Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study aims to demonstrate that the mobilization with cytokine stimulation with G-CSF alone is non-inferior as compared to the standard mobilization with chemotherapy and G-CSF while associated with fewer side effects in myeloma patients.
Background and Rationale High-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) with melphalan and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) remains an integral component of the myeloma treatment algorithm for patients considered eligible for the procedure, nowadays performed in myeloma patients up to the age of 75 years. Until the advent of the novel agents, the initial therapy regimens commonly used were vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone (VAD) or single-agent dexamethasone, both of which shared the advantage of having little impact on stem cell mobilization and collection. Previous studies had shown that alkylating agents can potentially affect the stem cell pool and thus interfere with the ability to collect adequate numbers of stem cells. However, VAD is no longer uses nowadays, whereas current lenalidomide-containing combinations significantly affect stem cell collection. .In Switzerland, the combination of non-myeloablative chemotherapy with vinorelbine or gemcitabine and G-CSF is the current standard procedure. With the predominant use of bortezomib during induction treatment more patients have pre-existing neurotoxicity. Vinorelbine can aggravate this problem. Recently data have shown that a mobilization with gemcitabine together with G-CSF is safe and effective in myeloma patients. Whether chemotherapy is mandatory at all to achieve the same reliable and cost-effective mobilization is currently unknown. The investigators therefore consider that a direct comparison between vinorelbine/gemcitabine and G-CSF versus G-CSF alone is justified.
Objective:
The primary objective is to show non-inferiority of cytokine stimulation with G-CSF compared to chemotherapy stimulation with vinorelbine (or gemcitabine) together with G-CSF for the mobilization of autologous stem cells in myeloma patients in first remission.
Study Duration:
The anticipated total study duration is 42 months.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| CG (Chemotherapy/G-CSF) - Regime | Active Comparator | Vinorelbine 35 mg/m2 at day 1 as an i.v. infusion over 10 minutes or gemcitabine 1250 mg/m2 as a 30 minutes infusion at day 1. G-CSF will be started at day 4 at 10mcg/kg b.w. split in two daily doses, until the end of the stem cell collection procedure, with the first collection attempt on day 8. |
|
| G (G-CSF) - Regime | Experimental | G-CSF at 10mcg/kg b.w. split in two daily doses starting from day 1 until the end of the stem cell collection procedure, with the first collection attempt on day 5. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vinorelbine | Drug | Stimulation with vinorelbine together with G-CSF for mobilization of autologous stem cells |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of patients achieving a sufficient number of stem cells | Number of patients achieving a sufficient number (at least 5.0 Mio/kg) of stem cells at the planned day in a single day procedure without the use of the rescue compound plerixafor | 8 days |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Adverse events | Number of patients experiencing toxicities/adverse events assessed according to the CTCAE 5.0 during the study period | 30 days after ASCT |
| Quality of life | Assessment of quality of life before and after mobilization. The EORTC Q30 questionnaire will be given to patients at screening and after mobilization |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Barbara Jeker, MD | Department for Medical Oncology University Hospital/Inselspital 3010 Bern Switzerland | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Department for Medical Oncology University Hospital/Inselspital | Bern | 3010 | Switzerland |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 39548306 | Derived | Jeker B, Thalmann L, Bacher U, Nilius H, Rhyner G, Sokler M, Soltermann S, Winkler A, Vorburger C, Daskalakis M, Hoffmann M, Pabst T. Comparing stem cell mobilization with chemotherapy and cytokine (G-CSF) versus cytokine alone in myeloma patients (MOCCCA): a randomized phase II, open-label, non-inferiority trial. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2025 Mar;60(3):270-276. doi: 10.1038/s41409-024-02468-z. Epub 2024 Nov 15. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009101 | Multiple Myeloma |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D054219 | Neoplasms, Plasma Cell |
| D009370 | Neoplasms by Histologic Type |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D020141 | Hemostatic Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000077235 | Vinorelbine |
| D000093542 | Gemcitabine |
| D016179 | Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014748 | Vinca Alkaloids |
| D046948 | Secologanin Tryptamine Alkaloids |
| D026121 | Indole Alkaloids |
| D000470 | Alkaloids |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Gemcitabine | Drug | Stimulation with gemcitabine together with G-CSF for mobilization of autologous stem cells |
|
| G-CSF | Drug | Cytokine stimulation with G-CSF for mobilization of autologous stem cells |
|
| 8 days |
| Pain | Assessment of pain associated with the mobilization procedure. Pain is measured with visual analogue scale before and after mobilization | 8 days |
| Use of plerixafor | Number of patients requiring plerixafor for mobilization | 8 days |
| Hematologic engraftment after ASCT | First day (after ASCT) of neutrophils rising again above 0.5 G/l, and of platelets rising again above 20 G/L in the absence of platelet transfusions in the previous 3 days. | 30 days |
| Cellular composition of the peripheral blood and the grafts | Standard multiparameter flowcytometric assessment will determine CD4, CD8, sCD3, CD56 and CD19 cellular subsets. | 30 days |
| Flowcytometric MRD levels in the peripheral blood and the grafts | Assessed by standard multiparameter flowcytometry. | 30 days |
| Overall survival | Time from ASCT until death of any cause or date of last follow-up. | 60 months |
| Progression free survival | Time from ASCT until first recurrence of myeloma or date of last follow-up whatever occurs first. | 60 months |
| D014652 |
| Vascular Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D010265 | Paraproteinemias |
| D001796 | Blood Protein Disorders |
| D006402 | Hematologic Diseases |
| D006425 | Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases |
| D006474 | Hemorrhagic Disorders |
| D008232 | Lymphoproliferative Disorders |
| D007160 | Immunoproliferative Disorders |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |
| D006571 |
| Heterocyclic Compounds |
| D007211 | Indoles |
| D006574 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 2-Ring |
| D000072471 | Heterocyclic Compounds, Fused-Ring |
| D054836 | Indolizidines |
| D007212 | Indolizines |
| D003841 | Deoxycytidine |
| D003562 | Cytidine |
| D011741 | Pyrimidine Nucleosides |
| D011743 | Pyrimidines |
| D006573 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring |
| D003115 | Colony-Stimulating Factors |
| D006023 | Glycoproteins |
| D006001 | Glycoconjugates |
| D002241 | Carbohydrates |
| D016298 | Hematopoietic Cell Growth Factors |
| D016207 | Cytokines |
| D036341 | Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins |
| D010455 | Peptides |
| D000602 | Amino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins |
| D011506 | Proteins |
| D001685 | Biological Factors |