Mailed educational print materials sent to the participants' primary care doctors about health risks and recommendations for medical screening for adult women who were treated for a childhood cancer with chest radiation.

Mailed educational materials.

Elicits a rank order of the most relevant and important barriers of breast MRI and those associated with mammogram, for those women who did not obtain the recommended screening. The barriers are presented as a list of 13 statements in which there are 5 ranges of measure provided for each statement. The scale ranges include "Not at all," "A little bit," "Moderately," "Quite a bit," and "Extremely." The value/response of "Not at all" is considered to be the better outcome, whereas the value/response of "Extremely" is considered to be the worst outcome for the barrier scale. The scale is not combined to compute a total score, since responses are scored for each statement individually.

The Pros and Cons of mammography is a 13-item instrument developed by Rakowski et al (Prev Med 1997). It was used in our Breast Cancer Surveillance Practices instrument (Oeffinger KC, et al. JAMA, 2009). The pros and cons scores (5-point Likert items) are converted to T-scores and then presented as a summary Decisional Balance. For EMPOWER-I Study, we adapted this instrument to also assess a woman's perspective on the pros and cons of breast MRI. This resulted in a 7-item instrument that is analyzed similar to the Pros and Cons of Mammography and presented as a Decisional Balance.

This one-item question asks participants whether their mother, sister(s), or daughter(s) have been diagnosed with breast cancer.

This item was developed for the aforementioned Breast Cancer Surveillance Practices instrument and is a one-time question with asking women how they estimate their risk of breast cancer (with five responses: much more than the average woman, more than the average woman, same as the average woman, less than the average woman, much less than the average woman).

Developed for the EMPOWER-I study, the questionnaire asks participants at the end of the study whether they saw a health care provider during the 18-month study period, whether they discussed breast cancer screening with a provider, and whether the provider responded to the information (5-point Likert). Each of these items will be analyzed separately.

Will be measured using the adapted and shortened version of the Positive Affect Negative Affect Scale (PANAS). We will focus on emotions related to managing health.

To determine the Stage of Adoption (Change) for breast cancer surveillance, participants will be asked when they plan to have their next mammogram and/or breast MRI (following the completion of the study).

Measures confidence in discussing breast surveillance with the primary care physician and obtaining the recommended screening using items developed by Champion and colleagues.

Age, gender, years in practice, and practice setting.

Most PCPs have taken care of only a few childhood cancer survivors. To ascertain their past experience with caring for this population, we ask PCPs how many childhood cancer survivors they have in their practice panel (0, 1-2, 3-5, >5).

Comfort level with caring for adult survivors of childhood cancer (Likert scale)and familiarity with available guidelines (Likert scale).

Using a hypothetical vignette of a 29-year old female patient treated for Hodgkin lymphoma with chemotherapy and chest RT, questions will be asked about screening for thyroid dysfunction, breast cancer, and cardiac dysfunction.

Replication costs of the intervention and health services from the intervention per participant.

C + PA + PCP activation (PA+PCP) with physician materials about breast cancer risk in this population along with national and international guidelines for breast cancer surveillance.

Patient activation: Smartphone-based materials including text messages and supplemental short videos focusing on how to find a primary care doctor, the importance of medical screening, and how to talk to a doctor about medical screening. Guidelines for monitoring and maintaining health, such as a survivorship care plan, will also be included in the smartphone-based materials.

Primary care physician activation: Mailed educational print materials sent to the participants' primary care doctors about health risks and recommendations for medical screening for adult women who were treated for a childhood cancer with chest radiation.

Control: Mailed educational materials.

Total of all reporting groups

C + PA + PCP activation (PA+PCP) with physician materials about breast cancer risk in this population along with national and international guidelines for breast cancer surveillance.

Patient activation: Smartphone-based materials including text messages and supplemental short videos focusing on how to find a primary care doctor, the importance of medical screening, and how to talk to a doctor about medical screening. Guidelines for monitoring and maintaining health, such as a survivorship care plan, will also be included in the smartphone-based materials.

Primary care physician activation: Mailed educational print materials sent to the participants' primary care doctors about health risks and recommendations for medical screening for adult women who were treated for a childhood cancer with chest radiation.

Control: Mailed educational materials.

Measures patient activation and includes: believing one has an active role to play, having the confidence and knowledge to take action, taking action, and staying the course under stress.

The Breast Cancer Surveillance Practices instrument (questionnaire) was developed as part of an effort supported by NCI funding (R21CA106972) and published in JAMA (Oeffinger KC, et al. JAMA, 301:404-414, 2009). The section regarding knowledge of the recommendations was then adapted for the EMPOWER-I Study, supported by NCI R01134722, and includes 3 items to determine if participants have (1) heard of mammography for breast cancer screening (yes, no, not sure), at what age women like the participant should begin getting a mammogram, and how frequently (multiple time frames).

Elicits a rank order of the most relevant and important barriers of breast MRI and those associated with mammogram, for those women who did not obtain the recommended screening. The barriers are presented as a list of 13 statements in which there are 5 ranges of measure provided for each statement. The scale ranges include "Not at all," "A little bit," "Moderately," "Quite a bit," and "Extremely." The value/response of "Not at all" is considered to be the better outcome, whereas the value/response of "Extremely" is considered to be the worst outcome for the barrier scale. The scale is not combined to compute a total score, since responses are scored for each statement individually.

The Pros and Cons of mammography is a 13-item instrument developed by Rakowski et al (Prev Med 1997). It was used in our Breast Cancer Surveillance Practices instrument (Oeffinger KC, et al. JAMA, 2009). The pros and cons scores (5-point Likert items) are converted to T-scores and then presented as a summary Decisional Balance. For EMPOWER-I Study, we adapted this instrument to also assess a woman's perspective on the pros and cons of breast MRI. This resulted in a 7-item instrument that is analyzed similar to the Pros and Cons of Mammography and presented as a Decisional Balance.

This one-item question asks participants whether their mother, sister(s), or daughter(s) have been diagnosed with breast cancer.

This item was developed for the aforementioned Breast Cancer Surveillance Practices instrument and is a one-time question with asking women how they estimate their risk of breast cancer (with five responses: much more than the average woman, more than the average woman, same as the average woman, less than the average woman, much less than the average woman).

Developed for the EMPOWER-I study, the questionnaire asks participants at the end of the study whether they saw a health care provider during the 18-month study period, whether they discussed breast cancer screening with a provider, and whether the provider responded to the information (5-point Likert). Each of these items will be analyzed separately.

Will be measured using the adapted and shortened version of the Positive Affect Negative Affect Scale (PANAS). We will focus on emotions related to managing health.

To determine the Stage of Adoption (Change) for breast cancer surveillance, participants will be asked when they plan to have their next mammogram and/or breast MRI (following the completion of the study).

Measures confidence in discussing breast surveillance with the primary care physician and obtaining the recommended screening using items developed by Champion and colleagues.

Age, gender, years in practice, and practice setting.

Most PCPs have taken care of only a few childhood cancer survivors. To ascertain their past experience with caring for this population, we ask PCPs how many childhood cancer survivors they have in their practice panel (0, 1-2, 3-5, >5).

Comfort level with caring for adult survivors of childhood cancer (Likert scale)and familiarity with available guidelines (Likert scale).

Using a hypothetical vignette of a 29-year old female patient treated for Hodgkin lymphoma with chemotherapy and chest RT, questions will be asked about screening for thyroid dysfunction, breast cancer, and cardiac dysfunction.

Replication costs of the intervention and health services from the intervention per participant.

C + patient activation (PA) consisting of (1) smartphone app with HIPAA compliant survivorship care plan that can be viewed, printed, or emailed to their primary care provider; and (2) two-way (interactive) tailored text messages with links to video vignettes discussing the primary barriers to breast MRI and mammography.

Patient activation: Smartphone-based materials including text messages and supplemental short videos focusing on how to find a primary care doctor, the importance of medical screening, and how to talk to a doctor about medical screening. Guidelines for monitoring and maintaining health, such as a survivorship care plan, will also be included in the smartphone-based materials.

Control: Mailed educational materials.

C + PA + PCP activation (PA+PCP) with physician materials about breast cancer risk in this population along with national and international guidelines for breast cancer surveillance.

Patient activation: Smartphone-based materials including text messages and supplemental short videos focusing on how to find a primary care doctor, the importance of medical screening, and how to talk to a doctor about medical screening. Guidelines for monitoring and maintaining health, such as a survivorship care plan, will also be included in the smartphone-based materials.

Primary care physician activation: Mailed educational print materials sent to the participants' primary care doctors about health risks and recommendations for medical screening for adult women who were treated for a childhood cancer with chest radiation.

Control: Mailed educational materials.