Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Most spinal cord injuries (SCI) are anatomically incomplete - some nerve circuits remain intact, even if the individual cannot feel or control them. Activating spared nerve circuits may improve functional recovery.
With this goal, the Investigators have developed a form of electrical stimulation over the cervical spinal cord that can activate muscles in both hands simultaneously and comfortably. This technique, called cervical electrical stimulation (CES), works at the skin surface - no surgery or other invasive procedures are required.
The long-term goal is to use CES to strengthen residual circuits to hand muscles after SCI. Regaining control over hand function represents the top priority for individuals with cervical SCI.
In the current study, the Investigators first need to better understand how CES works. In the first half of this study, the Investigators will take a systematic approach to determining how CES interacts with other circuits in the spinal cord and the brain. In the second half of the study, the Investigators will test combinations of CES with active hand and wrist movements to find ways to enhance physical movement with CES.
These experiments will improve understanding of electrical stimulation in SCI, and may set the table for future treatments to prolong any short-term benefits observed in this study.
Roughly 60% of spinal cord injuries occur at the cervical level. Most injuries are anatomically incomplete. Activating spared nerve circuits augments functional recovery of the damaged nervous system. With this goal, the Investigators have developed a novel method of non-invasive cervical electrical stimulation (CES). Preliminary data show that CES triggers afferent sensory or efferent motor nerve roots depending on stimulus intensity, resulting in concurrent activation of multiple muscles on both upper limbs. the Investigators aim to use CES to strengthen residual circuits to hand muscles after SCI. Regaining control over hand function represents the top priority for individuals with cervical SCI.
However, much more work needs to be done to better understand underlying CES mechanisms, its interactions with segmental and supraspinal circuits, and its optimal stimulation parameters for improving neural transmission to the hands. This proposal will address these issues.
Mechanistic experiments: 15 able-bodied volunteers and 15 subjects with motor-incomplete cervical spinal cord injury will undergo systematic combinations of CES with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) or peripheral nerve stimuli at varying intensities, sites, and interstimulus intervals.
Mechanistic hypotheses: Conditioning subthreshold CES pulses will potentiate responses to test pulses of TMS and peripheral nerve F-wave stimulation, will reduce responses to test pulses of peripheral nerve H-reflex stimulation, and will modulate response to test suprathreshold CES pulses in either direction depending on conditioning stimulus interval and intensity. These experiments will elucidate CES circuit interactions at both the segmental and supraspinal levels.
Combined CES-volitional movement experiments: 15 able-bodied volunteers and 15 subjects with motor-incomplete cervical spinal cord injury will undergo systematic combinations of CES with volitional wrist and hand movements at varying intensity and effort level.
Combined CES-volitional movement hypotheses: Conditioning subthreshold CES pulses will facilitate concurrent volitional wrist and hand muscle activation. Suprathreshold CES will transiently inhibit concurrent volitional wrist and hand muscle activation. These experiments will shed light on the clinically relevant possibility of using CES to enhance response to physical exercise therapy.
