Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Data collection was halted prematurely due to COVID-19.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The investigator proposes an evaluation of a randomized, sustainable intervention in 8 intervention and 8 control pantries. We will enroll a sample clients at the food pantry at baseline and follow them for 1 year to assess changes in overall diet quality (the primary outcome) and cardiovascular health. We will also enroll a sample of clients at follow-up to assess to assess the nutritional quality of food selected at the pantry.
Evaluate the health impact of an intervention targeting the hunger relief network and the clients with food insecurity it serves. The long-term goal of this work is to reduce nutrition-related health disparities by intervening on a system that serves individuals at high risk for chronic disease. In 2014, an estimated 14% of U.S. households experienced food insecurity (i.e., they lacked access to enough food for an active, healthy life for all household members). Large numbers of low-income, racial/ethnic minority, and immigrant families who experience food insecurity rely on a hunger relief network that includes food banks and food pantries. Pantry clients have demonstrated poor nutritional outcomes, high chronic disease rates, and dissatisfaction with the quality and cultural-appropriateness of food offered. Unlike other food assistance programs, there are currently no standards on the nutritional quality of pantry offerings, but recent work by our study team demonstrated the need to improve the healthfulness of hunger relief network inventory. We proposed an evaluation of a randomized, sustainable intervention in 8 intervention and 8 control pantries. We will enroll clients at baseline and follow them for 1 year to assess changes in overall diet quality (the primary outcome). Working with our food bank partners, the intervention at the pantry level targets the supply of nutritious foods. At the client level, the intervention targets healthy food demand. Measured outcomes include overall diet quality (the primary outcome), as assessed by the Healthy Eating Index-2015 (HEI), the nutritional quality of foods selected at the food shelf visit, and cardiovascular disease health (assessed by the American Heart Association's Life's Simple 7 scores). The study will also evaluate the impact of a multilevel intervention on the nutritional quality of pantry offerings. The study also aims to improve implementation of practices that promote a nutrition-focused hunger relief network.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention Food Pantries | Experimental | Food pantries will transform to offer healthier and more appealing food ; the effect on clients will be measured. |
|
| Control Food Pantries | Active Comparator | Food pantries will make no changes during the evaluation period; the effect on clients will be measured. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention Food Pantries | Behavioral | Food pantries will receive consulting services to transform their food offerings and environment in order to influence client health behaviors. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Diet Quality of Clients | Assessed by Healthy Eating Index-2015 scores (scale 0-100), with 100 representing the best possible score (i.e., nutritional quality best aligned with Dietary Guidelines for Americans) | Baseline, 1 year |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Nutritional Quality of Food Selected by Clients at the Food Pantry | Assessed by Healthy Eating Index-2015 scores (scale 0-100), with 100 representing the best possible score (i.e., nutritional quality best aligned with Dietary Guidelines for Americans) | 1 year post-sample comparison |
| Cardiovascular Health |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
-≥18 years old
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Caitlin E Caspi, ScD | University of Connecticut | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Minnesota | Minneapolis | Minnesota | 55414 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 41501671 | Derived | Pratt R, Barsness CB, Gordon N, Canterbury M, Peterson H, Caspi CE. Qualitative perspectives on the implementation of an intervention transforming food pantry environments. BMC Public Health. 2026 Jan 7;26(1):463. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-26036-2. | |
| 35666208 | Derived | Caspi C, Gordon N, Bliss Barsness C, Bohen L, Canterbury M, Peterson H, Wolfson J, Pratt R. A randomized study of food pantry environment-level change following the SuperShelf intervention. Transl Behav Med. 2022 Jul 7;12(6):764-774. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibac003. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Two samples of participants were enrolled. The first (Sample A, n=317), had measures collected at two time points. They were enrolled at baseline and followed for one year to assess change in diet quality (primary outcome) and cardiovascular measures (secondary outcome). The second (Sample B, n=187) had measures collected at one time point only. They were enrolled at the pantry during the follow-up period to assess post-intervention client cart diet quality (secondary outcome).
