Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| U1111-1203-7949 | Registry Identifier | WHO | |
| 2017-004293-33 | EudraCT Number |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a study to explore the effect of oral ozanimod as an induction treatment for participants with moderately to severely active Crohn's Disease.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Administration of oral Ozanimod | Experimental |
| |
| Administration of Placebo | Placebo Comparator |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ozanimod | Drug | Specified dose on specified days |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score < 150 | The CDAI is a composite score that is used to measure the clinical activity of Crohn's disease (CD). The CDAI uses a questionnaire with 8 disease activity variables: number of soft/liquid stools, severity of abdominal pain, general well-being, presence of complications, need for antidiarrheal drugs, presence of an abdominal mass, hematocrit, and deviation in body weight. The sub scores of number of soft/liquid stool, severity of abdominal pain (0 [none] to 3 [Severe]), general well-being (0 [well] to 4 [terrible] were summed over the 7 days prior to each visit. Additionally, the remaining predictors were also noted and weighted to create the total CDAI score which ranged from 0-600 with a higher score indicating a worse outcome. | Week 12 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With Abdominal Pain and Stool Frequency Clinical Remission | Abdominal pain and stool frequency clinical remission was defined as average daily abdominal pain score ≤ 1 point, and average daily stool frequency ≤ 3 with abdominal pain and stool frequency no worse than baseline at Week 12. Participants entered the responses in diaries daily. The 7 days entries prior to Week 12 visit were considered for calculating average abdominal pain score and stool frequency. The abdominal pain was graded on severity of 0 (none) to 3 (severe) scale and stool frequency was defined number of liquid or soft stools per day. Baseline was defined as the last assessment prior to the start time of the first drug administration if time of measurement is available else the last assessment prior to or on the date of the first drug administration. |
Not provided
For more information regarding Bristol-Myers Squibb Clinical Trial participation, please visit: www.BMSStudyConnect.com
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria apply
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Bristol-Myers Squibb | Bristol-Myers Squibb | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Local Institution - 202 | Scottsdale | Arizona | 85258 | United States | ||
| Ucsd Medical Center |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 36208720 | Derived | Feagan BG, Schreiber S, Afzali A, Rieder F, Hyams J, Kollengode K, Pearlman J, Son V, Marta C, Wolf DC, D'Haens GG. Ozanimod as a novel oral small molecule therapy for the treatment of Crohn's disease: The YELLOWSTONE clinical trial program. Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 Nov;122:106958. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106958. Epub 2022 Oct 5. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| BMS Clinical Trial Information | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Ozanimod | Participants with moderate to severe acute Crohn's disease were administered Ozanimod capsule orally. Participants were administered 0.23 milligram (mg) of Ozanimod capsule (daily) from Day 1 to Day 4 followed by 0.46 mg of Ozanimod (2 capsules of 0.23 mg daily) from Day 5 to Day 7 followed by 0.92 mg of Ozanimod capsule (daily) from Day 8 to Week 12. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Jun 14, 2021 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Placebo |
| Other |
Specified dose on specified days |
|
| Week 12 |
| Percentage of Participants With a Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) Score Decrease From Baseline of ≥ 50% | The SES-CD assessed the degree of inflammation. The SES-CD assesses the following 4 components: size of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface, and presence of narrowing. Each of these components was scored on a scale of 0 (none/unaffected) to 3 (worst). In the SES-CD, each of these 4 components are assessed in the five segments: ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum. The SES-CD was the sum of the individual scores of each of the components across the five segments. The range of SES-CD scores was 0 - 12 for each segment, and 0 - 60 for the overall SES-CD score, with larger scores indicating greater degree of inflammation. Baseline was defined as the last assessment prior to the start time of the first drug administration if time of measurement is available else the last assessment prior to or on the date of the first drug administration. | Week 12 |
| Percentage of Participants With Reduction From Baseline in the Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score of >= 100 Points or a Total CDAI Score < 150 | The CDAI is a composite score that is used to measure the clinical activity of Crohn's disease (CD). The CDAI uses a questionnaire with 8 disease activity variables: number of soft/liquid stools, severity of abdominal pain, general well-being, presence of complications, need for antidiarrheal drugs, presence of an abdominal mass, hematocrit, and deviation in body weight. The sub scores of number of soft/liquid stool, severity of abdominal pain (0 [none] to 3 [Severe]), general well-being (0 [well] to 4 [terrible] were summed over the 7 days prior to each visit. Additionally, the remaining predictors were also noted and weighted to create the total CDAI score which ranged from 0-600 with a higher score indicating a worse outcome. Baseline was defined as the last assessment prior to the start time of the first drug administration if time of measurement is available else the last assessment prior to or on the date of the first drug administration. | Week 12 |
| Percentage of Participants With Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score Reduction From Baseline of ≥ 100 Points or CDAI Score < 150 and SES-CD Decrease From Baseline of ≥ 50% | CDAI include 8 components number of soft/liquid stools, severity of abdominal pain, wellbeing, complications, need antidiarrheal drugs, abdominal mass, hematocrit, deviation in body wt. Subscores of numbers of soft/liquid stool, severity of abdominal pain (0 [none] to 3 [Severe]), general well-being (0 [well] to 4 [terrible] were summed over the 7 days prior to visit. The others weighted to create the total CDAI score ranging 0-600 with higher score indicating worse outcome. The SES-CD has 4 components size of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface, presence of narrowing. Each component was scored on scale of 0 (none) to 3 (worst). In SES-CD, each of 4 components are assessed in the five segments: ileum, right, transverse, left colon, and rectum. The SES-CD was the sum of the individual scores of each of the components across the five segments. The range of SES-CD scores was 0 - 12 for each segment, and 0 - 60 for overall, with larger scores show greater degree of inflammation. | Week 12 |