Completion of the proposed studies will characterize CES circuit timing and distribution, and will demonstrate in principle the potential for CES to enhance physical therapy for wrist and hand muscles. Furthermore, this approach is compatible with other interventions, including drug and cell-based treatments.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| All subjects | Experimental | All subjects undergo same full protocol, including CES at rest and CES plus active hand or wrist movements. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CES at rest | Device | CES will be delivered at rest at various intensities, in combination with either electrical stimulation over peripheral nerves or magnetic stimulation over the motor cortex. This is an experiment designed to measure CES interactions with other central and peripheral nerve circuits. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Electromyographic Responses (Active) | Effect of cervical electrical stimulation (CES) on concurrent finger or wrist active movements will be measured via root-mean-square of ongoing muscle activity in various hand and forearm muscles. | up to one day |
| Electromyographic Responses to Transcranial Magnetic and Cervical Electrical Stimulation at Rest | Response of the target hand muscle to transcranial magnetic stimulation (delivered at 120% of resting motor threshold) with or without a conditioning cervical electrical stimulator pulse (delivered at 90% of resting motor threshold) timed to arrive at cervical synapses 2 milliseconds after transcranial pulse arrival. Response is expressed as percentage change relative to the response to unconditioned transcranial magnetic stimulation. | up to one day |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
History of other serious injury or disease of central or peripheral nervous system
History of seizures
Ventilator dependence or patent tracheostomy site
Use of medications that significantly lower seizure threshold
History of head trauma with evidence of brain contusion or hemorrhage or depressed skull fracture on prior imaging
History of implanted:
Significant coronary artery or cardiac conduction disease
Recent history (within past 6 months) of recurrent autonomic dysreflexia, defined as a syndrome of sudden rise in systolic pressure greater than 20 mm Hg (millimeters of mercury) or diastolic pressure greater than 10 mm Hg, without rise in heart rate, accompanied by symptoms such as headache, facial flushing, sweating, nasal congestion, and blurry vision (this will be closely monitored during all screening and testing procedures);
History of bipolar disorder or suicide attempt or active psychosis
Heavy alcohol consumption (> equivalent of 5 ounces of liquor) within previous 48 hours
Open skin lesions over the face, neck, shoulders, or arms
Pregnancy
Unsuitable for study participation as determined by study physician
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Noam Y. Harel, MD, PhD | Bronx VA Medical Center | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| James J. Peters VA Medical Center, Bronx, NY | The Bronx | New York | 10468 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 31887616 | Background | Wu YK, Levine JM, Wecht JR, Maher MT, LiMonta JM, Saeed S, Santiago TM, Bailey E, Kastuar S, Guber KS, Yung L, Weir JP, Carmel JB, Harel NY. Posteroanterior cervical transcutaneous spinal stimulation targets ventral and dorsal nerve roots. Clin Neurophysiol. 2020 Feb;131(2):451-460. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2019.11.056. Epub 2019 Dec 13. | |
| 34830584 |
Not provided
Not provided
A Limited Dataset (LDS), with individual electrophysiological and physiological outcome measures, will be shared in electronic format pursuant to a VA-approved Data Use Agreement. Individually Identifiable Data will be shared pursuant to valid HIPAA Authorization, Informed Consent, and an appropriate written agreement limiting use of the data to the conditions as described in the authorization and consent, and a written assurance from the recipient that the information will be maintained in accordance with the security requirements of 38 CFR Part 1.466.
At time of publication
A Limited Dataset (LDS) will be shared in electronic format pursuant to a VA-approved Data Use Agreement. Individually Identifiable Data will be shared pursuant to valid HIPAA Authorization, Informed Consent, and an appropriate written agreement limiting use of the data to the conditions as described in the authorization and consent, and a written assurance from the recipient that the information will be maintained in accordance with the security requirements of 38 CFR Part 1.466.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Able Bodied | All subjects undergo same full protocol, including CES at rest and CES plus active hand or wrist movements. CES at rest: CES will be delivered at rest at various intensities, in combination with either electrical stimulation over peripheral nerves or magnetic stimulation over the motor cortex. This is an experiment designed to measure CES interactions with other central and peripheral nerve circuits. CES plus active hand or wrist movements: CES will be delivered while the participant performs specific finger or wrist tasks at different degrees of effort. This is an experiment designed to detect momentary changes in muscle function. |
| FG001 | Spinal Cord Injured | All subjects undergo same full protocol, including CES at rest and CES plus active hand or wrist movements. CES at rest: CES will be delivered at rest at various intensities, in combination with either electrical stimulation over peripheral nerves or magnetic stimulation over the motor cortex. This is an experiment designed to measure CES interactions with other central and peripheral nerve circuits. CES plus active hand or wrist movements: CES will be delivered while the participant performs specific finger or wrist tasks at different degrees of effort. This is an experiment designed to detect momentary changes in muscle function. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Able Bodied | All subjects undergo same full protocol, including CES at rest and CES plus active hand or wrist movements. CES at rest: CES will be delivered at rest at various intensities, in combination with either electrical stimulation over peripheral nerves or magnetic stimulation over the motor cortex. This is an experiment designed to measure CES interactions with other central and peripheral nerve circuits. CES plus active hand or wrist movements: CES will be delivered while the participant performs specific finger or wrist tasks at different degrees of effort. This is an experiment designed to detect momentary changes in muscle function. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Electromyographic Responses (Active) | Effect of cervical electrical stimulation (CES) on concurrent finger or wrist active movements will be measured via root-mean-square of ongoing muscle activity in various hand and forearm muscles. | Data collection for this outcome was plagued with technical problems. The relative timing of cervical stimulation relative to active effort was irregularly applied. Grant funding expired. It is not possible to analyze the data collected for this aim. | Posted | up to one day |
|
1 week
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Able-bodied | Volunteers without spinal cord injury. | 0 |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scalp pain/Headache | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
Data collection for the active condition (cervical electrical stimulation during active muscle contraction) was plagued with technical problems, not possible to quantitatively analyze.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noam Y. Harel | Bronx VA Medical Center | 718-584-9000 | 1742 | Noam.harel@va.gov |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Dec 9, 2020 | Nov 5, 2023 | Prot_SAP_001.pdf |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013119 | Spinal Cord Injuries |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013118 | Spinal Cord Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D020196 | Trauma, Nervous System |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| CES plus active hand or wrist movements | Device | CES will be delivered while the participant performs specific finger or wrist tasks at different degrees of effort. This is an experiment designed to detect momentary changes in muscle function. |
|
| Wecht JR, Savage WM, Famodimu GO, Mendez GA, Levine JM, Maher MT, Weir JP, Wecht JM, Carmel JB, Wu YK, Harel NY. Posteroanterior Cervical Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation: Interactions with Cortical and Peripheral Nerve Stimulation. J Clin Med. 2021 Nov 15;10(22):5304. doi: 10.3390/jcm10225304. |
| BG001 | Spinal Cord Injured | All subjects undergo same full protocol, including CES at rest and CES plus active hand or wrist movements. CES at rest: CES will be delivered at rest at various intensities, in combination with either electrical stimulation over peripheral nerves or magnetic stimulation over the motor cortex. This is an experiment designed to measure CES interactions with other central and peripheral nerve circuits. CES plus active hand or wrist movements: CES will be delivered while the participant performs specific finger or wrist tasks at different degrees of effort. This is an experiment designed to detect momentary changes in muscle function. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
|
| Primary | Electromyographic Responses to Transcranial Magnetic and Cervical Electrical Stimulation at Rest | Response of the target hand muscle to transcranial magnetic stimulation (delivered at 120% of resting motor threshold) with or without a conditioning cervical electrical stimulator pulse (delivered at 90% of resting motor threshold) timed to arrive at cervical synapses 2 milliseconds after transcranial pulse arrival. Response is expressed as percentage change relative to the response to unconditioned transcranial magnetic stimulation. | Two enrolled spinal cord injury (SCI) participants failed screening. Data for transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) were excluded from two more SCI participants who were found after screening to either have unacceptable electrical background electromyographic activity or unreliable responses in resting muscle during TMS. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | % change from unconditioned TMS. | up to one day |
|
|
|
| 15 |
| 0 |
| 15 |
| 7 |
| 15 |
| EG001 | Spinal Cord Injury | Participants with chronic SCI between levels C2-C8 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 15 | 7 | 15 |
| Neck pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Sleepy | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Depressed mood | Psychiatric disorders | Systematic Assessment | Temporary |
|
| Paresthesias | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Light-headed | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Metallic taste | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Trouble concentrating | Psychiatric disorders | Systematic Assessment | Transient |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |