Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length versus Bishop score in labour induction at term for prediction of Caesarean delivery. This study is prospective study. This study will be carried out in Ain-shams maternity hospital. Sample size of 320 parturients.
Patients and Methods
Study design:
This study is prospective study, comparative clinical trial for a test against a gold standard with blinding of the evaluator
Study setting:
This study will be carried out in Ain-Shams university maternity hospital.
Methods:
History of the patient:
Detailed and careful history was taken from the patient as the following:
Personal history: name, age, occupation, residence and special habit of medical importance.
Obstetric history: including last menstrual period, Gestation age and regular Antenatal care.
Past history: including any medical disorder e.g. Diabetes mellitus, hypertension or any surgical procedure
History of present pregnancy: duration of pregnancy from last menstrual period, any complications occurred or any medication used during pregnancy.
Examination of the patient:
Investigations. Complete blood count , Rh, transvaginal ultra sound and non-stress test.
All patients had vaginal examination for assessing the (Bishop Score,1964) before induction of labour.
All women had transvaginal ultrasound for assessment of cervical length using (median digital GAIA) Ultrasonic machine.
Protocol of transvaginal ultrasound will be done as follow:
Patient will be asked to void.
Vaginal probe will be inserted using direct visualization with K-Y gel.
Identification of bladder, amniotic fluid and fetal presenting part.
Identification of abnormal findings as placenta pervia or absence of fetal heart motion.
Identification of midline sagittal plane of the cervix and looking in the proximal one third of the image for the internal os then pulling back the probe until the lightest touch provides good image of the cervical canal and moving the probe slightly to get the best long axis of the cervix then measuring the cervical length by placing the calipers appropriately and recording the distance between internal and external cervical os.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Single gruop320 parturients | Measurement of cervical length and digital examination of Bishop score in 320 women undergoing induction of labour will be carried out in ain shams university maternity hospital. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bishop score calculation of modified Bishop score in numbers by digital vaginal examination | Other | Measurement of cervical length by transvaginal ultrasound and digital examination of Bishop score in 320 parturients undergoing labour induction at term |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Cervical length | median cervical length measured by transvaginal ultrasound in centimetres. | 24 hours |
| Bishop score | median Bishop score assessed by digital vaginal examination as follows: Cervical dilatation in centimeters will be given a score of zero if closed, a score of 1 if 1-2 cm dilated, a score of 2 if 3-4 cm dilated and a score of 3 if 5 cm or more dilatation. Effacement of the cervix will be given a score of zero if 0-30%, a score of 1 if 40-50%, a score of 2 if 60-70% and a score of 3 if 80% or more. Station of fetal head will be given a score of zero if -3, a score of 1 if -2, a score of 2 if -1 to zero and a score of 3 if 1 or more. Consistency of the cervix will be given a score of zero if firm, a score of 1 if medium and a score of 2 if soft. Position of the cervix will be given a score of zero if posterior, a score of 1 if mid position and a score of 2 if anterior. So, a total score (sum of all scores) of zero at a minimum to 10 at a maximum can be estimated. Note that a score more than 10 means patient is in labor not needing induction of labor. | 72 |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
1. Malpresentation. 2. Major fetal congenital anomalies as hydrocephalous & dead fetus. 3. Patient received any pre induction ripping methods for example: (Acetic Acid-Prostaglandins).
4. Any medical history contraindicating vaginal delivery. 5. Assessment meconium staining to liquor or any evidence of chorioamnionitis. 6. Previous uterine surgery. 7. Multiple gestations. 8. Women with allergy to prostaglandins.
Not provided
Not provided
Single group 320 parturients udergoing induction of labour at term
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mohamed adel mazroa | Tanta | Egypt |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|