| Percentage of Participants With Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score < 150 and Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) Score Decrease From Baseline of ≥ 50% | CDAI include 8 components number of soft/liquid stools, severity of abdominal pain, wellbeing, complications, need antidiarrheal drugs, abdominal mass, hematocrit, deviation in body wt. Subscores of numbers of soft/liquid stool, severity of abdominal pain (0 [none] to 3 [Severe]), general well-being (0 [well] to 4 [terrible] were summed over the 7 days prior to visit. The others weighted to create the total CDAI score ranging 0-600 with higher score indicating worse outcome. The SES-CD has 4 components size of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface, presence of narrowing. Each component was scored on scale of 0 (none) to 3 (worst). In SES-CD, each of 4 components are assessed in the five segments: ileum, right, transverse, left colon, and rectum. The SES-CD was the sum of the individual scores of each of the components across the five segments. The range of SES-CD scores was 0 - 12 for each segment, and 0 - 60 for overall, with larger scores show greater degree of inflammation. | Week 12 |
| Percentage of Participants With Abdominal Pain and Stool Frequency Clinical Remission and a Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) Score <= 4 Points and Decrease >= 2 Points | Abdominal pain (AP) and stool frequency (SF) clinical remission was defined as average daily abdominal pain score ≤ 1 point, and average daily stool frequency ≤ 3 times with AP and SF no worse than baseline at Week 12. Participants entered responses in diaries daily. The 7 days entries prior to visit were considered for calculating average AP score and SF. The AP was graded on severity of 0 (none) to 3 (severe) scale and SF was defined number of liquid or soft stools per day. The SES-CD has 4 components size of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface, presence of narrowing. Each component was scored on scale of 0 (none) to 3 (worst). In SES-CD, each of 4 components are assessed in the five segments: ileum, right, transverse, left colon, and rectum. The SES-CD was the sum of the individual scores of each of the components across the five segments. The range of SES-CD scores was 0 - 12 for each segment, and 0 - 60 for overall, with larger scores show greater degree of inflammation. | Week 12 |
| Percentage of Participants With Global Histologic Activity Score (GHAS) Remission | GHAS assesses the inflammation and mucosal damage. GHAS has 8 components Epithelial damage, Architectural changes, Infiltration of mononuclear cells in the lamina propria, Infiltration of polymorphonuclear cells in the lamina propria, Polymorphonuclear cells in epithelium, Presence of erosion and/or ulcers, Presence of granuloma and number of biopsy specimens affected. Each of these components was scored on a scale of 0 (none/unaffected) to 2 (worst). Each of these 8 components are assessed in the five segments: ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum. Within each segment, the GHAS score has a range of 0 - 16, and the total GHAS score has a range of 0 - 80. Higher numbers correspond to more inflammation and more mucosal damage. Baseline was defined as the last assessment prior to the start time of the first drug administration if time of measurement is available else the last assessment prior to or on the date of the first drug administration. | Week 12 |
| Percentage of Participants With CDAI Reduction From Baseline of >=70 Points | The CDAI is a composite score that is used to measure the clinical activity of Crohn's disease (CD). The CDAI uses a questionnaire with 8 disease activity variables: number of soft/liquid stools, severity of abdominal pain, general well-being, presence of complications, need for antidiarrheal drugs, presence of an abdominal mass, hematocrit, and deviation in body weight. The sub scores of number of soft/liquid stool, severity of abdominal pain (0 [none] to 3 [Severe]), general well-being (0 [well] to 4 [terrible] were summed over the 7 days prior to each visit. Additionally, the remaining predictors were also noted and weighted to create the total CDAI score which ranged from 0-600 with a higher score indicating a worse outcome. Baseline was defined as the last assessment prior to the start time of the first drug administration if time of measurement is available else the last assessment prior to or on the date of the first drug administration. | Week 12 |
| Percentage of Participants With Absence of Ulcers ≥ 0.5 cm With no Segment With Any Ulcerated Surface ≥10% | The ulcerated surface were assessed via endoscopy. | Week 12 |
| Percentage of Participants With a Crohn's Disease Endoscopic Index of Severity (CDEIS) Decrease From Baseline of ≥ 50% | CDEIS is an index for determining the severity of Crohn's disease with endoscopic localization to ileum and colon. The CDEIS divides the intestine into 5 segments: rectum, sigmoid and left colon, transverse colon, right colon, and ileum. Four variables are assessed in each segment: the presence of deep ulceration, the presence of superficial ulceration, the percentage of ulcerated surface, and the percentage of surface affected by CD, indicated on 10-cm visual analogue scales. In addition, the presence of ulcerated stenosis and the presence of nonulcerated stenosis are also assessed over the entire intestine. These factors are weighted and summed to calculate the total score ranging from 0- 44, with higher scores indicating more severe disease. | Week 12 |
| Percentage of Participants With Abdominal Pain (AP) and Stool Frequency (SF) Clinical Remission and an Endoscopic (50%) Response | AP and SF clinical remission is average daily abdominal pain score ≤ 1 point, and average daily stool frequency ≤ 3 times with AP and SF no worse than baseline at Week 12. Participants entered responses in diaries daily. The 7 days entries prior to visit were considered for calculating average AP score and SF. AP was graded on severity of 0 (none) to 3 (severe) scale and SF was defined number of liquid or soft stools per day. SES-CD has 4 components size of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface, presence of narrowing. Each component was scored on scale of 0 (none) to 3 (worst). Endoscopic Response is defined as >= 50% decrease from baseline in SES-CD. In SES-CD, each of 4 components are assessed in five segments: ileum, right, transverse, left colon, and rectum. The SES-CD was sum of individual scores of each of components across five segments. Range of SES-CD scores was 0 - 12 for each segment, and 0 - 60 for overall, with larger scores show greater degree of inflammation. | Week 12 |
| Percentage of Participants With Robarts Histologic Index (RHI) Mucosal Healing at Week 12 | RHI mucosal healing was defined as RHI remission combined with SES-CD <= 4 points and a SES-CD decrease from baseline >= 2 points with no SES-CD sub-score >1 point. RHI Remission is defined as no active inflammation in any measured segment. The SES-CD assesses the following 4 components: size of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface, and presence of narrowing. Each of these components was scored on a scale of 0 (none/unaffected) to 3 (worst). In the SES-CD, each of these 4 components are assessed in the five segments: ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum. The SES-CD was the sum of the individual scores of each of the components across the five segments. The range of SES-CD scores was 0 - 12 for each segment, and 0 - 60 for the overall SES-CD score, with larger scores indicating greater degree of inflammation. | Week 12 |
| La Jolla |
| California |
| 92037 |
| United States |
| Local Institution - 010 | Lancaster | California | 93534 | United States |
| Southern California Research Institute Medical Group, Inc. | Los Angeles | California | 90045 | United States |
| Matrix Clinical Research Inc | Los Angeles | California | 90048 | United States |
| Facey Medical Foundation (Parent) | Mission Hills | California | 91345 | United States |
| Local Institution - 093 | Pasadena | California | 91105 | United States |
