Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The aim of the current study is to examine the contribution of intense pulsed light (IPL) for relieving signs and symptoms of dry eye due to meibomian gland dysfunction. The effect of IPL will be examined in a study designed as a randomized controlled trial. In the study arm, subjects will undergo 4 treatment sessions, consisting of IPL pulses immediately followed by meibomian gland expression (MGX). In the control arm, subjects will undergo the same treatments, except that the IPL pulses will be disabled. For each subject, the duration of the study will be 10 weeks, as explained in the detailed description.
Outcome measures (tear break-up time,meibography, self-assessed symptoms and close up photos of the lid margins) will be measured at baseline. All subjects will receive 4 treatments at 2 weeks intervals. In each treatment session, a subject allocated to the study group will be treated with intense pulsed light (IPL) administered in the malar region, from tragus to tragus including the nose, 2-3 mm below the lower eyelids. Immediately following the IPL administration, the subject will undergo meibomian gland expression (MGX) in both eyelids of both eyes. Subjects in the control arm will receive exactly the same treatment, except that the IPL administration will be sham. A single follow-up will occur at 10 weeks after the baseline (or 4 weeks after the 4th treatment session). At the follow-up, the changes in the outcome measures will be evaluated, and compared between the two arms.
For each subject, the duration of the study will be 10 weeks: 1st treatment at baseline; 2nd treatment at 2 weeks after baseline; 3rd treatment at 4 weeks after baseline; 4th treatment at 6 weeks after baseline; and a single follow-up at 10 weeks after baseline).
Statistically significant differences between the two arms will support the study hypothesis that IPL treatment itself provides relief to both signs and symptoms of dry eye disease.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| IPL followed by Meibomian Gland Expression (MGX) | Experimental | Subjects in the experimental arm with receive IPL followed by MGX: IPL pulses will be administered on the skin of the malar region (both cheeks, from tragus to tragus including the nose) and below the lower eyelids. Following IPL therapy, subjects will undergo MGX of both eyelids in both eyes. |
|
| Sham IPL followed by MGX | Sham Comparator | Subjects in the sham comparator arm with receive Sham IPL followed by MGX: Sham IPL pulses will be administered on the skin of the malar region (both cheeks, from tragus to tragus including the nose) and below the lower eyelids. Following Sham IPL therapy, subjects will undergo MGX of both eyelids in both eyes. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IPL | Device | Intense pulsed light (IPL) is a non-invasive and non-laser light treatment that is FDA-approved for various conditions in dermatology. Subjects will receive a total of 4 IPL treatments over the course of the study, at intervals of 2 weeks. Each treatment will include applications of 10-15 IPL pulses in the malar region and close to the lower eyelids, followed by meibomian gland expression. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change of Baseline Tear Breakup Time (TBUT) | Change of Tear breakup time (TBUT) in the study eye, from baseline to follow-up. TBUT is measured in seconds. Higher values mean better outcome. | 10 weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) | Change of self-assessed symptoms with the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire, from baseline to follow-up. OSDI was collected per patient (one number per patient). The minimal number is 0 and the maximal number is 100. Higher scores mean worse outcome. A score of 0-12 is considered normal. A score of 13-22 is consistent with mild dry eye. A score of 23 to 32 is consistent with moderate dry eye. A score from 33 to 100 is consistent with severe dry eye. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Qualitative Assessment of Eyelid Appearance | High resolution photos of the upper and lower eyelids in both eyes | 10 weeks |
| Meiboscore | The difference in the percentage of area loss of meibomian glands, as evaluated using meibography, between eyes in the study arm and eyes in the control arm |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Steven J Dell, MD | Dell Laser Consultants | Principal Investigator |
| Rolando Toyos, MD | Toyos Clinic | Principal Investigator |
| Neel Desai, MD | The Eye Institute of West Florida | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Toyos Clinic | Nashville | Tennessee | 37215 | United States | ||
| Dell Laser Consultants |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Sham+MGX | Sham IPL followed by meibomian gland expression (control group) |
| FG001 | IPL+MGX | Patients treated with IPL followed by meibomian gland expression (study group) |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Sham+MGX | Sham IPL followed by meibomian gland expression (control group) |
| BG001 | IPL+MGX | Patients treated with IPL followed by meibomian gland expression (study group) |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change of Baseline Tear Breakup Time (TBUT) | Change of Tear breakup time (TBUT) in the study eye, from baseline to follow-up. TBUT is measured in seconds. Higher values mean better outcome. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | seconds | 10 weeks |
|
|
10 weeks
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Sham+MGX | Sham IPL followed by meibomian gland expression (control group) | 0 |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bronchitis | General disorders | PT | Non-systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yair Manor, Clinical Director | Lumenis | +972-52-3763416 | yair.manor@lumenis.com |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Sep 19, 2019 | Sep 6, 2020 | Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Mar 26, 2020 | Sep 6, 2020 | SAP_001.pdf |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D015352 | Dry Eye Syndromes |
| D000080343 | Meibomian Gland Dysfunction |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007766 | Lacrimal Apparatus Diseases |
| D005128 | Eye Diseases |
| D005141 | Eyelid Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Subjects will be randomized 1:1 to a study arm and a control arm. Subjects in the study arm will be treated with IPL and meibomian gland expression. Subjects in the control arm will be treated with sham and meibomian gland expression.
