Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Obsessive Compulsive Foundation | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The investigators are examining whether conditions of ambiguity during decision-making may prime intolerance of uncertainty beliefs (i.e., difficulties coping with ambiguity, unpredictability, and the future) and lead to impaired performance when individuals with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) are making uncertain decisions compared to non-psychiatric controls.
The primary aims of this study are to examine the extent to which individuals with OCD avoid decisions that involve ambiguity through the use of self-report and behavioral measures. Specifically, the investigators will examine how individuals with OCD minimize risk at the expense of monetary profit under conditions of ambiguity (relative to risky but unambiguous options) compared to non-psychiatric controls utilizing a series of judgment and decision-making (JDM) tasks.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| OCD Group | Experimental | Meet Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) criteria for principal OCD. These participants will complete clinician interviews, self-report questionnaires, and receive the Decision-Making Tasks Intervention. |
|
| Non-psychiatric Control Group | Experimental | No current DSM-5 diagnosis. These participants will also complete clinician interviews, self-report questionnaires, and receive the Decision-Making Tasks Intervention. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision-Making Tasks | Behavioral | All participants will receive a structured diagnostic assessment and complete self-report questionnaires about cognitive factors, decision-making styles, and anxiety/mood symptoms. They then will be guided through three judgment and decision-making (JDM) paradigms (the Risk and Ambiguity Task, the Beads Task, and the Balloon Analogue Risk Task), each of which each has been modified to differ by whether the likelihood of potential adverse outcomes is provided (or whether it remains ambiguous). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Ambiguity aversion score on the Risk and Ambiguity Task | In the Risk and Ambiguity Task participants make repeated choices between a certain payoff vs. a gamble. On low ambiguity trials, the likelihood of the gamble is known (i.e., "risky" lottery). On high ambiguity trials, the likelihood of the gamble is unknown (i.e., "ambiguous" lottery). Ambiguity aversion = (number of 50% risky lotteries chosen / total number of 50% risky lotteries) - (# of ambiguous lotteries chosen / total number of ambiguous lotteries). | Day 1 |
| Average adjusted pump scores on the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART) | In the BART participants blow up a series of virtual balloons. With each pump: (a) they earn 5 cents that accumulate in a temporary reserve, but (b) the likelihood of the balloon exploding increases. When this occurs participants lose the money in their temporary reserve. At any time, participants can choose to transfer their earnings to a permanent savings bank (and move to the next balloon). Thus, participants weigh the likelihood of the negative outcome (i.e., the balloon exploding and losing money) with the potential gains (i.e., 5 cents per pump). In the low ambiguity version of the task, the likelihood of the balloon exploding is known. In the high ambiguity version, the likelihood of the balloon exploding is unknown. The average adjusted pump score = average number of pumps on trials in which the balloons did not explode. | Day 1 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Money spent on draws to decision (DTD) in the Beads Task | The Beads Task is a probabilistic inference task in which participants gather as much information (i.e., beads) as they desire before feeling "certain" enough to decide from which jar the beads have come. Participants will start off with a fixed amount of money, and invest money for each bead requested. If they answer correctly, the money earned will be transferred to a savings bank; if incorrect, they lose any earnings from that trial. Thus, participants must consider the tradeoff between the number of beads they choose and their accuracy as they decide. In the low ambiguity version of the task, the ratio of colored beads inside the jar is known. In the high ambiguity version, the ratio of colored beads inside the jar is unknown. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Ryan J Jacoby, Ph.D. | Massachusetts General Hospital | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Massachusetts General Hospital | Boston | Massachusetts | 02114 | United States |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009771 | Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001008 | Anxiety Disorders |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided
The current study has two diagnostic arms (the OCD group and the Non-Psychiatric Control group) all receiving a single interventional protocol.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Day 1 |
| Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale (IUS-12) | The IUS-12 measures reactions to uncertainty, ambiguity, and the future consisting of two subscales: Prospective and Inhibitory IU. | Day 1 |