| Sutter Medical Group | Roseville | California | 95661 | United States |
| Local Institution - 280 | Sacramento | California | 95817 | United States |
| Local Institution - 281 | San Francisco | California | 94158 | United States |
| Local Institution - 124 | West Covina | California | 91790 | United States |
| Local Institution - 065 | Colorado Springs | Colorado | 80907 | United States |
| Local Institution - 182 | Bristol | Connecticut | 06010 | United States |
| Local Institution - 166 | Clearwater | Florida | 33765 | United States |
| Local Institution - 084 | Clermont | Florida | 34711 | United States |
| American Research Institute Inc | Cutler Bay | Florida | 33157 | United States |
| Local Institution - 112 | Doral | Florida | 33166 | United States |
| Riverside Clinical Research | Edgewater | Florida | 32132 | United States |
| SIH Research | Kissimmee | Florida | 34759 | United States |
| Local Institution - 067 | Lighthouse PT | Florida | 33064 | United States |
| Center For Advanced Gastroenterology | Maitland | Florida | 32751 | United States |
| LMG Research | Miami | Florida | 33125 | United States |
| Local Institution - 175 | Miami | Florida | 33166 | United States |
| Local Institution - 081 | Miami | Florida | 33176 | United States |
| Local Institution - 044 | Miami Springs | Florida | 33166 | United States |
| Local Institution - 192 | New Port Richey | Florida | 34655 | United States |
| Local Institution - 200 | Orlando | Florida | 32810 | United States |
| Local Institution - 002 | Palmetto Bay | Florida | 33157 | United States |
| Theia Clinical Research, LLC | Pinellas Park | Florida | 33781 | United States |
| Precision Clinical Research, LLC. | Sunrise | Florida | 33351 | United States |
| Local Institution - 183 | Tampa | Florida | 33612-4799 | United States |
| Apex Clinical Research | Tampa | Florida | 33612 | United States |
| Local Institution - 107 | Tampa | Florida | 33614 | United States |
| Local Institution - 037 | Atlanta | Georgia | 30322 | United States |
| Local Institution - 220 | Atlanta | Georgia | 30322 | United States |
| Local Institution - 143 | Decatur | Georgia | 30030 | United States |
| Local Institution - 115 | Idaho Falls | Idaho | 83404 | United States |
| Local Institution - 022 | Chicago | Illinois | 60637 | United States |
| Local Institution - 092 | Evansville | Indiana | 47714 | United States |
| Local Institution - 033 | Indianapolis | Indiana | 46202 | United States |
| Local Institution - 070 | Topeka | Kansas | 66606 | United States |
| Local Institution - 020 | Baton Rouge | Louisiana | 70809 | United States |
| Clinical Trials of SW Louisiana LLC | Lake Charles | Louisiana | 70601 | United States |
| Tandem Clinical Research, LLC | Marrero | Louisiana | 70072 | United States |
| Local Institution - 024 | Worcester | Massachusetts | 01655 | United States |
| Local Institution - 167 | Kalamazoo | Michigan | 49008 | United States |
| Local Institution - 005 | Novi | Michigan | 48377 | United States |
| Local Institution - 095 | Minneapolis | Minnesota | 55455 | United States |
| Local Institution - 045 | Rochester | Minnesota | 55905 | United States |
| Local Institution - 198 | Kansas City | Missouri | 64111 | United States |
| Internal Medicine Specialists | Las Vegas | Nevada | 89145 | United States |
| Local Institution - 040 | Lebanon | New Hampshire | 03756 | United States |
| Local Institution - 054 | Hartsdale | New York | 10530 | United States |
| Weill Cornell Medical College | New York | New York | 10010 | United States |
| Concorde Medical Group | New York | New York | 10016 | United States |
| TrialSpark | New York | New York | 10024 | United States |
| Local Institution - 060 | North Massapequa | New York | 11758-1802 | United States |
| Local Institution - 156 | Charlotte | North Carolina | 28209 | United States |
| Local Institution - 052 | Winston-Salem | North Carolina | 27103 | United States |
| Local Institution - 170 | Dayton | Ohio | 45417 | United States |
| Local Institution - 049 | Hilliard | Ohio | 43026 | United States |
| Paramount Medical Research & Consulting, Llc | Middleburg Heights | Ohio | 44130 | United States |
| Local Institution - 087 | Norman | Oklahoma | 73071 | United States |
| Local Institution - 294 | Oklahoma City | Oklahoma | 73102 | United States |
| Local Institution - 185 | Tulsa | Oklahoma | 74136 | United States |
| Local Institution - 217 | Tulsa | Oklahoma | 74137 | United States |
| University of Pennsylvania Cancer Center | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 19104 | United States |
| Local Institution - 034 | Fort Sam Houston | Texas | 78234 | United States |
| Local Institution - 079 | Houston | Texas | 77058 | United States |
| Local Institution - 196 | Houston | Texas | 77089 | United States |
| Gulf Coast Research Group LLC | Houston | Texas | 77098 | United States |
| Accurate Clinical Research Inc | Pasadena | Texas | 77505 | United States |
| Local Institution - 071 | Richardson | Texas | 75082 | United States |
| Local Institution - 178 | San Antonio | Texas | 78229 | United States |
| Local Institution - 181 | Temple | Texas | 76508 | United States |
| Local Institution - 292 | Riverton | Utah | 84065 | United States |
| Local Institution - 030 | Lynchburg | Virginia | 24502 | United States |
| The Gastroenterology Group | Reston | Virginia | 20191 | United States |
| Local Institution - 072 | Richmond | Virginia | 23249 | United States |
| Local Institution - 172 | Roanoke | Virginia | 24016 | United States |
| Local Institution - 089 | La Crosse | Wisconsin | 54601 | United States |
| Local Institution - 309 | Liverpool | New South Wales | 2170 | Australia |
| Local Institution - 318 | New Lambton Heights | New South Wales | 2305 | Australia |
| Local Institution - 328 | Herston | Queensland | 4029 | Australia |
| Local Institution - 313 | Maroorchydore | Queensland | 4558 | Australia |
| Local Institution - 321 | North Mackay | Queensland | 4740 | Australia |
| Local Institution - 312 | South Brisbane | Queensland | 4101 | Australia |
| Local Institution - 307 | Bedford Park | South Australia | 5042 | Australia |
| Local Institution - 326 | Elizabeth Vale | South Australia | 05112 | Australia |
| Local Institution - 317 | Clayton | Victoria | 3168 | Australia |
| Local Institution - 305 | Fitzroy | Victoria | 3065 | Australia |
| Local Institution - 329 | Geelong | Victoria | 3220 | Australia |
| Local Institution - 327 | Melbourne | Victoria | 3004 | Australia |
| Local Institution - 315 | Subiaco | Western Australia | 6008 | Australia |
| Local Institution - 726 | Innsbruck | 6020 | Austria |
| Local Institution - 727 | Sankt Pölten | 3100 | Austria |
| Local Institution - 336 | Vienna | 1020 | Austria |
| Local Institution - 725 | Vienna | 1090 | Austria |
| Local Institution - 753 | Rousse | 7002 | Bulgaria |
| Local Institution - 750 | Sofia | 1407 | Bulgaria |
| Local Institution - 755 | Sofia | 1407 | Bulgaria |
| Local Institution - 756 | Sofia | 1431 | Bulgaria |
| Local Institution - 752 | Sofia | 1527 | Bulgaria |
| Local Institution - 554 | Sofia | 1784 | Bulgaria |
| Local Institution - 269 | Edmonton | Alberta | T5R1W2 | Canada |
| Local Institution - 262 | New Westminster | British Columbia | V3L 3W5 | Canada |
| Local Institution - 267 | Vancouver | British Columbia | V6Z 2K5 | Canada |
| Local Institution - 256 | Brandon | Manitoba | R7A 0N7 | Canada |
| Local Institution - 266 | Greater Sudbury | Ontario | P3C 5K6 | Canada |
| Local Institution - 264 | Toronto | Ontario | M5G 1X5 | Canada |
| Local Institution - 257 | Toronto | Ontario | M5T 3A9 | Canada |
| Local Institution - 254 | Montreal | Quebec | H1T 2M4 | Canada |