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Intervention Food Pantries and Clients | Food pantries will transform to offer healthier and more appealing food; the effect on clients will be measured; Intervention Food Pantries: Food pantries will receive consulting services to transform their food offerings and environment in order to influence client health behaviors. Intervention Clients: Clients who use and were recruited at intervention food pantries. |
| FG001 | Control Food Pantries and Clients | Food pantries will make no changes during the evaluation period; the effect on clients will be measured. Control Food Pantries: Normal food pantry operations during the evaluation period. Control Clients: Clients who use and were recruited at control food pantries. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample A (Followed for 1 Year) |
| |||||||||||||
| Sample B (Evaluated at Post Only) |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Intervention Food Pantries and Clients | Food pantries will transform to offer healthier and more appealing food; the effect on clients will be measured; Intervention Food Pantries: Food pantries will receive consulting services to transform their food offerings and environment in order to influence client health behaviors; Intervention Clients: Clients who use and were recruited at intervention food pantries. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Customized | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Overall Diet Quality of Clients | Assessed by Healthy Eating Index-2015 scores (scale 0-100), with 100 representing the best possible score (i.e., nutritional quality best aligned with Dietary Guidelines for Americans) | COVID-19 disrupted intervention and post-evaluation activities in 5 sites. The analysis includes participants in Sample A at the 11 completed sites. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Pre-post change in HEI score on a scale | Baseline, 1 year |
|
Adverse events were collected during the period of follow-up for each participant. In Sample A, the mean follow-up was 13.9 months. In Sample B, there was no follow-up and no monitoring of adverse events.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Intervention Food Pantries and Clients | Food pantries will transform to offer healthier and more appealing food; the effect on clients will be measured; Intervention Food Pantries: Food pantries will receive consulting services to transform their food offerings and environment in order to influence client health behaviors; Intervention Clients: Clients who use and were recruited at intervention food pantries. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caitlin Caspi | University of Connecticut | (860) 486-2834 | caitlin.caspi@uconn.edu |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Nov 10, 2020 | Nov 11, 2021 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
| ICF | No | No | Yes | Informed Consent Form | Feb 15, 2019 | Nov 11, 2021 | ICF_001.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005518 | Food Preferences |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005247 | Feeding Behavior |
| D001519 | Behavior |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Control Food Pantries | Other | Normal food pantry use |
|
American Heart Association's Life's Simple 7 (LS7) scores (scale 0 -7), with 7 representing the best possible score for cardiovascular health |
| Baseline, 1 year |
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
| BG001 | Control Food Pantries and Clients | Food pantries will make no changes during the evaluation period; the effect on clients will be measured; Control Food Pantries: Normal food pantry operations during the evaluation period; Control Clients: Clients who use and were recruited at control food pantries. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Participants |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | 6 total participants did not provide binary sex designations. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| OG001 | Control Food Pantries and Clients | Food pantries will make no changes during the evaluation period; the effect on clients will be measured; Control Food Pantries: Normal food pantry operations during the evaluation period; Control Clients: Clients who use and were recruited at control food pantries. |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Nutritional Quality of Food Selected by Clients at the Food Pantry | Assessed by Healthy Eating Index-2015 scores (scale 0-100), with 100 representing the best possible score (i.e., nutritional quality best aligned with Dietary Guidelines for Americans) | COVID-19 disrupted intervention and post-evaluation activities in 5 sites. The analysis includes participants in Sample B at the 11 completed sites. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Post-sample HEI score | 1 year post-sample comparison |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Cardiovascular Health | American Heart Association's Life's Simple 7 (LS7) scores (scale 0 -7), with 7 representing the best possible score for cardiovascular health | COVID-19 disrupted intervention and post-evaluation activities in 5 sites. The analysis includes participants in Sample A at the 11 completed sites. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Pre-post change in LS7 score on a scale | Baseline, 1 year |
|
|
|
| 1 |
| 158 |
| 0 |
| 158 |
| 0 |
| 158 |
| EG001 | Control Food Pantries and Clients | Food pantries will make no changes during the evaluation period; the effect on clients will be measured; Control Food Pantries: Normal food pantry operations during the evaluation period; Control Clients: Clients who use and were recruited at control food pantries. | 1 | 159 | 0 | 159 | 0 | 159 |
Not provided
Not provided
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| White |
|
| More than one race |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|