Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Barts Cancer Institute | OTHER |
| Abramson Cancer Center at Penn Medicine | OTHER |
| Salk Institute for Biological Studies | OTHER |
| Mayo Clinic |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to determine if the combination of paclitaxel protein bound, gemcitabine, cisplatin, paricalcitol are effective in individuals with previously untreated metastatic pancreatic cancer.
Pancreatic cancer continues to be a highly lethal disease with an overall 5 year survival of only 8%. Since 2004, the incidence of pancreatic cancer has been increasing by 1.5% per year and it is estimated that there will be 53,670 new cases diagnosed in the United States in 2017, with 43,090 expected deaths. Pancreatic cancer is the third most common cause of cancer-related deaths in both men and women, and the incidence is about equal in both sexes. Of all types of pancreatic cancers, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) is by far the most common, representing 80% of cases. Due to lack of adequate screening techniques, greater than 80% of patients at the time of diagnosis present with unresectable, advanced disease. Standard treatment options for inoperable patients with locally advanced and metastatic PDA have been quite limited. Gemcitabine monotherapy, approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1996, demonstrated a median survival of 5.7 months, and has been the mainstay in treating patients with PDA. The first combination regimen to demonstrate any survival benefit compared with gemcitabine alone was gemcitabine plus erlotinib, with median survival of 6.24 months versus 5.91 months for single agent gemcitabine.
A meta-analysis of randomized trials by Heinemann and colleagues showed that patients with advanced pancreatic cancer and a good performance status may benefit from combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine plus a platinum agent or a fluoropyrimidine. Multiple combination regimens are being utilized.
Recently, the regimen of 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin/irinotecan/oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX) compared with gemcitabine demonstrated improvement in both progression-free survival (PFS, 6.4 vs. 3.3 months) and overall survival (OS, 11.1 vs. 6.8 months) for patients with a good performance status. FOLFIRINOX, however, is associated with substantial grade 3 and 4 toxicities, including diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, fatigue, neutropenia and febrile neutropenia, and cannot be given to patients >76 years of age or in some cases patients with head of the pancreas tumors. An international phase III trial comparing paclitaxel protein bound (now called paclitaxel protein bound) plus gemcitabine to gemcitabine single agent demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in OS (8.5 vs. 6.7 months) for advanced pancreatic cancer patients using the gemcitabine and paclitaxel protein bound over gemcitabine alone.
A recently completed phase Ib/II trial of the combination of paclitaxel protein bound plus gemcitabine plus cisplatin in previously untreated stage IV pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients was presented at the 2017 Gastrointestinal Cancer Symposium. In 24 patients with stage IV pancreatic cancer they reported 8.3% complete response (CR), 62.5% partial response (PR), 16.7% stable disease and 12.5% progressive disease. The rationale for adding cisplatin to paclitaxel protein bound and gemcitabine is that in a study of 1,029 patients whose pancreatic cancer tumors underwent molecular profiling, 57% of these tumors were negative for expression of the excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1), indicating sensitivity to a platinum anti-tumor agent. In addition to the above, in our whole genome/transcriptome sequencing analysis, we found that abnormal repair pathways were a feature of all of the pancreatic cancers that were sequenced. Cisplatin prevents cellular deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) repair by binding to and causing crosslinking of DNA, triggering apoptosis. Cisplatin has been used in other combination regimens to treat patients with PDA. For example, the cisplatin, epirubicin, 5-fluorouracil and gemcitabine (PEFG) regimen had an acceptable toxicity profile and was associated with a 24% partial response rate, 5 month PFS and 8.3 month OS as second line therapy.
Most recently, a study showed that Vitamin D can change the pancreatic tumor microenvironment from an immunologically suppressive (tumor promoting) one to an immunologically hostile one (e.g. decreased IL-6, decreased CXCL12 etc.). In addition, in the same study, the vitamin D ligand calcipotriol decreased production of collagen, decreased myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) and decreased regulatory T cells. Remarkably, in clinical practice, the vitamin D analogue paricalcitol was observed to reverse chemotherapy resistance. Two individuals with pancreatic adenocarcinoma who were receiving paclitaxel protein bound and gemcitabine based combination chemotherapy developed progressive disease which was reversed by the addition of paricalcitol.
