Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Define the best analgesic method between peri prostatic blockage, analgesic suppository, oral analgesic and topic anesthetic gel, during trans rectal prostate biopsy
Comparison between four analgesic methods during trans rectal prostatic biopsy.
OBJECTIVE: To define the best analgesic method between the peri-prostatic block, the analgesic suppository, the oral analgesic, the final anesthetic gel, during the trans rectal prostate biopsy determined at the end of the procedure with a visual analogue scale for pain (VAS pain) in a Interview 15 to 30 minutes at the end of the procedure.
METHODS: experimental, retrospective, longitudinal, comparative, during May to July 2017, 350 trans rectal prostate biopsies were performed, all cases were randomly assigned to one of the four study groups. The data analysis will be performed by calculating measures of central tendency and dispersion for quantitative variables and ANOVA test, for qualitative variables Chi square to determine statistical differences between the three moments of pain in the parameters of introduction of the ultrasound transducer, sampling of Prostate of the minimum 12 biopsies and discomfort in general of the procedure
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | Group 1 an analgesic suppository was applied | ||
| Group 2 | Group 2 was administered analgesic orally | ||
| Group 3 | Group 3 was given trans rectal gel | ||
| Group 4 | Group was performed peri prostatic infiltration. | ||
| Group 5 | Group was performed by placebo oral |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Ultrasound Transducer | Evaluation of the discomfort or pain in the introduction of the trans rectal ultrasound transducer determined at the end of the procedure with Visual Analog Scale for Pain, which is a psychometric measuring instrument designed to assess the pain intensity experienced by each patient individually. Was employ for first time in 1921 and referred as a "graphical rating method", which has the characteristic of being able to achieve a rapid classification (statistically measurable and reproducible) of the severity of pain experience. The analogous visual scale used for this study measures from 0-10 the intensity of the pain with a series of "faces" that show the intensity in the pain experimentation with categories like "No pain" approximately 0-1, mild, annoying in number 2, nagging in number 4, distressing in number 6, intense in number 8 and worst possible in number 10. | Interview 15 to 30 minutes at the end of the procedure |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Biopsy | Evaluation of the discomfort or pain at the moment of the biopsy, that is, when the needle is inserted to take the samples in a 12-cylinder minimum or as needed, determined at the end of the procedure with Visual Analog Scale for Pain, The analogous visual scale used for this study measures from 0 to 10 the intensity of pain with a series of "faces" that show the intensity in the pain experimentation with categories such as "No pain" approximately 0-1, mild, annoying in number 2, annoying in number 4, distressing in number 6, intense in number 8 and worse in number 10. The analogous visual scale used for this study measures from 0-10 the intensity of the pain with a series of "faces" that show the intensity in the pain experimentation with categories like "No pain" approximately 0-1, mild, annoying in number 2, nagging in number 4, distressing in number 6, intense in number 8 and worst possible in number 10. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| General procedure | Evaluation of the discomfort or pain at the moment of the biopsy, that is, when the needle is inserted to take the samples in a 12-cylinder minimum or as needed, determined at the end of the procedure with Visual Analog Scale for Pain. The analogous visual scale used for this study measures from 0 to 10 the intensity of pain with a series of "faces" that show the intensity in the pain experimentation with categories such as "No pain" approximately 0-1, mild, annoying in number 2, annoying in number 4, distressing in number 6, intense in number 8 and worse in number 10. |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
The patients from the consultation were taken from the first time they were derived from the peripheral clinics or from the ones derived from our same medicine, with suspicion of prostate cancer and that the criteria for carrying out the trans rectal prostate biopsy were met.
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| EDGAR BELTRAN-SUAREZ, MD | HOSPITAL OF SPECIALTIES OF THE NATIONAL MEDICAL | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edgar Beltran-Suarez | Mexico City | Aztcapotzalco | 07300 | Mexico |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26074382 | Background | Attard G, Parker C, Eeles RA, Schroder F, Tomlins SA, Tannock I, Drake CG, de Bono JS. Prostate cancer. Lancet. 2016 Jan 2;387(10013):70-82. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61947-4. Epub 2015 Jun 11. | |
| 26498056 | Background | Lowrance WT, Roth BJ, Kirkby E, Murad MH, Cookson MS. Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: AUA Guideline Amendment 2015. J Urol. 2016 May;195(5):1444-1452. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.10.086. Epub 2015 Oct 20. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| National Cancer Institute. A Snapshot of Prostate Cancer: Incidence and Mortality | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011471 | Prostatic Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005834 | Genital Neoplasms, Male |
| D014565 | Urogenital Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Interview 15 to 30 minutes at the end of the procedure |
| Interview 15 to 30 minutes at the end of the procedure |
| 23787356 | Background | Loeb S, Vellekoop A, Ahmed HU, Catto J, Emberton M, Nam R, Rosario DJ, Scattoni V, Lotan Y. Systematic review of complications of prostate biopsy. Eur Urol. 2013 Dec;64(6):876-92. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.05.049. Epub 2013 Jun 4. |
| 21757258 | Background | Mottet N, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, Joniau S, Mason M, Matveev V, Schmid HP, van der Kwast T, Wiegel T, Zattoni F, Heidenreich A. [EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part II: treatment of advanced, relapsing, and castration-resistant prostate cancer]. Actas Urol Esp. 2011 Nov-Dec;35(10):565-79. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2011.03.011. Epub 2011 Jul 14. Spanish. |
| 16800136 | Background | Herranz Amo F, Diez Cordero JM, Cabello Benavente R. [Evolution of the transrectal ultrasound guided prostatic biopsy technique]. Arch Esp Urol. 2006 May;59(4):385-96. Spanish. |
| 26229322 | Background | Sahin A, Ceylan C, Gazel E, Odabas O. Three different anesthesia techniques for a comfortable prostate biopsy. Urol Ann. 2015 Jul-Sep;7(3):339-44. doi: 10.4103/0974-7796.152014. |
| WHO \| GLOBOCAN 2012 Estimated Cancer Incidence, Mortality and Prevalence Worlwide in 2012 \[Internet\]. 2015 \[cited 2016 Mar 21\]. p. 3. Available from: | View source |
| D005832 |
| Genital Diseases, Male |
| D000091662 | Genital Diseases |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
| D011469 | Prostatic Diseases |
| D052801 | Male Urogenital Diseases |