Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Cosmos Technical Center | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The primary purpose of the study is to observe the adherence and health seeking behavior of patients with Head and Neck cancer (HNC) certified to obtain medically certified cannabis as part of their supportive care regimen undergoing treatment with definitive or adjuvant concurrent chemoradiation (CRT).
Patients undergoing intensive treatment for locally advanced Head and Neck Cancer (HNC) with definitive or adjuvant concurrent chemoradiation (CRT) typically experience high levels of acute treatment toxicity due to the unavoidable irradiation of normal tissues in the upper aerodigestive tract adjacent to tumor and nodal target structures such as pharyngeal constrictors, salivary glands, oral cavity, and the upper esophagus. Radiation dose to these structures has been substantially reduced with the widespread adoption of advanced treatment planning and delivery techniques such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT), however patients continue to experience significant toxicity due to local effects of radiotherapy. Treatment toxicity due to local effects increases synergistically with the addition of concurrent chemotherapy, and additional toxicities such as myelosuppression and chemotherapy induced nausea/vomiting can be introduced with the addition of concurrent chemotherapy. Acute treatment toxicities include significant mucositis, odynophagia, nausea, anorexia, weight loss leading to severe reductions in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) domains related to eating, tasting, and overall sense of wellbeing. These effects generally build up over the course of a typical radiotherapy schedule (six to eight weeks), continue to persist after treatment, and demonstrate a gradual improvement over a typical course of three to six months post-treatment.
Treatment toxicity and their resultant treatment burden are typically managed with a regimen of medications directed at specific cell receptor targets involved in pain signaling, inflammation, nausea/vomiting and occasionally supplemented by topical agents intended to protect mucosal surfaces and provide local pain relief. Notably, patients often require high dose opiate analgesics to achieve adequate pain relief, exposing patients to risks of opiate dependence and the constellation of adverse effects associated with chronic opiate use. Overall, in spite of maximal treatment with currently available agents, patients continue to experience significant reduction in QoL during and after CRT attributable to both treatment-related toxicity and adverse effects of opiate analgesics utilized to alleviate treatment-related pain.
Cannabis is defined as products derived from the Cannabis sativa plant leaf. Cannabis consists of numerous bioactive compounds collectively referred to as cannabinoids. The most studied and best characterized cannabinoids are tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD). Cannabinoids interact with endogenous cannabinoid receptors to produce biologic effects. Two types of cannabinoid receptors, CB1 and CB2, have been identified and characterized to date. CB1 receptors are primarily expressed in the CNS and GI tract whereas CB2 receptors are primarily expressed in immune cells, particularly circulating B-lymphocytes. Collectively, CB receptors are involved in cellular pathways regulating pain, nausea, appetite, and mood Cannabis derivatives such as tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) have demonstrated anti-inflammatory, anti-emetic, analgesic, and appetite stimulatory activity in clinical use in humans. Pre-clinical studies with tumor cell lines have also demonstrated anti-neoplastic activity.
Trials evaluating cannabis have shown synergistic anti-emetic effects with commonly used agents such as prochloperazine and ondansetron and synergistic analgesic effects with opiates. Cannabis was also shown to reduce opiate requirements and consequent opiate related toxicity for acute and chronic cancer-related pain. Of note, cannabis and cannabinoids have a favorable safety profile compared to opioid analgesics with significantly lower addictive potential and carry a lower risk of potentially serious cardiovascular toxicity (QTc prolongation) or systemic toxicity (serotonin syndrome) compared to commonly utilized anti-emetic agents. In fact, the potential lethal dose in humans has been estimated in the range of 650-700 kg inhaled in 15 minutes, making overdose highly unlikely. As a result, cannabis has recently been approved in many states within the USA for medical use, including New York state. Physician and patient enthusiasm for medical use of cannabis is high, however clinical data clarifying the role of cannabis in the treatment armamentarium for a variety of disease conditions including cancer is currently limited.
Many of the common acute symptoms experienced by HNC patients during CRT involve physiologic pathways in which cannabinoid receptors have been implicated. Therefore, given the favorable safety profile of cannabis derivatives and potential synergistic effects with commonly used medications for relief of these treatment toxicities, we hypothesize that the addition of cannabis to the supportive care regimen will improve symptom burden during and immediately post-treatment resulting in improved HRQoL and may also decrease weight loss and opiate analgesic requirement.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Observational group | Patient dosing options will be stratified into three groups defined as standard, frail/elderly (age > 65 or ECOG 2), and cannabis-experienced (> weekly use of cannabis in the past year outside of NYC Medical Marijuana program). NYC specified cannabis formulation options are defined by THC:CBD ratio as 1:1, low THC:high CBD, high THC:low CBD, and high THC:high CBD. |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Patients' adherence to registering for medically certified cannabis - Aim 1 | The primary endpoint of aim 1 is a determination of the number of patients registering for medically certified cannabis as assessed as the number (frequency) as well as proportion of patients registering on New York State Medical Marijuana website. Patients' adherence percentage will be presented along with Clopper-Pearson exact 95% confidence interval. | Through study completion, up to 6 months |
| Patients' adherence to procuring medically certified cannabis - Aim 2 | The primary endpoint of aim 2 is a determination of the number of patients procuring medically certified cannabis as assessed as the number (frequency) as well as proportion of patients procuring marijuana from dispensary. Patients' adherence percentage will be presented along with Clopper-Pearson exact 95% confidence interval. | Through study completion, up to 6 months |
| Duration of time for patients to obtain medically certified cannabis | The primary endpoint of aim 3 is the length of time it takes patients to obtain medically certified cannabis as assessed by the time elapsed in number of days from study enrollment until medically certified cannabis acquisition and use. Time to cannabis acquisition will be summarized using Kaplan-Meier product limit estimator. | Through study completion, up to 6 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Recovery based on Head and Neck Radiotherapy Questionnaire (HNRQ) | Recovery based on HNRQ will be assessed by the difference in HNRQ between time points. HNRQ is a validated, 22-item, disease-specific, multidimensional tool designed to measure acute morbidity and health-related quality of life (QOL) in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients undergoing radiation therapy (RT). It assesses symptoms like mucositis, dysphagia, and xerostomia, providing crucial data for clinical trials and treatment monitoring. The HNRQ focuses on the patient's experience during the preceding 7 days, with 22 items usually scored on a 1-7 Likert-type scale, where lower scores indicate poorer QOL. Results will be summarized using descriptive statistics and changes will be examined using Wilcoxon sign test. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Patients with head and neck cancer that meet the eligibility criteria as described.
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Rafi Kabarriti, MD | Montefiore Medical Center | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Montefiore Medical Center | The Bronx | New York | 10467 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 28766791 | Background | Astrup GL, Rustoen T, Hofso K, Gran JM, Bjordal K. Symptom burden and patient characteristics: Association with quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer undergoing radiotherapy. Head Neck. 2017 Oct;39(10):2114-2126. doi: 10.1002/hed.24875. Epub 2017 Aug 2. | |
| 27727063 | Background | Xiao C, Zhang Q, Nguyen-Tan PF, List M, Weber RS, Ang KK, Rosenthal D, Filion EJ, Kim H, Silverman C, Raben A, Galloway T, Fortin A, Gore E, Winquist E, Jones CU, Robinson W, Raben D, Le QT, Bruner D. Quality of Life and Performance Status From a Substudy Conducted Within a Prospective Phase 3 Randomized Trial of Concurrent Standard Radiation Versus Accelerated Radiation Plus Cisplatin for Locally Advanced Head and Neck Carcinoma: NRG Oncology RTOG 0129. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Mar 15;97(4):667-677. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.07.020. Epub 2016 Jul 25. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006258 | Head and Neck Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Blood (less than 10 mL in an EDTA tube), urine (less than 15 mL), and oral swab samples will be collected from patients at baseline, once during weeks 1-2, once during week 5-6, and at the time of post-treatment follow-up appointments. Blood tests are routinely performed on a weekly basis for patients receiving systemic therapy and all attempts will be made to coordinate biospecimen collection for study purposes with biospecimen collection for standard clinical care in order to minimize patient inconvenience.
Each specimen will be analyzed in the Stable Isotope & Metabolomics Core Facility of the Diabetes Research Center under the direction of Dr. Irwin Kurland.
