Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The primary objective of this study is aimed at analyzing the ICU triage practices of clinicians at a cancer hospital with and without the use of an algorithm-based triage tool, and to assess whether or not the triage tool improves the consensus amongst practioners on the prioritization of patients for ICU admission. Secondary objectives include assessment of whether or not triage practices based on guidelines correlate with what is done in actual practice.
This is a prospective study designed to evaluate the ICU triage practices of clinicians at MD Anderson Cancer Center using the standard Society of Critical Care Medicine Prioritization Model (SCCMP) versus a uniquely designed flowchart-based triage tool created specifically for the oncologic setting.
Study participants will initially receive either an email explaining the study and asking if they would agree to participate in the survey, or a hard copy of an identical letter. Their participation will remain anonymous, and will strictly be on a volunteer basis. If the participant wishes to participate, they will be given either a link to the survey using an institutionally improved electronic survey tool, or alternatively a hard copy of the survey with identical instructions.
The survey consists of 15 fictional patient case scenarios, and participants will be asked to use the modified SCCMP to prioritize each patient scenario into one of the 5-point likert-scale categories for admission. The participants will be randomized with 1:1 ratio to use either a) the standard SCCMP or b) the SCCMP in addition to a newly designed flowchart-based triage guide to prioritize each patient case scenario into one of the 5-point likert-scale categories.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard SCCMP | Experimental | Health care provider completes triage survey of 15 fictional patient case scenarios using the standard SCCMP to prioritize each for admission. |
|
| SCCMP + Algorithm-based Triage Tool | Experimental | Health care provider completes triage survey of 15 fictional patient case scenarios using SCCMP in addition to a newly designed flowchart-based triage guide to prioritize each for admission. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Survey | Behavioral | Survey of 15 fictional patient case scenarios to be assessed by participant using the standard prioritization or modified SCCMP to prioritize each patient scenario into one of a 5-point likert-scale categories for ICU admission. SCCMP scale categorized as 1-Critically ill to 4-Less likely to require ICU. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Agreement among clinicians for each of triage tools: SCCMP Standard versus SCCMP + Algorithm-based Triage Tool | Survey responses used to evaluate the ICU triage practices of clinicians using the standard SCCMP versus a uniquely designed flowchart-based triage tool created specifically for the oncologic setting. Participants are randomized to use either a) the standard SCCMP or b) the SCCMP in addition to a newly designed flowchart-based triage guide to prioritize 15 fictional patient case scenarios into one of the 5-point likert-scale categories for admission. SCCMP system defines those that will benefit most from the ICU (Priority 1) to those that will not benefit at all (Priority 4) from ICU admission. Reported proportion of clinicians choosing category i in the 5-point likert-scale, i=1, 2, 3, 4a or 4b, for a particular patient case. The range of the entropy is between 0 (perfect agreement among the clinicians) and 1.61 (total disagreement among the clinicians). | 20 minutes for participant survey completion |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
1) Study participant must be a health care provider who frequently refers or accepts oncologic patients to the ICU
Exclusion Criteria:
1) none
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Nisha Rathi, MD | UT MD Anderson Cancer Center | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latino-American Critical Care Trial Network (LACTIN) | Houston | Texas | 77030 | United States | ||
| The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center |
Not provided
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| The University of Texas (UT) MD Anderson Cancer Center Official Website | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011795 | Surveys and Questionnaires |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003625 | Data Collection |
| D004812 | Epidemiologic Methods |
| D008919 | Investigative Techniques |
| D017531 | Health Care Evaluation Mechanisms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
| Algorithm-based Triage Tool | Behavioral | Newly designed flowchart-based triage guide to prioritize each patient case scenario into one of the 5-point likert-scale categories, used in conjunction with SCCMP for ICU admission. |
|
| Houston |
| Texas |
| 77030 |
| United States |
| 5th International Oncology Course Conference | Manta | Manabí Province | Ecuador |
| D011787 | Quality of Health Care |
| D017530 | Health Care Quality, Access, and Evaluation |
| D011634 | Public Health |
| D004778 | Environment and Public Health |