Based upon these promising clinical and pre-clinical data we are initiating a clinical trial combining paclitaxel protein bound, gemcitabine, and cisplatin for patients with metastatic PDA. When these patients develop progressive disease the vitamin D analog paricalcitol will be added to the regimen. The treatment will continue until further disease progression.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Paricalcitol (Zemplar) | Experimental | Participants will be treated with the regimen according to the study protocol. Participants will complete 3 cycles (cycle is 21 days) and then will be evaluated for CA19-9 normalization and undergo imaging to determine response, if any. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paricalcitol (Zemplar) | Drug | combination therapy |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Best Overall Response (BOR) | Best overall response (BOR) is defined as the best tumor response recorded 9 weeks after treatment initiation Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1). Responses are categorized as: complete response (CR), disappearance of all target lesions; partial response (PR), ≥30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; stable disease (SD), no change in target lesion size; and progressive disease (PD), ≥20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions. MRI completed every 3 cycles of treatment to determine if the tumor responded to treatment. A confirmatory positron emission tomography (PET) scan could be ordered to confirm CR. | From enrollment until the end of 3+ treatment cycles (each cycle is 21 days), up to 190 days. |
| Progression-free Survival (PFS) | Progression-free survival (PFS) is defined as the time from starting paricalcitol until disease progression. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1), as a ≥20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions. | From start of paricalcitol to disease progression, up to 7 months |
| Overall Survival (OS) | Overall survival (OS) is defined as the length of time that patients remained alive after starting paricalcitol treatment. | From start of paricalcitol through follow-up, up to 16.5 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Serum Levels of Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) | Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) is a validated serum biomarker for pancreatic cancer tumor burden used to monitor treatment response. Serum CA19-9 values were measured after each cycle of treatment to identify if they normalized over time. The median beta coefficient (slope of the regression line) among CA 19-9 expressing participants in a linear mixed effects model of log-transformed CA 19-9 is reported here. A positive beta coefficient is associated with increasing CA 19-9 levels over time (higher tumor burden; no treatment response), while a negative beta coefficient is associated with decreasing CA 19-9 levels over time (lower tumor burden; treatment response). |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Erkut Borazanci, MD | HonorHealth Research Institute | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HonorHealth Research Institute | Scottsdale | Arizona | 85258 | United States |
If the study site is a 'covered site' under the definitions of the Health Insurance Portability and Accounting Act (HIPAA), the Investigator will ensure that the patient consents to the use of data by HonorHealth and its designees for the purposes of regulatory submissions, study publications, and drug approval.
Stand Up To Cancer (SU2C) will be notified of any outputs of the research such as guidelines, publications, presentation, changes in service delivery etc. prior to external submission or presentation. In any oral or written report or poster presentation of Results or otherwise relating to the Research, the support of Cancer Research UK (CRUK), SU2C and the Lustgarten foundation will be acknowledged, displaying the relevant logs where possible. Any publications resulting from research funded in whole or in part by the Grant must be cited as required per signed confidentiality agreements.
To be determined
The Investigator and any other study personnel involved in this study shall not disclose, or use for any purposes (other than for the performance of this study), any data, records, or other information (hereinafter collectively "information") disclosed to the Investigator or other study personnel. Such information shall remain the confidential and proprietary property of HonorHealth, and shall be disclosed only to the Investigator or other designated study personnel.
The obligation of non-disclosure shall not apply to the following:
Not provided
Not provided
34 participants with metastatic PDAC were enrolled at 2 sites. 16 participants went on to commence paricalcitol upon attaining stable disease (SD) or progressive disease (PD) on first-line chemotherapy. Data from those 16 patients were analyzed for the purposes of this study.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Paricalcitol (Zemplar) | Participants will be treated with the regimen according to the study protocol. Participants will complete 3 cycles (cycle is 21 days) and then will be evaluated for CA19-9 normalization and undergo imaging to determine response, if any. Paricalcitol (Zemplar): combination therapy |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Oct 25, 2018 |
Not provided
Not provided
| OTHER |
| Princeton University | OTHER |
| Imaging Endpoints | UNKNOWN |
| Translational Genomics Research Institute | OTHER |
| Stand Up To Cancer | OTHER |
| Cancer Research UK | OTHER |
| Lustgarten Foundation | OTHER |
| University of California, San Diego | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| At the end of each treatment cycle (each cycle is 21 days), up to 30 weeks. |
| Adverse Events Possibly Related to Paricalcitol | The number of patients who experienced an adverse event (AE) determined to be possibly related to the study treatment of paricalcitol. Adverse events occurring were graded according to the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0 (CTCAE). Grade refers to the severity of the AE and are given on a 1-5 scale, with each scale having unique clinical descriptions of severity for each AE based on this general guideline:
| From enrollment through 30 days after last paricalcitol treatment, up to 16.5 months |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Paricalcitol (Zemplar) | Participants will be treated with the regimen according to the study protocol. Participants will complete 3 cycles (cycle is 21 days) and then will be evaluated for CA19-9 normalization and undergo imaging to determine response, if any. Paricalcitol (Zemplar): combination therapy |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Median | Full Range | years |
| |||||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) | The Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) ranges from 0-100% and allows patients to be graded and classified by functional impairment. This can be used to compare effectiveness of different therapies and to assess the prognosis in individual patients. Lower KPS is associated with worse survival. 0% = unable to care for self, requires equivalent of institutional or hospital care, disease may be progressing; 100% = able to carry on normal activity and to work, no special care needed. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Best Overall Response (BOR) | Best overall response (BOR) is defined as the best tumor response recorded 9 weeks after treatment initiation Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1). Responses are categorized as: complete response (CR), disappearance of all target lesions; partial response (PR), ≥30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; stable disease (SD), no change in target lesion size; and progressive disease (PD), ≥20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions. MRI completed every 3 cycles of treatment to determine if the tumor responded to treatment. A confirmatory positron emission tomography (PET) scan could be ordered to confirm CR. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | From enrollment until the end of 3+ treatment cycles (each cycle is 21 days), up to 190 days. |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Serum Levels of Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) | Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) is a validated serum biomarker for pancreatic cancer tumor burden used to monitor treatment response. Serum CA19-9 values were measured after each cycle of treatment to identify if they normalized over time. The median beta coefficient (slope of the regression line) among CA 19-9 expressing participants in a linear mixed effects model of log-transformed CA 19-9 is reported here. A positive beta coefficient is associated with increasing CA 19-9 levels over time (higher tumor burden; no treatment response), while a negative beta coefficient is associated with decreasing CA 19-9 levels over time (lower tumor burden; treatment response). | n=13 patients were CA 19-9 expressers and could be included in this analysis. n=3 were not CA 19-9 expressers and excluded from this analysis. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | Beta coefficient | At the end of each treatment cycle (each cycle is 21 days), up to 30 weeks. |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Adverse Events Possibly Related to Paricalcitol | The number of patients who experienced an adverse event (AE) determined to be possibly related to the study treatment of paricalcitol. Adverse events occurring were graded according to the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0 (CTCAE). Grade refers to the severity of the AE and are given on a 1-5 scale, with each scale having unique clinical descriptions of severity for each AE based on this general guideline:
| Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | From enrollment through 30 days after last paricalcitol treatment, up to 16.5 months |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Progression-free Survival (PFS) | Progression-free survival (PFS) is defined as the time from starting paricalcitol until disease progression. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1), as a ≥20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions. | n=15 experienced progression and were evaluable for PFS; n=1 participant was progression-free at their last study scan and was censored from this analysis. | Posted | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | Months | From start of paricalcitol to disease progression, up to 7 months |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Overall Survival (OS) | Overall survival (OS) is defined as the length of time that patients remained alive after starting paricalcitol treatment. | Posted | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | Months | From start of paricalcitol through follow-up, up to 16.5 months |
|
|
From enrollment until 30 days after last dose of study drug, up to 16.5 months