| 1-2 weeks, 4-6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months post-treatment |
| Recovery based on Performance Status Scale for Head and Neck Cancer (PSS-HN) | Recovery based PSS-HN will be assessed by the difference in PSS-HN between time points. PSS-HN is a clinician-rated, 3-item tool assessing functional, disease-specific outcomes (diet, public eating, speech) on a 0-100 scale, where higher scores indicate better function. Results will be summarized using descriptive statistics and changes will be examined using Wilcoxon sign test. | 1-2 weeks, 4-6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months post-treatment |
| Recovery of Spitzer Quality of Life Index (SQLI) | Recovery based on SQLI will be assessed by the difference in SQLI between time points. Results will be summarized using descriptive statistics and changes will be examined using Wilcoxon sign test. | 1-2 weeks, 4-6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months post-treatment |
| 27020104 | Background | Ohri N, Rapkin BD, Guha C, Kalnicki S, Garg M. Radiation Therapy Noncompliance and Clinical Outcomes in an Urban Academic Cancer Center. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 Jun 1;95(2):563-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.01.043. Epub 2016 Jan 30. |
| 20551723 | Background | Banta-Green CJ, Von Korff M, Sullivan MD, Merrill JO, Doyle SR, Saunders K. The prescribed opioids difficulties scale: a patient-centered assessment of problems and concerns. Clin J Pain. 2010 Jul-Aug;26(6):489-97. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181e103d9. |
| 8487051 | Background | Browman GP, Levine MN, Hodson DI, Sathya J, Russell R, Skingley P, Cripps C, Eapen L, Girard A. The Head and Neck Radiotherapy Questionnaire: a morbidity/quality-of-life instrument for clinical trials of radiation therapy in locally advanced head and neck cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1993 May;11(5):863-72. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1993.11.5.863. |
| 14595399 | Background | Piomelli D. The molecular logic of endocannabinoid signalling. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003 Nov;4(11):873-84. doi: 10.1038/nrn1247. No abstract available. |
| 15357514 | Background | Martin BR, Wiley JL. Mechanism of action of cannabinoids: how it may lead to treatment of cachexia, emesis, and pain. J Support Oncol. 2004 Jul-Aug;2(4):305-14; discussion 314-6. |
| 26986677 | Background | Wilkie G, Sakr B, Rizack T. Medical Marijuana Use in Oncology: A Review. JAMA Oncol. 2016 May 1;2(5):670-675. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.0155. |
| 25533893 | Background | Degenhardt L, Lintzeris N, Campbell G, Bruno R, Cohen M, Farrell M, Hall WD. Experience of adjunctive cannabis use for chronic non-cancer pain: findings from the Pain and Opioids IN Treatment (POINT) study. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015 Feb 1;147:144-50. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.11.031. Epub 2014 Dec 10. |
| 15629274 | Background | Hall W, Christie M, Currow D. Cannabinoids and cancer: causation, remediation, and palliation. Lancet Oncol. 2005 Jan;6(1):35-42. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(04)01711-5. |
| 28780725 | Background | Badowski ME. A review of oral cannabinoids and medical marijuana for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a focus on pharmacokinetic variability and pharmacodynamics. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2017 Sep;80(3):441-449. doi: 10.1007/s00280-017-3387-5. Epub 2017 Aug 5. |
| 17976975 | Background | Engels FK, de Jong FA, Mathijssen RH, Erkens JA, Herings RM, Verweij J. Medicinal cannabis in oncology. Eur J Cancer. 2007 Dec;43(18):2638-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2007.09.010. Epub 2007 Oct 31. |
| 23718175 | Background | Adler JN, Colbert JA. Clinical decisions. Medicinal use of marijuana--polling results. N Engl J Med. 2013 May 30;368(22):e30. doi: 10.1056/NEJMclde1305159. No abstract available. |
| 22019199 | Background | Bowles DW, O'Bryant CL, Camidge DR, Jimeno A. The intersection between cannabis and cancer in the United States. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2012 Jul;83(1):1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2011.09.008. Epub 2011 Oct 21. |
| 7309824 | Background | Spitzer WO, Dobson AJ, Hall J, Chesterman E, Levi J, Shepherd R, Battista RN, Catchlove BR. Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients: a concise QL-index for use by physicians. J Chronic Dis. 1981;34(12):585-97. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(81)90058-8. No abstract available. |
| 2364368 | Background | List MA, Ritter-Sterr C, Lansky SB. A performance status scale for head and neck cancer patients. Cancer. 1990 Aug 1;66(3):564-9. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19900801)66:33.0.co;2-d. |
| 28456586 | Background | Caudell JJ, Torres-Roca JF, Gillies RJ, Enderling H, Kim S, Rishi A, Moros EG, Harrison LB. The future of personalised radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2017 May;18(5):e266-e273. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30252-8. Epub 2017 Apr 26. |
| 28781759 | Background | Riekeberg E, Powers R. New frontiers in metabolomics: from measurement to insight. F1000Res. 2017 Jul 19;6:1148. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.11495.1. eCollection 2017. |
| 27877135 | Background | Shin JM, Kamarajan P, Fenno JC, Rickard AH, Kapila YL. Metabolomics of Head and Neck Cancer: A Mini-Review. Front Physiol. 2016 Nov 8;7:526. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2016.00526. eCollection 2016. |
| 28443095 | Background | Manning G, Tichy A, Sirak I, Badie C. Radiotherapy-Associated Long-term Modification of Expression of the Inflammatory Biomarker Genes ARG1, BCL2L1, and MYC. Front Immunol. 2017 Apr 10;8:412. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00412. eCollection 2017. |