Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Prospective, one-arm, baseline-controlled pilot study for the evaluation of the VelaShape III combined with UltraShape Power treatment for non-invasive circumference reduction to the thighs.
Eligible subjects will receive 3 bi-weekly treatments to the thighs at 2-week intervals, with the VelaShape III and UltraShape Power devices according to the study protocol.
Each subject will return for 3 follow up visits: four weeks (4wk FU), 8 weeks (8wk FU) and 12 weeks (12wk FU) after the last treatment (Tx.3), for total expected study duration of 16 weeks.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| VelaShape III & UltraShape Power | Experimental | VelaShape III treatment with radiofrequency, infrared and massage combined with UltraShape Power treatment, using pulsed, focused ultrasound treatment. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VelaShape III | Device | The VelaShape III device combines controlled infrared (IR) light and conducted bipolar radiofrequency (RF) energies with vacuum. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Circumference Change in the Thighs at the 12-week Follow-up Compared to Baseline Measurements | Circumference change of thigh midline post combined VelaShape III and UltraShape Power treatments. Negative change represent reduction in thigh circumference. | At 12 weeks after the third treatment (week 16) for each subject |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in the Thighs Circumference at Each Treatment Visit Post Baseline and at The 4 and 8 Week Follow-up Visits | The thighs circumference change (at midline) after combined treatment with VelaShape III and UltraShape Power treatments compared to baseline. The changed of thighs circumference was calculated at 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks after baseline (which are second treatment , third treatment, 4 and 8 week follow-up visits, respectively). Negative change represent reduction in thigh circumference. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skin Laser & Surgery Specialist of NY/NJ | Hackensack | New Jersey | 07601 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 28009680 | Background | Coleman WP 3rd, Coleman W 4th, Weiss RA, Kenkel JM, Ad-El DD, Amir R. A Multicenter Controlled Study to Evaluate Multiple Treatments With Nonthermal Focused Ultrasound for Noninvasive Fat Reduction. Dermatol Surg. 2017 Jan;43(1):50-57. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000918. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | VelaShape III & UltraShape Power | Subjects received 3 biweekly treatments to the thighs with the VelaShape III and UltraShape Power devices. The VelaShape III device combines controlled infrared (IR) light and conducted bipolar radiofrequency (RF) energies with vacuum. The UltraShape Power device uses focused ultrasound energy for lipolysis (breakdown of fat) via a non-thermal mechanism of action. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Subjects treated with VelaShape III and UltraShape Power
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | VelaShape III & UltraShape Power | Subjects received 3 biweekly treatments to the thighs with the VelaShape III and UltraShape Power devices. The VelaShape III device combines controlled infrared (IR) light and conducted bipolar radiofrequency (RF) energies with vacuum. The UltraShape Power device uses focused ultrasound energy for lipolysis (breakdown of fat) via a non-thermal mechanism of action. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Circumference Change in the Thighs at the 12-week Follow-up Compared to Baseline Measurements | Circumference change of thigh midline post combined VelaShape III and UltraShape Power treatments. Negative change represent reduction in thigh circumference. | 6 subjects were initially treated, but then were lost to follow-up during the period when the treatment protocol was amended. One other subject was lost to follow-up after three treatments because she was unable to come in for visits due to work schedule | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | centimeter | At 12 weeks after the third treatment (week 16) for each subject | Number of thighs | Number of thighs |
|
The period of time over which adverse event data were collected is from treatment visit until 12 weeks follow-up (16 weeks post baseline) treatment
The number and severity of adverse events following each treatment, with combined Velashape III and Ultrashape Power for the thighs, were evaluated at each of the three biweekly visits and at the 4, 8 and 12 weeks following the treatment.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | VelaShape III & UltraShape Power | Subjects left and right thighs were each treated with both VelaShape III and UltraShape Power, a combined treatment. |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blistering | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment | Patient developed 2 blisters on left thigh at the day after the second treatment. Subject advised to keep area clean & covered and to temporarily discontinue treatments. The blisters recovered without intervention. |
Small number of subjects analyzed.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Director of Clinical Marketing | Candela Corporation | +1 949.246.7983 | doranr@candelamedical.com |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Oct 6, 2017 | Feb 5, 2018 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| UltraShape Power | Device | The UltraShape Power device uses focused ultrasound energy for lipolysis (breakdown of fat) via a non-thermal mechanism of action. |
|
| At 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks after baseline |
| Investigator Satisfaction | Investigator satisfaction assessment performed independently, using a 5- point Likert scale questionnaire from 2=very satisfied to -2=very unsatisfied at each follow-up visits (4, 8 and 12 weeks after the last treatment) | At 4, 8 and 12 weeks follow-up visits |
| Subject Satisfaction | Subject satisfaction assessment performed independently, using a 5- point Likert scale questionnaire from 2=very satisfied to -2=very unsatisfied at each follow-up visits (at 4, 8 and 12 weeks after the last treatment visit). | At 4, 8 and 12 week follow-up visits |
| Number of thighs |
|
| Participants |
| Participants |
|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years | Participants |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants | Participants |
|
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants | Participants |
|
| Mean thigh circumference | Collected using a measuring tape at thigh midline | Mean | Standard Deviation | centimeter | Number of thighs |
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Number of thighs |
|
|
| Secondary | Change in the Thighs Circumference at Each Treatment Visit Post Baseline and at The 4 and 8 Week Follow-up Visits | The thighs circumference change (at midline) after combined treatment with VelaShape III and UltraShape Power treatments compared to baseline. The changed of thighs circumference was calculated at 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks after baseline (which are second treatment , third treatment, 4 and 8 week follow-up visits, respectively). Negative change represent reduction in thigh circumference. | 6 subjects were initially treated, but then were lost to follow-up during the period when the treatment protocol was amended. One other subject was lost to follow-up after three treatments because she was unable to come in for visits due to work schedule. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | centimeter | At 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks after baseline | Number of Thighs | Number of Thighs |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Investigator Satisfaction | Investigator satisfaction assessment performed independently, using a 5- point Likert scale questionnaire from 2=very satisfied to -2=very unsatisfied at each follow-up visits (4, 8 and 12 weeks after the last treatment) | 6 subjects were initially treated, but then were lost to follow-up during the period when the treatment protocol was amended. One other subject was lost to follow-up after three treatments because she was unable to come in for visits due to work schedule. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | At 4, 8 and 12 weeks follow-up visits |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Subject Satisfaction | Subject satisfaction assessment performed independently, using a 5- point Likert scale questionnaire from 2=very satisfied to -2=very unsatisfied at each follow-up visits (at 4, 8 and 12 weeks after the last treatment visit). | 6 subjects were initially treated, but then were lost to follow-up during the period when the treatment protocol was amended. One other subject was lost to follow-up after three treatments because she was unable to come in for visits due to work schedule. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | At 4, 8 and 12 week follow-up visits |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 16 |
| 0 |
| 16 |
| 1 |
| 16 |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Circumference change at the third treatment |
|
|
| Circumference change at 8 weeks after baseline |
|
|
| Circumference change at 12 weeks after baseline |
|
|
| (1) Satisfied |
|
| (2) Very satisfied |
|
| Investigator satisfaction at 8 week follow-up |
|
| Investigator satisfaction at 12 week follow-up |
|
| (1) Satisfied |
|
| (2) Very satisfied |
|
| Subject satisfaction at 8 week follow-up |
|
| Subject satisfaction at 12 week follow-up |
|