| Local Institution - 270 | Ottawa | Quebec | K1H 8L6 | Canada |
| Local Institution - 423 | Changzhou | Jiangsu | 213003 | China |
| Local Institution - 369 | Shanghai | Shanghai Municipality | 200120 | China |
| Local Institution - 482 | Beijing | 100050 | China |
| Local Institution - 467 | Beijing | 100700 | China |
| Local Institution - 379 | Bengbu | 233004 | China |
| Local Institution - 485 | Changchun | 130021 | China |
| Local Institution - 376 | Changchun | 130033 | China |
| Local Institution - 421 | Changsha | 410008 | China |
| Local Institution - 378 | Changsha | 450052 | China |
| Local Institution - 414 | Changzhou | 213004 | China |
| Local Institution - 419 | Chengdu | 610041 | China |
| Local Institution - 422 | Fuzhou | 350005 | China |
| Local Institution - 478 | Guangzhou | 510030 | China |
| Local Institution - 472 | Guangzhou | 510180 | China |
| Local Institution - 486 | Guangzhou | 510655 | China |
| Local Institution - 470 | Hangzhou, Zhejiang | 100142 | China |
| Local Institution - 491 | Hefei | 230001 | China |
| Local Institution - 374 | Kunming | 650032 | China |
| Local Institution - 383 | Luzhou | 646099 | China |
| Local Institution - 488 | Nanchang | 330006 | China |
| Local Institution - 418 | Nanjing | 210008 | China |
| Local Institution - 375 | Nanjing | 210009 | China |
| Local Institution - 487 | Nanjing | 210029 | China |
| Local Institution - 473 | Shanghai | 200025 | China |
| Local Institution - 380 | Shanghai | 200040 | China |
| Local Institution - 377 | Shanghai | 200080 | China |
| Local Institution - 458 | Taichung City | 40447 | China |
| Local Institution - 373 | Tianjin | 300052 | China |
| Local Institution - 475 | Wuhan | 430022 | China |
| Local Institution - 474 | Wuhan | 430030 | China |
| Local Institution - 483 | Wuhan | 430060 | China |
| Local Institution - 381 | Wuxi | 214023 | China |
| Local Institution - 415 | Xi'an | 710038 | China |
| Local Institution - 420 | Xi'an | 710100 | China |
| Local Institution - 370 | Zhengzhou | 450014 | China |
| Local Institution - 397 | Armenia | 630004 | Colombia |
| Local Institution - 398 | Barranquilla | 080020 | Colombia |
| Local Institution - 395 | Bogotá | 110221 | Colombia |
| Local Institution - 396 | Cali | 760026 | Colombia |
| Local Institution - 394 | Medellín | 050034 | Colombia |
| Local Institution - 613 | Helsinki | 00290 | Finland |
| Local Institution - 614 | Turku | FI-20521 | Finland |
| Local Institution - 647 | Neuilly-sur-Seine | Cedex | 92200 | France |
| Local Institution - 639 | Béziers | 34525 | France |
| Local Institution - 635 | Blois | 41016 | France |
| Local Institution - 634 | Caen | 14000 | France |
| Local Institution - 644 | Colombes | 92701 | France |
| Local Institution - 632 | Nantes | 44093 | France |
| Local Institution - 630 | Pierre-Bénite | 69495 | France |
| Local Institution - 631 | Saint-Priest-en-Jarez | 42270 | France |
| Local Institution - 786 | Batumi | 6010 | Georgia |
| Local Institution - 779 | Kutaisi | 4600 | Georgia |
| Local Institution - 454 | Tbilisi | 0101 | Georgia |
| Local Institution - 778 | Tbilisi | 0112 | Georgia |
| Local Institution - 782 | Tbilisi | 0131 | Georgia |
| Local Institution - 552 | Tbilisi | 0144 | Georgia |
| Local Institution - 793 | Tbilisi | 0159 | Georgia |
| Local Institution - 740 | Tbilisi | 0160 | Georgia |
| Local Institution - 783 | Tbilisi | 0160 | Georgia |
| Local Institution - 784 | Tbilisi | 0160 | Georgia |
| Local Institution - 785 | Tbilisi | 0160 | Georgia |
| Local Institution - 335 | Tbilisi | 0179 | Georgia |
| Local Institution - 455 | Tbilisi | 0180 | Georgia |
| Local Institution - 781 | Tbilisi | 0186 | Georgia |
| Local Institution - 780 | Telavi | 2200 | Georgia |
| Local Institution - 629 | Berlin | 10787 | Germany |
| Local Institution - 653 | Berlin | 12200 | Germany |
| Local Institution - 648 | Berlin | 13353 | Germany |
| Local Institution - 628 | Berlin | 14163 | Germany |
| Local Institution - 664 | Brandenburg an der Havel | 14770 | Germany |
| Local Institution - 732 | Dachau | 85221 | Germany |
| Local Institution - 574 | Frankfurt am Main | 60313 | Germany |
| Local Institution - 657 | Frankfurt am Main | 60590 | Germany |
| Local Institution - 658 | Halle | 06108 | Germany |
| Local Institution - 656 | Halle | 06120 | Germany |
| Local Institution - 652 | Hamburg | 22559 | Germany |
| Local Institution - 591 | Hanover | 30625 | Germany |
| Local Institution - 649 | Keil | 24105 | Germany |
| Local Institution - 337 | Leipzig | 04103 | Germany |
| Local Institution - 660 | Mainz | 55131 | Germany |
| Local Institution - 667 | Münster | 48149 | Germany |
| Local Institution - 620 | Neuruppin | 16816 | Germany |
| Local Institution - 584 | Nürtingen | 72622 | Germany |
| Local Institution - 661 | Stuttgart | 70376 | Germany |
| Local Institution - 790 | Athens | 11 527 | Greece |
| Local Institution - 588 | Athens | 115 28 | Greece |
| Local Institution - 791 | Athens | 11527 | Greece |
| Local Institution - 792 | Athens | 18536 | Greece |
| Local Institution - 592 | Athens, Attiki | 15562 | Greece |
| Local Institution - 787 | Heraklion | 71 110 | Greece |
| Local Institution - 789 | Thessaloniki | 54642 | Greece |
| Local Institution - 788 | Thessaloniki | 56429 | Greece |
| Local Institution - 404 | Hong Kong | 0 | Hong Kong |
| Local Institution - 405 | Kowloon | 0 | Hong Kong |
| Local Institution - 798 | Békéscsaba | 5600 | Hungary |
| Local Institution - 803 | Budapest | 1062 | Hungary |
| Local Institution - 804 | Budapest | 1088 | Hungary |
| Local Institution - 556 | Budapest | H-1036 | Hungary |
| Local Institution - 801 | Győr | 9024 | Hungary |
| Local Institution - 555 | Gyula | 5700 | Hungary |
| Local Institution - 797 | Miskolc | 3529 | Hungary |
| Local Institution - 800 | Nagykanizsa | H-8800 | Hungary |
| Local Institution - 816 | Szekszárd | 7100 | Hungary |
| Local Institution - 805 | Szentes | 6600 | Hungary |
| Local Institution - 799 | Székesfehérvár | 8000 | Hungary |
| Local Institution - 343 | Afula | 18341 | Israel |
| Local Institution - 346 | Beer Jacob | 73100 | Israel |
| Local Institution - 350 | Haifa | 3109601 | Israel |
| Local Institution - 347 | Jerusalem | 9362410 | Israel |
| Local Institution - 349 | Kfar Saba | 44281 | Israel |
| Local Institution - 341 | Petah Tikva | 49100 | Israel |
| Local Institution - 340 | Tel Aviv | 64239 | Israel |
| Local Institution - 605 | Kaunas | LT-50009 | Lithuania |
| Local Institution - 603 | Klaipėda | LT-5808 | Lithuania |
| Local Institution - 607 | Vilnius | 08406 | Lithuania |
| Local Institution - 606 | Vilnius | LT-08661 | Lithuania |
| Local Institution - 604 | Vilnius | LT-10207 | Lithuania |
| Local Institution - 952 | Amsterdam | 1081 HV | Netherlands |
| Local Institution - 955 | Amsterdam | 1105 AZ | Netherlands |
| Local Institution - 956 | Groningen | 9713 GZ | Netherlands |
| Local Institution - 949 | Nijmegen | 6525 GA | Netherlands |
| Local Institution - 951 | Sittard-Geleen | 6162 BG | Netherlands |
| Local Institution - 954 | Tilburg | 5022 GC | Netherlands |
| Local Institution - 580 | Częstochowa | 42-202 | Poland |
| Local Institution - 988 | Elblag | 82-300 | Poland |
| Local Institution - 579 | Gdansk | 80-382 | Poland |
| Local Institution - 978 | Gdansk | 80-803 | Poland |
| Local Institution - 577 | Gdynia | 81-537 | Poland |
| Local Institution - 906 | Jelenia Góra | 58-500 | Poland |
| Local Institution - 757 | Józefów | 05-410 | Poland |
| Local Institution - 578 | Katowice | 40-040 | Poland |
| Local Institution - 834 | Ksawerów | 95-054 | Poland |
| Local Institution - 581 | Lodz | 90-127 | Poland |
| Local Institution - 981 | Lodz | 93-034 | Poland |
