Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The decision to halt the study is due to a discovered discrepancy between the study design and the anticipated use of the TIES product system.
A new study will be launched during late 2024.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Devicia AB (now part of Veranex) | UNKNOWN |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Study to assess the safety, performance and durability of the TIES® transcutaneous titanium implant in patients requiring a permanent ileostomy.
This is a multicentre, open-label, single-arm clinical study that will assess the safety, performance and durability of the TIES® transcutaneous titanium implant in patients requiring a permanent ileostomy (a surgical procedure that involves connecting the small intestine to the skin to create an opening).
The Transcutaneous Implant Evacuation System (TIES®) is a medical device designed to enable continence control for patients who would otherwise need to wear an ileostomy bag.
Eligible subjects will undergo a conventional ileostomy procedure under general anaesthesia and have the TIES® Port implanted. To date, the TIES® has been evaluated in 11 patients in 2 clinical studies. This study aims to collect more data that will assess performance, durability, safety and the impact that the TIES® has on a patient's quality of life.
The study will enroll 50 patients across Europe that require a permanent ileostomy, including patients with ulcerative colitis, familial adenomatous polyposis coli or other diseases such as Crohn´s disease.
Study subjects are expected to participate for approximately 1 year following surgical placement of the TIES® Port. Participation will involve a screening period, surgical implantation of the device (in-patient) and scheduled follow-up assessments out to 1 year post implant.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Single | Experimental |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TIES® (Transcutaneous Implant Evacuation System) | Device | Transcutaneous Implant Evacuation System |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Absence of Visible Leakage or Fecal Staining of Clothing at 24 Weeks | Absence of visible leakage or fecal staining of clothing at 24 weeks after implantation of the TIES® Port. | 24 weeks after implantation of the TIES® Port |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Absence of Visible Leakage or Fecal Staining of Clothing at 16 Weeks | Absence of visible leakage or fecal staining of clothing at 16 weeks assessed in a diary | 16 weeks |
| Absence of Visible Leakage or Fecal Staining of Clothing 36 Weeks |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Ludvig Linton, PhD | OstomyCure AS | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gothenburgs University Hospital | Gothenburg | Sweden | ||||
| Linköpings University Hospital |
Currently no plan to share IPD but OstomyCure would be open to requests
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | TIES Implantation | TIES® (Transcutaneous Implant Evacuation System) implantation |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Single | TIES® (Transcutaneous Implant Evacuation System): Transcutaneous Implant Evacuation System |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Absence of Visible Leakage or Fecal Staining of Clothing at 24 Weeks | Absence of visible leakage or fecal staining of clothing at 24 weeks after implantation of the TIES® Port. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 24 weeks after implantation of the TIES® Port |
|
|
2.5 years
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Single | TIES® (Transcutaneous Implant Evacuation System): Transcutaneous Implant Evacuation System |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Infection, implant site | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cardiac event | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic affected the recruitment rate, and the number of subjects who participated in and completed the investigation was few. Of those enrolled, there were many dropouts, e.g. due to leakage at the lid. The low number of evaluable study participants limited the assessment of the medical device performance.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Johan Järte | OstomyCure AS | +46 706 524 532 | jjaerte@ostomycure.com |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Feb 2, 2022 | Jan 22, 2025 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
Not provided
Prospective single-arm multicentre open clinical study
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Absence of visible leakage or fecal staining of clothing at 36 weeks assessed in a diary
| 36 weeks |
| Absence of Visible Leakage or Fecal Staining of Clothing at 52 Weeks | Absence of visible leakage or fecal staining of clothing at 52 weeks assessed in a diary | 52 weeks |
| Proportion of Implanted Subjects Using the TIES Lid at 16 Weeks | Proportion of implanted subjects using the TIES Lid for continence control at 16 weeks | 16 weeks |
| Proportion of Implanted Subjects Using the TIES Lid at 24 Weeks | Proportion of implanted subjects using the TIES Lid for continence control at 24 weeks | 24 weeks |
| Proportion of Implanted Subjects Using the TIES Lid at 36 Weeks | Proportion of implanted subjects using the TIES Lid for continence control at 36 weeks | 36 weeks |
| Proportion of Implanted Subjects Using the TIES Lid at 52 Weeks | Proportion of implanted subjects using the TIES Lid for continence control at 52 weeks | 52 weeks |
| Subject's Preferences Regarding Maintaining Body Hygiene | Number of subjects who found it easier using the TIES® Lid than using stoma bags for periodic emptying of waste | 52 weeks |
| Subject's Preferences Regarding Daily Activities | Number of subjects who found it easier using the TIES® Lid than using stoma bags for periodic emptying of waste | 52 weeks |
| Subject's Preferences: Being Worried About Odor From Stoma | Number of subjects who were less worried when using the TIES® Lid than when using stoma bags for periodic emptying of waste | 52 weeks |
| Subject's Preferences: Being Worried About Leakage From Stoma | Number of subjects who were less worried when using the TIES® Lid than when using stoma bags for periodic emptying of waste | 52 weeks |
