Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The objective of this study is to determine if silicone adhesive multilayer foam dressings applied to the sacrum, heels and greater trochanter in addition to standard prevention reduce pressure ulcer incidence category II, III, IV, Unstageable and Deep Tissue Injury (DTI) compared to standard pressure ulcer prevention alone, in at risk hospitalised patients. In particular, this trial extends previous trial results obtained in ICU setting. Therefore, only a maximum of 25% of patients will be recruited from ICU settings.
The hypothesis is: 'The use of silicone adhesive multilayer foam dressings as adjuvant prophylactic therapy for pressure ulcer prevention is more effective in reducing pressure ulcer category II, III, IV, Unstageable, and Deep Tissue Injury (DTI) incidence rate on sacrum, heels and greater trochanter, compared to standard pressure ulcer prevention alone.' The null hypothesis is: 'The use of silicone adhesive multilayer foam dressings as adjuvant prophylactic therapy for pressure ulcer prevention is not more effective in reducing pressure ulcer category II, III, IV, Unstageable, and Deep Tissue Injury (DTI) incidence rate on sacrum, heels and greater trochanter, compared to standard pressure ulcer prevention alone.
A multicentre randomised controlled open label parallel group medical device trial in approximately 8 hospitals in Belgium.
Patients will be randomly allocated to three study arms based on a 1:1:1 allocation:
Study arm 1 (on top of standard of care):
Study arm 2 (on top of standard of care):
Study arm 3 (standard of care):
Skin sites (restricted to sacrum, heel right/left, greater trochanter right/left) of patients at risk for pressure ulcer category II, III, IV, Unstageable, and Deep Tissue Injury (DTI) development will be assessed daily for a maximum period of 14 days.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Study Arm 1 (on top of standard of care) | Experimental | Allevyn® brand silicone adhesive multilayer foam dressings
|
|
| Study Arm 2 (on top of standard of care) | Experimental | Mepilex® brand silicone adhesive multilayer foam dressings
|
|
| Study Arm 3 (standard of care) | No Intervention |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Allevyn® brand silicone adhesive multilayer foam dressings | Device | Skin sites (restricted to sacrum, heel right/left and greater trochanter right/left) will be treated with silicone adhesive multilayer foam dressings by Smith&Nephew (Allevyn® brand). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants Who Developed a New Pressure Ulcer Category 2 or Worse on Sacrum, Heels or Greater Trochanter | The number of participants who developed at least one new pressure ulcer of category 2 or worse on sacrum, heels or greater trochanter as judged onsite, during the study period (maximum 14 days). Patients in experimental groups 1 and 2 were pooled as the treatment group and compared to the control group (in the intention to treat population (n=1605) Note: The International NPUAP/EPUAP Pressure Ulcer Classification System (National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (2014)) distinguishes four categories of pressure ulcers: non-blanchable erythema of the intact skin (category I), partial thickness loss of dermis (category II), full thickness tissue loss (category III) and full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon or muscle (category IV). Also unstageable pressure ulcers and deep tissue injuries can be recognised. https://npiap.com/ | assessment during 14 days |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants Who Developed a New Pressure Ulcer Category 2 or Worse on Sacrum | The number of participants who developed at least one new pressure ulcer of category 2 or worse on sacrum as judged onsite, during the study period (maximum 14 days). | maximum treatment or study period 14 days |
| Number of Participants Who Developed a New Pressure Ulcer Category 2 or Worse on Any Heel |
Inclusion Criteria:
At risk for pressure ulcer development based on Braden risk assessment (Braden score ≤17).
Admitted to hospital within the previous 48 hours. Note: Not more than 25% of patients per site should be recruited at ICU wards.
Skin at sacrum is assessable and there is no clinically relevant incontinence- associated dermatitis (IAD*) or another skin condition that would be a contra-indication for the application of the devices under study, and there is no pressure ulcer category II or worse present.
*clinically relevant IAD is defined as any of the 4 categories described in the publication http://users.ugent.be/\~dibeeckm/globiadnl/nlv1.0.pdf
For at least 3 of the following 4 skin sites (heel left, heel right, greater trochanter left, greater trochanter right) one of the following two conditions should apply:
- A study dressing can be applied as prevention of a pressure ulcer category II or worse at that skin site (there is no contra-indication)
OR
- There is already a pressure ulcer category II or worse at that skin site.
