Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Michigan State University | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The proposed specific aims of this K01 pilot study were:
Recruitment. Participants were recruited according to eligibility criteria, in close collaboration with community partners. Specifically, health and mental health care centers, as well as community organizations and churches were targeted for recruitment activities. Recruitment also consisted of snowball recruitment from participants exposed to the intervention.
General Description of the Intervention. The Parent Management Training-Oregon model (GenerationPMTO) intervention is delivered primarily to parents in order to strengthen parenting skills in a safe learning environment that empower parents to implement these skills at home. The development of the original GenerationPMTO Spanish manual was conducted by Dr. Domenech-Rodriguez according to a comprehensive model of cultural adaptation research.
The intervention consisted of GenerationPMTO and culturally-focused sessions. The GenerationPMTO-focused sessions are detailed in the core treatment manual and have been translated into Spanish utilizing a rigorous process of translation and consultation with Hispanic scholars. Culturally-focused sessions integrated content from three sources. First, we informed sessions according to relevant literature focused on biculturalism. We also informed the intervention by addressing specific cultural themes that were identified as salient in our qualitative studies, which correspond to existing literature on risk and protective factors associated with Hispanic youth. Finally, parents were invited to reflect on additional cultural values and experiences that they consider relevant to their parenting efforts.
With regard to content of individual sessions, module 1 addressed issues associated with immigration, Hispanic culture, and bicultural frameworks. Module 2 addressed issues associated with parenting and biculturalism. Modules 3-6 covered the GenerationPMTO core components as they apply to adolescent populations. Module 7 consists of an in-person session to refine and troubleshoot parenting skills that parents may consider particularly challenging. To enhance the cultural relevance of GenerationPMTO components, we will present all GenerationPMTO parenting skills according to bicultural frameworks, a strategy highly effective the R34 study.
Modules 8-9 reinforced issues of biculturalism having exposed parents to all PMTO core components. A strong focus on biculturalism is particularly relevant as empirical research has demonstrated that the promotion of biculturalism constitutes an effective protective factor for Hispanic youth in first generation Hispanic families.
Randomization. The individual family was the unit of computer-derived randomization, with PTMO-control balance sought for (a) gender of target youth, and (b) time of recruitment. Assessments. Data collection was completed after recruitment (T1) and upon intervention completion (T2).
Intervention Delivery. The intervention was delivered in a major faith-based organization as this site was the preferred site selected by Latino/a parents. In addition to the parenting intervention, a strong advocacy approach was implemented to address various needs of parents (e.g., referral to job training programs or immigration services).
Analyses. Tests of the primary hypothesis will involve fitting of the more assumption-laden subject-specific multivariate response model to Likelihood of Youth Substance Use (LYUS) sub-scale values, followed by fitting of the somewhat more conservative Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) marginal model with the advantage of fewer assumptions.Our papers will report crude and covariate-adjusted efficacy estimates from both models, allowing readers to draw inferences based on either or both approaches. These same models are used to test the secondary efficacy hypotheses about program impact on parenting skill levels, youth internalizing/externalizing behaviors, and parent stress levels.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Experimental | CAPAS Youth Parenting Intervention |
|
| Wait-list control | No Intervention | Participants allocated to this condition were offered the parenting intervention until all T2 assessments of the intervention arm were completed |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAPAS Youth | Behavioral | 9-week parenting intervention |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Parenting Positive Involvement | Measures quality of parenting practices aimed at improving parent-youth relationship. Scale 0-4, with lower scores indicating worse outcome. | Measured 4-5 months after T1 measurements |
| Parenting Skills Encouragement | Measures quality of parenting practices aimed at motivating children's self-sufficient behaviors. Scale 0-4 with lower scores indicating worse outcomes. | Measured 4-5 months after T1 measurements |
| Parenting Discipline | Measures quality of parental limit setting skills. Scale 0-4 with lower score indicating worse outcome. | Measured 4-5 months after T1 measurements |
| Parenting Supervision. | Measures quality of parenting practices focused on monitoring and supervision. Scale 0-4 with lower score indicating worse outcome. | Measured 4-5 months after T1 measurements |
| Parenting Family Problem Solving | Measures quality of parenting practices aimed at helping youth develop problem solving skills. Scale 0-4 with lower score indicating worse outcome. | Measured 4-5 months after T1 measurements |
| Adolescents' Perceived Risk of Drug Use | Measures changes in youth's perception of drug use. Scale 0-4 with higher score indicating best outcome. | Measured 4-5 months after T1 measurements |
| Adolescents' Likelihood of Drug Use. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Bicultural Involvement Questionnaire | Measures level of acculturation in parents and youth. Scale 1-5. Lower scores indicate US oriented identity and high score indicate Latino-oriented identity. | Measured 4-5 months after T1 measurements |
| Hispanic Stress Inventory |
Not provided
Parent Inclusion Criteria:
Youth inclusion criteria:
Parent Exclusion Criteria:
Focal Youth exclusion criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Jose R Parra-Cardona, Ph.D. | The University of Texas at Austin | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steve Hicks School of Social Work, the University of Texas at Austin | Austin | Texas | 78712 | United States |
According to IRB regulations, no identifiable data will be shared, only aggregate data. However, the timing for sharing is not yet determined.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000294 | Adolescent Behavior |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001519 | Behavior |
Not provided
Not provided
Participants were randomized to one of two conditions: (a) intervention consisting of parenting program, or (b) wait-list control group
Not provided
Not provided
Data manager was in charge of conducting randomization and allocating parents to treatment conditions.
Measures likelihood of youth engaging in drug use. Scale 0-5 with higher score indicating best outcome. Scale 1-5 with higher score indicating worse outcome. |
| Measured 4-5 months after T1 measurements |
| Revised Behavioral Problem checklist | Measures youth's internalizing and externalizing problematic behaviors. Scale 0-2 with lower scores indicating worse outcomes. | Measured 4-5 months after T1 measurements |
Measurements parental stress characteristic of Hispanic immigrant populations. Score 0-5 with higher scores indicating worse outcome. |
| Measure 4-5 months after T1 measurements |