Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-A03333-50 | Registry Identifier | ANSM |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Région Ile de France, France | UNKNOWN |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study used 3D reconstructions from the EOS biplanar radiographic imaging system to perform leg length measurements before and after THA (Total hip arthroplasty) on all included THA patients from 2015 to evaluate surgeon performance in restoring lower limb length after THA and the relationships between the quality of life, estimated by the HOOS score (Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score), and the anatomy of the new hip in standing position.
The study was conducted in patients who underwent a total hip arthroplasty in Lariboisiere Hospital, Paris, France, during the year 2015.
This retrospective study used 3D reconstructions from the EOS biplanar radiographic imaging system (EOS imaging, Paris, France) to perform leg length measurements before and after THA on all included THA patients from 2015 to evaluate surgeon performance in restoring lower limb length after THA. Included patients either had hip osteoarthritis or femoral head osteonecrosis. Patients were excluded if they were undergoing revision surgery, or had a contralateral THA or total knee.
The performance of the surgeons was judged using the Cumulative Sum control chart (CUSUM) method.
Our objective was to study surgeon performance, measured by their ability to restore the initial preoperative length of the operated leg or to equalize the length of the two legs, and evaluate the relationships between the quality of life, estimated by the HOOS score, and the anatomy of the new hip in standing position using the EOS imaging system.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hip arthroplasty | Procedure |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in anatomic lower limb length measurements between preoperative and postoperative measurements | preoperative measurements (up to 1 year before surgery) and postoperative measurements (at 1 month after surgery) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in flessum/recurvatum/HKS angle (hip knee shaft ) measurements, between preoperative and postoperative measurements | preoperative measurements (up to 1 year before surgery) and postoperative measurements (at 1 month after surgery) | |
| HOOS score (Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The study was conducted in patients who underwent a total hip arthroplasty in Lariboisiere Hospital, Paris, France, during the year 2015.
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007870 | Leg Length Inequality |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001848 | Bone Diseases, Developmental |
| D001847 | Bone Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D020763 | Pathological Conditions, Anatomical |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D019644 | Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D019643 | Arthroplasty, Replacement |
| D001178 | Arthroplasty |
| D019637 | Orthopedic Procedures |
| D013514 | Surgical Procedures, Operative |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The outcome score consists of 40 items assessing 5 subscales. Pain (P) includes 10 items with a total score of 40 points, Symptoms (S) includes 5 items with a total score of 20, Activity limitations daily living (ADL) includes 17 items with a total score of 68 and finally Function in sport and recreation (SP) and hip related quality of life both include 4 items with a total score of 16 each.
To answer the questions, standardized answer options are given with scores from 0 to 4 (no, mild, moderate, severe and extreme).
To interpret the score, the outcome measure is transformed in a worst to best scale from 0 to 100, with 100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms.
To calculate the total HOOS score the subscales need to be summed up, using following formula for all dimension.
100 - [(patient's score of the subscale x 100)/(total score of the subscale)]
| 24 months after surgery |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D019651 | Plastic Surgery Procedures |
| D019919 | Prosthesis Implantation |