Adverse events were collected and graded utilizing the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Paricalcitol (Zemplar) | Participants will be treated with the regimen according to the study protocol. Participants will complete 3 cycles (cycle is 21 days) and then will be evaluated for CA19-9 normalization and undergo imaging to determine response, if any. Paricalcitol (Zemplar): combination therapy | 16 | 16 | 7 | 16 | 10 | 16 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dyspnea | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | CTCAE v4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Biliary tract infection | Infections and infestations | CTCAE v4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pain | General disorders | CTCAE v4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Tumor pain | General disorders | CTCAE v4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Platelet count decreased | Investigations | CTCAE v4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pleural effusion | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | CTCAE v4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE v4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fever | General disorders | CTCAE v4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ascites | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE v4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE v4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Flushing | Vascular disorders | CTCAE v4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | CTCAE v4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE v4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Constipation | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE v4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diarrhea | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE v4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE v4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE v4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Edema limbs | General disorders | CTCAE v4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fatigue | General disorders | CTCAE v4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gait disturbance | General disorders | CTCAE v4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pain | General disorders | CTCAE v4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| COVID-19 | Infections and infestations | CTCAE v4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | CTCAE v4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fall | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | CTCAE v4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Aspartate aminotransferase increased | Investigations | CTCAE v4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Blood bilirubin increased | Investigations | CTCAE v4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Neutrophil count decreased | Investigations | CTCAE v4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Platelet count decreased | Investigations | CTCAE v4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypoglycemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | CTCAE v4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vitamin D deficiency | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | CTCAE v4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arthralgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | CTCAE v4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Back pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | CTCAE v4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Myalgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | CTCAE v4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lethargy | Nervous system disorders | CTCAE v4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Peripheral sensory neuropathy | Nervous system disorders | CTCAE v4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urine discoloration | Renal and urinary disorders | CTCAE v4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pruritus | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | CTCAE v4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rash | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | CTCAE v4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
Limitations of this study include the small sample size, lack of dose escalation, and no placebo control group. Furthermore, exploratory analyses of tumor tissue samples and some circulating markers were unable to be completed due to impacts from the COVID-19 pandemic, limiting our ability to understand if there were any molecular or structural changes to the TME with paricalcitol treatment or systemic pathway impacts.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Erkut Borazanci, MD | HonorHealth Research Institute | 480-583-7120 | eborazanci@honorhealth.com |
| Apr 15, 2025 |
| Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
| ICF | No | No | Yes | Informed Consent Form | May 24, 2019 | Apr 15, 2025 | ICF_001.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010190 | Pancreatic Neoplasms |
| D000230 | Adenocarcinoma |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004067 | Digestive System Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D004701 | Endocrine Gland Neoplasms |
| D004066 | Digestive System Diseases |
| D010182 | Pancreatic Diseases |
| D004700 | Endocrine System Diseases |
| D002277 | Carcinoma |
| D009375 | Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial |
| D009370 | Neoplasms by Histologic Type |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C084656 | paricalcitol |
| D002945 | Cisplatin |
| D013660 | Taxes |
| D000068196 | Albumin-Bound Paclitaxel |
| D000093542 | Gemcitabine |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D017606 | Chlorine Compounds |
| D007287 | Inorganic Chemicals |
| D017672 | Nitrogen Compounds |
| D017671 | Platinum Compounds |
| D004467 | Economics |
| D004472 | Health Care Economics and Organizations |
| D017239 | Paclitaxel |
| D043823 | Taxoids |
| D043822 | Cyclodecanes |
| D003516 | Cycloparaffins |
| D006840 | Hydrocarbons, Alicyclic |
| D006844 | Hydrocarbons, Cyclic |
| D006838 | Hydrocarbons |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
| D004224 | Diterpenes |
| D013729 | Terpenes |
| D000418 | Albumins |
| D011506 | Proteins |
| D000602 | Amino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins |
| D006571 | Heterocyclic Compounds |
| D003841 | Deoxycytidine |
| D003562 | Cytidine |
| D011741 | Pyrimidine Nucleosides |
| D011743 | Pyrimidines |
| D006573 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring |
Not provided
Not provided
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| White |
|
| More than one race |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| 100% |
|
| Progressive disease (PD) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Title | Denominators | Categories | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|