| Subject's Preferences: Recommending the TIES Solution | Number of subjects who would recommend the TIES solution to friends or family who need to undergo ileostomy | 52 weeks |
| Linköping |
| Sweden |
| St James' University Hospital | Leeds | LS9 7TF | United Kingdom |
| University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust | Plymouth | PL6 5FP | United Kingdom |
| Physician Decision |
|
| Lost to Follow-up |
|
| Death |
|
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
|
| Secondary | Absence of Visible Leakage or Fecal Staining of Clothing at 16 Weeks | Absence of visible leakage or fecal staining of clothing at 16 weeks assessed in a diary | At 16 weeks | Posted | Number | participants | 16 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Absence of Visible Leakage or Fecal Staining of Clothing 36 Weeks | Absence of visible leakage or fecal staining of clothing at 36 weeks assessed in a diary | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 36 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Absence of Visible Leakage or Fecal Staining of Clothing at 52 Weeks | Absence of visible leakage or fecal staining of clothing at 52 weeks assessed in a diary | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 52 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Proportion of Implanted Subjects Using the TIES Lid at 16 Weeks | Proportion of implanted subjects using the TIES Lid for continence control at 16 weeks | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 16 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Proportion of Implanted Subjects Using the TIES Lid at 24 Weeks | Proportion of implanted subjects using the TIES Lid for continence control at 24 weeks | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 24 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Proportion of Implanted Subjects Using the TIES Lid at 36 Weeks | Proportion of implanted subjects using the TIES Lid for continence control at 36 weeks | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 36 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Proportion of Implanted Subjects Using the TIES Lid at 52 Weeks | Proportion of implanted subjects using the TIES Lid for continence control at 52 weeks | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 52 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Subject's Preferences Regarding Maintaining Body Hygiene | Number of subjects who found it easier using the TIES® Lid than using stoma bags for periodic emptying of waste | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 52 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Subject's Preferences Regarding Daily Activities | Number of subjects who found it easier using the TIES® Lid than using stoma bags for periodic emptying of waste | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 52 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Subject's Preferences: Being Worried About Odor From Stoma | Number of subjects who were less worried when using the TIES® Lid than when using stoma bags for periodic emptying of waste | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 52 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Subject's Preferences: Being Worried About Leakage From Stoma | Number of subjects who were less worried when using the TIES® Lid than when using stoma bags for periodic emptying of waste | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 52 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Subject's Preferences: Recommending the TIES Solution | Number of subjects who would recommend the TIES solution to friends or family who need to undergo ileostomy | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 52 weeks |
|
|
|
| 1 |
| 28 |
| 9 |
| 28 |
| 19 |
| 28 |
| Suspicion of pyoderma gangrenosum | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Self-explant of device (device misplacement or displacement) | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Ileus | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Re-fashioning of ileostomy | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Sepsis | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Intestinal obstruction | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Stenosis, stoma related event | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Erythema at site | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Narrow passage caused by irritated or swollen intestine | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pain and redness following bowel resection to device (mucocutaneous separation/ peristomal skin lesi | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Infection and dehydration | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Skin breakdown, pain, swelling | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Dehiscence and leaking around the device | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pelvic infection | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Incorrect ingrowth | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Cardiac arrest | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Dyspepsia | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Gastroenteritis | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Granulation | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Infection, blood | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Infection, bowel | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Infection, pulmonary | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Intestinal obstruction | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Irritable bowel | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Non-optimal ingrowth | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Skin reaction | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
Data need to be submitted by the PIs to the sponsor for review and comment at least 60 days prior to submission for publication, public dissemination, or review by a publication committee. All reasonable comments made by the sponsor shall be incorporated into the publication. The sponsor shall be entitled to make a reasoned request that publication be delayed for a period of up to 6 months from the date of first submission to the sponsor.