| Local Institution - 976 | Nowy Targ | 34-400 | Poland |
| Local Institution - 963 | Rzeszów | 35-302 | Poland |
| Local Institution - 979 | Sopot | 81-756 | Poland |
| Local Institution - 835 | Szczecin | 71-270 | Poland |
| Local Institution - 586 | Warsaw | 00-728 | Poland |
| Local Institution - 833 | Warsaw | 02-018 | Poland |
| Local Institution - 989 | Warsaw | 02-653 | Poland |
| Local Institution - 807 | Warsaw | 04-730 | Poland |
| Local Institution - 893 | Wierzchosławice | 33-122 | Poland |
| Local Institution - 983 | Wroclaw | 50-053 | Poland |
| Local Institution - 984 | Wroclaw | 50-367 | Poland |
| Local Institution - 582 | Wroclaw | 50-381 | Poland |
| Local Institution - 982 | Wroclaw | 51-162 | Poland |
| Local Institution - 831 | Wroclaw | 53-114 | Poland |
| Local Institution - 987 | Wroclaw | 53-333 | Poland |
| Local Institution - 832 | Wroclaw | 54-144 | Poland |
| Local Institution - 959 | Coimbra | 3000-075 | Portugal |
| Local Institution - 958 | Guimarães | 4835-044 | Portugal |
| Local Institution - 961 | Loures | 2674-514 | Portugal |
| Local Institution - 957 | Viana do Castelo | 4904-858 | Portugal |
| Local Institution - 966 | Barnaul | 656015 | Russia |
| Local Institution - 871 | Barnaul | 656024 | Russia |
| Local Institution - 589 | Bataysk | 346880 | Russia |
| Local Institution - 621 | Chelyabinsk | 454021 | Russia |
| Local Institution - 991 | Chelyabinsk | 454076 | Russia |
| Local Institution - 998 | Kaliningrad | 236016 | Russia |
| Local Institution - 882 | Kaluga | 248007 | Russia |
| Local Institution - 849 | Kemerovo | 650066 | Russia |
| Local Institution - 566 | Moscow | 105554 | Russia |
| Local Institution - 995 | Moscow | 115516 | Russia |
| Local Institution - 873 | Moscow | 117997 | Russia |
| Local Institution - 870 | Moscow | 119192 | Russia |
| Local Institution - 869 | Moscow | 123423 | Russia |
| Local Institution - 990 | Nizhny Novgorod | 603140 | Russia |
| Local Institution - 853 | Novosibirsk | 630091 | Russia |
| Local Institution - 876 | Novosibirsk | 630117 | Russia |
| Local Institution - 996 | Omsk | 644024 | Russia |
| Local Institution - 875 | Orenburg | 460050 | Russia |
| Local Institution - 867 | Penza | 440026 | Russia |
| Local Institution - 863 | Saint Petersburg | 191015 | Russia |
| Local Institution - 993 | Saint Petersburg | 191015 | Russia |
| Local Institution - 868 | Saint Petersburg | 194044 | Russia |
| Local Institution - 857 | Saint Petersburg | 195009 | Russia |
| Local Institution - 879 | Saint Petersburg | 196143 | Russia |
| Local Institution - 878 | Saint Petersburg | 196247 | Russia |
| Local Institution - 874 | Saint Petersburg | 197110 | Russia |
| Local Institution - 865 | Samara | 443001 | Russia |
| Local Institution - 992 | Saratov | 410053 | Russia |
| Local Institution - 866 | Sochi | 354207 | Russia |
| Local Institution - 877 | Tomsk | 634063 | Russia |
| Local Institution - 881 | Ufa | 450005 | Russia |
| Local Institution - 880 | Volgograd | 400107 | Russia |
| Local Institution - 583 | Yekaterinburg | 620075 | Russia |
| Local Institution - 872 | Yekaterinburg | 620109 | Russia |
| Local Institution - 546 | Cape Town | 7500 | Senegal |
| Local Institution - 887 | Belgrade | 11 080 | Serbia |
| Local Institution - 596 | Belgrade | 11000 | Serbia |
| Local Institution - 886 | Belgrade | 11000 | Serbia |
| Local Institution - 890 | Belgrade | 11000 | Serbia |
| Local Institution - 891 | Kragujevac | 34000 | Serbia |
| Local Institution - 884 | Novi Sad | 21 000 | Serbia |
| Local Institution - 885 | Pančevo | 26000 | Serbia |
| Local Institution - 585 | Vršac | 26300 | Serbia |
| Local Institution - 889 | Zrenjanin | 23 000 | Serbia |
| Local Institution - 900 | Bratislava | 820 07 | Slovakia |
| Local Institution - 894 | Bratislava | 82606 | Slovakia |
| Local Institution - 895 | Brezno | 97701 | Slovakia |
| Local Institution - 899 | Nitra | 94901 | Slovakia |
| Local Institution - 897 | Nové Zámky | 94002 | Slovakia |
| Local Institution - 898 | Prešov | 080 01 | Slovakia |
| Local Institution - 896 | Rimavská Sobota | 979 01 | Slovakia |
| Local Institution - 904 | Celje | 3000 | Slovenia |
| Local Institution - 543 | Gauteng | 1820 | South Africa |
| Local Institution - 545 | Kempton Park | 1619 | South Africa |
| Local Institution - 544 | Pretoria | 0001 | South Africa |
| Local Institution - 542 | Pretoria | 0084 | South Africa |
| Local Institution - 549 | Pretoria | 0181 | South Africa |
| Local Institution - 548 | Somerset West | 7130 | South Africa |
| Local Institution - 547 | Val de Grace | 0184 | South Africa |
| Local Institution - 434 | Busan | 49241 | South Korea |
| Local Institution - 431 | Busan | 612-030 | South Korea |
| Local Institution - 432 | Daegu | 705-030 | South Korea |
| Local Institution - 438 | Seoul | 3080 | South Korea |
| Local Institution - 429 | Suwon | 442723 | South Korea |
| Teknon Medical Center | Barcelona | 08022 | Spain |
| University Hospital Reina Sofia | Córdoba | 14001 | Spain |
| University Hospital of Girona Dr. Josep Trueta | Girona | 17007 | Spain |
| Hospital Universitario De Gran Canaria Dr. Negrin | Las Palmas de Gran Canaria | 35012 | Spain |
| Local Institution - 695 | Madrid | 28040 | Spain |
| University Hospital Puerta de Hierro Majadajonda | Majadahonda, Madrid | 28222 | Spain |
| University Hospital Marques de Valdecilla (HUMV) | Santander | 39008 | Spain |
| Local Institution - 697 | Valencia | 46010 | Spain |
| Local Institution - 625 | Stockholm | 112 81 | Sweden |
| Local Institution - 460 | Kaohsiung City | 82445 | Taiwan |
| Local Institution - 463 | Kaohsiung, San Ming Dist. | 807 | Taiwan |
| Local Institution - 461 | Niao-Sung Hsiang Kaohsiung County | 83301 | Taiwan |
| Local Institution - 459 | Tainan, Taiana | 704 | Taiwan |
| Local Institution - 462 | Taoyuan City | 33305 | Taiwan |
| Local Institution - 464 | Tapei, Beitou Dist. | 11217 | Taiwan |
| Local Institution - 465 | Tapei | 10002 | Taiwan |
| Local Institution - 357 | Ankara | 01660 | Turkey (Türkiye) |
| Local Institution - 365 | Elâzığ | 23119 | Turkey (Türkiye) |
| Local Institution - 358 | Istanbul | 34098 | Turkey (Türkiye) |
| Local Institution - 361 | Istanbul | 34668 | Turkey (Türkiye) |
| Local Institution - 353 | Kadiköy/Istanbul | 41380 | Turkey (Türkiye) |
| Local Institution - 922 | Chernivtsi | 58001 | Ukraine |
| Local Institution - 929 | Ivano-Frankivsk | 76008 | Ukraine |
| Local Institution - 965 | Kharkiv | 61037 | Ukraine |
| Local Institution - 920 | Khmelnytskyi | 29000 | Ukraine |
| Local Institution - 933 | Kropyvnytskyi | 25006 | Ukraine |
| Local Institution - 923 | Kyiv | 01601 | Ukraine |
| Local Institution - 563 | Kyiv | 02002 | Ukraine |
| Local Institution - 564 | Kyiv | 03037 | Ukraine |
| Local Institution - 977 | Kyiv | 04107 | Ukraine |
| Local Institution - 590 | Lutsk | 43005 | Ukraine |
| Local Institution - 974 | Lviv | 79010 | Ukraine |
| Local Institution - 902 | Odesa | 65025 | Ukraine |
| Local Institution - 932 | Vinnytsia | 21009 | Ukraine |
| Local Institution - 924 | Vinnytsia | 21018 | Ukraine |
| Local Institution - 587 | Zaporizhia | 69063 | Ukraine |
| Local Institution - 925 | Zaporizhzhya | 69600 | Ukraine |
| BMS Clinical Trial Patient Recruiting | View source |
| FG001 |
| Placebo |
Participants with moderate to severely active Crohn's disease were orally administered Placebo (daily) from Day 1 to Week 12. |
|
| Safety Population | Subjects who received at least 1 dose of study drug. |
|
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Ozanimod | Participants with moderate to severe acute Crohn's disease were administered Ozanimod capsule orally. Participants were administered 0.23 milligram (mg) of Ozanimod capsule (daily) from Day 1 to Day 4 followed by 0.46 mg of Ozanimod (2 capsules of 0.23 mg daily) from Day 5 to Day 7 followed by 0.92 mg of Ozanimod capsule (daily) from Day 8 to Week 12. |