Not provided
Not provided
Subjects in the study arm will receive a series of IPL pulses using the M22 IPL handpiece. In subjects of the control arm, the device will be disabled. The subject will feel the lightguide on the skin, will hear clicking sounds, but no light will be actually produced by the M22 device. Since during treatment both eyes of the subject will be fully occluded, no subject will be able to see if the treatment is actual or sham. There is no way to completely mask the subjects, since the IPL generally causes slight redness of the skin, and in some patients is may also cause some discomfort
|
| Sham IPL | Device | Sham intense pulsed light (IPL) will be implemented with an IPL device in which all light is blocked by a filter. Subjects will receive a total of 4 sham treatments over the course of the study, at intervals of 2 weeks. Each treatment will include applications of10-15 sham pulses in the malar region and close to the lower eyelids, followed by meibomian gland expression. |
|
| MGX | Procedure | Meibomian gland expression (MGX) will be implemented by squeezing the meibomian glands with the aid of two Q-tips positioned on either side of the meibomian glands, or with a meibomian gland expressor forceps |
|
| 10 weeks |
| Change From Baseline Eye Dryness Score (EDS) | Change of self-assessed symptoms on a visual analog scale (VAS) , from baseline to follow-up, in both eyes. Values were collected separately for each eye. Correlation between eyes was removed by statistical methods. Scores were 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum). Higher scores = worse outcome. VAS scores are not validated for dry eye. Hence, it is not known how to correlate VAS values to severity levels of dry eye. However, one can make estimations from the literature of VAS in other conditions. For example, in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain, in a VAS scale of 0 to 10 scores below 3.4 corresponded to mild pain, scores between 3.5 and 7.4 corresponded to moderate pain, and scores above 7.5 corresponded to severe pain. Using such results from other conditions, it is *estimated* that values between 0 and 34 correspond to mild symptoms, scores between 35 and 74 correspond to moderate symptoms, and scores above 75 correspond to severe symptoms. | 10 weeks |
| 10 weeks |
| Percentage of Eyes With Normal Tear Break-Up Time (TBUT) | The difference in the proportion of eyes with normal TBUT (TBUT > 10 sec) at follow-up, between study eyes in the study arm and study eyes in the control arm | 10 weeks |
| Percentage of Subjects With Normal Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) | The difference in the proportion of subjects with normal OSDI (OSDI < 23) at FU, between study eyes in the study arm and study eyes in the control arm | 10 weeks |
| Incidence of Ocular Adverse Events | The difference in the incidence of ocular adverse events, between subjects in the study arm and subjects in the control arm | 10 weeks |
| Incidence of Non-ocular Adverse Events | The difference in the incidence of non ocular adverse events, between subjects in the study arm and subjects in the control arm | 10 weeks |
| Incidence of Unanticipated Serious Adverse Events | The difference in the incidence of unanticipated serious adverse events, between subjects in the study arm and subjects in the control arm | 10 weeks |
| Immediate Biomicroscopy | difference in the change of bio-microscopy examinations pre- and post- treatment, between subjects in the study arm and subjects in the control arm | 10 weeks |
| Pain/Discomfort During Intense Pulsed Light (IPL) | The difference in the self-assessment of pain/discomfort during IPL administration, between subjects in the study arm and subjects in the control arm | 10 weeks |
| Pain/Discomfort During Meibomian Gland Expression (MGX) | The difference in the self-assessment of pain/discomfort during MGX, between subjects in the study arm and subjects in the control arm | 10 weeks |
| Austin |
| Texas |
| 78746 |
| United States |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Participants |
|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) | Change of self-assessed symptoms with the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire, from baseline to follow-up. OSDI was collected per patient (one number per patient). The minimal number is 0 and the maximal number is 100. Higher scores mean worse outcome. A score of 0-12 is considered normal. A score of 13-22 is consistent with mild dry eye. A score of 23 to 32 is consistent with moderate dry eye. A score from 33 to 100 is consistent with severe dry eye. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | score on a scale | 10 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline Eye Dryness Score (EDS) | Change of self-assessed symptoms on a visual analog scale (VAS) , from baseline to follow-up, in both eyes. Values were collected separately for each eye. Correlation between eyes was removed by statistical methods. Scores were 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum). Higher scores = worse outcome. VAS scores are not validated for dry eye. Hence, it is not known how to correlate VAS values to severity levels of dry eye. However, one can make estimations from the literature of VAS in other conditions. For example, in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain, in a VAS scale of 0 to 10 scores below 3.4 corresponded to mild pain, scores between 3.5 and 7.4 corresponded to moderate pain, and scores above 7.5 corresponded to severe pain. Using such results from other conditions, it is *estimated* that values between 0 and 34 correspond to mild symptoms, scores between 35 and 74 correspond to moderate symptoms, and scores above 75 correspond to severe symptoms. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | score on a scale | 10 weeks |
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Qualitative Assessment of Eyelid Appearance | High resolution photos of the upper and lower eyelids in both eyes | Not Posted | 10 weeks | Participants |
| Other Pre-specified | Meiboscore | The difference in the percentage of area loss of meibomian glands, as evaluated using meibography, between eyes in the study arm and eyes in the control arm | Not Posted | 10 weeks | Participants |
| Other Pre-specified | Percentage of Eyes With Normal Tear Break-Up Time (TBUT) | The difference in the proportion of eyes with normal TBUT (TBUT > 10 sec) at follow-up, between study eyes in the study arm and study eyes in the control arm | Not Posted | 10 weeks | Participants |
| Other Pre-specified | Percentage of Subjects With Normal Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) | The difference in the proportion of subjects with normal OSDI (OSDI < 23) at FU, between study eyes in the study arm and study eyes in the control arm | Not Posted | 10 weeks | Participants |
| Other Pre-specified | Incidence of Ocular Adverse Events | The difference in the incidence of ocular adverse events, between subjects in the study arm and subjects in the control arm | Not Posted | 10 weeks | Participants |
| Other Pre-specified | Incidence of Non-ocular Adverse Events | The difference in the incidence of non ocular adverse events, between subjects in the study arm and subjects in the control arm | Not Posted | 10 weeks | Participants |
| Other Pre-specified | Incidence of Unanticipated Serious Adverse Events | The difference in the incidence of unanticipated serious adverse events, between subjects in the study arm and subjects in the control arm | Not Posted | 10 weeks | Participants |
| Other Pre-specified | Immediate Biomicroscopy | difference in the change of bio-microscopy examinations pre- and post- treatment, between subjects in the study arm and subjects in the control arm | Not Posted | 10 weeks | Participants |
| Other Pre-specified | Pain/Discomfort During Intense Pulsed Light (IPL) | The difference in the self-assessment of pain/discomfort during IPL administration, between subjects in the study arm and subjects in the control arm | Not Posted | 10 weeks | Participants |
| Other Pre-specified | Pain/Discomfort During Meibomian Gland Expression (MGX) | The difference in the self-assessment of pain/discomfort during MGX, between subjects in the study arm and subjects in the control arm | Not Posted | 10 weeks | Participants |
| 43 |
| 0 |
| 43 |
| 9 |
| 43 |
| EG001 | IPL+MGX | Patients treated with IPL followed by meibomian gland expression (study group) | 0 | 45 | 0 | 45 | 4 | 45 |
| Hyperlipidemia | General disorders | PT | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Sinus infection | General disorders | PT | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| worsening of seasonal allergies | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Allergic conjunctivitis | Eye disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Bacterial conjunctivitis | Eye disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Conjunctival telangiectasia | Eye disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Blepharitis | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Chalazion | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Pain | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Stye | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided