Thoracoscopic Lobecotmy Under Spontaneous Ventilating Anesthesia or Intubated Anesthesia: A Prospective, Multicentre, Open-label, Randomized Control Trial
Thoracoscopic Lobecotmy Under Spontaneous Ventilating Anesthesia or Intubated Anesthesia: A Prospective, Multicentre, Open-label, Randomized Control Trial
With the development of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) techniques and technology for anesthesia control, non-intubated anesthesia with spontaneous ventilation has been widely applied in VATS. A prospective, multicentre, randomized controlled clinical study was applied in this study to assess the feasibility and safety of thoracoscopic lobectomy under spontaneous ventilation versus intubated single lung mechanical ventilation.
Intubated anesthesia with single lung mechanical ventilation (SLV) is considered the standard of care in VATS. However, this type of anesthesia has been associated with several adverse effects, which can trigger complications and increase the overall surgical risk. In order to avoid intubated-anesthesia related adverse effects, spontaneous ventilation strategies have been proposed in recent years.Encouraged by the satisfactory results with a preliminary experience of spontaneous ventilated VATS, the multicentre randomized controlled clinical controled study is established to comparatively analyze the outcome of patients undergoing either nonintubated intravenous anesthesia with spontaneous ventilation (SV) or SLV VATS lobectomy, especially in safety during operation, lymph nodes resection, complication rate, muscle recovery after surgery, the difference the postoperative hospitalization time.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
cuidavil@hotmail.com08618902301212 ext. 08602083062817
cuidavil@hotmail.com08618902301212 ext. 08602083062817
liujun9707@tom.com08602013808880646