| BG001 | Placebo | Participants with moderate to severely active Crohn's disease were orally administered Placebo (daily) from Day 1 to Week 12. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Percentage of Participants With Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score < 150 | The CDAI is a composite score that is used to measure the clinical activity of Crohn's disease (CD). The CDAI uses a questionnaire with 8 disease activity variables: number of soft/liquid stools, severity of abdominal pain, general well-being, presence of complications, need for antidiarrheal drugs, presence of an abdominal mass, hematocrit, and deviation in body weight. The sub scores of number of soft/liquid stool, severity of abdominal pain (0 [none] to 3 [Severe]), general well-being (0 [well] to 4 [terrible] were summed over the 7 days prior to each visit. Additionally, the remaining predictors were also noted and weighted to create the total CDAI score which ranged from 0-600 with a higher score indicating a worse outcome. | Intent to Treat population included all the randomized participants. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Week 12 |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Abdominal Pain and Stool Frequency Clinical Remission | Abdominal pain and stool frequency clinical remission was defined as average daily abdominal pain score ≤ 1 point, and average daily stool frequency ≤ 3 with abdominal pain and stool frequency no worse than baseline at Week 12. Participants entered the responses in diaries daily. The 7 days entries prior to Week 12 visit were considered for calculating average abdominal pain score and stool frequency. The abdominal pain was graded on severity of 0 (none) to 3 (severe) scale and stool frequency was defined number of liquid or soft stools per day. Baseline was defined as the last assessment prior to the start time of the first drug administration if time of measurement is available else the last assessment prior to or on the date of the first drug administration. | Intent to Treat Population included all the randomized participants. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Week 12 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With a Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) Score Decrease From Baseline of ≥ 50% | The SES-CD assessed the degree of inflammation. The SES-CD assesses the following 4 components: size of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface, and presence of narrowing. Each of these components was scored on a scale of 0 (none/unaffected) to 3 (worst). In the SES-CD, each of these 4 components are assessed in the five segments: ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum. The SES-CD was the sum of the individual scores of each of the components across the five segments. The range of SES-CD scores was 0 - 12 for each segment, and 0 - 60 for the overall SES-CD score, with larger scores indicating greater degree of inflammation. Baseline was defined as the last assessment prior to the start time of the first drug administration if time of measurement is available else the last assessment prior to or on the date of the first drug administration. | Intent to Treat population included all the randomized participants. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Week 12 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Reduction From Baseline in the Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score of >= 100 Points or a Total CDAI Score < 150 | The CDAI is a composite score that is used to measure the clinical activity of Crohn's disease (CD). The CDAI uses a questionnaire with 8 disease activity variables: number of soft/liquid stools, severity of abdominal pain, general well-being, presence of complications, need for antidiarrheal drugs, presence of an abdominal mass, hematocrit, and deviation in body weight. The sub scores of number of soft/liquid stool, severity of abdominal pain (0 [none] to 3 [Severe]), general well-being (0 [well] to 4 [terrible] were summed over the 7 days prior to each visit. Additionally, the remaining predictors were also noted and weighted to create the total CDAI score which ranged from 0-600 with a higher score indicating a worse outcome. Baseline was defined as the last assessment prior to the start time of the first drug administration if time of measurement is available else the last assessment prior to or on the date of the first drug administration. | Intent to treat population included all the randomized participants. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Week 12 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score Reduction From Baseline of ≥ 100 Points or CDAI Score < 150 and SES-CD Decrease From Baseline of ≥ 50% | CDAI include 8 components number of soft/liquid stools, severity of abdominal pain, wellbeing, complications, need antidiarrheal drugs, abdominal mass, hematocrit, deviation in body wt. Subscores of numbers of soft/liquid stool, severity of abdominal pain (0 [none] to 3 [Severe]), general well-being (0 [well] to 4 [terrible] were summed over the 7 days prior to visit. The others weighted to create the total CDAI score ranging 0-600 with higher score indicating worse outcome. The SES-CD has 4 components size of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface, presence of narrowing. Each component was scored on scale of 0 (none) to 3 (worst). In SES-CD, each of 4 components are assessed in the five segments: ileum, right, transverse, left colon, and rectum. The SES-CD was the sum of the individual scores of each of the components across the five segments. The range of SES-CD scores was 0 - 12 for each segment, and 0 - 60 for overall, with larger scores show greater degree of inflammation. | Intent to Treat population included all the randomized participants. Baseline was defined as the last assessment prior to the start time of the first drug administration if time of measurement is available else the last assessment prior to or on the date of the first drug administration | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Week 12 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score < 150 and Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) Score Decrease From Baseline of ≥ 50% | CDAI include 8 components number of soft/liquid stools, severity of abdominal pain, wellbeing, complications, need antidiarrheal drugs, abdominal mass, hematocrit, deviation in body wt. Subscores of numbers of soft/liquid stool, severity of abdominal pain (0 [none] to 3 [Severe]), general well-being (0 [well] to 4 [terrible] were summed over the 7 days prior to visit. The others weighted to create the total CDAI score ranging 0-600 with higher score indicating worse outcome. The SES-CD has 4 components size of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface, presence of narrowing. Each component was scored on scale of 0 (none) to 3 (worst). In SES-CD, each of 4 components are assessed in the five segments: ileum, right, transverse, left colon, and rectum. The SES-CD was the sum of the individual scores of each of the components across the five segments. The range of SES-CD scores was 0 - 12 for each segment, and 0 - 60 for overall, with larger scores show greater degree of inflammation. | Intent to Treat population included all the randomized participants. Baseline was defined as the last assessment prior to the start time of the first drug administration if time of measurement is available else the last assessment prior to or on the date of the first drug administration. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Week 12 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Abdominal Pain and Stool Frequency Clinical Remission and a Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) Score <= 4 Points and Decrease >= 2 Points | Abdominal pain (AP) and stool frequency (SF) clinical remission was defined as average daily abdominal pain score ≤ 1 point, and average daily stool frequency ≤ 3 times with AP and SF no worse than baseline at Week 12. Participants entered responses in diaries daily. The 7 days entries prior to visit were considered for calculating average AP score and SF. The AP was graded on severity of 0 (none) to 3 (severe) scale and SF was defined number of liquid or soft stools per day. The SES-CD has 4 components size of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface, presence of narrowing. Each component was scored on scale of 0 (none) to 3 (worst). In SES-CD, each of 4 components are assessed in the five segments: ileum, right, transverse, left colon, and rectum. The SES-CD was the sum of the individual scores of each of the components across the five segments. The range of SES-CD scores was 0 - 12 for each segment, and 0 - 60 for overall, with larger scores show greater degree of inflammation. | Intent to Treat population included all the randomized subjects. Baseline was defined as the last assessment prior to the start time of the first drug administration if time of measurement is available else the last assessment prior to or on the date of the first drug administration. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Week 12 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Global Histologic Activity Score (GHAS) Remission | GHAS assesses the inflammation and mucosal damage. GHAS has 8 components Epithelial damage, Architectural changes, Infiltration of mononuclear cells in the lamina propria, Infiltration of polymorphonuclear cells in the lamina propria, Polymorphonuclear cells in epithelium, Presence of erosion and/or ulcers, Presence of granuloma and number of biopsy specimens affected. Each of these components was scored on a scale of 0 (none/unaffected) to 2 (worst). Each of these 8 components are assessed in the five segments: ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum. Within each segment, the GHAS score has a range of 0 - 16, and the total GHAS score has a range of 0 - 80. Higher numbers correspond to more inflammation and more mucosal damage. Baseline was defined as the last assessment prior to the start time of the first drug administration if time of measurement is available else the last assessment prior to or on the date of the first drug administration. | Intent to treat population included all the randomized participants. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Week 12 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With CDAI Reduction From Baseline of >=70 Points | The CDAI is a composite score that is used to measure the clinical activity of Crohn's disease (CD). The CDAI uses a questionnaire with 8 disease activity variables: number of soft/liquid stools, severity of abdominal pain, general well-being, presence of complications, need for antidiarrheal drugs, presence of an abdominal mass, hematocrit, and deviation in body weight. The sub scores of number of soft/liquid stool, severity of abdominal pain (0 [none] to 3 [Severe]), general well-being (0 [well] to 4 [terrible] were summed over the 7 days prior to each visit. Additionally, the remaining predictors were also noted and weighted to create the total CDAI score which ranged from 0-600 with a higher score indicating a worse outcome. Baseline was defined as the last assessment prior to the start time of the first drug administration if time of measurement is available else the last assessment prior to or on the date of the first drug administration. | Intent to treat population included all the randomized participants. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Week 12 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Absence of Ulcers ≥ 0.5 cm With no Segment With Any Ulcerated Surface ≥10% | The ulcerated surface were assessed via endoscopy. | Intent to treat participants included all the randomized participants. | Posted | Number | percentage of partiicpants | Week 12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With a Crohn's Disease Endoscopic Index of Severity (CDEIS) Decrease From Baseline of ≥ 50% | CDEIS is an index for determining the severity of Crohn's disease with endoscopic localization to ileum and colon. The CDEIS divides the intestine into 5 segments: rectum, sigmoid and left colon, transverse colon, right colon, and ileum. Four variables are assessed in each segment: the presence of deep ulceration, the presence of superficial ulceration, the percentage of ulcerated surface, and the percentage of surface affected by CD, indicated on 10-cm visual analogue scales. In addition, the presence of ulcerated stenosis and the presence of nonulcerated stenosis are also assessed over the entire intestine. These factors are weighted and summed to calculate the total score ranging from 0- 44, with higher scores indicating more severe disease. | Intent to Treat included all the randomized participants. Baseline was defined as the last assessment prior to the start time of the first drug administration if time of measurement is available else the last assessment prior to or on the date of the first drug administration. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Week 12 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Abdominal Pain (AP) and Stool Frequency (SF) Clinical Remission and an Endoscopic (50%) Response | AP and SF clinical remission is average daily abdominal pain score ≤ 1 point, and average daily stool frequency ≤ 3 times with AP and SF no worse than baseline at Week 12. Participants entered responses in diaries daily. The 7 days entries prior to visit were considered for calculating average AP score and SF. AP was graded on severity of 0 (none) to 3 (severe) scale and SF was defined number of liquid or soft stools per day. SES-CD has 4 components size of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface, presence of narrowing. Each component was scored on scale of 0 (none) to 3 (worst). Endoscopic Response is defined as >= 50% decrease from baseline in SES-CD. In SES-CD, each of 4 components are assessed in five segments: ileum, right, transverse, left colon, and rectum. The SES-CD was sum of individual scores of each of components across five segments. Range of SES-CD scores was 0 - 12 for each segment, and 0 - 60 for overall, with larger scores show greater degree of inflammation. | Intent to Treat population included all the randomized participants. Baseline was defined as the last assessment prior to the start time of the first drug administration if time of measurement is available else the last assessment prior to or on the date of the first drug administration. | Posted | Number | percentage of particpants | Week 12 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Robarts Histologic Index (RHI) Mucosal Healing at Week 12 | RHI mucosal healing was defined as RHI remission combined with SES-CD <= 4 points and a SES-CD decrease from baseline >= 2 points with no SES-CD sub-score >1 point. RHI Remission is defined as no active inflammation in any measured segment. The SES-CD assesses the following 4 components: size of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface, and presence of narrowing. Each of these components was scored on a scale of 0 (none/unaffected) to 3 (worst). In the SES-CD, each of these 4 components are assessed in the five segments: ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum. The SES-CD was the sum of the individual scores of each of the components across the five segments. The range of SES-CD scores was 0 - 12 for each segment, and 0 - 60 for the overall SES-CD score, with larger scores indicating greater degree of inflammation. | Intent-to-treat population included all the randomized participants. Baseline was defined as the last assessment prior to the start time of the first drug administration if time of measurement is available else the last assessment prior to or on the date of the first drug administration. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Week 12 |
|
All cause mortality, non serious adverse events and serious adverse events were collected from the first dose and up to approximately 31 weeks.
Treated population include all the participants who were treated with at least one dose of study drug. 1 participant earlier randomized or pre-assigned to Placebo arm in error received Ozanimod and was included in Ozanimod' arm.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Ozanimod | Participants with moderate to severe acute Crohn's disease were administered Ozanimod capsule orally. Participants were administered 0.23 milligram (mg) of Ozanimod capsule (daily) from Day 1 to Day 4 followed by 0.46 mg of Ozanimod (2 capsules of 0.23 mg daily) from Day 5 to Day 7 followed by 0.92 mg of Ozanimod capsule (daily) from Day 8 to Week 12. | 0 | 404 | 24 | 404 | 15 | 404 |
| EG001 | Placebo | Participants with moderate to severely active Crohn's disease were orally administered Placebo (daily) from Day 1 to Week 12. | 0 | 202 | 11 | 202 | 11 | 202 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA 26.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pericarditis | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 26.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Retinal vein occlusion | Eye disorders | MedDRA 26.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 26.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Colonic fistula | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 26.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Crohn's disease | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 26.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fistula of small intestine | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 26.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Intestinal obstruction | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 26.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pancreatitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 26.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Proctitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 26.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Small intestinal obstruction | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 26.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cholecystitis | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA 26.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal wall abscess | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 26.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| COVID-19 | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 26.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastroenteritis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 26.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Femur fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 26.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Incision site haematoma | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 26.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Postoperative ileus | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 26.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Electrolyte imbalance | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 26.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypokalaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 26.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Malnutrition | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 26.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arthritis enteropathic | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 26.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Syncope | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 26.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vertebrobasilar insufficiency | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 26.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rash papular | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 26.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crohn's disease | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 26.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. agreements with investigators vary; constant is our right to embargo communications regarding trial results prior to public release for a period ≤60 days from submittal for review. We will not prohibit investigators from publishing, but will prohibit the disclosure of previously undisclosed confidential information other than study results, and request postponement of single-center publications until after disclosure of the clinical trial's primary publication.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bristol-Myers Squibb Study Director | Bristol-Myers Squibb | Please email | Clinical.Trials@bms.com |
| Nov 11, 2024 |
| Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003424 | Crohn Disease |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D015212 | Inflammatory Bowel Diseases |
| D005759 | Gastroenteritis |
| D005767 | Gastrointestinal Diseases |
| D004066 | Digestive System Diseases |
| D007410 | Intestinal Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C000607776 | ozanimod |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Male |
|
| Not Hispanic or Latino |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN |
|
| AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE |
|
| ASIAN |
|
| NATIVE HAWAIIAN OR OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER |
|
| OTHER |
|
| NOT REPORTED |
|
|
|
|
Participants with moderate to severely active Crohn's disease were orally administered Placebo (daily) from Day 1 to Week 12. |
|
|
|
| OG001 |
| Placebo |
Participants with moderate to severely active Crohn's disease were orally administered Placebo (daily) from Day 1 to Week 12. |
|
|
|
| OG001 | Placebo | Participants with moderate to severely active Crohn's disease were orally administered Placebo (daily) from Day 1 to Week 12. |
|
|
|
| OG001 | Placebo | Participants with moderate to severely active Crohn's disease were orally administered Placebo (daily) from Day 1 to Week 12. |
|
|
|
| OG001 | Placebo | Participants with moderate to severely active Crohn's disease were orally administered Placebo (daily) from Day 1 to Week 12. |
|
|
|
| Placebo |
Participants with moderate to severely active Crohn's disease were orally administered Placebo (daily) from Day 1 to Week 12. |
|
|
|
| Placebo |
Participants with moderate to severely active Crohn's disease were orally administered Placebo (daily) from Day 1 to Week 12. |
|
|
|
|
|
| Placebo |
Participants with moderate to severely active Crohn's disease were orally administered Placebo (daily) from Day 1 to Week 12. |
|
|
|
| OG001 | Placebo | Participants with moderate to severely active Crohn's disease were orally administered Placebo (daily) from Day 1 to Week 12. |
|
|
|
| OG001 | Placebo | Participants with moderate to severely active Crohn's disease were orally administered Placebo (daily) from Day 1 to Week 12. |
|
|
|