Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1R01AG047245-01A1 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| University of Vermont | OTHER |
| National Institutes of Health (NIH) | NIH |
| National Institute on Aging (NIA) | NIH |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
In general, men and women experience differing degrees of age-related decreases in physical function, with women having a greater prevalence of functional limitations and disability. A key predictor of this decrease in functional capacity is the reduction in leg muscle maximal power (product of force and velocity), which can be improved with exercise training. However, the development of exercise interventions to optimally improve skeletal muscle function in older adults has been difficult, in part because we now know that men and women respond differently to the same exercise training stimulus. In fact, the fundamental mechanisms by which habitual exercise improves physical function in older adults are still not well understood. The proposed studies are designed to address these knowledge gaps by examining the molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying the response to two distinct exercise training paradigms, and determining how these responses differ between older men and women. The investigators hypothesize that molecular, cellular and whole muscle contractile performance will be most improved in men by traditional low-velocity, high-load resistance training, and in women by high-velocity, low-load power training. Moreover, sex-specific structural responses in myofilament remodeling, protein expression and post-translational modifications will explain these sex-specific performance adaptations to each modality. To test these hypotheses, data will be gathered from 50 healthy, sedentary older men and women (65-75 years) prior to and following a 16-week unilateral exercise training program in which one leg undergoes resistance training and the other power training. The Specific Aims of this project are to identify the sex-specific effects of low-velocity resistance training versus high-velocity power training on: Aim 1) skeletal muscle function at the molecular, cellular and whole muscle levels, and Aim 2) protein expression and modification as well as size at the molecular and cellular levels. The within subject, unilateral intervention design provides a powerful model to minimize the effects of between-subject variability, and the translational approach will take advantage of our unique expertise with state-of-the-art measures from the molecular to whole body levels.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Training | Other | All participants will participate in the 16-week resistance exercise training program. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Resistance exercise training | Other | 16-week exercise training program, wherein one leg undergoes traditional low-velocity, high-load resistance training and the other leg undergoes high-velocity, low-load power training. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in peak isokinetic power | Peak isokinetic power at the whole muscle level will be evaluated using a dynamometer. | This measure will be collected for each volunteer pre- and post-16 week exercise intervention and take approximately 30 minutes to collect for each time point. |
| Change in single fiber specific power | Single fiber specific power will be measured from segments of chemically-skinned single human skeletal muscle fibers under maximal calcium-activated conditions, with muscle fiber type determined post-measurement by gel electrophoresis | This measure will be preformed on tissue biopsied from each volunteer pre- and post-16 week exercise intervention and requires approximately 1 week to collect per time point. |
| Change in myosin attachment time | Myosin attachment time will be measured from segments of chemically-skinned single human skeletal muscle fibers under maximal calcium-activated conditions, with muscle fiber type determined post-measurement by gel electrophoresis. | This measure will be preformed on tissue biopsied from each volunteer pre- and post-16 week exercise intervention and requires approximately one week to collect per time point. |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark S Miller, PhD | Contact | 4135774701 | markmiller@kin.umass.edu |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Mark S Miller, PhD | University of Massachusetts, Amherst | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Massachusetts | Recruiting | Amherst | Massachusetts | 01003 | United States |
Raw data will be considered for sharing under the rules indicated below. Raw datasets to be released for sharing will not contain identifiers. Data and associated documentation will be made available to users only under a signed and properly executed data-sharing agreement that provides for specific criteria under which the data will be used, including but not limited to a commitment to: 1) using the data only for research purposes; 2) securing the data using appropriate computer technology; and 3) destroying or returning the data after analyses are completed.
Not provided
Research data will be made available upon final acceptance for publication of the major findings from the proposed studies.
Data and associated documentation will be made available to users only under a signed and properly executed data-sharing agreement that provides for specific criteria under which the data will be used, including but not limited to a commitment to: 1) using the data only for research purposes; 2) securing the data using appropriate computer technology; and 3) destroying or returning the data after analyses are completed.
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Apr 22, 2019 | Apr 22, 2019 | Prot_004.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Apr 22, 2019 | Apr 22, 2019 | SAP_005.pdf |
| ICF | No | No | Yes | Informed Consent Form | Oct 1, 2021 | May 16, 2022 | ICF_006.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D055070 | Resistance Training |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005081 | Exercise Therapy |
| D012046 | Rehabilitation |
| D000359 | Aftercare |
| D003266 | Continuity of Patient Care |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| D005791 |
| Patient Care |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
| D026741 | Physical Therapy Modalities |
| D064797 | Physical Conditioning, Human |
| D015444 | Exercise |
| D009043 | Motor Activity |
| D009068 | Movement |
| D009142 | Musculoskeletal Physiological Phenomena |
| D055687 | Musculoskeletal and Neural Physiological Phenomena |