Written informed consent by the patient or his/her legal representative.
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Dimitri Beeckman | Ugent | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OLV Aalst | Aalst | 9300 | Belgium | |||
| AZ Maria Middelares Ghent |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 33216969 | Result | Beeckman D, Fourie A, Raepsaet C, Van Damme N, Manderlier B, De Meyer D, Beele H, Smet S, Demarre L, Vossaert R, de Graaf A, Verhaeghe L, Vandergheynst N, Hendrickx B, Hanssens V, Keymeulen H, Vanderwee K, Van De Woestijne J, Verhaeghe S, Van Hecke A, Savoye I, Harrison J, Vrijens F, Hulstaert F. Silicone adhesive multilayer foam dressings as adjuvant prophylactic therapy to prevent hospital-acquired pressure ulcers: a pragmatic noncommercial multicentre randomized open-label parallel-group medical device trial. Br J Dermatol. 2021 Jul;185(1):52-61. doi: 10.1111/bjd.19689. Epub 2020 Dec 28. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Study webpage | View source |
Not provided
Access will be granted to non-commercial researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal for a relevant research questions. Relevance will be assessed by the Sponsor in collaboration with the Chief investigator.
From 12 months after publication for 5 years.
To achieve aims in the approved proposal. Proposals should be directed to trials@KCE.fgov.be. To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement.
Not provided
47 participants were excluded; 1 asked to have their data excluded from the analysis and 46 were not randomised.
The study was conducted in 68 wards in 8 hospitals (three university/teaching and five general hospitals) in Flanders, Belgium from February 2018 to December 2018.
In total, 1680 participants were screened for eligibility and 1633 participants were randomised to one of the study arms. The number of participants randomised per study site varied between 64 and 287 (median 233).
In the intention to treat (ITT) population 12.4% of patients were randomised in the ICU and 87.5% in non-ICUs.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Intervention Group 1 (on Top of Standard of Care) | Allevyn® brand silicone adhesive multilayer foam dressings
|
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Jan 11, 2018 | Feb 12, 2018 |
Not provided
patients will be allocated to 1 of the 3 study arms based on a 1:1:1 allocation
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Mepilex® brand silicone adhesive multilayer foam dressings | Device | Skin sites (restricted to sacrum, heel right/left and greater trochanter right/left) will be treated with silicone adhesive multilayer foam dressings by Mölnlycke Health care (Mepilex® brand). |
|
The number of participants who developed at least one new pressure ulcer of category 2 or worse on any heel as judged onsite, during the study period (maximum 14 days). |
| maximum treatment or study period 14 days |
| The Number of Participants Who Developed a New Pressure Ulcer Category 2 or Worse on Any Trochanter | The number of patients who developed at least one new pressure ulcer of category 2 or worse on any greater trochanter as judged onsite, during the study period (maximum 14 days). | maximum treatment or study period 14 days |
| Ghent |
| 9000 |
| Belgium |
| University of Ghent | Ghent | 9000 | Belgium |
| UZ Brussel | Jette | 1090 | Belgium |
| AZ Groeninge | Kortrijk | 8500 | Belgium |
| UZ Leuven | Leuven | 3000 | Belgium |
| OLV van Lourdes Ziekenhuis Waregem | Waregem | 8790 | Belgium |
| AZ Sint-Elisabeth Zottegem | Zottegem | 9620 | Belgium |
| FG001 | Intervention Group 2 (on Top of Standard of Care) | Mepilex® brand silicone adhesive multilayer foam dressings
|
| FG002 | Control Group (Standard of Care) |
|
| COMPLETED | All participants completed the study however not all were included in the analysis. |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Intervention Group 1 (on Top of Standard of Care) | Allevyn® brand silicone adhesive multilayer foam dressings
|
| BG001 | Intervention Group 2 (on Top of Standard of Care) | Mepilex® brand silicone adhesive multilayer foam dressings
|
| BG002 | Control Group (Standard of Care) |
|
| BG003 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| ||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant. | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||
| Ward type at study start | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||
| Total Braden score (at Baseline) | The Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk (Bergstrom, Braden, Laguzza & Holman, 1987) is composed of six sub-scales that reflect sensory perception, skin moisture, activity, mobility, friction and shear, and nutritional status. Each sub-scale is scored from 1-3 or 4, for total scores that range from 6-23. A lower Braden Scale Score indicates a lower level of functioning and, therefore, a higher level of risk for pressure ulcer development. In this study a cut-off of <= 17 was used for being at risk of pressure ulcer development. | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
| |||||||||
| BMI (kg/m²) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||
| Diabetes | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||
