface treatment), placed without sufficient primary stability.
26 Implants were placed with a unique operative protocol in 4 private offices. A detailed informed consent was obtained from all patients. Surgical guides were used to achieve the idea implant position and axis.
Osteotomy drills were used in the sequence recommended by the implant manufacturer. Bone type was assessed by CT examinations using the classification proposed by Rebaudi.
All implants were tested by applying a lateral mild load with a probe in order to verify mobility immediately after placement.
Parameter used to assess a low primary stability were:
Follow-up post-operative visits were scheduled at 1 and 4 weeks. At 4-6 months after placement a periapical radiograph was taken, a torque/countertorque test of 30 Ncm was conducted and osteointegrated implants were restored. Patients were recalled, examined, and periapical radiographs were taken for a minimum of 6 months.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stark Implant with low primary stability | Patient who had received bone level V-Blast implants with low primary stability. |
| |
| Stark Implant with primary stability | Patient who had received bone level V-Blast implants and achieved primary stability. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stark Implant with low primary stability | Procedure |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Osteointegration of V-Blast surface implant with low primary stability (<10 N/cm) after 4-6 months | After 4-6 months, implant without good primary stability were evaluatd. A periapical radiograph was taken, a torque/countertorque test of 30 Ncm was conducted and osteointegrated implants were restored. | 4 to 6 months |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
the sample is composed by patients who had received Stark bone level V-Blast implants in 4 private offices in Italy. The same surgical protocol was used for all implants and a detailed informed consent was obtained from all patients, and included in their respective charts.
For the study objective were enrolled patient who didn't achieved primary stability at the placement: 26 patient
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Giulio Rasperini, Prof. | University of Milan | Study Director |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014095 | Tooth, Impacted |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014076 | Tooth Diseases |
| D009057 | Stomatognathic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided