Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This prospective, randomized controlled trial enrolled a convenience sample of adults and children presenting to two Level 1 trauma centers over 12-months with subcutaneous skin abscesses necessitating drainage. Two methods of drainage were compared: 1) the LOOP technique or 2) standard packing technique.
This prospective, randomized controlled trial enrolled a convenience sample of adults and children presenting to two Level 1 trauma centers over 12-months with subcutaneous skin abscesses necessitating drainage. Patients were excluded if the abscess was on the hand, foot, or face or if it required admission or operative intervention. Patients were followed over 10 days to determine the primary outcome of treatment failure defined by need for admission, IV antibiotics, or repeat drainage within 10-day follow-up. The secondary outcomes included ease of procedure, ease of care, pain after insertion and patient satisfaction using a 10-point numeric rating.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| LOOP Technique | Experimental | Placement of subcutaneous loop drain |
|
| Incision and Drainage | Active Comparator | Standard Incision and Drainage Technique |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LOOP Technique | Procedure | Placement of subcutaneous loop drain |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment Failure | Need for admission, IV antibiotics, or repeat drainage within 10-day follow-up derived from descriptive nature | 10 Days |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Procedure Pain | Procedure Pain using Likert scale 1-10 | At time of procedure |
| Ease of procedure | Ease of procedure using Likert 1-10 scale |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25435407 | Background | Ladde JG, Baker S, Rodgers CN, Papa L. The LOOP technique: a novel incision and drainage technique in the treatment of skin abscesses in a pediatric ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Feb;33(2):271-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.10.014. Epub 2014 Oct 16. | |
| 32770686 | Derived | Ladde J, Baker S, Lilburn N, Wan M, Papa L. A Randomized Controlled Trial of Novel Loop Drainage Technique Versus Standard Incision and Drainage in the Treatment of Skin Abscesses. Acad Emerg Med. 2020 Dec;27(12):1229-1240. doi: 10.1111/acem.14106. Epub 2020 Oct 11. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Link to PubMed Article | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000038 | Abscess |
| D018461 | Soft Tissue Infections |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013492 | Suppuration |
| D007239 | Infections |
| D007249 | Inflammation |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C000705129 | LAMP assay |
| D004322 | Drainage |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
| D013514 | Surgical Procedures, Operative |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Standard incision and drainage |
| Procedure |
Incise and drain with placement of packing |
|
| At time of procedure |
| Ease of care | Ease of care using 1-10 Likert scale | During 10 days |
| Pain on follow-up | Pain on follow-up using 1-10 Likert scale | 10 days |
| Patient satisfaction | Patient satisfaction using Patient derived Likert scale | During 10 days |
| D013568 |
| Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |