Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
to re-evaluate biomarker strategy for recruitment to Part 2
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
ALM201/0001 is a Phase I, open-label, dose-escalation study of the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics (PK) of ALM201.
Part 1 will be a dose-escalation study. Patients with advanced solid tumours will receive daily doses of ALM201 on Days 1-5, 8-12 and 15-19 in 21 day cycles.
Part 2 will be a dose-expansion of the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) determined in Part 1. Patients with advanced ovarian cancer will be enrolled with the main objective to determine the recommended Phase II dose.
ALM201 is a peptide with anti-angiogenic activity in a range of in-vitro and ex-vivo models. ALM201/0001 is a Phase I, multicentre, open-label, dose-escalation study of the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics (PK) of ALM201. The study is divided into two parts.
Part 1 will enrol patients with advanced solid tumours. Patients will receive subcutaneous injection of ALM201 on Days 1-5, 8-12 and 15-19 in 21 day cycles. Patients can receive up to 8 cycles of treatment. Enrolment will follow an accelerated dose-escalation schedule until grade 2 drug-related adverse events are observed, at this point the 3+3 enrolment design will be used. There will be at least 1 week stagger between the first and subsequent patients in a new cohort dose. Dose increments will not exceed 100% escalation and will be guided by data generated from previous cycles. The dose and possibly the schedule will be adjusted to determine the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD).
Part 2 will enrol patients with advanced ovarian cancer whose tumour has a proangiogenic profile as assessed by an angiogenesis gene signature biomarker. Patients will receive ALM201 at a dose and schedule established in Part 1.
Patients will undergo safety and tumour assessments as well as blood draws for PK profiling. The safety assessments will involve physical examination, vital signs, biochemistry and haematology laboratory screens as well as immunogenicity testing. Tumour assessments will involve computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans at screening and after every 2 cycles during cycles 1 -8. Patients will be asked to provide consent for access to archived tumour tissue and for fresh biopsies to be taken at pre-dose, tumour response and/or point of disease progression for potential biomarker and pharmacodynamic assessments. PK profiling will be carried out in Cycles 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Solid tumours | Experimental | Part 1 - Dose-escalation of ALM201 in patients with advanced solid tumours Daily dosing of ALM201 on Days 1-5, 8-12 and 15-19 of 21 day cycle. Escalating dose cohorts |
|
| Ovarian cancer | Experimental | Part 2 - Dose-expansion of ALM201 Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) in patients with advanced ovarian cancer Daily dosing of ALM201 on Days 1-5, 8-12 and 15-19 of 21 day cycle at the MTD determined in Part 1 |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALM201 | Drug | Drug: ALM201 administered subcutaneously |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Safety and Tolerability - Evaluation of AEs and DLT | All events and suspected dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) were graded according to the CTCAE, version 4.03. A DLT was defined as a Grade 3 or 4 AE that, in the opinion of the CRC, was likely to be related to ALM201 and represented a clinically significant hazard to the patient. Qualifying DLT events were considered to be clinically relevant; e.g. in duration, apparent reversibility, required management, and upon consideration of the patient's medical history and/or concomitant medications. DLT events were also evaluated in terms of what was considered to be an appropriate next escalation step: In the case where the CRC agreed that an escalation step of approximately 33% or lower was merited; the toxicity of concern could be declared a DLT. In order to be evaluable for DLT assessment, a patient had to receive at least 80% of their scheduled doses (e.g. 12 of the 15), unless this lack of compliance was due to ALM201-related toxicity. | Adverse event evaluation was done during treatment and follow-up. DLT evaluation was done during cycle 1 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Tumour Response Assessment - Best Overall Response | As this was a Phase 1 study, the extent of efficacy data was expected to be limited. Using RECIST Version 1.1, a summary of clinical benefit from patients with evaluable disease was generated via CT scans: Complete Response (CR) = Disappearance of all target & non-target lesions + normalization of tumor marker; Partial Response (PR) ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of LD of target lesions; Progressive Disease (PD) ≥ 20% increase (& 5mm absolute increase) in sum of LD of target lesions or appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions; Stable Disease (SD) = Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD or persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s) or/and maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Part 1 Specific Inclusion Criterion
*Patients with histologically and/or cytologically confirmed advanced solid tumour for whom no standard effective therapy is available or felt likely to be of limited efficacy and in whom a rationale for use of an anti-angiogenic treatment approach exists. Note: Previous use of anti-angiogenic therapy is allowed if tolerated
Part 2 Specific Inclusion Criterion
*Patients with advanced ovarian cancer, who are intolerant of or whose tumour is resistant to platinums and who have failed to respond to, or have relapsed following, standard therapy and whose tumour has a proangiogenic profile as assessed by the angiogenesis gene signature test. Note: Previous use of anti-angiogenic therapy is allowed if tolerated.
General Inclusion Criteria for all Patients
Exclusion Criteria:
For all Patients
History of inability to tolerate anti-angiogenic therapies e.g. increased blood pressure (BP), proteinuria, prior thromboembolic events.
Previous history of bowel obstruction, clinical evidence of gastro-intestinal obstruction, large burden of peritoneal disease or evidence of bowel involvement on computed tomography.
Patents has received:
Documented, symptomatic or uncontrolled intracranial metastases or primary intracerebral tumours.
Cancer with leptomeningeal involvement.
On therapeutic anti-coagulation (aspirin dosing ≤100 mg per oral (PO) daily allowed).
Previous malignancy, except for non-basal-cell carcinoma of skin or carcinoma-in-situ of the uterine cervix, unless the tumour was treated with curative intent more than 2 years prior to study entry.
Active cardiac condition or history of significant cardiac condition. Known human immunodeficiency virus positivity.
Active hepatitis B or C or other active liver disease (other than malignancy).
Any active, clinically significant, viral, bacterial, or systemic fungal infection within 4 weeks prior to Cycle 1, Day 1.
Any evidence of severe or uncontrolled systemic conditions or any other issues which make it undesirable for the patient to participate in the study or which could jeopardize compliance with the protocol.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Richard Wilson, Professor | Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast | Belfast | County Antrim | BT9 7AB | United Kingdom | ||
Part 1 enrolled adult patients with advanced solid tumours in whom treatment with an anti-angiogenic agent was appropriate. Participants had screening evaluations between Day -1 and -28 before entering the first 21-day treatment cycle.
Recruitment was carried out in three study sites in Belfast, Manchester and Newcastle, UK starting on 27 April 2015.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Cohort 1 - ALM201 | One patient received 10 mg IMP from cycle 1 through cycle 6. |
| FG001 | Cohort 2 - ALM201 | One patient received 20 mg IMP in cycle 1 and cycle 2. |
| FG002 | Cohort 3 - ALM201 | One patient received 40 mg IMP from cycle 1 through cycle 3. |
| FG003 | Cohort 4 - ALM201 | Three patients received 80 mg IMP (3 patients during cycle 1, 2 patients in cycle 1 and cycle 2). |
| FG004 | Cohort 5 - ALM201 | Three patients received 160 mg of IMP in cycles 1 and 2. |
| FG005 | Cohort 6 - ALM201 | Four patients received 200 mg IMP in cycle 1; 3 patients in cycle 1 and 2, 2 patients in cycle 1 through 4 and one patient in cycle 1 through 5. |
| FG006 | Cohort 7 - ALM201 | Three patients received 300 mg IMP in cycle 1 and 2; one of them received the IMP in cycle 1 through cycle 6. |
| FG007 | Cohort 8 - ALM201 | Four patients received 100 mg IMP in cycle 1; two of them completed cycle 2. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Part 1 enrolled adult patients with advanced solid tumours in whom treatment with an anti-angiogenic agent was appropriate. Participants had screening evaluations between Day -1 and -28 before entering the first 21-day treatment cycle.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Cohort 1 - ALM201 | One patient received 10 mg IMP from cycle 1 through cycle 6. |
| BG001 | Cohort 2 - ALM201 | One patient received 20 mg IMP in cycle 1 and cycle 2. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Safety and Tolerability - Evaluation of AEs and DLT | All events and suspected dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) were graded according to the CTCAE, version 4.03. A DLT was defined as a Grade 3 or 4 AE that, in the opinion of the CRC, was likely to be related to ALM201 and represented a clinically significant hazard to the patient. Qualifying DLT events were considered to be clinically relevant; e.g. in duration, apparent reversibility, required management, and upon consideration of the patient's medical history and/or concomitant medications. DLT events were also evaluated in terms of what was considered to be an appropriate next escalation step: In the case where the CRC agreed that an escalation step of approximately 33% or lower was merited; the toxicity of concern could be declared a DLT. In order to be evaluable for DLT assessment, a patient had to receive at least 80% of their scheduled doses (e.g. 12 of the 15), unless this lack of compliance was due to ALM201-related toxicity. | Reporting group | Posted | Number | participants | Adverse event evaluation was done during treatment and follow-up. DLT evaluation was done during cycle 1 |
|
AEs were collected from the patient's first dose of IMP, throughout the study until the 30-day follow-up visit. SAEs were followed until considered resolved, returned to baseline, chronically ongoing or otherwise explained by the Principal Investigator.
During the study, AEs were spontaneously reported or elicited during open-ended questioning, examination or evaluation of a patient. Progression of the disease under study was not captured as an AE.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Cohort 1 - ALM201 | One patient received 10 mg IMP from cycle 1 through cycle 6. |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pulmonary embolism | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hot flush | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
The study was terminated after Part 1 to re-evaluate the biomarker strategy for recruitment to Part 2
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Professor Richard Kennedy, Medical Director | Almac Discovery | +44 28 3833 2200 | richard.kennedy@almacgroup.com |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Sep 24, 2014 | Nov 9, 2018 | Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Aug 1, 2017 | Nov 28, 2018 | SAP_001.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010051 | Ovarian Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004701 | Endocrine Gland Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D010049 | Ovarian Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Response assessments were done to assess clinical benefit in the efficacy population overall and at the end of cycles 2, 4 and 6, as applicable |
| Pharmacokinetics: Tmax | Tmax was derived from the individual patient plasma concentration versus time profiles of ALM201. | Tmax was determined in cycles 1, 2, 4 and 6 of treatment |
| Pharmacokinetics: AUC 0-t | AUC 0-t was derived from the individual patient plasma concentration versus time profiles of ALM201. | AUC 0-t was determined in cycles 1, 2, 4 and 6 of treatment |
| Pharmacokinetics: Cmax | Cmax was derived from the individual patient plasma concentration of ALM201. | Cmax of ALM201 following subcutaneous (SC) administration of ALM201 was determined in cycles 1, 2, 4 and 6 of treatment |
| Dept Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust |
| Manchester |
| Lancashire |
| M20 4BX |
| United Kingdom |
| Freeman Hospital, Northern Centre for Cancer Care, Sir Bobby Robson Cancer Trial research Centre | Newcastle | Northumberland | NE7 7DN | United Kingdom |
| Physician Decision |
|
| BG002 | Cohort 3 - ALM201 | One patient received 40 mg IMP from cycle 1 through cycle 3. |
| BG003 | Cohort 4 - ALM201 | Three patients received 80 mg IMP (3 patients during cycle 1, 2 patients in cycle 1 and cycle 2). |
| BG004 | Cohort 5 - ALM201 | Three patients received 160 mg of IMP in cycles 1 and 2. |
| BG005 | Cohort 6 - ALM201 | Four patients received 200 mg IMP in cycle 1; 3 patients in cycle 1 and 2, 2 patients in cycle 1 through 4 and one patient in cycle 1 through 5. |
| BG006 | Cohort 7 - ALM201 | Three patients received 300 mg IMP in cycle 1 and 2; one of them received the IMP in cycle 1 through cycle 6. |
| BG007 | Cohort 8 - ALM201 | Four patients received 100 mg IMP in cycle 1; two of them completed cycle 2. |
| BG008 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Participants |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Title |
|---|
| Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Cohort 1 - ALM201 | One patient received 10 mg IMP from cycle 1 through cycle 6. |
| OG001 | Cohort 2 - ALM201 | One patient received 20 mg IMP in cycle 1 and cycle 2. |
| OG002 | Cohort 3 - ALM201 | One patient received 40 mg IMP from cycle 1 through cycle 3. |
| OG003 | Cohort 4 - ALM201 | Three patients received 80 mg IMP (3 patients during cycle 1, 2 patients in cycle 1 and cycle 2). |
| OG004 | Cohort 5 - ALM201 | Three patients received 160 mg of IMP in cycles 1 and 2. |
| OG005 | Cohort 6 - ALM201 | Four patients received 200 mg IMP in cycle 1; 3 patients in cycle 1 and 2, 2 patients in cycle 1 through 4 and one patient in cycle 1 through 5. |
| OG006 | Cohort 7 - ALM201 | Three patients received 300 mg IMP in cycle 1 and 2; one of them received the IMP in cycle 1 through cycle 6. |
| OG007 | Cohort 8 - ALM201 | Four patients received 100 mg IMP in cycle 1; two of them completed cycle 2. |
|
|
| Secondary | Tumour Response Assessment - Best Overall Response | As this was a Phase 1 study, the extent of efficacy data was expected to be limited. Using RECIST Version 1.1, a summary of clinical benefit from patients with evaluable disease was generated via CT scans: Complete Response (CR) = Disappearance of all target & non-target lesions + normalization of tumor marker; Partial Response (PR) ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of LD of target lesions; Progressive Disease (PD) ≥ 20% increase (& 5mm absolute increase) in sum of LD of target lesions or appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions; Stable Disease (SD) = Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD or persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s) or/and maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits. | Reporting