| Surgery since admission | Participants who had had surgery since admission to hospital (and prior to consent/randomization in the study). | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Number of Participants Who Developed a New Pressure Ulcer Category 2 or Worse on Sacrum, Heels or Greater Trochanter | The number of participants who developed at least one new pressure ulcer of category 2 or worse on sacrum, heels or greater trochanter as judged onsite, during the study period (maximum 14 days). Patients in experimental groups 1 and 2 were pooled as the treatment group and compared to the control group (in the intention to treat population (n=1605) Note: The International NPUAP/EPUAP Pressure Ulcer Classification System (National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (2014)) distinguishes four categories of pressure ulcers: non-blanchable erythema of the intact skin (category I), partial thickness loss of dermis (category II), full thickness tissue loss (category III) and full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon or muscle (category IV). Also unstageable pressure ulcers and deep tissue injuries can be recognised. https://npiap.com/ | Intention to treat population (n=1605) | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | assessment during 14 days |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other Pre-specified | Number of Participants Who Developed a New Pressure Ulcer Category 2 or Worse on Sacrum | The number of participants who developed at least one new pressure ulcer of category 2 or worse on sacrum as judged onsite, during the study period (maximum 14 days). | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | maximum treatment or study period 14 days |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other Pre-specified | Number of Participants Who Developed a New Pressure Ulcer Category 2 or Worse on Any Heel | The number of participants who developed at least one new pressure ulcer of category 2 or worse on any heel as judged onsite, during the study period (maximum 14 days). | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | maximum treatment or study period 14 days |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other Pre-specified | The Number of Participants Who Developed a New Pressure Ulcer Category 2 or Worse on Any Trochanter | The number of patients who developed at least one new pressure ulcer of category 2 or worse on any greater trochanter as judged onsite, during the study period (maximum 14 days). | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | maximum treatment or study period 14 days |
|
They will be recorded between the first usage of the study dressings and the last study related intervention for that patient for Adverse Device Events (ADEs) (usually maximum 14 days) and till 30 days after last study related intervention for SADEs/MDIs.
Only ADEs, SADEs (i.e. AE/SAEs considered related to intervention, the study dressings and their application) and device deficiencies were recorded. The safety population (n=1077) was calculated after exclusion of participants in the ITT population who wanted their data excluded (n=1), who were not randomized (n=46), did not receive at least one dressing (n=10) or received only standard of care (n=546).
Skin under the dressings was inspected every day.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Intervention Group 1 (on Top of Standard of Care) | Allevyn® brand silicone adhesive multilayer foam dressings
| 27 | 539 | 0 | 539 | 16 | 539 |
| EG001 | Intervention Group 2 (on Top of Standard of Care) | Mepilex® brand silicone adhesive multilayer foam dressings
| 23 | 538 | 0 | 538 | 12 | 538 |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pressure ulcer development | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment | Note: two of these pressure ulcers were category 1 and one was category 2 |
| |
| Erythema | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pruritus | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Blister formation | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Exacerbates athlete's foot | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Mechanical skin injuries | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Patient fall | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pain at sacrum | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
Performance and detection bias may have occurred because patients, caregivers and study personnel could not be blinded to the study procedures/devices. All study nurses were trained, and for most hospitals wound care teams were involved when a PU occurred, further strengthening the correct identification of skin injuries.
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jillian Harrison | Belgian Healthcare Knowledge Centre | +32 2 287 33 89 | jillian.harrison@kce.fgov.be |
| Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Nov 5, 2019 | Feb 18, 2021 | SAP_001.pdf |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003668 | Pressure Ulcer |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012883 | Skin Ulcer |
| D012871 | Skin Diseases |
| D017437 | Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|