Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
in patent have deeply impacted lower third molar ,dose computer guided enhance surgical outcome versus conventional surgical remove of wisdom teeth
P- Patient with deeply impacted mandibular molar I- Computer guided surgical cutting stent C- Conventional extraction O- Clinical outcome sound radiographic outcomes primary outcome
- pain : each patient well be asked to rate current and worst pain intensity on visual analogue scale (VAS ) of 0-10 with Zero being no pain and Ten corresponds to the worst pain.
Secondary outcome
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conventional surgery | Experimental | comprised 9 patient undergoing surgical removal of deeply impacted mandibular third molar by regular manor. (Based on :Panorama and CBCT ) technique : 1- flap design 2- bone removal 3- tooth division 4- closure flap (suture) |
|
| computer guided surgery | Experimental | comprised 9 patient undergoing surgical removal of deeply impacted mandibular third molar using computer guided surgical cutting stent. Based on (panorama , CBCT and fabricating computer guided stent technique: 1- flap design 2- accurate setting stent in a predesign site 3- bony window removing according to the stent design 4- surgical separation of the teeth with extraction the remaning part . 5- identify the nerve 6- replace the bony window in to original place with stability 7- closure and depridment |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| computer guided surgical | Procedure | has three cutting guided plane for identify the position of place of the third molar, it have beveled cut for stability after remove the teeth and placing the bony window |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Pain | each patient well be asked to rate current and worst pain intensity on visual analogue scale (VAS ) of 0-10 with Zero being no pain and Ten corresponds to the worst pain(pain change during follow up period . | immediate post operative ,at three day pain change till fourteen day day . |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| evaluation of maximum inter incisal opening | assessment of MMO will be performed by measuring the distance in mm between the incisal edges of the upper and lower central incisor by using tape graduated method. | immediate post operative ,at three day inter incisal change till fourteen day . |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| alaaedein M abu al einain, master | Contact | 00201011618208 | surgeonalaamahmoud@gmail.com | |
| Mamdouh S Sayed Ahmed, Professor | Contact | 00201222173262 | dr.mamdouhahmed@hotmail.com |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Conventional surgery | Procedure | Low speed motor with surgiacl round burs and surgical fissure for removal a covering bone with decapitation and guttering formation |
|
| CBCT | Device | For measuring the bone removeal |
|
| CBCT | Device | for identifed the nerve |
|