group | Posted | Number | participants | Response assessments were done to assess clinical benefit in the efficacy population overall and at the end of cycles 2, 4 and 6, as applicable |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Pharmacokinetics: Tmax | Tmax was derived from the individual patient plasma concentration versus time profiles of ALM201. | Reporting group | Posted | Median | Full Range | hour | Tmax was determined in cycles 1, 2, 4 and 6 of treatment |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Pharmacokinetics: AUC 0-t | AUC 0-t was derived from the individual patient plasma concentration versus time profiles of ALM201. | Reporting group | Posted | Geometric Mean | Full Range | ng*h/mL | AUC 0-t was determined in cycles 1, 2, 4 and 6 of treatment |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Pharmacokinetics: Cmax | Cmax was derived from the individual patient plasma concentration of ALM201. | Reporting group | Posted | Geometric Mean | Full Range | ng/mL | Cmax of ALM201 following subcutaneous (SC) administration of ALM201 was determined in cycles 1, 2, 4 and 6 of treatment |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 1 |
| 1 |
| 1 |
| 1 |
| 1 |
| EG001 | Cohort 2 - ALM201 | One patient received 20 mg IMP in cycle 1 and cycle 2. | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| EG002 | Cohort 3 - ALM201 | One patient received 40 mg IMP from cycle 1 through cycle 3. | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| EG003 | Cohort 4 - ALM201 | Three patients received 80 mg IMP (3 patients during cycle 1, 2 patients in cycle 1 and cycle 2). | 0 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| EG004 | Cohort 5 - ALM201 | Three patients received 160 mg of IMP in cycles 1 and 2. | 0 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| EG005 | Cohort 6 - ALM201 | Four patients received 200 mg IMP in cycle 1; 3 patients in cycle 1 and 2, 2 patients in cycle 1 through 4 and one patient in cycle 1 through 5. | 0 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| EG006 | Cohort 7 - ALM201 | Three patients received 300 mg IMP in cycle 1 and 2; one of them received the IMP in cycle 1 through cycle 6. | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| EG007 | Cohort 8 - ALM201 | Four patients received 100 mg IMP in cycle 1; two of them completed cycle 2. | 0 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Device occlusion | General disorders | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Pyrexia | General disorders | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Large intestinal obstruction | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Small intestinal obstruction | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Cholecystitis acute | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Renal vein thrombosis | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Lower respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Viral infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Thrombosis | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Chest discomfort | General disorders | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Device occlusion | General disorders | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Fatigue | General disorders | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Injection site bruising | General disorders | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Injection site erythema | General disorders | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Injection site pain | General disorders | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Injection site pruritus | General disorders | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Injection site rash | General disorders | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Injection site reaction | General disorders | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Non-cardiac chest pain | General disorders | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Oedema peripheral | General disorders | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Pyrexia | General disorders | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Confusional state | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Depressed mood | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Depression | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Insomnia | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Scrotal swelling | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Vaginal haemorrhage | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Catheter site pain | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Contusion | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Excoriation | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Fall | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Procedural pain | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Aspartate aminotransferase increased | Investigations | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Blood alkaline phosphatase increased | Investigations | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Blood bilirubin increased | Investigations | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Blood creatinine increased | Investigations | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Urine output decreased | Investigations | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Weight decreased | Investigations | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Conduction disorder | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Tachycardia | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Cough | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Dyspnoea | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Pulmonary embolism | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Wheezing | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Aphasia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Dysgeusia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Memory impairment | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Neuralgia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Neuropathy peripheral | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Vision blurred | Eye disorders | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Abdominal pain upper | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Ascites | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Constipation | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Dyspepsia | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Flatulence | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Haemorrhoidal haemorrhage | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Large intestinal obstruction | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Lip swelling | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Rectal haemorrhage | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Small intestinal obstruction | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Stomatitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Renal failure acute | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Renal vein thrombosis | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Urinary retention | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Cholecystitis acute | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Alopecia | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Dry skin | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Erythema | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Pruritus | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Rash erythematous | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Rash macular | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Arthralgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Flank pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Muscle spasms | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Musculoskeletal chest pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Musculoskeletal pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Neck pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Back pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Decreased appetite | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Hypophosphataemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Lower respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Oral candidiasis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Oral fungal infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Skin infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Urinary tract infection enterococcal | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Viral infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (17.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| D000291 |
| Adnexal Diseases |
| D005831 | Genital Diseases, Female |
| D052776 | Female Urogenital Diseases |
| D005261 | Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
| D005833 | Genital Neoplasms, Female |
| D014565 | Urogenital Neoplasms |
| D000091662 | Genital Diseases |
| D004700 | Endocrine System Diseases |
| D006058 | Gonadal Disorders |
| Partial Response (PR) |
|
| Overall Response Rate (CR+PR) |
|
| Stable Disease (SD) |
|
| Disease Control Rate (CR+PR+SD) |
|
| Progressive Disease |
|
| Not Evaluable (NE+NA) |
|
|
| Cycle 1 - Day 3 |
|
|
| Cycle 1 - Day 18 |
|
|
| Cycle 2 - Day 18 |
|
|
| Cycle 4 - Day 18 |
|
|
| Cycle 6 - Day 18 |
|
|
|
| Cycle 1 - Day 3 |
|
|
| Cycle 1 - Day 18 |
|
|
| Cycle 2 - Day 18 |
|
|
| Cycle 4 - Day 18 |
|
|
| Cycle 6 - Day 18 |
|
|
|
| Cycle 1 - Day 3 |
|
|
| Cycle 1 - Day 18 |
|
|
| Cycle 2 - Day 18 |
|
|
| Cycle 4 - Day 18 |
|
|
| Cycle 6 - Day 18 |
|
|